-
Landwehr, L.: Überlegungen und Erfahrungen zum Thema Langzeitarchivierung beim Verbundprojekt digiCULT-MuseenSH (2006)
0.02
0.020144662 = product of:
0.100723304 = sum of:
0.100723304 = sum of:
0.028297836 = weight(_text_:h in 3440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028297836 = score(doc=3440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 3440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3440)
0.07242547 = weight(_text_:l in 3440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07242547 = score(doc=3440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.4391412 = fieldWeight in 3440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3440)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Object
- Digicult S-H
-
Cazan, C.: Medizinische Ontologien : das Ende des MeSH (2006)
0.02
0.015279059 = product of:
0.038197648 = sum of:
0.0056595667 = product of:
0.011319133 = sum of:
0.011319133 = weight(_text_:h in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011319133 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.032538082 = product of:
0.065076165 = sum of:
0.065076165 = weight(_text_:lee in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065076165 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.26326886 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Die Komplexizität medizinischer Fragestellungen und des medizinischen Informationsmanagements war seit den Anfängen der Informatik immer ein besonders wichtiges Thema. Trotz des Scheiterns der Künstlichen Intelligenz in den 80er Jahren des vorigen Jahrhunderts haben deren Kernideen Früchte getragen. Durch kongruente Entwicklung einer Reihe anderer Wissenschaftsdisziplinen und der exponentiellen Entwicklung im Bereich Computerhardware konnten die gestellten, hohen Anforderungen bei der medizinischen Informationssuche doch noch erfüllt werden. Die programmatische Forderung von Tim Berners-Lee betreffend "Semantic Web" im Jahr 2000 hat dem Thema Ontologien für maschinenlesbare Repositorien in Allgemein- und Fachsprache breitere Aufmerksamkeit gewonnen. Da in der Medizin (PubMed) mit dem von NLM schon vor 20 Jahren entwickelten Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) eine funktionierende Ontologie in Form eines semantischen Netzes in Betrieb ist, ist es auch für Medizinbibliothekare und Medizindokumentare hoch an der Zeit, sich damit zu beschäftigen. Ontologien können im Wesen, trotz der informatisch vernebelnden Terminologie, als Werkzeuge der Klassifikation verstanden werden. Hier sind von seiten der Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswissenschaft wesentliche Beiträge möglich. Der vorliegende Bericht bietet einen Einstieg in das Thema, erklärt wesentliche Elemente des UMLS und schließt mit einer kommentierten Anmerkungs- und Literaturliste für die weitere Beschäftigung mit Ontologien.
- Source
- GMS Med Bibl Inf. 6(2006) H.3, Doc31
-
Tudhope, D.; Alani, H.; Jones, C.: Augmenting thesaurus relationships : possibilities for retrieval (2001)
0.01
0.012660796 = product of:
0.03165199 = sum of:
0.024577528 = weight(_text_:u in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024577528 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13587062 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
0.007074459 = product of:
0.014148918 = sum of:
0.014148918 = weight(_text_:h in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014148918 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Lee, M.; Baillie, S.; Dell'Oro, J.: TML: a Thesaural Markpup Language (200?)
0.01
0.009761425 = product of:
0.04880712 = sum of:
0.04880712 = product of:
0.09761424 = sum of:
0.09761424 = weight(_text_:lee in 1622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09761424 = score(doc=1622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24718519 = queryWeight, product of:
5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.3949033 = fieldWeight in 1622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.957094 = idf(docFreq=310, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001)
0.01
0.006746278 = product of:
0.03373139 = sum of:
0.03373139 = product of:
0.06746278 = sum of:
0.06746278 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06746278 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 24. 8.2005 19:20:22
-
Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007)
0.01
0.005621899 = product of:
0.028109495 = sum of:
0.028109495 = product of:
0.05621899 = sum of:
0.05621899 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05621899 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:22:07
-
Hill, L.: New Protocols for Gazetteer and Thesaurus Services (2002)
0.00
0.0040970035 = product of:
0.020485017 = sum of:
0.020485017 = product of:
0.040970035 = sum of:
0.040970035 = weight(_text_:l in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040970035 = score(doc=1206,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16492525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494254 = queryNorm
0.24841578 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The Alexandria Digital Library Project announces the online publication of two protocols to support querying and response interactions using distributed services: one for gazetteers and one for thesauri. These protocols have been developed for our own purposes and also to support the general interoperability of gazetteers and thesauri on the web. See <http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/~gjanee/gazetteer/> and <http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/~gjanee/thesaurus/>. For the gazetteer protocol, we have provided a page of test forms that can be used to experiment with the operational functions of the protocol in accessing two gazetteers: the ADL Gazetteer and the ESRI Gazetteer (ESRI has participated in the development of the gazetteer protocol). We are in the process of developing a thesaurus server and a simple client to demonstrate the use of the thesaurus protocol. We are soliciting comments on both protocols. Please remember that we are seeking protocols that are essentially "simple" and easy to implement and that support basic operations - they should not duplicate all of the functions of specialized gazetteer and thesaurus interfaces. We continue to discuss ways of handling various issues and to further develop the protocols. For the thesaurus protocol, outstanding issues include the treatment of multilingual thesauri and the degree to which the language attribute should be supported; whether the Scope Note element should be changed to a repeatable Note element; the best way to handle the hierarchical report for multi-hierarchies where portions of the hierarchy are repeated; and whether support for searching by term identifiers is redundant and unnecessary given that the terms themselves are unique within a thesaurus. For the gazetteer protocol, we continue to work on validation of query and report XML documents and on implementing the part of the protocol designed to support the submission of new entries to a gazetteer. We would like to encourage open discussion of these protocols through the NKOS discussion list (see the NKOS webpage at <http://nkos.slis.kent.edu/>) and the CGGR-L discussion list that focuses on gazetteer development (see ADL Gazetteer Development page at <http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/gazetteer>).
