Search (33 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Assem, M. van: Converting and integrating vocabularies for the Semantic Web (2010) 0.01
    0.006657929 = product of:
      0.016644822 = sum of:
        0.006416623 = weight(_text_:information in 4639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006416623 = score(doc=4639,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 4639, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4639)
        0.010228199 = weight(_text_:und in 4639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010228199 = score(doc=4639,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.09795051 = fieldWeight in 4639, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4639)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    We refine the problem statement into three research questions. The first two focus on the problem of conversion of a vocabulary to a Semantic Web representation from its original format. Conversion of a vocabulary to a representation in a Semantic Web language is necessary to make the vocabulary available to SemanticWeb applications. In the last question we focus on integration of collection metadata schemas in a way that allows for vocabulary representations as produced by our methods. Academisch proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Dutch Research School for Information and Knowledge Systems.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Tavakolizadeh-Ravari, M.: Analysis of the long term dynamics in thesaurus developments and its consequences (2017) 0.01
    0.006468881 = product of:
      0.032344405 = sum of:
        0.032344405 = weight(_text_:und in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032344405 = score(doc=3081,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.3097467 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die Arbeit analysiert die dynamische Entwicklung und den Gebrauch von Thesaurusbegriffen. Zusätzlich konzentriert sie sich auf die Faktoren, die die Zahl von Indexbegriffen pro Dokument oder Zeitschrift beeinflussen. Als Untersuchungsobjekt dienten der MeSH und die entsprechende Datenbank "MEDLINE". Die wichtigsten Konsequenzen sind: 1. Der MeSH-Thesaurus hat sich durch drei unterschiedliche Phasen jeweils logarithmisch entwickelt. Solch einen Thesaurus sollte folgenden Gleichung folgen: "T = 3.076,6 Ln (d) - 22.695 + 0,0039d" (T = Begriffe, Ln = natürlicher Logarithmus und d = Dokumente). Um solch einen Thesaurus zu konstruieren, muss man demnach etwa 1.600 Dokumente von unterschiedlichen Themen des Bereiches des Thesaurus haben. Die dynamische Entwicklung von Thesauri wie MeSH erfordert die Einführung eines neuen Begriffs pro Indexierung von 256 neuen Dokumenten. 2. Die Verteilung der Thesaurusbegriffe erbrachte drei Kategorien: starke, normale und selten verwendete Headings. Die letzte Gruppe ist in einer Testphase, während in der ersten und zweiten Kategorie die neu hinzukommenden Deskriptoren zu einem Thesauruswachstum führen. 3. Es gibt ein logarithmisches Verhältnis zwischen der Zahl von Index-Begriffen pro Aufsatz und dessen Seitenzahl für die Artikeln zwischen einer und einundzwanzig Seiten. 4. Zeitschriftenaufsätze, die in MEDLINE mit Abstracts erscheinen erhalten fast zwei Deskriptoren mehr. 5. Die Findablity der nicht-englisch sprachigen Dokumente in MEDLINE ist geringer als die englische Dokumente. 6. Aufsätze der Zeitschriften mit einem Impact Factor 0 bis fünfzehn erhalten nicht mehr Indexbegriffe als die der anderen von MEDINE erfassten Zeitschriften. 7. In einem Indexierungssystem haben unterschiedliche Zeitschriften mehr oder weniger Gewicht in ihrem Findability. Die Verteilung der Indexbegriffe pro Seite hat gezeigt, dass es bei MEDLINE drei Kategorien der Publikationen gibt. Außerdem gibt es wenige stark bevorzugten Zeitschriften."
    Footnote
    Dissertation, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin - Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft.
    Imprint
    Berlin : Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin / Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  3. Ermert, A.; Stein, R.: ¬Das Portal museumsvokabular.de für kontrolliertes Vokabular (2006) 0.01
    0.0061369194 = product of:
      0.030684596 = sum of:
        0.030684596 = weight(_text_:und in 2831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030684596 = score(doc=2831,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 2831, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2831)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  4. Stein, R.; Saro, C.: Online-Plattform für kontrolliertes Vokabular (2006) 0.01
    0.0051140995 = product of:
      0.025570497 = sum of:
        0.025570497 = weight(_text_:und in 3443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025570497 = score(doc=3443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 3443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3443)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  5. Michel, D.: Taxonomy of Subject Relationships (1997) 0.01
    0.0051140995 = product of:
      0.025570497 = sum of:
        0.025570497 = weight(_text_:und in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025570497 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  6. Kless, D.: From a thesaurus standard to a general knowledge organization standard?! (2007) 0.01
    0.0051140995 = product of:
      0.025570497 = sum of:
        0.025570497 = weight(_text_:und in 528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025570497 = score(doc=528,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 528, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=528)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  7. Cochard, N.: ¬A data model and XML schema for BS 8723-5 (2007) 0.01
    0.0051140995 = product of:
      0.025570497 = sum of:
        0.025570497 = weight(_text_:und in 532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025570497 = score(doc=532,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 532, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=532)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  8. Fayen, E.; Hlava, M.: Crosswalks and the USA perspective (2007) 0.01
    0.0051140995 = product of:
      0.025570497 = sum of:
        0.025570497 = weight(_text_:und in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025570497 = score(doc=536,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  9. Assem, M. van; Menken, M.R.; Schreiber, G.; Wielemaker, J.; Wielinga, B.: ¬A method for converting thesauri to RDF/OWL (2004) 0.00
    0.0035798696 = product of:
      0.017899347 = sum of:
        0.017899347 = weight(_text_:und in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017899347 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  10. Quick Guide to Publishing a Thesaurus on the Semantic Web (2008) 0.00
    0.0035798696 = product of:
      0.017899347 = sum of:
        0.017899347 = weight(_text_:und in 4656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017899347 = score(doc=4656,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 4656, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4656)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  11. Assem, M. van; Malaisé, V.; Miles, A.; Schreiber, G.: ¬A method to convert thesauri to SKOS (2006) 0.00
    0.0030684597 = product of:
      0.015342298 = sum of:
        0.015342298 = weight(_text_:und in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015342298 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  12. Hill, L.: New Protocols for Gazetteer and Thesaurus Services (2002) 0.00
    0.0020456398 = product of:
      0.010228199 = sum of:
        0.010228199 = weight(_text_:und in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010228199 = score(doc=1206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.09795051 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  13. Fischer, D.H.: Converting a thesaurus to OWL : Notes on the paper "The National Cancer Institute's Thesaurus and Ontology" (2004) 0.00
    0.0017899348 = product of:
      0.008949674 = sum of:
        0.008949674 = weight(_text_:und in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008949674 = score(doc=2362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.085706696 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus