Search (123 results, page 2 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Modélisation, au moyen d'un thésaurus encyclopédique et plurilingue, des connaissances présentées au cours de l'Exposition Mondialede l'an 2000 (1999) 0.01
    0.012215096 = product of:
      0.024430191 = sum of:
        0.024430191 = product of:
          0.036645286 = sum of:
            0.030892346 = weight(_text_:j in 6296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030892346 = score(doc=6296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109994456 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 6296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6296)
            0.0057529383 = weight(_text_:a in 6296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0057529383 = score(doc=6296,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 6296, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6296)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Modelling, by means of a encyclopedic multilingual thesaurus, of knowledge presented at the World Exhibition of the year 2000
    Source
    Organisation des connaissances en vue de leur intégration dans les systèmes de représentation et de recherche d'information. Ed.: J. Maniez, et al
    Type
    a
  2. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Thesaurus and beyond : an advanced formula for linguistic engineering and information retrieval (1999) 0.01
    0.011414142 = product of:
      0.022828285 = sum of:
        0.022828285 = product of:
          0.034242425 = sum of:
            0.006101913 = weight(_text_:a in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006101913 = score(doc=4116,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
            0.028140513 = weight(_text_:22 in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028140513 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1212218 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a proposal for a new approach to thesaurus design and construction that could have significant implicantions for change in the way multilingual thesauri are handled and integrated with each other. The formula presented here has its origin in the work of the German Thesaurus Committee and has had input from a number of scientists and practitioners int he field. The emphasis is on the various types of relationships found among concepts, notiions and universals in languages. These relationships are analysed and refined beyond the approach taken in existing thesauri. This proposal is very much at the discussion stage and the author invites the assistance of interested readers through criticisms, discussion and dialogue. Applications of the proposed thesaurus are included and the major goal of this proposal is to provide the basis for improved desing and integration of multilingual thesauri
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 26(1999) no.1, S.10-22
    Type
    a
  3. Jones, S.; Gatford, M.; Robertson, S.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.; Secker, J.; Walker, S.: Interactive thesaurus navigation : intelligence rules OK? (1995) 0.01
    0.010688208 = product of:
      0.021376416 = sum of:
        0.021376416 = product of:
          0.032064624 = sum of:
            0.027030803 = weight(_text_:j in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027030803 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109994456 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
            0.0050338213 = weight(_text_:a in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0050338213 = score(doc=180,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We discuss whether it is feasible to build intelligent rule- or weight-based algorithms into general-purpose software for interactive thesaurus navigation. We survey some approaches to the problem reported in the literature, particularly those involving the assignement of 'link weights' in a thesaurus network, and point out some problems of both principle and practice. We then describe investigations which entailed logging the behavior of thesaurus users and testing the effect of thesaurus-based query enhancement in an IR system using term weighting, in an attempt to identify successful strategies to incorporate into automatic procedures. The results cause us to question many of the assumptions made by previous researchers in this area
    Type
    a
  4. Chen, H.; Martinez, J.; Kirchhoff, A.; Ng, T.D.; Schatz, B.R.: Alleviating search uncertainty through concept associations : automatic indexing, co-occurence analysis, and parallel computing (1998) 0.01
    0.010214183 = product of:
      0.020428365 = sum of:
        0.020428365 = product of:
          0.030642547 = sum of:
            0.02316926 = weight(_text_:j in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02316926 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109994456 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
            0.007473286 = weight(_text_:a in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007473286 = score(doc=5202,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, we report research on an algorithmic approach to alleviating search uncertainty in a large information space. Grounded on object filtering, automatic indexing, and co-occurence analysis, we performed a large-scale experiment using a parallel supercomputer (SGI Power Challenge) to analyze 400.000+ abstracts in an INSPEC computer engineering collection. Two system-generated thesauri, one based on a combined object filtering and automatic indexing method, and the other based on automatic indexing only, were compaed with the human-generated INSPEC subject thesaurus. Our user evaluation revealed that the system-generated thesauri were better than the INSPEC thesaurus in 'concept recall', but in 'concept precision' the 3 thesauri were comparable. Our analysis also revealed that the terms suggested by the 3 thesauri were complementary and could be used to significantly increase 'variety' in search terms the thereby reduce search uncertainty
    Type
    a
  5. Raupp, J.: Konzeption eines Standard-Thesaurus für Ökologischen Landbau (1994) 0.01
    0.010196751 = product of:
      0.020393502 = sum of:
        0.020393502 = product of:
          0.030590253 = sum of:
            0.027030803 = weight(_text_:j in 8606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027030803 = score(doc=8606,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109994456 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 8606, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8606)
            0.003559449 = weight(_text_:a in 8606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003559449 = score(doc=8606,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 8606, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8606)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  6. Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998) 0.01
    0.009284702 = product of:
      0.018569404 = sum of:
        0.018569404 = product of:
          0.027854105 = sum of:
            0.0044036764 = weight(_text_:a in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0044036764 = score(doc=2337,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
            0.023450429 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023450429 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1212218 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Despite early claims to the contemporary, thesauri continue to find use as access tools for information in the full-text environment. Their mode of use is changing, but this change actually represents an expansion rather than a contrdiction of their utility. Thesauri and similar vocabulary tools can complement full-text access by aiding users in focusing their searches, by supplementing the linguistic analysis of the text search engine, and even by serving as one of the tools used by the linguistic engine for its analysis. While human indexing contunues to be used for many databases, the trend is to increase the use of machine aids for this purpose. All machine-aided indexing (MAI) systems rely on thesauri as the basis for term selection. In the 21st century, the balance of effort between human and machine will change at both input and output, but thesauri will continue to play an important role for the foreseeable future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Type
    a
  7. ¬3rd Infoterm Symposiums Terminology Work in Subject Fields, Vienna, 12.-14.11.1991 (1992) 0.01
    0.009199042 = product of:
      0.018398084 = sum of:
        0.018398084 = product of:
          0.027597126 = sum of:
            0.021844188 = weight(_text_:j in 4648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021844188 = score(doc=4648,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.109994456 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.19859353 = fieldWeight in 4648, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4648)
            0.0057529383 = weight(_text_:a in 4648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0057529383 = score(doc=4648,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4648, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4648)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält 47 Beiträge den Schwerpunkten der Tagung: Biology and related fields - Engineering and natural sciences - Medicine - Information science and information technology - Law and economics - Social sciences and humanities - Terminology research and interdisciplinary aspects; darunter: OESER, E. u. G. BUDIN: Explication and representation of qualitative biological and medical concepts: the example of the pocket knowledge data base on carnivores; HOHENEGGER, J.: Specles as the basic units in taxonomy and nomenclature; LAVIETER, L. de, J.A. DESCHAMPS u. B. FELLUGA: A multilingual environmental thesaurus: past, present, and future; TODESCHINI, C. u. G. Thoemig: The thesaurus of the International Nuclear Information System: experiences in an international environment; CITKINA, F.: Terminology of mathematics: contrastive analysis as a basis for standardization and harmonization; WALKER, D.G.: Technology and engineering terminolgy: translation problems encountered and suggested solutions; VERVOOM, A.J.: Terminology and engineering sciences; HIRS, W.M.: ICD-10, a missed chance and a new opportunity for medical terminology standardization; THOMAS, P.: Subject indexes in medical literature; RAHMSTORF, G.: Analysis of information technology terms; NEGRINI, G.: Indexing language for research projects and its graphic display; BATEWICZ, M.: Impact of modern information technology on knowledge transfer services and terminology; RATZINGER, M.: Multilingual product description (MPD): a European project; OHLY, H.P.: Terminology of the social sciences and social context approaches; BEAUGRANDE, R. de: Terminology and discourse between the social sciences and the humanities; MUSKENS, G.: Terminological standardisation and socio-linguistic diversity: dilemmas of crosscultural sociology; SNELL, B.: Terminology ten years on; ZHURAVLEV, V.F.: Standard ontological structures of systems of concepts of active knowledge; WRIGHT, S.E.: Terminology standardization in standards societies and professional associations in the United States; DAHLBERG; I.: The terminology of subject fields - reconsidered; AHMAD, K. u. H. Fulford: Terminology of interdisciplinary fields: a new perspective; DATAA, J.: Full-text databases as a terminological support for translation
    Editor
    Krommer-Benz, M u. A. Manu
  8. Compatibility and integration of order systems : Research Seminar Proceedings of the TIP/ISKO Meeting, Warsaw, 13-15 September 1995 (1996) 0.01
    0.008511819 = product of:
      0.017023638 = sum of:
        0.017023638 = product of:
          0.025535455 = sum of:
            0.019307716 = weight(_text_:j in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019307716 = score(doc=6050,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109994456 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
            0.0062277387 = weight(_text_:a in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0062277387 = score(doc=6050,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SCHMITZ-ESSER, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility; RIESTHUIS, G.: Theory of compatibility of information languages; DAHLBERG, I.: The compatibility guidelines - a re-evaluation; SOERGEL, D.: Data structure and software support for integrated thesauri; MURASZKIEWICZ, M., H. RYBINSKI u. W. STRUK: Software problems of merging multilingual thesauri; CHMIELEWSKA-GORCZYCA, E.: Compatibility of indexing tools in multidatabase environment; NEGRINI, G.: Towards structural compatibility between concept systems; SCIBOR, E.: Some remarks on the establishment of concordances between a universal classification system and an interdisciplinary thesaurus; HOPPE, S.: The UMLS - a model for knowledge integration in a subject field; DEXTRE-CLARKE, S.: Integrating thesauri in the agricultural sciences; ROULIN, C.: Bringing multilingual thesauri together: a feasibility study; ZIMMERMANN, H.: Conception and application possibilities of classification concordances in an OPAC environment; SOSINSKA-KALATA, B.: The Universal Decimal Classification as an international standard for knowledge organization in bibliographic databases and library catalogues; WOZNIAK, J. u. T. GLOWACKA: KABA Subject Authority File - an example of an integrated Polish-French-English subject headings system; BABIK, W.: Terminology as a level for the compatibility of indexing languages - some remarks; STANCIKOVA, P.: International integrated database systems linked to multilingual thesauri covering the field of environment and agriculture; SAMEK, T.: Indexing languages integration and the EUROVOC Thesaurus in the Czech Republic; SIWEK, K.: Compatibility discrepancies between Polish and foreign databases; GLINSKI, W. u. M. MURASZKIEWICZ: An intelligent front-end processor for accessing information systems
  9. Pollard, A.: ¬A hypertext-based thesaurus as subject browsing aid for bibliographic databases (1993) 0.00
    0.002055049 = product of:
      0.004110098 = sum of:
        0.004110098 = product of:
          0.012330294 = sum of:
            0.012330294 = weight(_text_:a in 4713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012330294 = score(doc=4713,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.3089162 = fieldWeight in 4713, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4713)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  10. Diaz, I.: Semi-automatic construction of thesaurus applying domain analysis techniques (1998) 0.00
    0.0017937938 = product of:
      0.0035875875 = sum of:
        0.0035875875 = product of:
          0.010762762 = sum of:
            0.010762762 = weight(_text_:a in 3744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010762762 = score(doc=3744,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.26964417 = fieldWeight in 3744, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3744)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a specific application of domain analysis to the construction of thesauri to exploit domain analysis' ability to construct valid domain representations and determine fuzzy limits that normally define specific domains. The system employs a structure, called a Software Thesaurus (developed from a descriptor thesaurus), as a repository to store the information regarding specific domains. The domain representation is constructued semi automatically and can be used as a means of semiautomatic thesaurus generation
    Type
    a
  11. Grapton, A.-M.: ¬La maintenance d'un outil linguistique : anomalies d'un thésaurus et propositions de solutions (1994) 0.00
    0.0017614705 = product of:
      0.003522941 = sum of:
        0.003522941 = product of:
          0.010568823 = sum of:
            0.010568823 = weight(_text_:a in 2916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010568823 = score(doc=2916,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.26478532 = fieldWeight in 2916, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2916)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    The maintenance of a linguistic tool: the anomalies of a thesaurus and proposals for their solution
  12. Stumm, D.: When is a forest fire a bushfire? : Towards an Australian Pictorial Thesaurus (1999) 0.00
    0.0017614705 = product of:
      0.003522941 = sum of:
        0.003522941 = product of:
          0.010568823 = sum of:
            0.010568823 = weight(_text_:a in 500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010568823 = score(doc=500,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.26478532 = fieldWeight in 500, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=500)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  13. Roux, P.J.A.; Rykheer, J.H.: Developing a South African master thesaurus for community information (1990) 0.00
    0.0016779405 = product of:
      0.003355881 = sum of:
        0.003355881 = product of:
          0.010067643 = sum of:
            0.010067643 = weight(_text_:a in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010067643 = score(doc=3596,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In 1987 the Department of Library and Information Science at the University of South Africa committed itself to a research programme on community information. As part of that programme, the Department's Centre for Library and Information Service is compiling a prototype resource file of community information for a well-defined community in the Pretoria municipality. To retrieve information from the file, the Centre adopted an alphabetical approach, which necessitated a thesaurus. Instead of developing a thesaurus for the specific needs of the particular community, a "master" thesaurus, applicable to South African communities can be generated. The development of this South African "master" thesaurus for community information is described and the results reviewed.
    Type
    a
  14. Rudell-Betts, L.: New rules for thesauri (1995) 0.00
    0.0016779405 = product of:
      0.003355881 = sum of:
        0.003355881 = product of:
          0.010067643 = sum of:
            0.010067643 = weight(_text_:a in 6076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010067643 = score(doc=6076,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 6076, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6076)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A review of ANSI-NISO Z39-19-1993 intended for indexers
    Type
    a
  15. Chmielewska-Gorczycy, E.: Funkcje tezaurusa w systemie informacy jno-wyszzukiwawczm (1995) 0.00
    0.0016779405 = product of:
      0.003355881 = sum of:
        0.003355881 = product of:
          0.010067643 = sum of:
            0.010067643 = weight(_text_:a in 3227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010067643 = score(doc=3227,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3227, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3227)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the various functions which a thesaurus can have. Highlights the main function of a thesaurus in vocabulary control, eliminating natural language ambiguity and providing consistency of indexing, and serving as an aid in the searching process. Further discusses the function of a search thesaurus in serving as a user's aid in full text systems and in free indexing systems, and the additional function of an online thesaurus integrated with an online database, that of a vocabulary master file. Notes also how a thesaurus can function as a switching language or intermediary lexicon in multidatabase systems
    Type
    a
  16. Roulin, C.: Sub-thesauri as part of a metathesaurus (1992) 0.00
    0.0016607302 = product of:
      0.0033214604 = sum of:
        0.0033214604 = product of:
          0.009964381 = sum of:
            0.009964381 = weight(_text_:a in 2112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009964381 = score(doc=2112,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 2112, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2112)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A metathesaurus is a set made of a reference thesaurus and various forms of indexing languages attached to it. Among these, the sub-thesauri cover restricted fields in more detail. A functional definition of the sub-thesaurus is proposed: elements, relationships, sub-systems and rules to be respected to preserve the possibilities for communication via the reference thesaurus. Considerations on the methods of presentation, the use and the compilation are also given
    Type
    a
  17. Pollard, R.: ¬A hypertext-based thesaurus as a subject browsing aid for bibliographic databases (1993) 0.00
    0.0015695696 = product of:
      0.0031391392 = sum of:
        0.0031391392 = product of:
          0.009417417 = sum of:
            0.009417417 = weight(_text_:a in 5096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009417417 = score(doc=5096,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 5096, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5096)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Part of a special issue on hypertext and information retrieval. Conventional information retrieval systems provide little support for browsing. Browsing is the major method of searching in hypertext system but users can become disoriented even when browsing small information space. If hypertext is to be used to support browsing in bibliographic databases navigational assistance will be required. Examines the role of thesauri as navigational aids for subject domains of Bibliographic databases. Presents the design of an experimental hypertext-based browsing inference for a thesaurus and its implementation using a commercially available hypertext program. Examines strategies for linking the thesaurus to a database
    Type
    a
  18. Williamson, N.J.: Deriving a thesaurus from a restructured UDC (1996) 0.00
    0.0015695696 = product of:
      0.0031391392 = sum of:
        0.0031391392 = product of:
          0.009417417 = sum of:
            0.009417417 = weight(_text_:a in 5194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009417417 = score(doc=5194,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 5194, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5194)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The derivation of a thesaurus from a new schedule for UDC class 61 Medical Sciences which has been restructured into a faceted classification system using the framework provided by the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The resulting thesaurus is intended to serve as a tool for indexing and searching but will also be the index to the 61 class itself. The background for the research is briefly described. The sources and methods used to select the descriptors and define their relationships are discussed. Problems are identified and some solutions proposed
    Type
    a
  19. Pastor, J.A.; Saorin, T.: ¬Un interfaz hipertexto para un sistema de gestion de tesauros (1996) 0.00
    0.0015695696 = product of:
      0.0031391392 = sum of:
        0.0031391392 = product of:
          0.009417417 = sum of:
            0.009417417 = weight(_text_:a in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009417417 = score(doc=379,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Shows the possibilities that exist to create a basic hypertext interface for a thesaurus management system. The project has been built in 3 stages: conceptual data model for the thesaurus; development of the management tools, that is, the thesaurus management system; and the hypertext interfaces. The system has been developed on Windows and combines the power of relational database management systems and the navigational flexibility of Guide, a hypertext shell. presents 2 interface models. Concludes that hypertext interfaces improve management, and open a new path for knowledge organization research
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: A hypertext interface for a thesaurus management system
    Type
    a
  20. Jones, S.: ¬A thesaurus data model for an intelligent retrieval system (1993) 0.00
    0.0015254782 = product of:
      0.0030509564 = sum of:
        0.0030509564 = product of:
          0.009152869 = sum of:
            0.009152869 = weight(_text_:a in 5279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009152869 = score(doc=5279,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.039914686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034616705 = queryNorm
                0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 5279, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5279)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper demonstrates the application of conventional database design techniques to thesaurus representation. The thesaurus is considered as a printed document, as a semantic net, and as a relational database to be used in conjunction with an intelligent information retrieval system. Some issues raised by analysis of two standard thesauri include: the prevalence of compound terms and the representation of term structure; thesaurus redundancy and the extent to which it can be eliminated in machine-readable versions; the difficulty of exploiting thesaurus knowledge originally designed for human rather than automatic interpretation; deriving 'strength of association' measures between terms in a thesaurus considered as a semantic net; facet representation and the need for variations in the data model to cater for structural differences between thesauri. A complete schema of database tables is presented, with an outline suggestion for using the stored information when matching one or more thesaurus terms with a user's query
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 113
  • m 3
  • el 2
  • r 2
  • s 2
  • b 1
  • n 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…