Search (64 results, page 2 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Jansen, R.: Thesaurusrelationen als instrumentelle Hilfsmittel für Hypertext und Wissensbanken? (1993) 0.01
    0.010510692 = product of:
      0.031532075 = sum of:
        0.031532075 = weight(_text_:im in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031532075 = score(doc=2926,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.2186231 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Ausgehend vom derzeitigen Wissensstand über Hypertext wird einleitend dargelegt, inwieweit und weshalb Relationen zwischen Begriffen und deren Darstellung ein Teilaspekt von Hypertext (und Wissensbanken) sind. Begriffsrelationen ihrerseits sind in der IuD-Praxis im besonderen Maße als Thesaurusrelationen realisiert. Welche Anforderungen sind an Thesaurusrelationen zu stellen, damit sie als Instrument bei der Generierung von Hypertextrelationen angewendet werden können? Wie steht es eigentlich mit der Definition von Thesaurusrelationsarten (hierarchische vs. nichthierarchische, gerichtete vs. ungerichtete Begriffsrelationen)? Nach einem (notwendigerweise kurzen und zugleich kritischen) Überblick über den Kenntnis- und Erfahrungsstand werden Vorschläge zu einer verbesserten Klassifikation und Definition von Begriffsrelationsarten für den IuD-Bereich gemacht. Die Vorschläge führen zu differenzierteren Möglichkeiten der Darstellung von Netzstrukturen. Die Auswirkungen dieser Erkenntnisse auf die Generierung von Hypertext und von Wissensbanken, insbesondere auf die Darstellung von netzartigen Verknüpfungen, werden abschließend noch einmal erörtert
  2. Raupp, J.: Konzeption eines Standard-Thesaurus für Ökologischen Landbau (1994) 0.01
    0.010510692 = product of:
      0.031532075 = sum of:
        0.031532075 = weight(_text_:im in 8606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031532075 = score(doc=8606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.2186231 = fieldWeight in 8606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8606)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die Vergabe von Keywords mit Hilfe eines (poly)hierarchisch gegliederten Thesaurus hat gegenüber der freien Verschlagwortung eine Reihe von Vorteilen. Ein Nachteil des Thesaurus ist jedoch, daß er einigen Aufwand für Planung, Aufbau und Pflege erfordert. Ein Standard-Thesaurus, der für die eigenen Bedürfnisse modifiziert wird, kann deshalb ein Weg sein, um die Vorteile des Thesaurus nutzen zu können, ohne gleichzeitig den erwähnten Aufwand in vollem Umfang leisten zu müssen. Konzeption, Aufbau und Inhalt eines Standard-Thesaurus Ökologischer Landbau werden hier vorgestellt. Der Vergleich mit dem üblicherweise verwendeten Vokabular AGROVOC macht die Überlegenheit des Standard-Thesuaurs im Hinblick auf korrekte Verschlagwortung deutlich
  3. ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997) 0.01
    0.009712125 = product of:
      0.029136375 = sum of:
        0.029136375 = product of:
          0.043704562 = sum of:
            0.018172964 = weight(_text_:online in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018172964 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.11735933 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
            0.025531596 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025531596 = score(doc=1800,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.16542503 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The SAC Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures was authorized at the 1995 Midwinter Meeting and appointed shortly before Annual Conference. Its creation was one result of a discussion of how (and why) to promote the display and use of broader-term subject heading references, and its charge reads as follows: To investigate: (1) the kinds of relationships that exist between subjects, the display of which are likely to be useful to catalog users; (2) how these relationships are or could be recorded in authorities and classification formats; (3) options for how these relationships should be presented to users of online and print catalogs, indexes, lists, etc. By the summer 1996 Annual Conference, make some recommendations to SAC about how to disseminate the information and/or implement changes. At that time assess the need for additional time to investigate these issues. The Subcommittee's work on each of the imperatives in the charge was summarized in a report issued at the 1996 Annual Conference (Appendix A). Highlights of this work included the development of a taxonomy of 165 subject relationships; a demonstration that, using existing MARC coding, catalog systems could be programmed to generate references they do not currently support; and an examination of reference displays in several CD-ROM database products. Since that time, work has continued on identifying term relationships and display options; on tracking research, discussion, and implementation of subject relationships in information systems; and on compiling a list of further research needs.
    Content
    Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  4. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.01
    0.009217165 = product of:
      0.027651494 = sum of:
        0.027651494 = product of:
          0.08295448 = sum of:
            0.08295448 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08295448 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  5. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.01
    0.009217165 = product of:
      0.027651494 = sum of:
        0.027651494 = product of:
          0.08295448 = sum of:
            0.08295448 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08295448 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  6. Chen, H.: Generating, integrating and activating thesauri for concept-based document retrieval (1993) 0.01
    0.009170066 = product of:
      0.027510196 = sum of:
        0.027510196 = product of:
          0.08253059 = sum of:
            0.08253059 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08253059 = score(doc=7623,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 7623, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7623)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  7. Jarvelin, K.: ¬A deductive data model for thesaurus navigation and query expansion (1996) 0.01
    0.009170066 = product of:
      0.027510196 = sum of:
        0.027510196 = product of:
          0.08253059 = sum of:
            0.08253059 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08253059 = score(doc=5625,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a deductive data model based on 3 abstraction levels for representing vocabularies for information retrieval: conceptual level; expression level; and occurrence level. The proposed data model can be used for the representation and navigation of indexing and retrieval thesauri and as a vocabulary source for concept based query expansion in heterogeneous retrieval environments
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  8. Jing, Y.; Croft, W.B.: ¬An association thesaurus for information retrieval (199?) 0.01
    0.008023808 = product of:
      0.024071421 = sum of:
        0.024071421 = product of:
          0.07221426 = sum of:
            0.07221426 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07221426 = score(doc=4494,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Although commonly used in both commercial and experimental information retrieval systems, thesauri have not demonstrated consistent benefits for retrieval performance, and it is difficult to construct a thesaurus automatically for large text databases. In this paper, an approach, called PhraseFinder, is proposed to construct collection-dependent association thesauri automatically using large full-text document collections. The association thesaurus can be accessed through natural language queries in INQUERY, an information retrieval system based on the probabilistic inference network. Experiments are conducted in INQUERY to evaluate different types of association thesauri, and thesauri constructed for a variety of collections
  9. Osigwe, C.C.: ¬The effect of semantic and syntactic relationships in the choice of descriptor elements for precision in document indexing and information retrieval (1992) 0.01
    0.00794151 = product of:
      0.023824528 = sum of:
        0.023824528 = product of:
          0.07147358 = sum of:
            0.07147358 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07147358 = score(doc=4238,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 4238, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4238)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Examines some of the problems arising from the interaction between semantic and syntactic relationships in the working of information retrieval systems and proposes the introduction of a generalised thesaurus, universal programs for database storage and retrieval and for the construction of a common data input format for international information exchange
  10. Riege, U.: Thesaurus und Klassifikation Sozialwissenschaften : Entwicklung der elektronischen Versionen (1998) 0.01
    0.007680971 = product of:
      0.023042914 = sum of:
        0.023042914 = product of:
          0.06912874 = sum of:
            0.06912874 = weight(_text_:22 in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06912874 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  11. Alkämper, H.: ¬Die Neugestaltung des Parlamentsthesaurus PARTHES (1998) 0.01
    0.007680971 = product of:
      0.023042914 = sum of:
        0.023042914 = product of:
          0.06912874 = sum of:
            0.06912874 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06912874 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  12. Velasco, M.: Algoritmo de filtrado multitermino para la obtencion de relaciones jerarquicas en la construction automatica de un tesauro de descriptores (1999) 0.01
    0.007680971 = product of:
      0.023042914 = sum of:
        0.023042914 = product of:
          0.06912874 = sum of:
            0.06912874 = weight(_text_:22 in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06912874 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.1, S.34-49
  13. Klaus, H.: implications for construction and display : Understandings of thesauri in the online dialogue (1999) 0.01
    0.0069230343 = product of:
      0.020769102 = sum of:
        0.020769102 = product of:
          0.062307306 = sum of:
            0.062307306 = weight(_text_:online in 3449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062307306 = score(doc=3449,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 3449, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3449)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  14. Gödert, W.: Möglichkeiten der Disambiguierung durch Erstreckungsformen (1995) 0.01
    0.006877549 = product of:
      0.020632647 = sum of:
        0.020632647 = product of:
          0.06189794 = sum of:
            0.06189794 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06189794 = score(doc=1117,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1117, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1117)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Konstruktion und Retrieval von Wissen: 3. Tagung der Deutschen ISKO-Sektion einschließlich der Vorträge des Workshops "Thesauri als terminologische Lexika", Weilburg, 27.-29.10.1993. Hrsg.: N. Meder u.a
  15. Smith, D.A.: Use of a thesaurus in two-stage information retrieval of electronic records (1996) 0.01
    0.006877549 = product of:
      0.020632647 = sum of:
        0.020632647 = product of:
          0.06189794 = sum of:
            0.06189794 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06189794 = score(doc=1965,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  16. Srinivasan, P.: Thesaurus construction (1992) 0.01
    0.006877549 = product of:
      0.020632647 = sum of:
        0.020632647 = product of:
          0.06189794 = sum of:
            0.06189794 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06189794 = score(doc=3504,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 3504, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3504)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Thesauri are valuable structures for Information Retrieval systems. A thesaurus provides a precise and controlled vocabulary which serves to coordinate dacument indexing and document retrieval. In both indexing and retrieval, a thesaurus may be used to select the most appropriate terms. Additionally, the thesaurus can assist the searcher in reformulating search strategies if required. Examines the important features of thesauri. This should allow the reader to differentiate between thesauri. Next, a brief overview of the manual thesaurus construction process is given. 2 major approaches for automatic thesaurus construction have been selected for detailed examination. The first is on thesaurus construction from collections of documents,a nd the 2nd, on thesaurus construction by merging existing thesauri. These 2 methods were selected since they rely on statistical techniques alone and are also significantly different from each other. Programs written in C language accompany the discussion of these approaches
    Source
    Information retrieval: data structures and algorithms. Ed.: W.B. Frakes u. R. Baeza-Yates
  17. Schmitz-Esser, W.: ¬Ein Thesaurus als Teil eines terminologischen Lexikons (1995) 0.01
    0.0064842156 = product of:
      0.019452646 = sum of:
        0.019452646 = product of:
          0.058357935 = sum of:
            0.058357935 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058357935 = score(doc=2075,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 2075, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2075)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag enthält die Vorstellung des Entwurfs eines neuen Thesaurus-Konzepts, der vom Komitee für Thesaurusforschung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation entwickelt worden ist. In diesem Konzept soll der Thesaurus nicht allein dem Information Retrieval dienen, es soll als terminologisches Werkzeug auf möglichst allen Feldern des 'Linguistic engineering' eingesetzt werden können.
    Source
    Konstruktion und Retrieval von Wissen: 3. Tagung der Deutschen ISKO-Sektion einschließlich der Vorträge des Workshops "Thesauri als terminologische Lexika", Weilburg, 27.-29.10.1993. Hrsg.: N. Meder u.a
  18. Zimmermann, H.H.: Überlegungen zu einem multilingualen Thesaurus-Konzept (1995) 0.01
    0.0064842156 = product of:
      0.019452646 = sum of:
        0.019452646 = product of:
          0.058357935 = sum of:
            0.058357935 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058357935 = score(doc=2076,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 2076, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2076)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die Thesaurus-Thematik wird zunächst in den Zusammenhang der gesamten Erschließungs- und Retrievalmöglichkeiten eines Information-Retrieval-Systems gestellt. Auf dieser Grundlage wird ein multilinguales Thesaurus-Konzept entwickelt. Wichtige Elemente sind: die Ermöglichung des Zugangs anhand des Benutzervokabulars, eine systematische, transparente Bedeutungsdifferenzierung und eine Basis-Relationierung anhand einer einzigen ("ausgezeichneten") natürlichen Sprache.
    Source
    Konstruktion und Retrieval von Wissen: 3. Tagung der Deutschen ISKO-Sektion einschließlich der Vorträge des Workshops "Thesauri als terminologische Lexika", Weilburg, 27.-29.10.1993. Hrsg.: N. Meder u.a
  19. Dupuis, P.; Lapointe, J.: Developpement d'un outil documentaire à Hydro-Quebec : le Thesaurus HQ (1997) 0.01
    0.006144777 = product of:
      0.01843433 = sum of:
        0.01843433 = product of:
          0.055302992 = sum of:
            0.055302992 = weight(_text_:22 in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055302992 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Argus. 26(1997) no.3, S.16-22
  20. Heinzelin, D. de; ¬d'¬Hautcourt, F.; Pols, R.: ¬Un nouveaux thesaurus multilingue informatise relatif aux instruments de musique (1998) 0.01
    0.006144777 = product of:
      0.01843433 = sum of:
        0.01843433 = product of:
          0.055302992 = sum of:
            0.055302992 = weight(_text_:22 in 932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055302992 = score(doc=932,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 932, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=932)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00

Languages

Types

  • a 58
  • el 3
  • r 3
  • b 1
  • m 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…