Search (94 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999) 0.10
    0.10452529 = product of:
      0.15678793 = sum of:
        0.023928396 = weight(_text_:of in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023928396 = score(doc=4483,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
        0.13285953 = sum of:
          0.0480099 = weight(_text_:science in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0480099 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
          0.084849626 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084849626 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    15. 3.2000 10:22:37
    Source
    Journal of information science. 25(1999) no.2, S.113-131
  2. Busch, J.A.: Building and accessing vocabulary resources for networked resource discovery and navigation (1998) 0.08
    0.07801215 = product of:
      0.11701822 = sum of:
        0.027916465 = weight(_text_:of in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027916465 = score(doc=2346,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
        0.08910176 = sum of:
          0.039606147 = weight(_text_:science in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039606147 = score(doc=2346,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
          0.049495615 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049495615 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Getty has a lenghty history in the research and development of thesauri and other structured vocabulary tools to make the use and exchange of electronic information easier
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
    Object
    Thesaurus of Geographic Names
    Union List of Artist Names
    Source
    Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
  3. Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998) 0.06
    0.057292055 = product of:
      0.08593808 = sum of:
        0.022293966 = weight(_text_:of in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022293966 = score(doc=2337,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.27317715 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
        0.06364411 = sum of:
          0.028290104 = weight(_text_:science in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028290104 = score(doc=2337,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
          0.03535401 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03535401 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Despite early claims to the contemporary, thesauri continue to find use as access tools for information in the full-text environment. Their mode of use is changing, but this change actually represents an expansion rather than a contrdiction of their utility. Thesauri and similar vocabulary tools can complement full-text access by aiding users in focusing their searches, by supplementing the linguistic analysis of the text search engine, and even by serving as one of the tools used by the linguistic engine for its analysis. While human indexing contunues to be used for many databases, the trend is to increase the use of machine aids for this purpose. All machine-aided indexing (MAI) systems rely on thesauri as the basis for term selection. In the 21st century, the balance of effort between human and machine will change at both input and output, but thesauri will continue to play an important role for the foreseeable future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
  4. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.04
    0.039563164 = product of:
      0.059344746 = sum of:
        0.016919931 = weight(_text_:of in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016919931 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
        0.042424813 = product of:
          0.084849626 = sum of:
            0.084849626 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084849626 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: From classification to thesauri: making good use of facets
  5. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.04
    0.039563164 = product of:
      0.059344746 = sum of:
        0.016919931 = weight(_text_:of in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016919931 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
        0.042424813 = product of:
          0.084849626 = sum of:
            0.084849626 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084849626 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: The good use of facets: from classifications to thesauri
  6. Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies (1990) 0.04
    0.037281495 = product of:
      0.05592224 = sum of:
        0.027916465 = weight(_text_:of in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027916465 = score(doc=1271,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
        0.028005775 = product of:
          0.05601155 = sum of:
            0.05601155 = weight(_text_:science in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05601155 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.45, [=Suppl.10]
  7. Velasco, M.: Algoritmo de filtrado multitermino para la obtencion de relaciones jerarquicas en la construction automatica de un tesauro de descriptores (1999) 0.04
    0.036862895 = product of:
      0.055294342 = sum of:
        0.019940332 = weight(_text_:of in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019940332 = score(doc=348,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
        0.03535401 = product of:
          0.07070802 = sum of:
            0.07070802 = weight(_text_:22 in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07070802 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Statistical filtering techniques applied to the obtention of hierarchical relationships in the automatic construction of a thesaurus
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.1, S.34-49
  8. Dupuis, P.; Lapointe, J.: Developpement d'un outil documentaire à Hydro-Quebec : le Thesaurus HQ (1997) 0.03
    0.033895414 = product of:
      0.05084312 = sum of:
        0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02255991 = score(doc=3173,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
        0.028283209 = product of:
          0.056566417 = sum of:
            0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056566417 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the backgroud to the construction of a thesaurus at Hydro-Quebec, Quebec, Canada. Several information units, linked to form a network, share the same bibliographic database. The need for coherence and efficiency was the principle motive for the construction of the multidisciplinary thesaurus. Describes the construction process, discusses the specifity of the tool, its circulation, and considers its use on a partnership basis with other information services
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: The development of an information tool at Hydro-Quebec: the HQ Thesaurus
    Source
    Argus. 26(1997) no.3, S.16-22
  9. Crouch, C.J.: ¬An approach to the automatic construction of global thesauri (1990) 0.03
    0.032616116 = product of:
      0.048924174 = sum of:
        0.024176367 = weight(_text_:of in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024176367 = score(doc=4042,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
        0.024747808 = product of:
          0.049495615 = sum of:
            0.049495615 = weight(_text_:22 in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049495615 = score(doc=4042,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The benefits of a well constructed thesaurus to an information retrieval system have long been recognised by both researchers and practitioners in the field. Examines both early and current approaches to automatic thesaurus construction and describes an approach to the automatic generation of global thesauri based on the term discrimination value model of Salton Yang, and Yu and on an appropriate clustering algorithm. This method has been implemented and applied to 2 document collections. Preliminary results indicate that this method, which produces improvements in retrieval performance in excess of 10 and 15% in the test collections, is viable and worthy of continued investigation.
    Date
    22. 4.1996 3:39:53
  10. Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995) 0.03
    0.031880446 = product of:
      0.047820665 = sum of:
        0.019537456 = weight(_text_:of in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019537456 = score(doc=3734,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
        0.028283209 = product of:
          0.056566417 = sum of:
            0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056566417 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Most indexed databases now include their thesauri and/or coding in their bibliographic files, searchable at the databases' online connect rates. Assesses the searchability of these on the different hosts. Thesauri and classifications are also available as diskette or CD-ROM products. Describes a number of these, highlighting the diskette thesaurus from IFI/Plenum Data for its flexible databases, the CLAIMS Uniterm and Comprehensive indexes to US chemical patents
    Source
    Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22
  11. Heinzelin, D. de; ¬d'¬Hautcourt, F.; Pols, R.: ¬Un nouveaux thesaurus multilingue informatise relatif aux instruments de musique (1998) 0.03
    0.031880446 = product of:
      0.047820665 = sum of:
        0.019537456 = weight(_text_:of in 932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019537456 = score(doc=932,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 932, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=932)
        0.028283209 = product of:
          0.056566417 = sum of:
            0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056566417 = score(doc=932,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 932, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=932)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the development and structure of a multilingual thesaurus for classifying and defining musical instruments, designed at the Brussels Theatre de la Monnaie as part of a project to create a multimedia database of theatre and musical arts
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  12. Roux, P.J.A.; Rykheer, J.H.: Developing a South African master thesaurus for community information (1990) 0.03
    0.031813025 = product of:
      0.04771954 = sum of:
        0.027916465 = weight(_text_:of in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027916465 = score(doc=3596,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
        0.019803073 = product of:
          0.039606147 = sum of:
            0.039606147 = weight(_text_:science in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039606147 = score(doc=3596,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In 1987 the Department of Library and Information Science at the University of South Africa committed itself to a research programme on community information. As part of that programme, the Department's Centre for Library and Information Service is compiling a prototype resource file of community information for a well-defined community in the Pretoria municipality. To retrieve information from the file, the Centre adopted an alphabetical approach, which necessitated a thesaurus. Instead of developing a thesaurus for the specific needs of the particular community, a "master" thesaurus, applicable to South African communities can be generated. The development of this South African "master" thesaurus for community information is described and the results reviewed.
    Source
    South African journal of library and information science. 58(1990) no.2, S.174-179
  13. Z39.19-1993: Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual thesauri (1993) 0.03
    0.029490318 = product of:
      0.044235475 = sum of:
        0.015952265 = weight(_text_:of in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015952265 = score(doc=4092,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
        0.028283209 = product of:
          0.056566417 = sum of:
            0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056566417 = score(doc=4092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This 1993 edition is the authoritative guide constructing single-language thesauri, one of the most powerful tools for information retrieval. Written by experts, Z39.19 shows how to formulate descriptors, establish relationships among terms, and present the information in print and on a screen. Also included are thesaurus maintenance procedures and recommended features for thesaurus management systems
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.180-181 (M. Hudon)
  14. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Thesaurus and beyond : an advanced formula for linguistic engineering and information retrieval (1999) 0.03
    0.029063582 = product of:
      0.043595374 = sum of:
        0.022382967 = weight(_text_:of in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022382967 = score(doc=4116,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
        0.021212406 = product of:
          0.042424813 = sum of:
            0.042424813 = weight(_text_:22 in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042424813 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a proposal for a new approach to thesaurus design and construction that could have significant implicantions for change in the way multilingual thesauri are handled and integrated with each other. The formula presented here has its origin in the work of the German Thesaurus Committee and has had input from a number of scientists and practitioners int he field. The emphasis is on the various types of relationships found among concepts, notiions and universals in languages. These relationships are analysed and refined beyond the approach taken in existing thesauri. This proposal is very much at the discussion stage and the author invites the assistance of interested readers through criticisms, discussion and dialogue. Applications of the proposed thesaurus are included and the major goal of this proposal is to provide the basis for improved desing and integration of multilingual thesauri
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 26(1999) no.1, S.10-22
  15. Little, K.: Constructing a thesaurus of environmental protection terms (1993) 0.03
    0.02748403 = product of:
      0.041226044 = sum of:
        0.025222747 = weight(_text_:of in 8200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025222747 = score(doc=8200,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 8200, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8200)
        0.0160033 = product of:
          0.0320066 = sum of:
            0.0320066 = weight(_text_:science in 8200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0320066 = score(doc=8200,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 8200, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8200)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the background to and the process of thesaurus construction in an interdisciplinary soft science subject, environmental protection, for a specific government organization, the Environmental Protection Authority, Western Australia. Discusses and recommends methods of construction and develops a decision making checklists to aid in managing the task. Concentrates on the difficulties of creating a thesaurus in the real world compared to textual advice on thesaurus construction
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 10th National Cataloguing Conference on Subject to change: subject access and the role of the cataloguer, Freemantle, Western Australia, 4-6 Nov 93
  16. Rorvig, M.E.; Turner, C.H.; Moncada, J.: ¬The NASA Image Collection Visual Thesaurus (1999) 0.03
    0.025708806 = product of:
      0.038563207 = sum of:
        0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 3919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02255991 = score(doc=3919,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 3919, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3919)
        0.0160033 = product of:
          0.0320066 = sum of:
            0.0320066 = weight(_text_:science in 3919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0320066 = score(doc=3919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 3919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3919)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article is an unpublished manuscript of a paper presented at the 17th Annual Mid-Year Meeting of the ASIS at Ann Arbor, Mich., May 15-18, 1988. It is the first recorded proposal for visual support of indexing. The system itself was built and developed at NASA in the Johnson space Center Image Archives from 1989 to 1992
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.9, S.794-798
  17. Schmitz-Esser, W.: New approaches in thesaurus application (1991) 0.03
    0.025452837 = product of:
      0.038179256 = sum of:
        0.024176367 = weight(_text_:of in 2111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024176367 = score(doc=2111,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 2111, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2111)
        0.0140028875 = product of:
          0.028005775 = sum of:
            0.028005775 = weight(_text_:science in 2111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028005775 = score(doc=2111,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 2111, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2111)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    To show the difference and explain the move to a new kind of thesauri in the information science area, some of the main characteristics of conventional thesauri are pointed out as well as their side-effects. The new approaches for thesauri apllication are seen to exist in (1) expert systems, (2) interface systems, (3) object oriented design and programming, (4) hypertext systems, (5) machine translation, and (6) machine abstracting. These areas are shortly described including also the new problem which they might create. A discussion of the limitations of the new thesaurus application areas finishes the article which challenges, finally, an awareness to meet the new possibilities of a thesaural retrieval
  18. Jones, S.; Gatford, M.; Robertson, S.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.; Secker, J.; Walker, S.: Interactive thesaurus navigation : intelligence rules OK? (1995) 0.03
    0.025452837 = product of:
      0.038179256 = sum of:
        0.024176367 = weight(_text_:of in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024176367 = score(doc=180,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
        0.0140028875 = product of:
          0.028005775 = sum of:
            0.028005775 = weight(_text_:science in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028005775 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    We discuss whether it is feasible to build intelligent rule- or weight-based algorithms into general-purpose software for interactive thesaurus navigation. We survey some approaches to the problem reported in the literature, particularly those involving the assignement of 'link weights' in a thesaurus network, and point out some problems of both principle and practice. We then describe investigations which entailed logging the behavior of thesaurus users and testing the effect of thesaurus-based query enhancement in an IR system using term weighting, in an attempt to identify successful strategies to incorporate into automatic procedures. The results cause us to question many of the assumptions made by previous researchers in this area
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.1, S.52-59
  19. Zainab, A.N.; Silva, S.M. de: Expert systems in library and information services : publication trends, authorship patterns and expressiveness of published titles (1998) 0.03
    0.025018109 = product of:
      0.037527163 = sum of:
        0.02338211 = weight(_text_:of in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02338211 = score(doc=2927,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
        0.014145052 = product of:
          0.028290104 = sum of:
            0.028290104 = weight(_text_:science in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028290104 = score(doc=2927,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a state of the art review of the literature of expert systems in library and information science, involving exhaustive searches of all major LIS CD-ROM databases (LISA, ERIC, LiLi, INSPEC etc.) and bibliographies appended in review articles. The search retrieved 679 references, comprising 362 periodical articles, 180 conference proceedings, 63 books articles, 28 theses and 46 monographs. The growth of the literature peaked between 1989 and 1990 and subsequently declined after 1992. Over 1/3 (287) covered intelligent front ends and interfaces for online searching and retrieval, followed by applications in reference service (113), classification, indexing and abstracting (86) and cataloguing (7). The most productive periodicals comprised 6 titles, of which 'Information processing and management' topped the lsit: 43 authors were found to contribute between 5 and 35 articles each, hence contributing 32,19% of the total contributors. 382 of the publications were single author works, 172 were by 2 authors, 72 were by 3 authors and 49 were by 4 or more authors. Only 161 titles were expressive enough to reveal both the name and function of systems being developed
    Source
    Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.5, S.313-336
  20. Jones, S.: ¬A thesaurus data model for an intelligent retrieval system (1993) 0.02
    0.023953915 = product of:
      0.035930872 = sum of:
        0.023928396 = weight(_text_:of in 5279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023928396 = score(doc=5279,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 5279, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5279)
        0.012002475 = product of:
          0.02400495 = sum of:
            0.02400495 = weight(_text_:science in 5279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02400495 = score(doc=5279,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 5279, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5279)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper demonstrates the application of conventional database design techniques to thesaurus representation. The thesaurus is considered as a printed document, as a semantic net, and as a relational database to be used in conjunction with an intelligent information retrieval system. Some issues raised by analysis of two standard thesauri include: the prevalence of compound terms and the representation of term structure; thesaurus redundancy and the extent to which it can be eliminated in machine-readable versions; the difficulty of exploiting thesaurus knowledge originally designed for human rather than automatic interpretation; deriving 'strength of association' measures between terms in a thesaurus considered as a semantic net; facet representation and the need for variations in the data model to cater for structural differences between thesauri. A complete schema of database tables is presented, with an outline suggestion for using the stored information when matching one or more thesaurus terms with a user's query
    Source
    Journal of information science. 19(1993), S.167-178

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 85
  • el 3
  • m 2
  • n 2
  • r 2
  • s 2
  • b 1
  • More… Less…