Search (31 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Holzner, S.: FIZ Wirtschaft - das Portal der Wirtschaftswissenschaften : Standard Thesaurus Wirtschaft als Basis für Wortschatzsynchronisierung (2001) 0.01
    0.011648476 = product of:
      0.03494543 = sum of:
        0.026183454 = weight(_text_:internet in 5886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026183454 = score(doc=5886,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.23064373 = fieldWeight in 5886, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5886)
        0.008761973 = product of:
          0.026285918 = sum of:
            0.026285918 = weight(_text_:29 in 5886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026285918 = score(doc=5886,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5886, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5886)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Das Internet-Portal >FIZ Wirtschaft< bündelt wichtige Informationsbestände der vier Institutionen GBI, HWWA, ifo Institut und ZBW zu den Bereichen Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Betriebswirtschaft, Volkswirtschaft und Politik zu einem umfassenden Informationspool. Das Spektrum ist breit gefächert und umfasst auch Informationen zu Randgebieten von betriebswirtschaftlichen Aspekten in der Produktion bis hin zu Rechtsfragen und Umweltökonomie. Recherchen in vordefinierten Themenpools oder Einzeldatenbanken, Nutzung von Online-Katalogen, Abspeichern von Profildiensten, Durchführung von Auftragsrecherchen oder auch individuelle Intranetanbindungen sind realisierbar. Zudem bietet FIZ Wirtschaft auch eine Volltextbestellung bei den Instituten HWWA, ito Institut und ZBW zu den recherchierten Dokumenten. Geordert werden kann Material aus der ganzen Welt. Eingebunden ist auch der StandardThesaurus-Wirtschaft als Hilfsmittel zur Suche nach Schlagworten oder Begriffen, aber auch als generelle Orientierungshilfe im wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Begriffsumfeld mit direkter Suchmöglichkeit. Das Portal ist daher eine Fundgrube für alle, die wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Informationen benötigen wie Mitarbeiter in volkswirtschaftlichen Abteilungen von Firmen, Unternehmensberatungen, wirtschaftlichen Verbänden und Sparkassen
    Date
    17. 5.2001 20:29:55
    Theme
    Internet
  2. Schmitz-Esser, W.: EXPO-INFO 2000 : Visuelles Besucherinformationssystem für Weltausstellungen (2000) 0.01
    0.009092158 = product of:
      0.027276471 = sum of:
        0.018514499 = weight(_text_:internet in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018514499 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.16308975 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
        0.008761973 = product of:
          0.026285918 = sum of:
            0.026285918 = weight(_text_:29 in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026285918 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Das aktuelle Wissen der Welt im Spiegel einer Weltausstellung: Wie stellt man das dar und wie macht man es Interessierten zugänglich - in der Ausstellung, in Publikationen, im Funk und über das Internet? Was man alles auf einer Weltausstellung an der Schwelle zum dritten Jahrtausend sehen und erfahren kann, sprengt in Fülle und Vielfalt jeden individuell faßbaren Rahmen. Schmitz-Esser zeigt in seinem Buch, wie der Besucher wahlweise in vier Sprachen die Weltausstellung erleben und die Quintessenz davon mitnehmen kann. Ermöglicht wird dies durch das Konzept des virtuellen "Wissens in der Kapsel", das so aufbereitet ist, daß es in allen gängigen medialen Formen und für unterschiedlichste Wege der Aneignung eingesetzt werden kann. Die Lösung ist nicht nur eine Sache der Informatik und Informationstechnologie, sondern vielmehr auch eine Herausforderung an Informationswissenschaft und Computerlinguistik. Das Buch stellt Ziel, Ansatz, Komponenten und Voraussetzungen dafür dar.
    Footnote
    Rez.in: KO 29(2002) no.2, S.103-104 (G.J.A. Riesthuis)
  3. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Thesauri on the Web : current developments and trends (2000) 0.01
    0.0061094724 = product of:
      0.036656834 = sum of:
        0.036656834 = weight(_text_:internet in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036656834 = score(doc=2558,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.32290122 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article provides an overview of recent developments relating to the application of thesauri in information organisation and retrieval on the World Wide Web. It describes some recent thesaurus projects undertaken to facilitate resource description and discovery and access to wide-ranging information resources on the Internet. Types of thesauri available on the Web, thesauri integrated in databases and information retrieval systems, and multiple-thesaurus systems for cross-database searching are also discussed. Collective efforts and events in addressing the standardisation and novel applications of thesauri are briefly reviewed.
    Theme
    Internet
  4. Johnson, E.H.: Distributed thesaurus Web services (2004) 0.01
    0.005236691 = product of:
      0.031420145 = sum of:
        0.031420145 = weight(_text_:internet in 4863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031420145 = score(doc=4863,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.27677247 = fieldWeight in 4863, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4863)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The World Wide Web and the use of HTML-based information displays has greatly increased access to online information sources, but at the same time limits the ways in which they can be used. By the same token, Web-based indexing and search engines give us access to the full text of online documents, but make it difficult to access them in any kind of organized, systematic way. For years before the advent of the Internet, lexicographers built weIl-structured subject thesauri to organize large collections of documents. These have since been converted into electronic form and even put online, but in ways that are largely uncoordinated and not useful for searching. This paper describes some of the ways in which XML-based Web services could be used to coordinate subject thesauri and other online vocabulary sources to create a "Thesauro-Web" that could be used by both searchers and indexers to improve subject access an the Internet.
  5. Williamson, N.J.: Thesauri in the digital age : stability and dynamism in their development and use (2000) 0.00
    0.0049371994 = product of:
      0.029623196 = sum of:
        0.029623196 = weight(_text_:internet in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029623196 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.2609436 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The latest thesaurus guidelines, ISO 2788 and ANSI/NISO Z39.19-1993, were published before many recent changes in the nature of databases, and before the full impact of the Internet on information storage and retrieval. The major changes are addressed in light of implications for reconsideration and possible revision of the guidelines
  6. Bambey, D.: Thesauri und Klassifikationen im Netz : Neue Herausforderungen für klassische Werkzeuge (2000) 0.00
    0.0043639094 = product of:
      0.026183454 = sum of:
        0.026183454 = weight(_text_:internet in 5505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026183454 = score(doc=5505,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.23064373 = fieldWeight in 5505, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5505)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Die verstärkte Diskussion über qualitativ bessere Such- und Erschließungsmethoden im Internet führt auch dazu, dass Thesauri und Klassifikation bei Fachanbietern und im wissenschaftlich-bibliothekarischen Bereich verstärkt wieder Thema und auch Gegenstand von Projekten geworden sind. Solche Konjunkturschwankungen sind ein bekanntes Phänomen, denn schon immer haben fachlich-methodische Instrumente in Zeiten technologischer Schübe schlechte Konjunktur. Wenn die technologischen Machbarkeiten dann kritisch überdacht werden müssen und die Probleme der Qualitätssicherung ins Auge fallen, rückt das Problem der Vermittlung technologischer Verfahren mit sach- und inhaltsbezogenen Anforderungen unweigerlich wieder stärker in den Mittelpunkt des Interesses'. Meine Ausführungen richten sich vor allem auf aktuelle Probleme der Produktion und Wiedergewinnung von Informationen oder präziser: von Fachinformationen, Fragen der Qualitätssicherung und die Rolle, die Klassifikationen und Thesauri in diesem Zusammenhang spielen oder spielen könnten. Insbesondere der Aspekt der Nutzerakzeptanz wird hier stärker thematisiert. Der Punkt nettere Ansätze wird etwas eingehender am Beispiel der Vernetzung verschiedener Thesauri und Klassifikationen mittels sogenannter Cross-Konkordanzen erläutert. Im Folgenden beziehe ich mich vor allem auf die Sozialwissenschaften und insbesondere die Erziehungswissenschaft. Dies ist der fachliche Background des Fachinformationssystem Bildung, und des Deutschen Bildungsservers in deren Kontext ich mit den hier angesprochenen Problemen befasst bin
    Theme
    Internet
  7. Fenske, M.: Modell eines automatisierbaren syntaktischen Metathesaurus und seine Eignung für parlamentarische Thesauri im Internet (2006) 0.00
    0.0037028994 = product of:
      0.022217397 = sum of:
        0.022217397 = weight(_text_:internet in 32) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022217397 = score(doc=32,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 32, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=32)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  8. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002) 0.00
    0.003504789 = product of:
      0.021028733 = sum of:
        0.021028733 = product of:
          0.0630862 = sum of:
            0.0630862 = weight(_text_:29 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0630862 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    18. 5.2002 17:29:00
  9. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.00
    0.0034732614 = product of:
      0.020839568 = sum of:
        0.020839568 = product of:
          0.0625187 = sum of:
            0.0625187 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0625187 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
  10. Faden, M.: ¬Der Einsatz eines WIKIs als zentrales Kommunikationsinstrument für die Thesauruspflege an verteilten Bibliotheksstandorten (2007) 0.00
    0.00308575 = product of:
      0.018514499 = sum of:
        0.018514499 = weight(_text_:internet in 2824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018514499 = score(doc=2824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.16308975 = fieldWeight in 2824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2824)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Mit dieser Arbeit wird untersucht, welche Möglichkeiten und Vorteile ein Wiki bei der Pflege und Weiterentwicklung eines Thesaurus bietet. Als Basis für diese Arbeit wird ein entsprechendes Wiki, der Standard-Thesaurus Wirtschaft (STW) und Einrichtungen an verschiedenen Standorten, die mit dem STW arbeiten (das sog. STW-Konsortium) herangezogen. Um die Untersuchungsergebnisse zu präsentieren und zu belegen, wird parallel dazu der Prototyp "Wikisaurus oeconomicus" entwickelt; er ist die praktische Umsetzung der hier beschriebenen Möglichkeiten und wird im Internet zur Verfügung gestellt. Die Arbeit gliedert sich in zwei wesentliche Bereiche. Zuerst wird in einem kurzen Abriss die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Dokumentationssprachen, insbesondere von Thesauri, im 20. Jhd. beschrieben. Darauf aufbauend folgt die Darstellung der Genese und der Struktur des STW sowie dessen Pflege und Weiterentwicklung. Der zweite Teil widmet sich dann dem eigentlichen Untersuchungsgegenstand: Um diesen sinnvoll vor- und darstellen zu können, erfolgt eine Einführung in die, zugegebenermaßen kurze Geschichte der WikiWelt. Dazu wird noch die Software MediaWiki, deren Möglichkeiten sowie die Theorie der Zusammenarbeit in Wikis beschrieben. Danach wird ein möglicher Einsatz von Wikitechnik bei der Pflege und Weiterentwicklung des STW beschrieben. Wie oben schon erwähnt, wird zur Präsentation der Ergebnisse im Inter-net, der Prototyp "Wikisaurus oeconomicus" entwickelt. Neben der reinen Präsentation soll so auch ein (exemplarischer) Eindruck über die Praktikabilität und Anwendbarkeit der Wiki-technik vermittelt werden.
  11. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.00
    0.0028943846 = product of:
      0.017366307 = sum of:
        0.017366307 = product of:
          0.05209892 = sum of:
            0.05209892 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05209892 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  12. Dextre Clarke, S.G.; Gilchrist, A.; Will, L.: Revision and extension of thesaurus standards (2004) 0.00
    0.0024685997 = product of:
      0.014811598 = sum of:
        0.014811598 = weight(_text_:internet in 2615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014811598 = score(doc=2615,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.1304718 = fieldWeight in 2615, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2615)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The current standards for monolingual and multilingual thesauri are long overdue for an update. This applies to the international standards ISO 2788 and ISO 5964, as well as the corresponding national standards in several countries and the American standard ANSI/NISO Z39.19. Work is now under way in the UK and in the USA to revise and extend the standards, with particular emphasis on interoperability needs in our world of vast electronic networks. Work in the UK is starting with the British Standards, in the hope of leading on to one international standard to serve all. Some of the issues still under discussion include the treatment of facet analysis, coverage of additional types of controlled vocabulary such as classification schemes, taxonomies and ontologies, and mapping from one vocabulary to another. 1. Are thesaurus standards still needed? Since the 1960s, even before the renowned Cranfield experiments (Cleverdon et al., 1966; Cleverdon, 1967) arguments have raged over the usefulness or otherwise of controlled vocabularies. The case has never been proved definitively one way or the other. At the same time, a recognition has become widespread that no one search method can answer all retrieval requirements. In today's environment of very large networks of resources, the skilled information professional uses a range of techniques. Among these, controlled vocabularies are valued alongside others. The first international standard for monolingual thesauri was issued in 1974. In those days, the main application was for postcoordinate indexing and retrieval from document collections or bibliographic databases. For many information professionals the only practicable alternative to a thesaurus was a classification scheme. And so the thesaurus developed a strong following. After computer systems with full text search capability became widely available, however, the arguments against controlled vocabularies gained more followers. The cost of building and maintaining a thesaurus or a classification scheme was a strong disincentive. Today's databases are typically immense compared with those three decades ago. Full text searching is taken for granted, not just in discrete databases but across all the resources in an intranet or even the Internet. But intranets have brought particular frustration as users discover that despite all the computer power, they cannot find items which they know to be present an the network. So the trend against controlled vocabularies is now being reversed, as many information professionals are turning to them for help. Standards to guide them are still in demand.
  13. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhurry, G.: Assessing the impact of user interaction with thesaural knowledge structures : a quantitative analysis framework (2003) 0.00
    0.0024685997 = product of:
      0.014811598 = sum of:
        0.014811598 = weight(_text_:internet in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014811598 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038453303 = queryNorm
            0.1304718 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Thesauri have been important information and knowledge organisation tools for more than three decades. The recent emergence and phenomenal growth of the World Wide Web has created new opportunities to introduce thesauri as information search and retrieval aids to end user communities. While the number of web-based and hypertextual thesauri continues to grow, few investigations have yet been carried out to evaluate how end-users, for whom all these efforts are ostensibly made, interact with and make use of thesauri for query building and expansion. The present paper reports a pilot study carried out to determine the extent to which a thesaurus-enhanced search interface to a web-based database aided end-users in their selection of search terms. The study also investigated the ways in which users interacted with the thesaurus structure, terms, and interface. Thesaurusbased searching and browsing behaviours adopted by users while interacting with the thesaurus-enhanced search interface were also examined. 1. Introduction The last decade has witnessed the emergence of a broad range of applications for knowledge structures in general and thesauri in particular. A number of researchers have predicted that thesauri will increasingly be used in retrieval rather than for indexing (Milstead, 1998; Aitchison et al., 1997) and that their application in information retrieval systems will become more diverse due to the growth of fulltext databases accessed over the Internet (Williamson, 2000). Some researchers have emphasised the need for tailoring the structure and content of thesauri as tools for end-user searching (Bates, 1986; Strong and Drott, 1986; Anderson and Rowley, 1991; Lopez-Huertas, 1997) while others have suggested thesaurus-enhanced user interfaces to support query formulation and expansion (Pollitt et.al., 1994; Jones et.al., 1995; Beaulieu, 1997). The recent phenomenal growth of the World Wide Web has created new opportunities to introduce thesauri as information search and retrieval aids to end user communities. While the number of web-based and hypertextual thesauri continues to grow, few investigations have been carried out to evaluate the ways in which end-users interact with and make use of online thesauri for query building and expansion. The work reported here expands an a pilot study (Shiri and Revie, 2001) carried out to investigate user - thesaurus interaction in the domains of biology and veterinary medicine.
  14. Riesland, M.A.: Tools of the trade : vocabulary management software (2004) 0.00
    0.002336526 = product of:
      0.014019156 = sum of:
        0.014019156 = product of:
          0.042057466 = sum of:
            0.042057466 = weight(_text_:29 in 4859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042057466 = score(doc=4859,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4859, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4859)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    18. 5.2006 20:06:29
  15. García Marco, F.J. et al: Proyectos internacionales de reforma y ampliación de las normas sobre tesauros para su adaptación a los nuevos contextos de integración e interoperabilidad en el entorno digital (2007) 0.00
    0.002336526 = product of:
      0.014019156 = sum of:
        0.014019156 = product of:
          0.042057466 = sum of:
            0.042057466 = weight(_text_:29 in 1099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042057466 = score(doc=1099,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1099, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1099)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29.12.2007 18:03:29
  16. Eckert, K.; Pfeffer, M.; Stuckenschmidt, H.: Assessing thesaurus-based annotations for semantic search applications (2008) 0.00
    0.0020444603 = product of:
      0.012266762 = sum of:
        0.012266762 = product of:
          0.036800284 = sum of:
            0.036800284 = weight(_text_:29 in 1528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036800284 = score(doc=1528,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1528, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1528)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    25. 2.2012 13:51:29
  17. Assem, M. van; Menken, M.R.; Schreiber, G.; Wielemaker, J.; Wielinga, B.: ¬A method for converting thesauri to RDF/OWL (2004) 0.00
    0.0020444603 = product of:
      0.012266762 = sum of:
        0.012266762 = product of:
          0.036800284 = sum of:
            0.036800284 = weight(_text_:29 in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036800284 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13526669 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 7.2011 14:44:56
  18. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.00
    0.0020260692 = product of:
      0.012156415 = sum of:
        0.012156415 = product of:
          0.036469243 = sum of:
            0.036469243 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036469243 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
  19. Nielsen, M.L.: Thesaurus construction : key issues and selected readings (2004) 0.00
    0.0020260692 = product of:
      0.012156415 = sum of:
        0.012156415 = product of:
          0.036469243 = sum of:
            0.036469243 = weight(_text_:22 in 5006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036469243 = score(doc=5006,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5006, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5006)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    18. 5.2006 20:06:22
  20. Schneider, J.W.; Borlund, P.: ¬A bibliometric-based semiautomatic approach to identification of candidate thesaurus terms : parsing and filtering of noun phrases from citation contexts (2005) 0.00
    0.0020260692 = product of:
      0.012156415 = sum of:
        0.012156415 = product of:
          0.036469243 = sum of:
            0.036469243 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036469243 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13465692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038453303 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    8. 3.2007 19:55:22