-
Schmitz-Esser, W.: Thesaurus and beyond : an advanced formula for linguistic engineering and information retrieval (1999)
0.05
0.046775818 = product of:
0.093551636 = sum of:
0.093551636 = sum of:
0.048973244 = weight(_text_:work in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048973244 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.2433148 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
0.04457839 = weight(_text_:22 in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04457839 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper describes a proposal for a new approach to thesaurus design and construction that could have significant implicantions for change in the way multilingual thesauri are handled and integrated with each other. The formula presented here has its origin in the work of the German Thesaurus Committee and has had input from a number of scientists and practitioners int he field. The emphasis is on the various types of relationships found among concepts, notiions and universals in languages. These relationships are analysed and refined beyond the approach taken in existing thesauri. This proposal is very much at the discussion stage and the author invites the assistance of interested readers through criticisms, discussion and dialogue. Applications of the proposed thesaurus are included and the major goal of this proposal is to provide the basis for improved desing and integration of multilingual thesauri
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 26(1999) no.1, S.10-22
-
Aitchison, J.; Dextre Clarke, S.G.: ¬The Thesaurus : a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future (2004)
0.05
0.046775818 = product of:
0.093551636 = sum of:
0.093551636 = sum of:
0.048973244 = weight(_text_:work in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048973244 = score(doc=5005,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.2433148 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
0.04457839 = weight(_text_:22 in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04457839 = score(doc=5005,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- After a period of experiment and evolution in the 1950s and 1960s, a fairly standard format for thesauri was established with the publication of the influential Thesaurus of Engineering and Scientific Terms (TEST) in 1967. This and other early thesauri relied primarily an the presentation of terms in alphabetical order. The value of a classified presentation was subsequently realised, and in particular the technique of facet analysis has profoundly influenced thesaurus evolution. Thesaurofacet and the Art & Architecture Thesaurus have acted as models for two distinct breeds of thesaurus using faceted displays of terms. As of the 1990s, the expansion of end-user access to vast networked resources is imposing further requirements an the style and structure of controlled vocabularies. The international standards for thesauri, first conceived in a print-based era, are badly in need of updating. Work is in hand in the UK and the USA to revise and develop standards in support of electronic thesauri.
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:46:13
-
Bagheri, M.: Development of thesauri in Iran (2006)
0.05
0.046775818 = product of:
0.093551636 = sum of:
0.093551636 = sum of:
0.048973244 = weight(_text_:work in 260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048973244 = score(doc=260,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.2433148 = fieldWeight in 260, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=260)
0.04457839 = weight(_text_:22 in 260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04457839 = score(doc=260,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 260, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=260)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The need for Persian thesauri became apparent during the late 1960s with the advent of documentation centres in Iran. The first Persian controlled vocabulary was published by IRANDOC in 1977. Other centres worked on translations of existing thesauri, but it was soon realised that these efforts did not meet the needs of the centres. After the Islamic revolution in 1979, the foundation of new centres intensified the need for Persian thesauri, especially in the fields of history and government documents. Also, during the Iran-Iraq war, Iranian research centres produced reports in scientific and technical fields, both to support military requirements and to meet society's needs. In order to provide a comprehensive thesaurus, the Council of Scientific Research of Iran approved a project for the compilation of such a work. Nowadays, 12 Persian thesauri are available and others are being prepared, based on the literary corpus and conformity with characteristics of Iranian culture.
- Source
- Indexer. 25(2006) no.1, S.19-22
-
Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985)
0.03
0.027285893 = product of:
0.054571785 = sum of:
0.054571785 = sum of:
0.028567726 = weight(_text_:work in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028567726 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.14193363 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.02600406 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02600406 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
- Footnote
- Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
-
Röttsches, H.: Thesauruspflege im Verbund der Bibliotheken der obersten Bundesbehörden (1989)
0.03
0.02600406 = product of:
0.05200812 = sum of:
0.05200812 = product of:
0.10401624 = sum of:
0.10401624 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10401624 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Parlaments- und Behördenbibliotheken. 1989, H.67, S.1-22
-
Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999)
0.02
0.022289194 = product of:
0.04457839 = sum of:
0.04457839 = product of:
0.08915678 = sum of:
0.08915678 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08915678 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 15. 3.2000 10:22:37
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.02
0.022289194 = product of:
0.04457839 = sum of:
0.04457839 = product of:
0.08915678 = sum of:
0.08915678 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08915678 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.02
0.022289194 = product of:
0.04457839 = sum of:
0.04457839 = product of:
0.08915678 = sum of:
0.08915678 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08915678 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001)
0.02
0.022289194 = product of:
0.04457839 = sum of:
0.04457839 = product of:
0.08915678 = sum of:
0.08915678 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08915678 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 24. 8.2005 19:20:22
-
Nielsen, M.L.: ¬A framework for work task based thesaurus design (2001)
0.02
0.021206036 = product of:
0.042412072 = sum of:
0.042412072 = product of:
0.084824145 = sum of:
0.084824145 = weight(_text_:work in 4477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084824145 = score(doc=4477,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.4214336 = fieldWeight in 4477, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4477)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Design and construction of indexing languages require thorough knowledge and understanding of the information environment. This empirical study investigated a mixed set of methods (group interviews, recollection of information needs and word association tests to collect data; content analysis and discourse analysis to analyse data) to evaluate whether these methods collected the data needed for work domain oriented thesaurus design. The findings showed that the study methods together provided the domain knowledge needed to define the role of the thesaurus and design its content and structure. The study was carried out from a person-insituation perspective. The findings reflected the information environment and made it possible to develop a thesaurus according to the characteristics of the work domain. It seemed more difficult to capture the needs of the individual user and adapt the thesaurus to individual characteristics.
-
Riege, U.: Thesaurus und Klassifikation Sozialwissenschaften : Entwicklung der elektronischen Versionen (1998)
0.02
0.01857433 = product of:
0.03714866 = sum of:
0.03714866 = product of:
0.07429732 = sum of:
0.07429732 = weight(_text_:22 in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07429732 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
-
Alkämper, H.: ¬Die Neugestaltung des Parlamentsthesaurus PARTHES (1998)
0.02
0.01857433 = product of:
0.03714866 = sum of:
0.03714866 = product of:
0.07429732 = sum of:
0.07429732 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07429732 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
-
Schenkel, M.: Vom Leitkartenthesaurus zum Online-Bibliotheksthesaurus : Die Revision des Dokumentationssystems der Bibliothek des Deutschen Bundestages (1949-1998) (1998)
0.02
0.01857433 = product of:
0.03714866 = sum of:
0.03714866 = product of:
0.07429732 = sum of:
0.07429732 = weight(_text_:22 in 4163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07429732 = score(doc=4163,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4163, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4163)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
-
Velasco, M.: Algoritmo de filtrado multitermino para la obtencion de relaciones jerarquicas en la construction automatica de un tesauro de descriptores (1999)
0.02
0.01857433 = product of:
0.03714866 = sum of:
0.03714866 = product of:
0.07429732 = sum of:
0.07429732 = weight(_text_:22 in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07429732 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.1, S.34-49
-
Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007)
0.02
0.01857433 = product of:
0.03714866 = sum of:
0.03714866 = product of:
0.07429732 = sum of:
0.07429732 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07429732 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:22:07
-
Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.: Still quite popular after all those years : the continued relevance of the information retrieval thesaurus (2016)
0.02
0.017314656 = product of:
0.03462931 = sum of:
0.03462931 = product of:
0.06925862 = sum of:
0.06925862 = weight(_text_:work in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06925862 = score(doc=2908,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.3440991 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The recent ISKO-UK conference considered the question of whether the traditional thesaurus has any place in modern information retrieval. This note is intended to continue in the spirit of that good-natured debate, arguing that there is indeed a role today and highlighting some recent work showing the continued relevance of the thesaurus, particularly in the linked data area. Key functionality that a thesaurus makes possible is discussed. A brief outline is provided of prominent work hat employs thesauri in three key areas of infrastructure underpinning advanced retrieval functionality today: metadata enrichment,vocabulary mapping and web services.
-
Dupuis, P.; Lapointe, J.: Developpement d'un outil documentaire à Hydro-Quebec : le Thesaurus HQ (1997)
0.01
0.014859463 = product of:
0.029718926 = sum of:
0.029718926 = product of:
0.059437852 = sum of:
0.059437852 = weight(_text_:22 in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059437852 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Argus. 26(1997) no.3, S.16-22
-
Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995)
0.01
0.014859463 = product of:
0.029718926 = sum of:
0.029718926 = product of:
0.059437852 = sum of:
0.059437852 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059437852 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22
-
Heinzelin, D. de; ¬d'¬Hautcourt, F.; Pols, R.: ¬Un nouveaux thesaurus multilingue informatise relatif aux instruments de musique (1998)
0.01
0.014859463 = product of:
0.029718926 = sum of:
0.029718926 = product of:
0.059437852 = sum of:
0.059437852 = weight(_text_:22 in 932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059437852 = score(doc=932,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 932, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=932)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Z39.19-1993: Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual thesauri (1993)
0.01
0.014859463 = product of:
0.029718926 = sum of:
0.029718926 = product of:
0.059437852 = sum of:
0.059437852 = weight(_text_:22 in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059437852 = score(doc=4092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.180-181 (M. Hudon)
