Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Literaturübersicht"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Hjoerland, B.; Kyllesbech Nielsen, L.: Subject access points in electronic retrieval (2001) 0.03
    0.026738876 = product of:
      0.106955506 = sum of:
        0.106955506 = weight(_text_:l in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.106955506 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17396861 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043769516 = queryNorm
            0.6147977 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  2. Blair, D.C.: Information retrieval and the philosophy of language (2002) 0.02
    0.015038833 = product of:
      0.060155332 = sum of:
        0.060155332 = weight(_text_:van in 4283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060155332 = score(doc=4283,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24408463 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043769516 = queryNorm
            0.24645276 = fieldWeight in 4283, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4283)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Information retrieval - the retrieval, primarily, of documents or textual material - is fundamentally a linguistic process. At the very least we must describe what we want and match that description with descriptions of the information that is available to us. Furthermore, when we describe what we want, we must mean something by that description. This is a deceptively simple act, but such linguistic events have been the grist for philosophical analysis since Aristotle. Although there are complexities involved in referring to authors, document types, or other categories of information retrieval context, here I wish to focus an one of the most problematic activities in information retrieval: the description of the intellectual content of information items. And even though I take information retrieval to involve the description and retrieval of written text, what I say here is applicable to any information item whose intellectual content can be described for retrieval-books, documents, images, audio clips, video clips, scientific specimens, engineering schematics, and so forth. For convenience, though, I will refer only to the description and retrieval of documents. The description of intellectual content can go wrong in many obvious ways. We may describe what we want incorrectly; we may describe it correctly but in such general terms that its description is useless for retrieval; or we may describe what we want correctly, but misinterpret the descriptions of available information, and thereby match our description of what we want incorrectly. From a linguistic point of view, we can be misunderstood in the process of retrieval in many ways. Because the philosophy of language deals specifically with how we are understood and mis-understood, it should have some use for understanding the process of description in information retrieval. First, however, let us examine more closely the kinds of misunderstandings that can occur in information retrieval. We use language in searching for information in two principal ways. We use it to describe what we want and to discriminate what we want from other information that is available to us but that we do not want. Description and discrimination together articulate the goals of the information search process; they also delineate the two principal ways in which language can fail us in this process. Van Rijsbergen (1979) was the first to make this distinction, calling them "representation" and "discrimination.""
  3. Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L.; Björneborn, L.: Webometrics (2004) 0.01
    0.013505171 = product of:
      0.054020684 = sum of:
        0.054020684 = weight(_text_:l in 4279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054020684 = score(doc=4279,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17396861 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043769516 = queryNorm
            0.31051973 = fieldWeight in 4279, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4279)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  4. Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval (2008) 0.01
    0.011860331 = product of:
      0.047441322 = sum of:
        0.047441322 = product of:
          0.094882645 = sum of:
            0.094882645 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094882645 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15327339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043769516 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:01:26
  5. Morris, S.A.: Mapping research specialties (2008) 0.01
    0.011860331 = product of:
      0.047441322 = sum of:
        0.047441322 = product of:
          0.094882645 = sum of:
            0.094882645 = weight(_text_:22 in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094882645 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15327339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043769516 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 9:30:22
  6. Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006) 0.01
    0.011860331 = product of:
      0.047441322 = sum of:
        0.047441322 = product of:
          0.094882645 = sum of:
            0.094882645 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094882645 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15327339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043769516 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:22:28
  7. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.01
    0.011860331 = product of:
      0.047441322 = sum of:
        0.047441322 = product of:
          0.094882645 = sum of:
            0.094882645 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094882645 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15327339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043769516 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  8. Spree, U.: Wissensorganisation und Records Management : Was ist der State of the Art? Literaturübersicht (2009) 0.01
    0.0059718033 = product of:
      0.023887213 = sum of:
        0.023887213 = product of:
          0.047774427 = sum of:
            0.047774427 = weight(_text_:der in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047774427 = score(doc=3132,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.09777089 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043769516 = queryNorm
                0.4886365 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Ordnungssysteme, vor allem in Form von Aktenplänen und business classifications schemes, gelten weiterhin als ein Kernelement von elektronischen Records Management Systemen. Die Rezeption und Nutzung von in den Informations- und Bibliothekswissenschaften entwickelten normativen Vorgaben und/oder Forschungsergebnissen zu Ordnungssystemen ist in der Records Management Community hingegen noch eher selten und zufällig. Aufgrund der Auswertung aktueller Fachliteratur zum Thema Records Management / Schriftgutverwaltung sowie der Erfahrungen der Autorin in zwei Lehrveranstaltungen, die die Eignung informationswissenschaftlicher Ansätze der Wissensorganisation auf Probleme der Schriftgutverwaltung überprüft haben, lässt sich eine Reihe von konkreten Empfehlungen für die Integration wissensorganisatorischer Expertise bei der Entwicklung von Records Management Systemen auf organisatorischer und inhaltlicher Ebene ableiten.
  9. Kim, K.-S.: Recent work in cataloging and classification, 2000-2002 (2003) 0.01
    0.0059301653 = product of:
      0.023720661 = sum of:
        0.023720661 = product of:
          0.047441322 = sum of:
            0.047441322 = weight(_text_:22 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047441322 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15327339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043769516 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.01
    0.0059301653 = product of:
      0.023720661 = sum of:
        0.023720661 = product of:
          0.047441322 = sum of:
            0.047441322 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047441322 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15327339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043769516 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.01
    0.0059301653 = product of:
      0.023720661 = sum of:
        0.023720661 = product of:
          0.047441322 = sum of:
            0.047441322 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047441322 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15327339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043769516 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Nielsen, M.L.: Thesaurus construction : key issues and selected readings (2004) 0.01
    0.0051888945 = product of:
      0.020755578 = sum of:
        0.020755578 = product of:
          0.041511156 = sum of:
            0.041511156 = weight(_text_:22 in 5006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041511156 = score(doc=5006,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15327339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043769516 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5006, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5006)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    18. 5.2006 20:06:22
  13. Weiss, A.K.; Carstens, T.V.: ¬The year's work in cataloging, 1999 (2001) 0.01
    0.0051888945 = product of:
      0.020755578 = sum of:
        0.020755578 = product of:
          0.041511156 = sum of:
            0.041511156 = weight(_text_:22 in 6084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041511156 = score(doc=6084,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15327339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043769516 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6084, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6084)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007) 0.00
    0.0044476236 = product of:
      0.017790494 = sum of:
        0.017790494 = product of:
          0.03558099 = sum of:
            0.03558099 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03558099 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15327339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043769516 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Corbett, L.E.: Serials: review of the literature 2000-2003 (2006) 0.00
    0.0037063533 = product of:
      0.014825413 = sum of:
        0.014825413 = product of:
          0.029650826 = sum of:
            0.029650826 = weight(_text_:22 in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029650826 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15327339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043769516 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22