-
Corbett, L.E.: Serials: review of the literature 2000-2003 (2006)
0.09
0.08847439 = product of:
0.17694879 = sum of:
0.17694879 = sum of:
0.142333 = weight(_text_:journals in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.142333 = score(doc=1088,freq=8.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.5547544 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
0.03461579 = weight(_text_:22 in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03461579 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The topic of electronic journals (e-journals) dominated the serials literature from 2000 to 2003. This review is limited to the events and issues within the broad topics of cost, management, and archiving. Coverage of cost includes such initiatives as PEAK, JACC, BioMed Central, SPARC, open access, the "Big Deal," and "going e-only." Librarians combated the continued price increase trend for journals, fueled in part by publisher mergers, with the economies found with bundled packages and consortial subscriptions. Serials management topics include usage statistics; core title lists; staffing needs; the "A-Z list" and other services from such companies as Serials Solutions; "deep linking"; link resolvers such as SFX; development of standards or guidelines, such as COUNTER and ERMI; tracking of license terms; vendor mergers; and the demise of integrated library systems and a subscription agent's bankruptcy. Librarians archived print volumes in storage facilities due to space shortages. Librarians and publishers struggled with electronic archiving concepts, discussing questions of who, where, and how. Projects such as LOCKSS tested potential solutions, but missing online content due to the Tasini court case and retractions posed more archiving difficulties. The serials literature captured much of the upheaval resulting from the rapid pace of changes, many linked to the advent of e-journals.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Kling, R.: ¬The Internet and unrefereed scholarly publishing (2003)
0.06
0.064049855 = product of:
0.12809971 = sum of:
0.12809971 = product of:
0.25619942 = sum of:
0.25619942 = weight(_text_:journals in 4272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25619942 = score(doc=4272,freq=18.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.9985579 = fieldWeight in 4272, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4272)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In the early 1990s, much of the enthusiasm for the use of electronic media to enhance scholarly communication focused an electronic journals, especially electronic-only, (pure) e journals (see for example, Peek & Newby's [1996] anthology). Much of the systematic research an the use of electronic media to enhance scholarly communication also focused an electronic journals. However, by the late 1990s, numerous scientific publishers had transformed their paper journals (p journals) into paper and electronic journals (p-e journals) and sold them via subscription models that did not provide the significant costs savings, speed of access, or breadth of audience that pure e -journal advocates had expected (Okerson, 1996). In 2001, a group of senior life scientists led a campaign to have publishers make their journals freely available online six months after publication (Russo, 2001). The campaign leaders, using the name "Public Library of Science," asked scientists to boycott journals that did not comply with these demands for open access. Although the proposal was discussed in scientific magazines and conferences, it apparently did not persuade any journal publishers to comply (Young, 2002). Most productive scientists, who work for major universities and research institutes
-
Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007)
0.06
0.06346937 = product of:
0.12693875 = sum of:
0.12693875 = sum of:
0.08539981 = weight(_text_:journals in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08539981 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.33285263 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.041538943 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041538943 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Kling, R.; Callahan, E.: Electronic journals, the Internet, and scholarly communication (2002)
0.05
0.049816553 = product of:
0.099633105 = sum of:
0.099633105 = product of:
0.19926621 = sum of:
0.19926621 = weight(_text_:journals in 1969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19926621 = score(doc=1969,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.77665615 = fieldWeight in 1969, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1969)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
El-Sherbini, M.: Selected cataloging tools on the Internet (2003)
0.03
0.028466603 = product of:
0.056933206 = sum of:
0.056933206 = product of:
0.11386641 = sum of:
0.11386641 = weight(_text_:journals in 1997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11386641 = score(doc=1997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.44380352 = fieldWeight in 1997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1997)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This bibliography contains selected cataloging tools an the Internet. It is divided into seven sections as follows: authority management and subject headings tools; cataloging tools by type of materials; dictionaries, encyclopedias, and place names; listservs and workshops; software and vendors; technical service professional organizations; and journals and newsletters. Resources are arranged in alphabetical order under each topic. Selected cataloging tools are annotated. There is some overlap since a given web site can cover many tools.
-
Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval (2008)
0.03
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = product of:
0.110770516 = sum of:
0.110770516 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110770516 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:01:26
-
Morris, S.A.: Mapping research specialties (2008)
0.03
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = product of:
0.110770516 = sum of:
0.110770516 = weight(_text_:22 in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110770516 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 9:30:22
-
Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006)
0.03
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = product of:
0.110770516 = sum of:
0.110770516 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110770516 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:22:28
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.03
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = product of:
0.110770516 = sum of:
0.110770516 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110770516 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Chen, A.-P.; Chen, M.-Y.: ¬A review of survey research in knowledge management performance (2005)
0.02
0.021349952 = product of:
0.042699903 = sum of:
0.042699903 = product of:
0.08539981 = sum of:
0.08539981 = weight(_text_:journals in 3025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08539981 = score(doc=3025,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.33285263 = fieldWeight in 3025, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3025)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys knowledge management (KM) development using a literature review and classification of articles from 1995 to 2004 with a keyword index and article abstract in order to explore how KM performance evaluation has developed during this period. Based on the scope of 76 articles from 78 academic journals of KM, this paper surveys and classifies KM measurements using the following eight categories: qualitative analysis, quantitative analysis, financial indicator analysis, non-financial indicator analysis, internal performance analysis, external performance analysis, project-oriented analysis, and organizational-oriented analysis together with their measurement matrices for different research and problem domains. Discussion is presented, indicating the followings future development directions for KM performance evaluation: (1) KM performance evaluation is getting more important. (2) The quantitative analysis is the primary methodology in KM performance evaluation. (3) Firms are now highlighting the KM performance of competitors, through benchmarking or best practices, rather than internally auditing KM performance via balanced scorecard. (4) Firms may begin to focus more on project management measurement, than on the entire organization.
-
Fox, E.A.; Urs, S.R.: Digital libraries (2002)
0.02
0.020128928 = product of:
0.040257856 = sum of:
0.040257856 = product of:
0.08051571 = sum of:
0.08051571 = weight(_text_:journals in 4299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08051571 = score(doc=4299,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.3138165 = fieldWeight in 4299, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4299)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The emergence of digital libraries (DLs), at the interface of library and information science with computer and communication technologies, helped to expand significantly the literature in all of these areas during the late 1990s. The pace of development is reflected by the number of special issues of major journals in information science and computer science, and the increasing number of workshops and conferences an digital libraries. For example, starting in 1995, the Communications of the ACM has devoted three special issues to the topic (Fox, Akscyn, Furuta, & Leggett, 1995; Fox & Marchionini, 1998, 2001). The Journal of the American Society for Information Science devoted two issues to digital libraries (H. Chen, 2000; Fox & Lunin, 1993); Information Processing & Management and the Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation each had one special issue (Chen & Fox, 1996; Marchionini & Fox, 1999). The domain of digital libraries, though still evolving, has matured over the last decade, as demonstrated by coverage through D-Lib (http://www.dlib.org), the International Journal an Digital Libraries (http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00799), and two overview works (W Y Arms, 2000; Lesk, 1997; both of which have also served as textbooks). Sun Microsystems published a small book to guide those planning a digital library (Noerr, 2000), and IBM has been developing commercial products for digital libraries since 1994 (IBM, 2000). A number of Web sites have extensive sets of pointers to information an DLs (D-Lib Forum, 2001; Fox, 1998a; Habing, 1998; Hein, 2000; Schwartz, 2001a, 2001b). Further, the field has attracted the attention of diverse academics, research groups, and practitionersmany of whom have attended tutorials, workshops, or conferences, e.g., the Joint Conference an Digital Libraries, which is a sequel to a separate series run by ACM and IEEE-CS. Therefore, it is timely that ARIST publishes this first review focusing specifically an digital libraries. There has been no ARIST chapter to date directly dealing with the area of DLs, though some related domains have been covered-particularly: information retrieval, user interfaces (Marchionini & Komlodi, 1998), social informatics of DLs (Bishop & Star, 1996), and scholarly communication (see Borgman and Furner's chapter in this volume). This chapter provides an overview of the diverse aspects and dimensions of DL research, practice, and literature, identifying trends and delineating research directions.
-
Kim, K.-S.: Recent work in cataloging and classification, 2000-2002 (2003)
0.01
0.0138463145 = product of:
0.027692629 = sum of:
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055385258 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.01
0.0138463145 = product of:
0.027692629 = sum of:
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055385258 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007)
0.01
0.0138463145 = product of:
0.027692629 = sum of:
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055385258 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Nielsen, M.L.: Thesaurus construction : key issues and selected readings (2004)
0.01
0.012115525 = product of:
0.02423105 = sum of:
0.02423105 = product of:
0.0484621 = sum of:
0.0484621 = weight(_text_:22 in 5006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0484621 = score(doc=5006,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5006, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5006)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 5.2006 20:06:22
-
Weiss, A.K.; Carstens, T.V.: ¬The year's work in cataloging, 1999 (2001)
0.01
0.012115525 = product of:
0.02423105 = sum of:
0.02423105 = product of:
0.0484621 = sum of:
0.0484621 = weight(_text_:22 in 6084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0484621 = score(doc=6084,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6084, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6084)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
