Search (233 results, page 12 of 12)

  • × theme_ss:"Literaturübersicht"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. White, H.D.; McCain, K.W.: Visualization of literatures (1997) 0.00 
    0.0041178903 = product of:
  0.01235367 = sum of:
    0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01235367 = score(doc=2291,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 32(1997), S.99-168
  2. Fagan, J.C.: Usability studies of faceted browsing : a literature review (2010) 0.00 
    0.0041178903 = product of:
  0.01235367 = sum of:
    0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 4396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01235367 = score(doc=4396,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4396, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4396)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 2010, June, S.58-66
  3. Rasmussen, E.M.: Indexing images (1997) 0.00 
    0.0035296201 = product of:
  0.01058886 = sum of:
    0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 2215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01058886 = score(doc=2215,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2215, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2215)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 32(1997), S.169-196
  4. Jascó, P.: Content evaluation of databases (1997) 0.00 
    0.0035296201 = product of:
  0.01058886 = sum of:
    0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01058886 = score(doc=2299,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 32(1997), S.231-267
  5. Yee, M.M.: System design and cataloging meet the user : user interfaces to online public access catalogs (1991) 0.00 
    0.0035296201 = product of:
  0.01058886 = sum of:
    0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 2782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01058886 = score(doc=2782,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2782, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2782)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 42(1991), S.78-98
  6. Kling, R.: ¬The Internet and unrefereed scholarly publishing (2003) 0.00 
    0.0035296201 = product of:
  0.01058886 = sum of:
    0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 4272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01058886 = score(doc=4272,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4272, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4272)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 38(2004), S.591-632
  7. Davenport, E.; Hall, H.: Organizational Knowledge and Communities of Practice (2002) 0.00 
    0.0035296201 = product of:
  0.01058886 = sum of:
    0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 4293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01058886 = score(doc=4293,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4293, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4293)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 36(2002), S.171-228
  8. Desale, S.K.; Kumbhar, R.: Research on automatic classification of documents in library environment : a literature review (2013) 0.00 
    0.0035296201 = product of:
  0.01058886 = sum of:
    0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 1071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01058886 = score(doc=1071,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1071, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1071)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper aims to provide an overview of automatic classification research, which focuses on issues related to the automatic classification of documents in a library environment. The review covers literature published in mainstream library and information science studies. The review was done on literature published in both academic and professional LIS journals and other documents. This review reveals that basically three types of research are being done on automatic classification: 1) hierarchical classification using different library classification schemes, 2) text categorization and document categorization using different type of classifiers with or without using training documents, and 3) automatic bibliographic classification. Predominantly this research is directed towards solving problems of organization of digital documents in an online environment. However, very little research is devoted towards solving the problems of arrangement of physical documents.
  9. Sugimoto, C.R.; Work, S.; Larivière, V.; Haustein, S.: Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics : A review of the literature (2017) 0.00 
    0.0035296201 = product of:
  0.01058886 = sum of:
    0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 3781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01058886 = score(doc=3781,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3781, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3781)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.9, S.2037-2062
  10. Callahan, E.: Interface design and culture (2004) 0.00 
    0.0033277576 = product of:
  0.009983272 = sum of:
    0.009983272 = weight(_text_:information in 4281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009983272 = score(doc=4281,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 4281, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4281)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    It is common knowledge that computer interfaces in different cultures vary. Interface designers present information in different languages, use different iconography to designate concepts, and employ different standards for dates, time, and numbers. These manifest differences beg the question of how easily an interface designed in one country can be used in and transferred to another country. Are the challenges involved in adaptation merely cosmetic or are they shaped by more profound forces? Do all cultures respond to interfaces in similar ways, or does culture itself shape user comprehension? If culture is a factor in explaining varied user reactions to comparable interfaces, what specific cultural dimensions are responsible for the divergences? Do differences reside mainly at the level of national cultures, or do they depend an other variables such as class, gender, age, education, and expertise with technology? In the face of a potentially large number of explanatory variables, how do we delimit a workable concept of culture and yet remain cognizant of other factors that might shape the results of culture and interface research? Questions such as these have been asked in the ergonomics community since the early 1970s, when the industrialization of developing countries created a need for more research an cultural differences (Honold, 1999), resulting in an increased interest in the universal applicability of ergonomic principles. This trend continued after the reunification of Germany and the emergence of market economies in Eastern Europe (Nielsen, 1990). In the mid-1990s, as markets outside the U.S. rapidly expanded, it became necessary to develop appropriate user interfaces for non-Western cultures in order to facilitate international cooperation. This fresh impetus for research led to the development of practical guidelines and a body of Gase studies and examples of possible solutions. Most recently we have seen attempts to provide a theoretical foundation for cross-cultural usability engineering and experimental comparison studies (Honold, 1999).
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 39(2005), S.257-310
  11. Dewey, S.H.: Foucault's toolbox : use of Foucault's writings in LIS journal literature, 1990-2016 (2020) 0.00 
    0.00294135 = product of:
  0.0088240495 = sum of:
    0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 5841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0088240495 = score(doc=5841,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5841, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5841)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose To provide a close, detailed analysis of the frequency, nature, and depth of visible use of Michel Foucault's works by library and information science/studies (LIS) scholars. Design/methodology/approach The study conducted extensive full-text searches in a large number of electronically available LIS journal databases to find citations of Foucault's works, then examined each cited article to evaluate the nature and depth of use. Findings Most uses of Foucault are brief or in passing. In-depth explorations of Foucault's works are comparatively rare and relatively little-used by other LIS scholars. Yet the relatively brief uses of Foucault encompass a wide array of different topics spread across a wide spectrum of LIS journal literature. Research limitations/implications The study was limited to articles from particular relatively prominent LIS journals. Results might vary if different journals or non-journal literature were studied. More sophisticated bibliometric techniques might reveal different relative performance among journals and might better test, confirm, or reject various patterns and relationships found here. Other research approaches, such as discourse analysis, social network analysis, or scholar interviews, might reveal patterns of use and influence not visible in this literature sample. Originality/value This intensive study of both quality and quantity of citations may challenge some existing assumptions regarding citation analysis, plus illuminating Foucault scholarship. It also indicates possible problems for future application of artificial intelligence (AI) approaches to similar depth-of-use studies.
  12. Siqueira, J.; Martins, D.L.: Workflow models for aggregating cultural heritage data on the web : a systematic literature review (2022) 0.00 
    0.00294135 = product of:
  0.0088240495 = sum of:
    0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0088240495 = score(doc=464,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 464, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=464)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.2, S.204-224
  13. Rogers, Y.: New theoretical approaches for human-computer interaction (2003) 0.00 
    0.0020589451 = product of:
  0.006176835 = sum of:
    0.006176835 = weight(_text_:information in 4270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006176835 = score(doc=4270,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.06788416 = fieldWeight in 4270, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4270)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 38(2004), S.87-144

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 225
  • d 5
  • pt 1
  • ru 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

Themes