Search (84 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Literaturübersicht"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Kranich, N.; Schement, J.: Information commons (2008) 0.01 
    0.008243278 = product of:
  0.03297311 = sum of:
    0.03297311 = weight(_text_:information in 3724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03297311 = score(doc=3724,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.5375032 = fieldWeight in 3724, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3724)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.xxx-xxx
    Theme
    Information
  2. Black, A.: ¬The history of information (2006) 0.01 
    0.008243278 = product of:
  0.03297311 = sum of:
    0.03297311 = weight(_text_:information in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03297311 = score(doc=4189,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.5375032 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 40(2006), S.xxx-xxx
    Theme
    Information
  3. Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006) 0.01 
    0.008243278 = product of:
  0.03297311 = sum of:
    0.03297311 = weight(_text_:information in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03297311 = score(doc=4368,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.5375032 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 40(2006), S.xxx-xxx
    Theme
    Information
  4. Davies, P.H.J.: Intelligence, information technology, and information warfare (2002) 0.01 
    0.008243278 = product of:
  0.03297311 = sum of:
    0.03297311 = weight(_text_:information in 3832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03297311 = score(doc=3832,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.5375032 = fieldWeight in 3832, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3832)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 36(2002), S.313-352
  5. Day, R.E.: Poststructuralism and information studies (2004) 0.01 
    0.008243278 = product of:
  0.03297311 = sum of:
    0.03297311 = weight(_text_:information in 4269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03297311 = score(doc=4269,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.5375032 = fieldWeight in 4269, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4269)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 39(2005), S.347-394
    Theme
    Information
  6. Ruthven, R.: Interactive information retrieval (2008) 0.01 
    0.0067306077 = product of:
  0.02692243 = sum of:
    0.02692243 = weight(_text_:information in 2839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02692243 = score(doc=2839,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 2839, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2839)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.xxx-xxx
  7. Andersen, J.: ¬The concept of genre in information studies (2008) 0.01 
    0.0067306077 = product of:
  0.02692243 = sum of:
    0.02692243 = weight(_text_:information in 3504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02692243 = score(doc=3504,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 3504, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3504)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.xxx-xxx
  8. Mezick, E.M.; Koenig, M.E.D.: Education for information science (2008) 0.01 
    0.0067306077 = product of:
  0.02692243 = sum of:
    0.02692243 = weight(_text_:information in 3817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02692243 = score(doc=3817,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 3817, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3817)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.xxx-xxx
  9. Priss, U.: Formal concept analysis in information science (2006) 0.01 
    0.0067306077 = product of:
  0.02692243 = sum of:
    0.02692243 = weight(_text_:information in 4305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02692243 = score(doc=4305,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 4305, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4305)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 40(2006), S.xxx-xxx
  10. Foster, J.: Collaborative information seeking and retrieval (2006) 0.01 
    0.0067306077 = product of:
  0.02692243 = sum of:
    0.02692243 = weight(_text_:information in 4321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02692243 = score(doc=4321,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 4321, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4321)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 40(2006), S.xxx-xxx
  11. Case, D.: Information seeking (2006) 0.01 
    0.0067306077 = product of:
  0.02692243 = sum of:
    0.02692243 = weight(_text_:information in 4326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02692243 = score(doc=4326,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 4326, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4326)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 40(2006), S.xxx-xxx
  12. Burke, C.: History of information science (2007) 0.01 
    0.0067306077 = product of:
  0.02692243 = sum of:
    0.02692243 = weight(_text_:information in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02692243 = score(doc=4694,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 41(2007), S.xxx-xxx
  13. Jones, W.: Personal information management (2007) 0.01 
    0.0067306077 = product of:
  0.02692243 = sum of:
    0.02692243 = weight(_text_:information in 5382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02692243 = score(doc=5382,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 5382, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5382)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 41(2007), S.xxx-xxx
  14. Bearman, D.: Digital libraries (2007) 0.01 
    0.0067306077 = product of:
  0.02692243 = sum of:
    0.02692243 = weight(_text_:information in 5634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02692243 = score(doc=5634,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 5634, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5634)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 41(2007), S.xxx-xxx
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  15. Jacob, E.; Loehrlein, A.: Information architecture (2009) 0.01 
    0.0067306077 = product of:
  0.02692243 = sum of:
    0.02692243 = weight(_text_:information in 5831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02692243 = score(doc=5831,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 5831, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5831)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 43(2009), S.xxx-xxx
  16. Courtright, C.: Context in information behavior research (2007) 0.01 
    0.0067306077 = product of:
  0.02692243 = sum of:
    0.02692243 = weight(_text_:information in 6090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02692243 = score(doc=6090,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 6090, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6090)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 41(2007), S.xxx-xxx
  17. Wilson, T.D.: Activity theory and information seeking (2008) 0.01 
    0.0067306077 = product of:
  0.02692243 = sum of:
    0.02692243 = weight(_text_:information in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02692243 = score(doc=701,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.xxx-xxx
  18. Fisher, K.; Julien, H.: Information behavior (2009) 0.01 
    0.0067306077 = product of:
  0.02692243 = sum of:
    0.02692243 = weight(_text_:information in 4122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02692243 = score(doc=4122,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 4122, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4122)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 43(2009), S.xxx-xxx
  19. Cornelius, I.: Theorizing information for information science (2002) 0.01 
    0.0064176964 = product of:
  0.025670785 = sum of:
    0.025670785 = weight(_text_:information in 4244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025670785 = score(doc=4244,freq=76.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.4184661 = fieldWeight in 4244, product of:
          8.717798 = tf(freq=76.0), with freq of:
            76.0 = termFreq=76.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4244)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Does information science have a theory of information? There seems to be a tendency within information science to seek a theory of information, but the search is apparently unproductive (Hjoerland, 1998; Saracevic, 1999). This review brings together work from inside and outside the field of information science, showing that other perspectives an information theory could be of assistance. Constructivist claims that emphasize the uniqueness of the individual experience of information, maintaining that there is no information independent of our social practices (Cornelius, 1996a), are also mentioned. Such a position would be echoed in a symbolic interactionist approach. Conventionally, the history of attempts to develop a theory of information date from the publication of Claude Shannon's work in 1948, and his joint publication of that work with an essay by Warren Weaver in 1949 (Shannon & Weaver, 1949/1963). Information science found itself alongside many other disciplines attempting to develop a theory of information (Machlup & Mansfield, 1983). From Weaver's essay stems the claim that the basic concepts of Shannon's mathematical theory of communication, which Shannon later referred to as a theory of information, can be applied in disciplines outside electrical engineering, even in the social sciences.
    Shannon provides a model whereby an information source selects a desired message, out of a set of possible messages, that is then formed into a signal. The signal is sent over the communication channel to a receiver, which then transforms the signal back to a message that is relayed to its destination (Shannon & Weaver, 1949/1963, p. 7). Problems connected with this model have remained with us. Some of the concepts are ambiguous; the identification of information with a process has spancelled the debate; the problems of measuring the amount of information, the relation of information to meaning, and questions about the truth value of information have remained. Balancing attention between the process and the act of receiving information, and deterrnining the character of the receiver, has also been the focus of work and debate. Information science has mined work from other disciplines involving information theory and has also produced its own theory. The desire for theory remains (Hjorland, 1998; Saracevic, 1999), but what theory will deliver is unclear. The distinction between data and information, or communication and information, is not of concern here. The convention that data, at some point of use, become information, and that information is transferred in a process of communication suffices for this discussion. Substitution of any of these terms is not a problem. More problematic is the relationship between information and knowledge. It seems accepted that at some point the data by perception, or selection, become information, which feeds and alters knowledge structures in a human recipient. What that process of alteration is, and its implications, remain problematic. This review considers the following questions: 1. What can be gleaned from the history of reviews of information in information science? 2. What current maps, guides, and surveys are available to elaborate our understanding of the issues? 3. Is there a parallel development of work outside information science an information theory of use to us? 4. Is there a dominant view of information within information science? 5. What can we say about issues like measurement, meaning, and misinformation? 6. Is there other current work of relevance that can assist attempts, in information science, to develop a theory of information?
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 36(2002), S.393-426
    Theme
    Information
  20. Vakkari, P.: Task-based information searching (2002) 0.01 
    0.0059192525 = product of:
  0.02367701 = sum of:
    0.02367701 = weight(_text_:information in 4288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02367701 = score(doc=4288,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034944877 = queryNorm
        0.38596505 = fieldWeight in 4288, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4288)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The rationale for using information systems is to find information that helps us in our daily activities, be they tasks or interests. Systems are expected to support us in searching for and identifying useful information. Although the activities and tasks performed by humans generate information needs and searching, they have attracted little attention in studies of information searching. Such studies have concentrated an search tasks rather than the activities that trigger them. It is obvious that our understanding of information searching is only partial, if we are not able to connect aspects of searching to the related task. The expected contribution of information to the task is reflected in relevance assessments of the information items found, and in the search tactics and use of the system in general. Taking the task into account seems to be a necessary condition for understanding and explaining information searching, and, by extension, for effective systems design.
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 37(2003), S.413-464

Authors

Languages

  • e 83
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 80
  • b 5
  • m 3
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes