Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Literaturübersicht"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Deokattey, S.; Sharma, S.B.K.; Kumar, G.R.; Bhanumurthy, K.: Knowledge organization research : an overview (2015) 0.06 
    0.056185715 = product of:
  0.11237143 = sum of:
    0.11237143 = sum of:
      0.06273113 = weight(_text_:r in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06273113 = score(doc=2092,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05234091 = queryNorm
          0.3620595 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
      0.049640294 = weight(_text_:22 in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049640294 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05234091 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The object of this literature review is to provide a historical perspective of R and D work in the area of Knowledge Organization (KO). This overview/summarization will provide information on major areas of KO. Journal articles published in core areas of KO: (Classification, Indexing, Thesauri and Taxonomies, Internet and Subject approach to information in the electronic era and Ontologies will be predominantly covered in this literature review. Coverage in this overview may not be completely exhaustive, but it succinctly showcases major developments in the area of KO. This review is a good source of additional reading material on KO apart from prescribed reading material on KO
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:13:38
    Type
    r
  2. Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011) 0.02 
    0.024820147 = product of:
  0.049640294 = sum of:
    0.049640294 = product of:
      0.09928059 = sum of:
        0.09928059 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09928059 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05234091 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27.12.2014 18:54:22
  3. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.01 
    0.012410074 = product of:
  0.024820147 = sum of:
    0.024820147 = product of:
      0.049640294 = sum of:
        0.049640294 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049640294 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05234091 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Martin, K.E.; Mundle, K.: Positioning libraries for a new bibliographic universe (2014) 0.01 
    0.010637206 = product of:
  0.021274412 = sum of:
    0.021274412 = product of:
      0.042548824 = sum of:
        0.042548824 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042548824 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05234091 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Meschede, C.; Henkel, C.M.: Library and information science and sustainable development : a structured literature review (2019) 0.01 
    0.010622948 = product of:
  0.021245897 = sum of:
    0.021245897 = product of:
      0.08498359 = sum of:
        0.08498359 = weight(_text_:authors in 5472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08498359 = score(doc=5472,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05234091 = queryNorm
            0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 5472, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5472)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose Awareness on and importance of sustainability in all aspects of our lives is becoming more and more important. The question arises, how - not if - scientists can contribute to a sustainable development. As information plays an important role for development, information scientists should be included in this debate. However, is there a sustainable information science or an information science of sustainability? The purpose of this paper is to perform a mapping of publications in library and information science (LIS) directly dealing with sustainability and sustainable development. Design/methodology/approach A structured literature review was conducted, enhanced by bibliometric analyses. For this purpose, 102 LIS journals and conferences were considered. The authors identified 81 publications dealing with sustainability and sustainable development and analyzed the concrete contents and methodological approaches of these. Findings A large proportion of articles could be found dealing with sustainable development and libraries. Other publications focus on information and communication technology or information systems. Only few articles deal with further topics like government, urban development or scientific output. Research limitations/implications Sustainability and sustainable development are complex topics. This work only considers literature whose title or keywords contain the string sustainab*. Originality/value The presented work helps to get an overview on sustainability research and activities in the LIS field and additionally, potential research gaps may be identified. The authors call for more research in this area and concrete ideas to help develop a sustainable future.
  6. Desale, S.K.; Kumbhar, R.: Research on automatic classification of documents in library environment : a literature review (2013) 0.01 
    0.009505202 = product of:
  0.019010404 = sum of:
    0.019010404 = product of:
      0.03802081 = sum of:
        0.03802081 = weight(_text_:r in 1071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03802081 = score(doc=1071,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05234091 = queryNorm
            0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 1071, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1071)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Types

Themes