Search (90 results, page 4 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Literaturübersicht"
  1. Saracevic, T.: Relevance: a review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II : nature and manifestations of relevance (2007) 0.01
    0.005272096 = product of:
      0.02636048 = sum of:
        0.02636048 = weight(_text_:system in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02636048 = score(doc=612,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.19684705 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Relevance is a, if not even the, key notion in information science in general and information retrieval in particular. This two-part critical review traces and synthesizes the scholarship on relevance over the past 30 years and provides an updated framework within which the still widely dissonant ideas and works about relevance might be interpreted and related. It is a continuation and update of a similar review that appeared in 1975 under the same title, considered here as being Part I. The present review is organized into two parts: Part II addresses the questions related to nature and manifestations of relevance, and Part III addresses questions related to relevance behavior and effects. In Part II, the nature of relevance is discussed in terms of meaning ascribed to relevance, theories used or proposed, and models that have been developed. The manifestations of relevance are classified as to several kinds of relevance that form an interdependent system of relevances. In Part III, relevance behavior and effects are synthesized using experimental and observational works that incorporate data. In both parts, each section concludes with a summary that in effect provides an interpretation and synthesis of contemporary thinking on the topic treated or suggests hypotheses for future research. Analyses of some of the major trends that shape relevance work are offered in conclusions.
    Content
    Relevant: Having significant and demonstrable bearing on the matter at hand.[Note *][A version of this article has been published in 2006 as a chapter in E.G. Abels & D.A. Nitecki (Eds.), Advances in Librarianship (Vol. 30, pp. 3-71). San Diego: Academic Press. (Saracevic, 2006).] Relevance: The ability as of an information retrieval system to retrieve material that satisfies the needs of the user. - Merriam-Webster Dictionary 2005
  2. Haythornthwaite, C.; Hagar, C.: ¬The social worlds of the Web (2004) 0.00
    0.0046599186 = product of:
      0.023299592 = sum of:
        0.023299592 = weight(_text_:system in 4282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023299592 = score(doc=4282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 4282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4282)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    We know this Web world. We live in it, particularly those of us in developed countries. Even if we do not go online daily, we live with itour culture is imprinted with online activity and vocabulary: e-mailing colleagues, surfing the Web, posting Web pages, blogging, gender-bending in cyberspace, texting and instant messaging friends, engaging in ecommerce, entering an online chat room, or morphing in an online world. We use it-to conduct business, find information, talk with friends and colleagues. We know it is something separate, yet we incorporate it into our daily lives. We identify with it, bringing to it behaviors and expectations we hold for the world in general. We approach it as explorers and entrepreneurs, ready to move into unknown opportunities and territory; creators and engineers, eager to build new structures; utopians for whom "the world of the Web" represents the chance to start again and "get it right" this time; utilitarians, ready to get what we can out of the new structures; and dystopians, for whom this is just more evidence that there is no way to "get it right." The word "world" has many connotations. The Oxford English Dictionary (http://dictionary.oed.com) gives 27 definitions for the noun "world" including: - The sphere within which one's interests are bound up or one's activities find scope; (one's) sphere of action or thought; the "realm" within which one moves or lives. - A group or system of things or beings associated by common characteristics (denoted by a qualifying word or phrase), or considered as constituting a unity. - Human society considered in relation to its activities, difficulties, temptations, and the like; hence, contextually, the ways, practices, or customs of the people among whom one lives; the occupations and interests of society at large.
  3. Ding, Y.: Scholarly communication and bibliometrics : Part 1: The scholarly communication model: literature review (1998) 0.00
    0.003875286 = product of:
      0.01937643 = sum of:
        0.01937643 = product of:
          0.05812929 = sum of:
            0.05812929 = weight(_text_:29 in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05812929 = score(doc=3995,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 23(1998) no.2, S.20-29
  4. Rader, H.B.: Library orientation and instruction - 1993 (1994) 0.00
    0.0038404248 = product of:
      0.019202124 = sum of:
        0.019202124 = product of:
          0.057606373 = sum of:
            0.057606373 = weight(_text_:22 in 209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057606373 = score(doc=209,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 209, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=209)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Reference services review. 22(1994) no.4, S.81-
  5. Yang, K.: Information retrieval on the Web (2004) 0.00
    0.003727935 = product of:
      0.018639674 = sum of:
        0.018639674 = weight(_text_:system in 4278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018639674 = score(doc=4278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.13919188 = fieldWeight in 4278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4278)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    How do we find information an the Web? Although information on the Web is distributed and decentralized, the Web can be viewed as a single, virtual document collection. In that regard, the fundamental questions and approaches of traditional information retrieval (IR) research (e.g., term weighting, query expansion) are likely to be relevant in Web document retrieval. Findings from traditional IR research, however, may not always be applicable in a Web setting. The Web document collection - massive in size and diverse in content, format, purpose, and quality - challenges the validity of previous research findings that are based an relatively small and homogeneous test collections. Moreover, some traditional IR approaches, although applicable in theory, may be impossible or impractical to implement in a Web setting. For instance, the size, distribution, and dynamic nature of Web information make it extremely difficult to construct a complete and up-to-date data representation of the kind required for a model IR system. To further complicate matters, information seeking on the Web is diverse in character and unpredictable in nature. Web searchers come from all walks of life and are motivated by many kinds of information needs. The wide range of experience, knowledge, motivation, and purpose means that searchers can express diverse types of information needs in a wide variety of ways with differing criteria for satisfying those needs. Conventional evaluation measures, such as precision and recall, may no longer be appropriate for Web IR, where a representative test collection is all but impossible to construct. Finding information on the Web creates many new challenges for, and exacerbates some old problems in, IR research. At the same time, the Web is rich in new types of information not present in most IR test collections. Hyperlinks, usage statistics, document markup tags, and collections of topic hierarchies such as Yahoo! (http://www.yahoo.com) present an opportunity to leverage Web-specific document characteristics in novel ways that go beyond the term-based retrieval framework of traditional IR. Consequently, researchers in Web IR have reexamined the findings from traditional IR research.
  6. Zhu, B.; Chen, H.: Information visualization (2004) 0.00
    0.003261943 = product of:
      0.016309716 = sum of:
        0.016309716 = weight(_text_:system in 4276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016309716 = score(doc=4276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.1217929 = fieldWeight in 4276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4276)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Visualization can be classified as scientific visualization, software visualization, or information visualization. Although the data differ, the underlying techniques have much in common. They use the same elements (visual cues) and follow the same rules of combining visual cues to deliver patterns. They all involve understanding human perception (Encarnacao, Foley, Bryson, & Feiner, 1994) and require domain knowledge (Tufte, 1990). Because most decisions are based an unstructured information, such as text documents, Web pages, or e-mail messages, this chapter focuses an the visualization of unstructured textual documents. The chapter reviews information visualization techniques developed over the last decade and examines how they have been applied in different domains. The first section provides the background by describing visualization history and giving overviews of scientific, software, and information visualization as well as the perceptual aspects of visualization. The next section assesses important visualization techniques that convert abstract information into visual objects and facilitate navigation through displays an a computer screen. It also explores information analysis algorithms that can be applied to identify or extract salient visualizable structures from collections of information. Information visualization systems that integrate different types of technologies to address problems in different domains are then surveyed; and we move an to a survey and critique of visualization system evaluation studies. The chapter concludes with a summary and identification of future research directions.
  7. O'Brien, A.: Online catalogs : enhancements and developments (1994) 0.00
    0.0031002287 = product of:
      0.015501143 = sum of:
        0.015501143 = product of:
          0.04650343 = sum of:
            0.04650343 = weight(_text_:29 in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04650343 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 29(1994), S.219-242
  8. Schamber, L.: Relevance and information behavior (1994) 0.00
    0.0031002287 = product of:
      0.015501143 = sum of:
        0.015501143 = product of:
          0.04650343 = sum of:
            0.04650343 = weight(_text_:29 in 1004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04650343 = score(doc=1004,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1004, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1004)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 29(1994), S.3-48
  9. Rothenberg, D.: Information technology in education (1994) 0.00
    0.0031002287 = product of:
      0.015501143 = sum of:
        0.015501143 = product of:
          0.04650343 = sum of:
            0.04650343 = weight(_text_:29 in 1111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04650343 = score(doc=1111,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1111, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1111)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 29(1994), S.277-302
  10. Bath, P.A.: Data mining in health and medical information (2003) 0.00
    0.0031002287 = product of:
      0.015501143 = sum of:
        0.015501143 = product of:
          0.04650343 = sum of:
            0.04650343 = weight(_text_:29 in 4263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04650343 = score(doc=4263,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14956595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4263, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4263)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    23.10.2005 18:29:03
  11. Hsueh, D.C.: Recon road maps : retrospective conversion literature, 1980-1990 (1992) 0.00
    0.0030723398 = product of:
      0.015361699 = sum of:
        0.015361699 = product of:
          0.046085097 = sum of:
            0.046085097 = weight(_text_:22 in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046085097 = score(doc=2193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 14(1992) nos.3/4, S.5-22
  12. Gabbard, R.: Recent literature shows accelerated growth in hypermedia tools : an annotated bibliography (1994) 0.00
    0.0030723398 = product of:
      0.015361699 = sum of:
        0.015361699 = product of:
          0.046085097 = sum of:
            0.046085097 = weight(_text_:22 in 8460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046085097 = score(doc=8460,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8460, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8460)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Reference services review. 22(1994) no.2, S.31-40
  13. Buckland, M.K.; Liu, Z.: History of information science (1995) 0.00
    0.0030723398 = product of:
      0.015361699 = sum of:
        0.015361699 = product of:
          0.046085097 = sum of:
            0.046085097 = weight(_text_:22 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046085097 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    13. 6.1996 19:22:20
  14. Haas, S.W.: Natural language processing : toward large-scale, robust systems (1996) 0.00
    0.0030723398 = product of:
      0.015361699 = sum of:
        0.015361699 = product of:
          0.046085097 = sum of:
            0.046085097 = weight(_text_:22 in 7415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046085097 = score(doc=7415,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7415, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7415)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of natural language processing updating an earlier review published in ARIST 22(1987). Discusses important developments that have allowed for significant advances in the field of natural language processing: materials and resources; knowledge based systems and statistical approaches; and a strong emphasis on evaluation. Reviews some natural language processing applications and common problems still awaiting solution. Considers closely related applications such as language generation and th egeneration phase of machine translation which face the same problems as natural language processing. Covers natural language methodologies for information retrieval only briefly
  15. Kim, K.-S.: Recent work in cataloging and classification, 2000-2002 (2003) 0.00
    0.0030723398 = product of:
      0.015361699 = sum of:
        0.015361699 = product of:
          0.046085097 = sum of:
            0.046085097 = weight(_text_:22 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046085097 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.00
    0.0030723398 = product of:
      0.015361699 = sum of:
        0.015361699 = product of:
          0.046085097 = sum of:
            0.046085097 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046085097 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.00
    0.0030723398 = product of:
      0.015361699 = sum of:
        0.015361699 = product of:
          0.046085097 = sum of:
            0.046085097 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046085097 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Khoo, S.G.; Na, J.-C.: Semantic relations in information science (2006) 0.00
    0.0027959512 = product of:
      0.013979756 = sum of:
        0.013979756 = weight(_text_:system in 1978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013979756 = score(doc=1978,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04251826 = queryNorm
            0.104393914 = fieldWeight in 1978, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1978)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter examines the nature of semantic relations and their main applications in information science. The nature and types of semantic relations are discussed from the perspectives of linguistics and psychology. An overview of the semantic relations used in knowledge structures such as thesauri and ontologies is provided, as well as the main techniques used in the automatic extraction of semantic relations from text. The chapter then reviews the use of semantic relations in information extraction, information retrieval, question-answering, and automatic text summarization applications. Concepts and relations are the foundation of knowledge and thought. When we look at the world, we perceive not a mass of colors but objects to which we automatically assign category labels. Our perceptual system automatically segments the world into concepts and categories. Concepts are the building blocks of knowledge; relations act as the cement that links concepts into knowledge structures. We spend much of our lives identifying regular associations and relations between objects, events, and processes so that the world has an understandable structure and predictability. Our lives and work depend on the accuracy and richness of this knowledge structure and its web of relations. Relations are needed for reasoning and inferencing. Chaffin and Herrmann (1988b, p. 290) noted that "relations between ideas have long been viewed as basic to thought, language, comprehension, and memory." Aristotle's Metaphysics (Aristotle, 1961; McKeon, expounded on several types of relations. The majority of the 30 entries in a section of the Metaphysics known today as the Philosophical Lexicon referred to relations and attributes, including cause, part-whole, same and opposite, quality (i.e., attribute) and kind-of, and defined different types of each relation. Hume (1955) pointed out that there is a connection between successive ideas in our minds, even in our dreams, and that the introduction of an idea in our mind automatically recalls an associated idea. He argued that all the objects of human reasoning are divided into relations of ideas and matters of fact and that factual reasoning is founded on the cause-effect relation. His Treatise of Human Nature identified seven kinds of relations: resemblance, identity, relations of time and place, proportion in quantity or number, degrees in quality, contrariety, and causation. Mill (1974, pp. 989-1004) discoursed on several types of relations, claiming that all things are either feelings, substances, or attributes, and that attributes can be a quality (which belongs to one object) or a relation to other objects.
  19. Nielsen, M.L.: Thesaurus construction : key issues and selected readings (2004) 0.00
    0.0026882975 = product of:
      0.013441487 = sum of:
        0.013441487 = product of:
          0.04032446 = sum of:
            0.04032446 = weight(_text_:22 in 5006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04032446 = score(doc=5006,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5006, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5006)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    18. 5.2006 20:06:22
  20. Weiss, A.K.; Carstens, T.V.: ¬The year's work in cataloging, 1999 (2001) 0.00
    0.0026882975 = product of:
      0.013441487 = sum of:
        0.013441487 = product of:
          0.04032446 = sum of:
            0.04032446 = weight(_text_:22 in 6084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04032446 = score(doc=6084,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1488917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04251826 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6084, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6084)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Languages

  • e 81
  • d 5
  • m 2
  • f 1
  • ru 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 77
  • b 22
  • m 5
  • el 2
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…