Search (26 results, page 1 of 2)

0.19297035 = product of:
  0.3859407 = sum of:
    0.3190147 = weight(_text_:themes in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3190147 = score(doc=266,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.39696783 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.8036286 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
    0.06692601 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06692601 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This paper reviews the enormous changes in cataloging and classification reflected in the literature of 2003 and 2004, and discusses major themes and issues. Traditional cataloging and classification tools have been re-vamped and new resources have emerged. Most notable themes are: the continuing influence of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Control (FRBR); the struggle to understand the ever-broadening concept of an "information entity"; steady developments in metadata-encoding standards; and the globalization of information systems, including multilinguistic challenges.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.12797028 = product of:
  0.25594056 = sum of:
    0.19738029 = weight(_text_:themes in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19738029 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39696783 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.49721986 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
    0.05856026 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05856026 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.1096888 = product of:
  0.2193776 = sum of:
    0.1691831 = weight(_text_:themes in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1691831 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39696783 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.42618844 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
    0.050194506 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050194506 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.042295776 = product of:
  0.1691831 = sum of:
    0.1691831 = weight(_text_:themes in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1691831 = score(doc=3733,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39696783 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.42618844 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Presents a selective literature review covering the process of browsing as a means of searching for information. References are selected in order to illustrate the major themes and to bring out points which have not been emphasised before. The main points covered in the review include: consideration of browsing as an important, but under rated and little understood, form of information access; the ability in browsing to find analogies, connections, and new lines of thought; the potential of browsings as an ideal technique for accasional or non expert users; the ability to apply browsing to both paper based and computerized information retrieval; and the ability to search for information in a semi-random fashion leading to serendipitous linkage. Concludes that, despite the acknowledges importance of browsing, the increased effort being expended in making computerized systems browsable and the many references to the concept in the computer literature, there is still a lack of real understanding of the basic concepts of the process

0.033463005 = product of:
  0.13385202 = sum of:
    0.13385202 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13385202 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 1.2012 13:01:26

0.033463005 = product of:
  0.13385202 = sum of:
    0.13385202 = weight(_text_:22 in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13385202 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

13. 7.2008 9:30:22

0.033463005 = product of:
  0.13385202 = sum of:
    0.13385202 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13385202 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

13. 7.2008 19:22:28

0.033463005 = product of:
  0.13385202 = sum of:
    0.13385202 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13385202 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

13. 7.2008 19:53:22

0.033463005 = product of:
  0.13385202 = sum of:
    0.13385202 = weight(_text_:22 in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13385202 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

17.10.1996 14:22:33

0.033463005 = product of:
  0.13385202 = sum of:
    0.13385202 = weight(_text_:22 in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13385202 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.109-145

0.033463005 = product of:
  0.13385202 = sum of:
    0.13385202 = weight(_text_:22 in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13385202 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.41-77

0.033463005 = product of:
  0.13385202 = sum of:
    0.13385202 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13385202 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108

0.02928013 = product of:
  0.11712052 = sum of:
    0.11712052 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11712052 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

27.12.2014 18:54:22

0.021147888 = product of:
  0.08459155 = sum of:
    0.08459155 = weight(_text_:themes in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08459155 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39696783 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.21309422 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 54(2003) no.7, S.695-697 (R. Savolainen): "Donald O. Case has written an ambitious book to create an overall picture of the major approaches to information needs and seeking (INS) studies. The aim to write an extensive review is reflected in the list of references containing about 700 items. The high ambitions are explained an p. 14, where Case states that he is aiming at a multidisciplinary understanding of the concept of information seeking. In the Preface, the author characterizes his book as an introduction to the topic for students at the graduate level, as well as as a review and handbook for scholars engagged in information behavior research. In my view, Looking for Information is particularly welcome as an academic textbook because the field of INS studies suffers from the lack of monographs. Along with the continuous growth of the number of journal articles and conference papers, there is a genuine need for a book that picks up the numerous pieces and puts them together. The use of the study as a textbook is facilitated by clearly delineated sections an major themes and the wealth of concrete examples of information seeking in everyday contexts. The book is lucidly written and it is accessible to novice readers, too. At first glance, the idea of providing a comprehensive review of INS studies may seem a mission impossible because the current number of articles, papers, and other contributions in this field is nearing the 10,000 range (p. 224). Donald Case is not alone in the task of coming to grips with an increasing number of studies; similar problems have been faced by those writing INS-related chapters for the Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST). Case has solved the problem of "too many publications to be reviewed" by concentrating an the INS literature published during the last two decades. Secondly, studies an library use and information retrieval are discussed only to a limited extent. In addition, Case is highly selective as to studies focusing an the use of specific sources and channels such as WWW. These delineations are reasonable, even though they beg some questions. First, how should one draw the line between studies an information seeking and information retrieval? Case does not discuss this question in greater detail, although in recent years, the overlapping areas of information seeking and retrieval studies have been broadened, along with the growing importance of WWW in information seeking/retrieval. Secondly, how can one define the concept of information searching (or, more specifically, Internet or Web searching) in relation to information seeking and information retrieval? In the field of Web searching studies, there is an increasing number of contributions that are of direct relevance to information-seeking studies. Clearly, the advent of the Internet, particularly, the Web, has blurred the previous lines between INS and IR literature, making them less clear cut. The book consists of five main sections, and comprises 13 chapters. There is an Appendix serving the needs of an INS textbook (questions for discussion and application). The structure of the book is meticulously planned and, as a whole, it offers a sufficiently balanced contribution to theoretical, methodological, and empirical issues of INS. The title, Looking for Information: A Survey of Research an Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior aptly describes the main substance of the book. . . . It is easy to agree with Case about the significance of the problem of specialization and fragmentation. This problem seems to be concomitant with the broadening field of INS research. In itself, Case's book can be interpreted as a struggle against this fragmentation. His book suggests that this struggle is not hopeless and that it is still possible to draw an overall picture of the evolving research field. The major pieces of the puzzle were found and the book will provide a useful overview of INS studies for many years."

0.02091438 = product of:
  0.08365752 = sum of:
    0.08365752 = weight(_text_:22 in 209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08365752 = score(doc=209,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 209, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=209)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Reference services review. 22(1994) no.4, S.81-

0.016731502 = product of:
  0.06692601 = sum of:
    0.06692601 = weight(_text_:22 in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06692601 = score(doc=2193,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 14(1992) nos.3/4, S.5-22

0.016731502 = product of:
  0.06692601 = sum of:
    0.06692601 = weight(_text_:22 in 8460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06692601 = score(doc=8460,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8460, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8460)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Reference services review. 22(1994) no.2, S.31-40

0.016731502 = product of:
  0.06692601 = sum of:
    0.06692601 = weight(_text_:22 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06692601 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

13. 6.1996 19:22:20

0.016731502 = product of:
  0.06692601 = sum of:
    0.06692601 = weight(_text_:22 in 7415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06692601 = score(doc=7415,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7415, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7415)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

State of the art review of natural language processing updating an earlier review published in ARIST 22(1987). Discusses important developments that have allowed for significant advances in the field of natural language processing: materials and resources; knowledge based systems and statistical approaches; and a strong emphasis on evaluation. Reviews some natural language processing applications and common problems still awaiting solution. Considers closely related applications such as language generation and th egeneration phase of machine translation which face the same problems as natural language processing. Covers natural language methodologies for information retrieval only briefly

0.016731502 = product of:
  0.06692601 = sum of:
    0.06692601 = weight(_text_:22 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06692601 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061746154 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22