Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Dunsire, G.; Willer, M.: Initiatives to make standard library metadata models and structures available to the Semantic Web (2010) 0.04
    0.037770152 = product of:
      0.15108061 = sum of:
        0.048561215 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048561215 = score(doc=3965,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.34034526 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
        0.017986061 = product of:
          0.035972122 = sum of:
            0.035972122 = weight(_text_:rules in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035972122 = score(doc=3965,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.22257565 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.048561215 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048561215 = score(doc=3965,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.34034526 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
        0.035972122 = weight(_text_:rules in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035972122 = score(doc=3965,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22257565 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
      0.25 = coord(4/16)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes recent initiatives to make standard library metadata models and structures available to the Semantic Web, including IFLA standards such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD), and International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD) along with the infrastructure that supports them. The FRBR Review Group is currently developing representations of FRAD and the entityrelationship model of FRBR in resource description framework (RDF) applications, using a combination of RDF, RDF Schema (RDFS), Simple Knowledge Organisation System (SKOS) and Web Ontology Language (OWL), cross-relating both models where appropriate. The ISBD/XML Task Group is investigating the representation of ISBD in RDF. The IFLA Namespaces project is developing an administrative and technical infrastructure to support such initiatives and encourage uptake of standards by other agencies. The paper describes similar initiatives with related external standards such as RDA - resource description and access, REICAT (the new Italian cataloguing rules) and CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM). The DCMI RDA Task Group is working with the Joint Steering Committee for RDA to develop Semantic Web representations of RDA structural elements, which are aligned with FRBR and FRAD, and controlled metadata content vocabularies. REICAT is also based on FRBR, and an object-oriented version of FRBR has been integrated with CRM, which itself has an RDF representation. CRM was initially based on the metadata needs of the museum community, and is now seeking extension to the archives community with the eventual aim of developing a model common to the main cultural information domains of archives, libraries and museums. The Vocabulary Mapping Framework (VMF) project has developed a Semantic Web tool to automatically generate mappings between metadata models from the information communities, including publishers. The tool is based on several standards, including CRM, FRAD, FRBR, MARC21 and RDA.
    Content
    Vortrag im Rahmen der Session 93. Cataloguing der WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 76TH IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND ASSEMBLY, 10-15 August 2010, Gothenburg, Sweden - 149. Information Technology, Cataloguing, Classification and Indexing with Knowledge Management
  2. Gracy, K.F.: Enriching and enhancing moving images with Linked Data : an exploration in the alignment of metadata models (2018) 0.01
    0.009688189 = product of:
      0.077505514 = sum of:
        0.033013538 = weight(_text_:author in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033013538 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.21322623 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
        0.044491973 = weight(_text_:descriptive in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044491973 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974061 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.24753433 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this paper is to examine the current state of Linked Data (LD) in archival moving image description, and propose ways in which current metadata records can be enriched and enhanced by interlinking such metadata with relevant information found in other data sets. Design/methodology/approach Several possible metadata models for moving image production and archiving are considered, including models from records management, digital curation, and the recent BIBFRAME AV Modeling Study. This research also explores how mappings between archival moving image records and relevant external data sources might be drawn, and what gaps exist between current vocabularies and what is needed to record and make accessible the full lifecycle of archiving through production, use, and reuse. Findings The author notes several major impediments to implementation of LD for archival moving images. The various pieces of information about creators, places, and events found in moving image records are not easily connected to relevant information in other sources because they are often not semantically defined within the record and can be hidden in unstructured fields. Libraries, archives, and museums must work on aligning the various vocabularies and schemas of potential value for archival moving image description to enable interlinking between vocabularies currently in use and those which are used by external data sets. Alignment of vocabularies is often complicated by mismatches in granularity between vocabularies. Research limitations/implications The focus is on how these models inform functional requirements for access and other archival activities, and how the field might benefit from having a common metadata model for critical archival descriptive activities. Practical implications By having a shared model, archivists may more easily align current vocabularies and develop new vocabularies and schemas to address the needs of moving image data creators and scholars. Originality/value Moving image archives, like other cultural institutions with significant heritage holdings, can benefit tremendously from investing in the semantic definition of information found in their information databases. While commercial entities such as search engines and data providers have already embraced the opportunities that semantic search provides for resource discovery, most non-commercial entities are just beginning to do so. Thus, this research addresses the benefits and challenges of enriching and enhancing archival moving image records with semantically defined information via LD.
  3. Metadata and semantics research : 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings (2016) 0.01
    0.007373941 = product of:
      0.05899153 = sum of:
        0.043774184 = weight(_text_:26 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043774184 = score(doc=3283,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.3862604 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
        0.015217344 = product of:
          0.030434689 = sum of:
            0.030434689 = weight(_text_:22 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030434689 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 10th Metadata and Semantics Research Conference, MTSR 2016, held in Göttingen, Germany, in November 2016. The 26 full papers and 6 short papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 67 submissions. The papers are organized in several sessions and tracks: Digital Libraries, Information Retrieval, Linked and Social Data, Metadata and Semantics for Open Repositories, Research Information Systems and Data Infrastructures, Metadata and Semantics for Agriculture, Food and Environment, Metadata and Semantics for Cultural Collections and Applications, European and National Projects.
    Date
    19.12.2014 19:26:51
  4. Metadata and semantics research : 9th Research Conference, MTSR 2015, Manchester, UK, September 9-11, 2015, Proceedings (2015) 0.00
    0.0016581976 = product of:
      0.026531162 = sum of:
        0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 3274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026531162 = score(doc=3274,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 3274, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3274)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    19.12.2014 19:26:51
  5. Bellotto, A.; Bekesi, J.: Enriching metadata for a university repository by modelling and infrastructure : a new vocabulary server for Phaidra (2019) 0.00
    0.0016581976 = product of:
      0.026531162 = sum of:
        0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 5693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026531162 = score(doc=5693,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 5693, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5693)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    5. 6.2016 17:23:26
  6. Metadata and semantics research : 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings (2014) 0.00
    0.0013818314 = product of:
      0.022109302 = sum of:
        0.022109302 = weight(_text_:26 in 2192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022109302 = score(doc=2192,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 2192, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2192)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    19.12.2014 19:26:51
  7. Hook, P.A.; Gantchev, A.: Using combined metadata sources to visualize a small library (OBL's English Language Books) (2017) 0.00
    0.0012878824 = product of:
      0.02060612 = sum of:
        0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 3870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02060612 = score(doc=3870,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 3870, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3870)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Content
    Beitrag bei: NASKO 2017: Visualizing Knowledge Organization: Bringing Focus to Abstract Realities. The sixth North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization (NASKO 2017), June 15-16, 2017, in Champaign, IL, USA.