Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0029509363 = product of:
  0.028525718 = sum of:
    0.006919681 = weight(_text_:und in 4729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006919681 = score(doc=4729,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047096446 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02124939 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 4729, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4729)
    0.010803019 = weight(_text_:des in 4729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010803019 = score(doc=4729,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058846094 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02124939 = queryNorm
        0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 4729, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4729)
    0.010803019 = weight(_text_:des in 4729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010803019 = score(doc=4729,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058846094 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02124939 = queryNorm
        0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 4729, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4729)
  0.10344828 = coord(3/29)

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

2.9782744E-4 = product of:
  0.008636996 = sum of:
    0.008636996 = product of:
      0.017273992 = sum of:
        0.017273992 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017273992 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07441174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.03448276 = coord(1/29)

Source

Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

1.9541052E-4 = product of:
  0.005666905 = sum of:
    0.005666905 = product of:
      0.01133381 = sum of:
        0.01133381 = weight(_text_:1 in 1075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01133381 = score(doc=1075,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05219918 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 1075, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1075)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.03448276 = coord(1/29)

Content

Tutorial topics and outline 1. Tutorial Background Overview The Semantic Web, Linked Data, and the Resource Description Framework 2. Ontology Basics and RDFS Tutorial Semantic modeling, domain ontologies, and RDF Vocabulary Description Language (RDFS) concepts and terminology Examples: domain ontologies, models, and schemas Exercises 3. OWL Overview Tutorial Web Ontology Language (OWL): selected concepts and terminology Exercises

9.770526E-5 = product of:
  0.0028334525 = sum of:
    0.0028334525 = product of:
      0.005666905 = sum of:
        0.005666905 = weight(_text_:1 in 117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005666905 = score(doc=117,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05219918 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 117, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=117)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.03448276 = coord(1/29)

Footnote

https://app.uff.br/riuff/handle/1/13904.

9.770526E-5 = product of:
  0.0028334525 = sum of:
    0.0028334525 = product of:
      0.005666905 = sum of:
        0.005666905 = weight(_text_:1 in 1030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005666905 = score(doc=1030,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05219918 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02124939 = queryNorm
            0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 1030, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1030)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.03448276 = coord(1/29)

Abstract

In the last few years, the size of Linked Open Data (LOD) describing artworks, in general or domain-specific Knowledge Graphs (KGs), is gradually increasing. This provides (art-)historians and Cultural Heritage professionals with a wealth of information to explore. Specifically, structured data about iconographical and iconological (icon) aspects, i.e. information about the subjects, concepts and meanings of artworks, are extremely valuable for the state-of-the-art of computational tools, e.g. content recognition through computer vision. Nevertheless, a data quality evaluation for art domains, fundamental for data reuse, is still missing. The purpose of this study is filling this gap with an overview of art-historical data quality in current KGs with a focus on the icon aspects. Design/methodology/approach This study's analyses are based on established KG evaluation methodologies, adapted to the domain by addressing requirements from art historians' theories. The authors first select several KGs according to Semantic Web principles. Then, the authors evaluate (1) their structures' suitability to describe icon information through quantitative and qualitative assessment and (2) their content, qualitatively assessed in terms of correctness and completeness. Findings This study's results reveal several issues on the current expression of icon information in KGs. The content evaluation shows that these domain-specific statements are generally correct but often not complete. The incompleteness is confirmed by the structure evaluation, which highlights the unsuitability of the KG schemas to describe icon information with the required granularity. Originality/value The main contribution of this work is an overview of the actual landscape of the icon information expressed in LOD. Therefore, it is valuable to cultural institutions by providing them a first domain-specific data quality evaluation. Since this study's results suggest that the selected domain information is underrepresented in Semantic Web datasets, the authors highlight the need for the creation and fostering of such information to provide a more thorough art-historical dimension to LOD.