Search (56 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Sutton, S.A.; Golder, D.: Achievement Standards Network (ASN) : an application profile for mapping K-12 educational resources to achievement (2008) 0.07
    0.06875784 = product of:
      0.13751568 = sum of:
        0.13751568 = sum of:
          0.09568194 = weight(_text_:network in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09568194 = score(doc=2636,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.22917621 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05146125 = queryNorm
              0.41750383 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
          0.041833732 = weight(_text_:22 in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041833732 = score(doc=2636,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05146125 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes metadata development of an application profile for the National Science Digital Library (NSDL) Achievement Standards Network (ASN) in the United States. The ASN is a national repository of machine-readable achievement standards modeled in RDF that shape teaching and learning in the various states. We describe the nature of the ASN metadata and the various uses to which that metadata is applied including the alignment of the standards of one state to those of another and the correlation of those standards to educational resources in support of resource discovery and retrieval.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  2. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.03
    0.027889157 = product of:
      0.055778313 = sum of:
        0.055778313 = product of:
          0.11155663 = sum of:
            0.11155663 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11155663 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05146125 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
  3. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.02
    0.024403011 = product of:
      0.048806023 = sum of:
        0.048806023 = product of:
          0.097612046 = sum of:
            0.097612046 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.097612046 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05146125 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
  4. Hert, C.A.; Denn, S.O.; Gillman, D.W.; Oh, J.S.; Pattuelli, M.C.; Hernandez, N.: Investigating and modeling metadata use to support information architecture development in the statistical knowledge network (2007) 0.02
    0.023920486 = product of:
      0.04784097 = sum of:
        0.04784097 = product of:
          0.09568194 = sum of:
            0.09568194 = weight(_text_:network in 422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09568194 = score(doc=422,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22917621 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05146125 = queryNorm
                0.41750383 = fieldWeight in 422, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=422)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata and an appropriate metadata model are nontrivial components of information architecture conceptualization and implementation, particularly when disparate and dispersed systems are integrated. Metadata availability can enhance retrieval processes, improve information organization and navigation, and support management of digital objects. To support these activities efficiently, metadata need to be modeled appropriately for the tasks. The authors' work focuses on how to understand and model metadata requirements to support the work of end users of an integrative statistical knowledge network (SKN). They report on a series of user studies. These studies provide an understanding of metadata elements necessary for a variety of user-oriented tasks, related business rules associated with the use of these elements, and their relationship to other perspectives on metadata model development. This work demonstrates the importance of the user perspective in this type of design activity and provides a set of strategies by which the results of user studies can be systematically utilized to support that design.
  5. Jun, W.: ¬A knowledge network constructed by integrating classification, thesaurus and metadata in a digital library (2003) 0.02
    0.022552451 = product of:
      0.045104902 = sum of:
        0.045104902 = product of:
          0.090209804 = sum of:
            0.090209804 = weight(_text_:network in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.090209804 = score(doc=1254,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.22917621 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05146125 = queryNorm
                0.3936264 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge management in digital libraries is a universal problem. Keyword-based searching is applied everywhere no matter whether the resources are indexed databases or full-text Web pages. In keyword matching, the valuable content description and indexing of the metadata, such as the subject descriptors and the classification notations, are merely treated as common keywords to be matched with the user query. Without the support of vocabulary control tools, such as classification systems and thesauri, the intelligent labor of content analysis, description and indexing in metadata production are seriously wasted. New retrieval paradigms are needed to exploit the potential of the metadata resources. Could classification and thesauri, which contain the condensed intelligence of generations of librarians, be used in a digital library to organize the networked information, especially metadata, to facilitate their usability and change the digital library into a knowledge management environment? To examine that question, we designed and implemented a new paradigm that incorporates a classification system, a thesaurus and metadata. The classification and the thesaurus are merged into a concept network, and the metadata are distributed into the nodes of the concept network according to their subjects. The abstract concept node instantiated with the related metadata records becomes a knowledge node. A coherent and consistent knowledge network is thus formed. It is not only a framework for resource organization but also a structure for knowledge navigation, retrieval and learning. We have built an experimental system based on the Chinese Classification and Thesaurus, which is the most comprehensive and authoritative in China, and we have incorporated more than 5000 bibliographic records in the computing domain from the Peking University Library. The result is encouraging. In this article, we review the tools, the architecture and the implementation of our experimental system, which is called Vision.
  6. Cordeiro, M.I.: From library authority control to network authoritative metadata sources (2003) 0.02
    0.01993374 = product of:
      0.03986748 = sum of:
        0.03986748 = product of:
          0.07973496 = sum of:
            0.07973496 = weight(_text_:network in 3083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07973496 = score(doc=3083,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22917621 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05146125 = queryNorm
                0.34791988 = fieldWeight in 3083, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Authority control is a quite recent term in the long history of cataloguing, although the underlying principle is among the very early principles of bibliographic control. Bibliographic control is a Field in transformation by the rapid expansion of the WWW, which has brought new problems to infonnation discovery and retrieval, creating new challenges and requirements in information management. In a comprehensive approach, authority control is presented as one of the most promising library activities in this respect. The evolution of work methods and standards for the sharing of authority files is reviewed, showing the imbalance in developments and practical achievements between name and subject authority, in an international perspective. The need to improve the network availability and usability of authority information assets in more effective and holistic ways is underlyned; and a new philosophy and scope is proposed for library authority work, based an the primacy of the linking function of authority data, and by expanding the finding, relating and informing functions of authority records. Some of these aspects are being addressed in several projects dealing with knowledge organization systems, notably to cope with multilingual needs and to enable semantic interoperability among different systems. Library practice itself should evolve in the same direction, thereby providing practical experience to inform new or improved principles and standards for authority work, while contributing to enhance local information services and to promote their involvement in the WWW environment.
  7. Rusch-Feja, D.: Dublin Core Educational Metadata : Entwicklungen bei Metadaten für den Bildungsbereich (2000) 0.02
    0.019733394 = product of:
      0.039466787 = sum of:
        0.039466787 = product of:
          0.078933574 = sum of:
            0.078933574 = weight(_text_:network in 4451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.078933574 = score(doc=4451,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22917621 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05146125 = queryNorm
                0.3444231 = fieldWeight in 4451, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4451)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    August 1999 wurde eine Arbeitsgruppe für bildungsbezogene Metadaten im Rahmen der Dublin Core Metadaten-Initiative unter der Leitung von Prof. Dr. Stuart Sutton (Gateway for Educational Materials, GEM, und School of Libraray and Information Science der University of Washington, USA und Dr. Jon Mason, Direktor des Education Network Australia, EdNA, Australien) konstituiert. Innerhalb einer Woche nach der Presseankündigung hatten sich weltweit über 70 Teilnehmer für die Arbeitsgruppe gemeldet. Ziele dieser Arbeitsgruppe sind: ... die Eingrenzungen und Erweiterungen zum Dublin Core Metadatensatz zu entwickeln, der Bildungsinformationen zum Zwecke einer besseren Quellensuche beschreibt. Es ist zu erwarten, daß die daraus resultierenden Metadaten sowohl bildungsbezogene Qualifier innerhalb des Rahmens der bestehenden Dublin Core Elemente beinhalten als auch potentiell einige, die für den Bibldungsbereich spezifisch sind
  8. Dekkers, M.; Weibel, S.L.: State of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative April 2003 (2003) 0.02
    0.019733394 = product of:
      0.039466787 = sum of:
        0.039466787 = product of:
          0.078933574 = sum of:
            0.078933574 = weight(_text_:network in 2795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.078933574 = score(doc=2795,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22917621 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05146125 = queryNorm
                0.3444231 = fieldWeight in 2795, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2795)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Dublin Core Metadata Initiative continues to grow in participation and recognition as the predominant resource discovery metadata standard on the Internet. With its approval as ISO 15836, DC is firmly established as a foundation block of modular, interoperable metadata for distributed resources. This report summarizes developments in DCMI over the past year, including the annual conference, progress of working groups, new developments in encoding methods, and advances in documentation and dissemination. New developments in broadening the community to commercial users of metadata are discussed, and plans for an international network of national affiliates are described.
  9. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.02
    0.019720612 = product of:
      0.039441224 = sum of:
        0.039441224 = product of:
          0.07888245 = sum of:
            0.07888245 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07888245 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05146125 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  10. Halbert, M.: ¬The Metascholar Initiative : AmericanSouth.Org and MetaArchive.Org (2003) 0.02
    0.016914338 = product of:
      0.033828676 = sum of:
        0.033828676 = product of:
          0.06765735 = sum of:
            0.06765735 = weight(_text_:network in 4777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06765735 = score(doc=4777,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22917621 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05146125 = queryNorm
                0.29521978 = fieldWeight in 4777, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4777)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The MetaScholar Initiative is a collaborative endeavor to explore the feasibility and utility of scholarly portal services developed in conjunction with Open Archives Initiative (OAI) metadata harvesting technologies. The MetaScholar Initiative comprises two projects, the MetaArchive and AmericanSouth projects, both funded by grants from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation totaling $600,000. These two projects have created two metadata aggregation networks connecting some 24 libraries, archives, museums, and electronic text centers. Each network has an associated portal being created under the guidance of teams composed of scholars, librarians, archivists, and technologists. The MetaScholar Initiative is studying issues such as metadata normalization, alternative forms of scholarly communication through portals, and the process of facilitating smaller archival institutions in providing better access to their collections through the OAI Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH). The MetaScholar Initiative is based at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia.
  11. Cantara, L.: METS: the metadata encoding and transmission standard (2005) 0.02
    0.016914338 = product of:
      0.033828676 = sum of:
        0.033828676 = product of:
          0.06765735 = sum of:
            0.06765735 = weight(_text_:network in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06765735 = score(doc=5727,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22917621 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05146125 = queryNorm
                0.29521978 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a data communication standard for encoding descriptive, administrative, and structural metadata regarding objects within a digital library, expressed using the XML Schema Language of the World Wide Web Consortium. An initiative of the Digital Library Federation, METS is under development by an international editorial board and is maintained in the Network Development and MARC Standards Office of the Library of Congress. Designed in conformance with the Open Archival Information System (OAIS) Reference Model, a METS document encapsulates digital objects and metadata as Information Packages for transmitting and/or exchanging digital objects to and from digital repositories, disseminating digital objects via the Web, and archiving digital objects for long-term preservation and access. This paper presents an introduction to the METS standard and through illustrated examples, demonstrates how to build a METS document.
  12. Tennis, J.T.: Data collection for controlled vocabulary interoperability : Dublin core audience element (2003) 0.01
    0.014095282 = product of:
      0.028190564 = sum of:
        0.028190564 = product of:
          0.05638113 = sum of:
            0.05638113 = weight(_text_:network in 1253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05638113 = score(doc=1253,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22917621 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05146125 = queryNorm
                0.2460165 = fieldWeight in 1253, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1253)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper outlines the assumptions, process and results of a pilot study of issues of interoperability among a set of seven existing controlled vocabulary schemes that make statements about the audience of an educational resource. The notion of audience for the study was defined in terms of the semantics of the Dublin Core metadata element of the same name: "A category of user for whom the resource is intended." The study used a data collection technique, card sorting, to see how nonexpert users sorted terms in the seven vocabularies into relationships and what their thought processes were in sorting these terms. The need for controlled vocabulary interoperability is a pressing concern for the education community as well as many others. In particular, the current study was informed by the need of the Dublin Core Education Working Group (www.dublin core.org/groups/education/) to explore the possibility of a high-level switching language in an application profile for the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) audience element. An abundance of educational resources exists, many of which are available in the networked environment. Yet, theie are various conceptualizations of the domain in the form of different controlled vocabularies that limit access. Controlled vocabulary interoperability would allow these different conceptualizations to remain intact, thereby serving local needs while allowing users to navigate across collections and exploiting the intellectual network of resources available.
  13. Calhoun, K.: Being a librarian : metadata and metadata specialists in the twenty-first century (2007) 0.01
    0.014095282 = product of:
      0.028190564 = sum of:
        0.028190564 = product of:
          0.05638113 = sum of:
            0.05638113 = weight(_text_:network in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05638113 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22917621 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05146125 = queryNorm
                0.2460165 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to forecast the changing roles of librarians - especially catalogers and metadata specialists - in today's technology-driven research, teaching, and learning environments, in which information seekers behave more and more self-sufficiently and move well beyond library collections in their pursuit of information. Design/methodology/approach - Places the roles of librarians and library collections in the larger context of knowledge management and campus information network processes, which occur in every knowledge community, with or without a library. Explores and provides examples of how knowledge creators can collaborate with information technology experts and librarians to transform how faculty members teach and conduct research; how students learn; and how libraries support these activities. Findings - Librarians need to make their collections and services much more visible through human and technological interconnections and greatly improved delivery of information content. Metadata and metadata specialists are strategic assets for libraries, but the service model for cataloging faces critical challenges. Two tables list these challenges and the implications for metadata specialists. Originality/value - Offers new observations and insights into how librarians can continue to contribute to saving information seekers' time and advancing the state of knowledge in the increasingly interconnected world of the web. Drawing from the larger context of the global infosphere, information-seeking behavior, and changing roles for library collections and information systems, forecasts the role of metadata and metadata specialists in libraries.
  14. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.01
    0.013944578 = product of:
      0.027889157 = sum of:
        0.027889157 = product of:
          0.055778313 = sum of:
            0.055778313 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055778313 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05146125 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  15. McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004) 0.01
    0.013944578 = product of:
      0.027889157 = sum of:
        0.027889157 = product of:
          0.055778313 = sum of:
            0.055778313 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055778313 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05146125 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
  16. Wusteman, J.: Whither HTML? (2004) 0.01
    0.013944578 = product of:
      0.027889157 = sum of:
        0.027889157 = product of:
          0.055778313 = sum of:
            0.055778313 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055778313 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05146125 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.99-105
  17. Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000) 0.01
    0.013944578 = product of:
      0.027889157 = sum of:
        0.027889157 = product of:
          0.055778313 = sum of:
            0.055778313 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055778313 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05146125 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:24
  18. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.01
    0.013944578 = product of:
      0.027889157 = sum of:
        0.027889157 = product of:
          0.055778313 = sum of:
            0.055778313 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055778313 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05146125 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
  19. Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004) 0.01
    0.013944578 = product of:
      0.027889157 = sum of:
        0.027889157 = product of:
          0.055778313 = sum of:
            0.055778313 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055778313 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05146125 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
  20. Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005) 0.01
    0.013944578 = product of:
      0.027889157 = sum of:
        0.027889157 = product of:
          0.055778313 = sum of:
            0.055778313 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055778313 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18020853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05146125 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Languages

  • e 50
  • d 6

Types