Search (179 results, page 9 of 9)

Arms, W.Y.; Dushay, N.; Fulker, D.; Lagoze, C.: ¬A case study in metadata harvesting : the NSDL (2003) 0.01

0.0066386065 = product of:
  0.033193033 = sum of:
    0.033193033 = weight(_text_:21 in 4780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033193033 = score(doc=4780,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.20536566 = fieldWeight in 4780, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4780)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Library hi tech. 21(2003) no.2, S.228-237

Baker, T.; Dekkers, M.: Identifying metadata elements with URIs : The CORES resolution (2003) 0.01
```
0.0062589394 = product of:
  0.031294696 = sum of:
    0.031294696 = weight(_text_:21 in 1199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031294696 = score(doc=1199,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.1936206 = fieldWeight in 1199, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1199)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

On 18 November 2002, at a meeting organised by the CORES Project (Information Society Technologies Programme, European Union), several organisations regarded as maintenance authorities for metadata elements achieved consensus on a resolution to assign Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) to metadata elements as a useful first step towards the development of mapping infrastructures and interoperability services. The signatories of the CORES Resolution agreed to promote this consensus in their communities and beyond and to implement an action plan in the following six months. Six months having passed, the maintainers of GILS, ONIX, MARC 21, CERIF, DOI, IEEE/LOM, and Dublin Core report on their implementations of the resolution and highlight issues of relevance to establishing good-practice conventions for declaring, identifying, and maintaining metadata elements more generally. In June 2003, the resolution was also endorsed by the maintainers of UNIMARC. The "Resolution on Metadata Element Identifiers", or CORES Resolution, is an agreement among the maintenance organisations for several major metadata standards - GILS, ONIX, MARC 21, UNIMARC, CERIF, DOI®, IEEE/LOM, and Dublin Core - to identify their metadata elements using Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs). The Uniform Resource Identifier, defined in the IETF RFC 2396 as "a compact string of characters for identifying an abstract or physical resource", has been promoted for use as a universal form of identification by the World Wide Web Consortium. The CORES Resolution, formulated at a meeting organised by the European project CORES in November 2002, included a commitment to publicise the consensus statement to a wider audience of metadata standards initiatives and to implement key points of the agreement within the following six months - specifically, to define URI assignment mechanisms, assign URIs to elements, and formulate policies for the persistence of those URIs. This article marks the passage of six months by reporting on progress made in implementing this common action plan. After presenting the text of the CORES Resolution and its three "clarifications", the article summarises the position of each signatory organisation towards assigning URIs to its metadata elements, noting any practical or strategic problems that may have emerged. These progress reports were based on input from Thomas Baker, José Borbinha, Eliot Christian, Erik Duval, Keith Jeffery, Rebecca Guenther, and Norman Paskin. The article closes with a few general observations about these first steps towards the clarification of shared conventions for the identification of metadata elements and perhaps, one can hope, towards the ultimate goal of improving interoperability among a diversity of metadata communities.

Wessel, C.: "Publishing and sharing your metadata application profile" : 2. SCHEMAS-Workshop in Bonn (2001) 0.01

0.0056550005 = product of:
  0.028275002 = sum of:
    0.028275002 = weight(_text_:22 in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028275002 = score(doc=5650,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 11. 3.2001 17:10:22

Baker, T.: ¬A grammar of Dublin Core (2000) 0.01

0.0056550005 = product of:
  0.028275002 = sum of:
    0.028275002 = weight(_text_:22 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028275002 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 26.12.2011 14:01:22

Rice, R.: Applying DC to institutional data repositories (2008) 0.01

0.0056550005 = product of:
  0.028275002 = sum of:
    0.028275002 = weight(_text_:22 in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028275002 = score(doc=2664,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012) 0.01
```
0.0056550005 = product of:
  0.028275002 = sum of:
    0.028275002 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028275002 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.

Hunter, J.: MetaNet - a metadata term thesaurus to enable semantic interoperability between metadata domains (2001) 0.01

0.0055321725 = product of:
  0.027660862 = sum of:
    0.027660862 = weight(_text_:21 in 6471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027660862 = score(doc=6471,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 6471, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6471)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 12. 8.2001 15:57:21

McCallum, S.H.: Library of Congress metadata landscape (2003) 0.01

0.0055321725 = product of:
  0.027660862 = sum of:
    0.027660862 = weight(_text_:21 in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027660862 = score(doc=1760,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 17.12.1996 21:11:09

Hengel, C.: Normdaten und Metadaten : die Idee eines internationalen authority file (2003) 0.01

0.0055321725 = product of:
  0.027660862 = sum of:
    0.027660862 = weight(_text_:21 in 1763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027660862 = score(doc=1763,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 1763, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1763)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 17.12.1996 21:11:09

Janssen, U.: ONIX - Metadaten in Verlagen und Buchhandel (2003) 0.01

0.0055321725 = product of:
  0.027660862 = sum of:
    0.027660862 = weight(_text_:21 in 1764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027660862 = score(doc=1764,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 1764, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1764)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 17.12.1996 21:11:09

Poulter, A.: Metaviews: metadata research and teaching in the United Kingdom and Ireland (2003) 0.01

0.0055321725 = product of:
  0.027660862 = sum of:
    0.027660862 = weight(_text_:21 in 1996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027660862 = score(doc=1996,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 1996, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1996)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 21. 3.1998 13:17:50

Özel, S.A.; Altingövde, I.S.; Ulusoy, Ö.; Özsoyoglu, G.; Özsoyoglu, Z.M.: Metadata-Based Modeling of Information Resources an the Web (2004) 0.01

0.0055321725 = product of:
  0.027660862 = sum of:
    0.027660862 = weight(_text_:21 in 2093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027660862 = score(doc=2093,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 2093, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2093)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 17. 1.2004 15:48:21

Cordeiro, M.I.: From library authority control to network authoritative metadata sources (2003) 0.01

0.0055321725 = product of:
  0.027660862 = sum of:
    0.027660862 = weight(_text_:21 in 3083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027660862 = score(doc=3083,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 3083, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3083)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 31. 8.2005 21:55:33

Bearman, D.; Miller, E.; Rust, G.; Trant, J.; Weibel, S.: ¬A common model to support interoperable metadata : progress report on reconciling metadata requirements from the Dublin Core and INDECS/DOI communities (1999) 0.01

0.0055321725 = product of:
  0.027660862 = sum of:
    0.027660862 = weight(_text_:21 in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027660862 = score(doc=1249,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 26.12.2011 13:59:21

Calhoun, K.: Being a librarian : metadata and metadata specialists in the twenty-first century (2007) 0.01

0.0055321725 = product of:
  0.027660862 = sum of:
    0.027660862 = weight(_text_:21 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027660862 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 31.12.2008 21:42:15

Laparra, E.; Binford-Walsh, A.; Emerson, K.; Miller, M.L.; López-Hoffman, L.; Currim, F.; Bethard, S.: Addressing structural hurdles for metadata extraction from environmental impact statements (2023) 0.01

0.0055321725 = product of:
  0.027660862 = sum of:
    0.027660862 = weight(_text_:21 in 1042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027660862 = score(doc=1042,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 1042, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1042)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 29. 8.2023 19:21:01

Miksa, S.D.; Moen, WE.; Snyder, G.; Polyakov, S.; Eklund, A.: Metadata assistance of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Record's four user tasks : a report on the MARC content designation utilization (MCDU) project (2006) 0.00
```
0.004425738 = product of:
  0.02212869 = sum of:
    0.02212869 = weight(_text_:21 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02212869 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.13691044 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

This paper describes the work of the MARC Content Designation Utilization (MCDU) Project, funded by a National Leadership Grant from the U.S. Federal Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS). The MCDU Project is analyzing approximately 56 million MARC 21 Format for Bibliographic Data records from OCLC's WorldCat database to identify actual use of the content designation available in the MARC bibliographic record. We consider bibliographic records as artifacts resulting from the overall cataloging enterprise, of which the encoding of the bibliographic data into MARC is only one part. Concepts from the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) can be used to examine and critically assess the availability of bibliographic data in these records, data meant to assist end users in finding, identifying, selecting, and obtaining relevant information resources. Overall, the MCDU Project will provide empirical data reflecting the actual use of MARC content designation structures in this set of records. Specifically, the data can be used to demonstrate how catalogers' coding of bibliographic data may or may not assist end users in these four tasks. The project is using the mapping by Delsey of MARC data elements to FRBR user tasks in this analysis. These data are crucial for making decisions about the future of MARC and may inform current work on bibliographic rules reflected in the development of the next version of cataloging rules (i.e., Resource Description and Access) by the Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules.
Gömpel, R.; Altenhöner, R.; Kunz, M.; Oehlschläger, S.; Werner, C.: Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 70. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in Buenos Aires : Aus den Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control, der Core Activities ICABS und UNIMARC sowie der Information Technology Section (2004) 0.00
```
0.0028275002 = product of:
  0.014137501 = sum of:
    0.014137501 = weight(_text_:22 in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014137501 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

"Libraries: Tools for Education and Development" war das Motto der 70. IFLA-Generalkonferenz, dem Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, der vom 22.-27. August 2004 in Buenos Aires, Argentinien, und damit erstmals in Lateinamerika stattfand. Rund 3.000 Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmer, davon ein Drittel aus spanischsprachigen Ländern, allein 600 aus Argentinien, besuchten die von der IFLA und dem nationalen Organisationskomitee gut organisierte Tagung mit mehr als 200 Sitzungen und Veranstaltungen. Aus Deutschland waren laut Teilnehmerverzeichnis leider nur 45 Kolleginnen und Kollegen angereist, womit ihre Zahl wieder auf das Niveau von Boston gesunken ist. Erfreulicherweise gab es nunmehr bereits im dritten Jahr eine deutschsprachige Ausgabe des IFLA-Express. Auch in diesem Jahr soll hier über die Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control berichtet werden. Die Arbeit der Division mit ihren Sektionen Bibliography, Cataloguing, Classification and Indexing sowie der neuen Sektion Knowledge Management bildet einen der Schwerpunkte der IFLA-Arbeit, die dabei erzielten konkreten Ergebnisse und Empfehlungen haben maßgeblichen Einfluss auf die tägliche Arbeit der Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. Erstmals wird auch ausführlich über die Arbeit der Core Activities ICABS und UNIMARC und der Information Technology Section berichtet.

Lagoze, C.: Keeping Dublin Core simple : Cross-domain discovery or resource description? (2001) 0.00

0.0027660863 = product of:
  0.013830431 = sum of:
    0.013830431 = weight(_text_:21 in 1216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013830431 = score(doc=1216,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.085569024 = fieldWeight in 1216, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1216)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 26.12.2011 14:04:21

Search (179 results, page 9 of 9)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes