Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Weibel, S.L.: Border crossings : reflections on a decade of metadata consensus building (2005) 0.01 
    0.0063561117 = product of:
  0.03813667 = sum of:
    0.03813667 = product of:
      0.07627334 = sum of:
        0.07627334 = weight(_text_:evolution in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07627334 = score(doc=1187,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1843245 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.41379923 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    In June of this year, I performed my final official duties as part of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative management team. It is a happy irony to affix a seal on that service in this journal, as both D-Lib Magazine and the Dublin Core celebrate their tenth anniversaries. This essay is a personal reflection on some of the achievements and lessons of that decade. The OCLC-NCSA Metadata Workshop took place in March of 1995, and as we tried to understand what it meant and who would care, D-Lib magazine came into being and offered a natural venue for sharing our work. I recall a certain skepticism when Bill Arms said "We want D-Lib to be the first place people look for the latest developments in digital library research." These were the early days in the evolution of electronic publishing, and the goal was ambitious. By any measure, a decade of high-quality electronic publishing is an auspicious accomplishment, and D-Lib (and its host, CNRI) deserve congratulations for having achieved their goal. I am grateful to have been a contributor. That first DC workshop led to further workshops, a community, a variety of standards in several countries, an ISO standard, a conference series, and an international consortium. Looking back on this evolution is both satisfying and wistful. While I am pleased that the achievements are substantial, the unmet challenges also provide a rich till in which to cultivate insights on the development of digital infrastructure.
  2. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.00 
    0.004714965 = product of:
  0.02828979 = sum of:
    0.02828979 = product of:
      0.05657958 = sum of:
        0.05657958 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05657958 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  3. DC-2013: International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications : Online Proceedings (2013) 0.00 
    0.0035955596 = product of:
  0.021573357 = sum of:
    0.021573357 = product of:
      0.043146715 = sum of:
        0.043146715 = weight(_text_:evolution in 1076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043146715 = score(doc=1076,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1843245 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.23408018 = fieldWeight in 1076, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1076)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    FULL PAPERS Provenance and Annotations for Linked Data - Kai Eckert How Portable Are the Metadata Standards for Scientific Data? A Proposal for a Metadata Infrastructure - Jian Qin, Kai Li Lessons Learned in Implementing the Extended Date/Time Format in a Large Digital Library - Hannah Tarver, Mark Phillips Towards the Representation of Chinese Traditional Music: A State of the Art Review of Music Metadata Standards - Mi Tian, György Fazekas, Dawn Black, Mark Sandler Maps and Gaps: Strategies for Vocabulary Design and Development - Diane Ileana Hillmann, Gordon Dunsire, Jon Phipps A Method for the Development of Dublin Core Application Profiles (Me4DCAP V0.1): Aescription - Mariana Curado Malta, Ana Alice Baptista Find and Combine Vocabularies to Design Metadata Application Profiles using Schema Registries and LOD Resources - Tsunagu Honma, Mitsuharu Nagamori, Shigeo Sugimoto Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model - Antoine Isaac, Valentine Charles, Kate Fernie, Costis Dallas, Dimitris Gavrilis, Stavros Angelis With a Focused Intent: Evolution of DCMI as a Research Community - Jihee Beak, Richard P. Smiraglia Metadata Capital in a Data Repository - Jane Greenberg, Shea Swauger, Elena Feinstein DC Metadata is Alive and Well - A New Standard for Education - Liddy Nevile Representation of the UNIMARC Bibliographic Data Format in Resource Description Framework - Gordon Dunsire, Mirna Willer, Predrag Perozic
  4. Understanding metadata (2004) 0.00 
    0.0031433103 = product of:
  0.018859861 = sum of:
    0.018859861 = product of:
      0.037719723 = sum of:
        0.037719723 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037719723 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    10. 9.2004 10:22:40
  5. Sewing, S.: Bestandserhaltung und Archivierung : Koordinierung auf der Basis eines gemeinsamen Metadatenformates in den deutschen und österreichischen Bibliotheksverbünden (2021) 0.00 
    0.0023574824 = product of:
  0.014144895 = sum of:
    0.014144895 = product of:
      0.02828979 = sum of:
        0.02828979 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02828979 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  6. Lagoze, C.: Keeping Dublin Core simple : Cross-domain discovery or resource description? (2001) 0.00 
    0.0022472246 = product of:
  0.013483347 = sum of:
    0.013483347 = product of:
      0.026966695 = sum of:
        0.026966695 = weight(_text_:evolution in 1216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026966695 = score(doc=1216,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1843245 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.1463001 = fieldWeight in 1216, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1216)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Metadata is not monolithic. Instead, it is helpful to think of metadata as multiple views that can be projected from a single information object. Such views can form the basis of customized information services, such as search engines. Multiple views -- different types of metadata associated with a Web resource -- can facilitate a "drill-down" search paradigm, whereby people start their searches at a high level and later narrow their focus using domain-specific search categories. In Figure 1, for example, Mona Lisa may be viewed from the perspective of non-specialized searchers, with categories that are valid across domains (who painted it and when?); in the context of a museum (when and how was it acquired?); in the geo-spatial context of a walking tour using mobile devices (where is it in the gallery?); and in a legal framework (who owns the rights to its reproduction?). Multiple descriptive views imply a modular approach to metadata. Modularity is the basis of metadata architectures such as the Resource Description Framework (RDF), which permit different communities of expertise to associate and maintain multiple metadata packages for Web resources. As noted elsewhere, static association of multiple metadata packages with resources is but one way of achieving modularity. Another method is to computationally derive order-making views customized to the current needs of a client. This paper examines the evolution and scope of the Dublin Core from this perspective of metadata modularization. Dublin Core began in 1995 with a specific goal and scope -- as an easy-to-create and maintain descriptive format to facilitate cross-domain resource discovery on the Web. Over the years, this goal of "simple metadata for coarse-granularity discovery" came to mix with another goal -- that of community and domain-specific resource description and its attendant complexity. A notion of "qualified Dublin Core" evolved whereby the model for simple resource discovery -- a set of simple metadata elements in a flat, document-centric model -- would form the basis of more complex descriptions by treating the values of its elements as entities with properties ("component elements") in their own right.
  7. Roy, W.; Gray, C.: Preparing existing metadata for repository batch import : a recipe for a fickle food (2018) 0.00 
    0.0019645689 = product of:
  0.011787413 = sum of:
    0.011787413 = product of:
      0.023574825 = sum of:
        0.023574825 = weight(_text_:22 in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023574825 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    10.11.2018 16:27:22
  8. Baker, T.: ¬A grammar of Dublin Core (2000) 0.00 
    0.0015716552 = product of:
  0.009429931 = sum of:
    0.009429931 = product of:
      0.018859861 = sum of:
        0.018859861 = weight(_text_:22 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018859861 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12186485 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034800336 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    26.12.2011 14:01:22

Authors

Years

Languages

Themes