Search (51 results, page 2 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Dublin Core and Web metadata standards converge in Helsinki (1997) 0.00
    0.0033329446 = product of:
      0.033329446 = sum of:
        0.033329446 = weight(_text_:web in 1767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033329446 = score(doc=1767,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 1767, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1767)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    A 5th metadata workshop was held in Helsinki in Oct 1997, cosponsored by the National Library of Finland and OCLC, and 75 experts continued work begun in 1995 to try and reach consensus on conventions for describing resources on the Internet. Representatives of the W3C Metadata Project presented the 1st draft of a new specification for extended Web metadata: the Resource Description Framework (RDF), and demonstrated how this meets the infrastructure and encoding arrangements identified at the series of international Dublin Core workshops. W3C is an industry consortium run jointly by institutions in the USA, France and Japan, and currently has 210 members
  2. Haas, S.: Metadata mania : an overview (1998) 0.00
    0.0028568096 = product of:
      0.028568096 = sum of:
        0.028568096 = weight(_text_:web in 2222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028568096 = score(doc=2222,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 2222, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2222)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the structure of metadata formats with particular reference to the taxonomy of data formats set out by the BIBLINK report of the UK Office for Library and Information Networking and based on their underlying complexity. Referes to 3 main types of metadata: Dublin Core; MARC and Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC). Provides practical examples of the actual codings used, illustrated with reference to the Dublin Core, Marc and FGDC elements in selected Web sites. Ends with a glossary and a list of Web sites containing background information on metadata, such as the IAMSLIC metadata homepage
  3. Turner, T.P.; Brackbill, L.: Rising to the top : evaluating the use of HTML META tag to improve retrieval of World Wide Web documents through Internet search engines (1998) 0.00
    0.0028568096 = product of:
      0.028568096 = sum of:
        0.028568096 = weight(_text_:web in 5230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028568096 = score(doc=5230,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 5230, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5230)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to evaluate the effectiveness of using the HTML META tag to improve retrieval of World Wide Web documents through Internet search engines. 20 documents were created in 5 subject areas: agricultural trade; farm business statistics; poultry statistics; vegetable statistics; and cotton statistics. 4 pages were created in each subject area: one with no META tags, one with a META tag using the keywords attribute, one with a META tag using the description attribute, and one with META tags using both the keywords and description attributes. Searches were performed in Alta Vista and Infoseek to find terms common to all pages as well as for each keyword term contained in the META tag. Analysis of the searches suggests that use of the keywords attribute in a META tag substantially improves accessibility while use of the description attribute alone does not. Concludes that HTML document authors should consider using keywords attribute META tags and suggests that more search engines index the META tag to improve resource discovery
  4. Steele, C.: Organization of knowledge on the Internet (1996) 0.00
    0.0026934259 = product of:
      0.026934259 = sum of:
        0.026934259 = weight(_text_:web in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026934259 = score(doc=6437,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses how information will be found in digital libraries of the future. Suggests that a metadata approach to cataloguing will prevail, whereby the content of the data will be analysed at source, rather than on receipt by an intermediary, altering the role of the cataloguer, who will be required to evaluate as well as classify and index. Web site administrators may have to provide site metadata for use by global indexers; provides some examples of projects aimed at developing standards and assisting information providers in creating descriptive metadata
  5. Jul, E.: Cataloguing Internet resources : survey and prospects (1997) 0.00
    0.0026934259 = product of:
      0.026934259 = sum of:
        0.026934259 = weight(_text_:web in 7199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026934259 = score(doc=7199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 7199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7199)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Describes key events in the development of cataloguing of Internet resources and ssurveys current activities. The fundamental questions are: are Internet resources worth cataloguing; is traditional MARC/AACR2 cataloguing appropriate for Internet resources; and how should resources that change location be dealt with? Libraries should start by cataloguing an Internet resource. Bibliographic records can be used to drive Web applications. Metadata holds considerable promise
  6. Efthimiadis, E.N.; Carlyle, A.: Organizing Internet resources : metadata and the Web (1997) 0.00
    0.0026934259 = product of:
      0.026934259 = sum of:
        0.026934259 = weight(_text_:web in 2561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026934259 = score(doc=2561,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2561, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2561)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
  7. Siripan, P.: Metadata and trends of cataloging in Thai libraries (1999) 0.00
    0.0026934259 = product of:
      0.026934259 = sum of:
        0.026934259 = weight(_text_:web in 4183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026934259 = score(doc=4183,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 4183, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4183)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    A status of cataloging in Thailand shows a movement toward the use of information technology. The international standards for cataloging are being used and modified to effectively organize the information resources. An expanded scope of resources needed cataloging now covers cataloging the Web resources. The paper mentions Thailand's participation in the international working group on the use of metadata for libraries
  8. Jizba, L.: Reflections on summarizing and abstracting : implications for Internet Web documents, and standardized library cataloging databases (1997) 0.00
    0.0023567479 = product of:
      0.023567477 = sum of:
        0.023567477 = weight(_text_:web in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023567477 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
  9. Koch, T.; Seiffert, F.; Wätjen, H.-J.: Informationen im Web anbieten und wiederfinden (1998) 0.00
    0.0023567479 = product of:
      0.023567477 = sum of:
        0.023567477 = weight(_text_:web in 1840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023567477 = score(doc=1840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 1840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1840)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
  10. Schaefer, M.T.: Demystifying metadata : initiatives for web document description (1998) 0.00
    0.0023567479 = product of:
      0.023567477 = sum of:
        0.023567477 = weight(_text_:web in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023567477 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
  11. Wu, C.-J.: Experiments on using the Dublin Core to reduce the retrieval error ratio (1998) 0.00
    0.0023567479 = product of:
      0.023567477 = sum of:
        0.023567477 = weight(_text_:web in 5201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023567477 = score(doc=5201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 5201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5201)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    In order to test the power of metadata on information retrieval, an experiment was designed and conducted on a group of 7 graduate students using the Dublin Core as the cataloguing metadata. Results show that, on average, the retrieval error rate is only 2.9 per cent for the MES system (http://140.136.85.194), which utilizes the Dublin Core to describe the documents on the World Wide Web, in contrast to 20.7 per cent for the 7 famous search engines including HOTBOT, GAIS, LYCOS, EXCITE, INFOSEEK, YAHOO, and OCTOPUS. The very low error rate indicates that the users can use the information of the Dublin Core to decide whether to retrieve the documents or not
  12. Howarth, L.C.: Metadata structures and user preferences : designing user-focused knowledge access systems (1998) 0.00
    0.0023567479 = product of:
      0.023567477 = sum of:
        0.023567477 = weight(_text_:web in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023567477 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Given the paucity of research addressing client preferences for metadata content and display in knowledge access systems, a three-year study involving a sample of Canadian public and academic libraries and their end-users, was undertaken. Gaps between user preferences and the availability and presentation of metadata elements in some current Canadian web-based knowledge access systems were identified. Ideal displays were subsequently prototyped and evaluated. Overall, end-users favoured systems containing brief, concise, and focused metadata elements, restricted to a one-screen, uncluttered display, and enhanced by a variety of hierarchical, associative, and equivalent relationship links.
  13. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.00
    0.002192856 = product of:
      0.02192856 = sum of:
        0.02192856 = product of:
          0.065785676 = sum of:
            0.065785676 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065785676 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  14. Turner, J.M.: ¬The organization of moving-image metadata : a research agenda (1997) 0.00
    0.0015646582 = product of:
      0.015646582 = sum of:
        0.015646582 = product of:
          0.046939746 = sum of:
            0.046939746 = weight(_text_:29 in 47) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046939746 = score(doc=47,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 47, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=47)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    3. 1.1999 12:29:24
  15. Hengel-Dittrich, C.: Im Kern einig: Dublin Core auf dem Wege zum weltweiten Standard : 7. Dublin Core Workshop in Frankfurt am Main (1999) 0.00
    0.0015646582 = product of:
      0.015646582 = sum of:
        0.015646582 = product of:
          0.046939746 = sum of:
            0.046939746 = weight(_text_:29 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046939746 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    26.12.1999 20:08:29
  16. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.00
    0.0014619039 = product of:
      0.014619039 = sum of:
        0.014619039 = product of:
          0.043857116 = sum of:
            0.043857116 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043857116 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  17. Hoffmann, L.: Metadaten von Internetressourcen und ihre Integrierung in Bibliothekskataloge (1998) 0.00
    0.0012921527 = product of:
      0.012921526 = sum of:
        0.012921526 = product of:
          0.038764577 = sum of:
            0.038764577 = weight(_text_:22 in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038764577 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 18:45:36
  18. Essen, F. von: Metadaten - neue Perspektiven für die Erschließung von Netzpublikationen in Bibliotheken : Erster META-LIB-Workshop in Göttingen (1998) 0.00
    0.0012921527 = product of:
      0.012921526 = sum of:
        0.012921526 = product of:
          0.038764577 = sum of:
            0.038764577 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038764577 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Content
    Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand
  19. Revelli, C.: Integrare o sostituire? : Un dilemma per la norme catalografiche (1997) 0.00
    0.0012907772 = product of:
      0.012907772 = sum of:
        0.012907772 = product of:
          0.038723316 = sum of:
            0.038723316 = weight(_text_:29 in 1624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038723316 = score(doc=1624,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.38474706 = fieldWeight in 1624, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1624)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 17:18:10
    29. 7.1998 10:28:48
  20. Baker, T.: Languages for Dublin Core (1998) 0.00
    0.0011783739 = product of:
      0.011783739 = sum of:
        0.011783739 = weight(_text_:web in 1257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011783739 = score(doc=1257,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.12619963 = fieldWeight in 1257, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1257)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Over the past three years, the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative has achieved a broad international consensus on the semantics of a simple element set for describing electronic resources. Since the first workshop in March 1995, which was reported in the very first issue of D-Lib Magazine, Dublin Core has been the topic of perhaps a dozen articles here. Originally intended to be simple and intuitive enough for authors to tag Web pages without special training, Dublin Core is being adapted now for more specialized uses, from government information and legal deposit to museum informatics and electronic commerce. To meet such specialized requirements, Dublin Core can be customized with additional elements or qualifiers. However, these refinements can compromise interoperability across applications. There are tradeoffs between using specific terms that precisely meet local needs versus general terms that are understood more widely. We can better understand this inevitable tension between simplicity and complexity if we recognize that metadata is a form of human language. With Dublin Core, as with a natural language, people are inclined to stretch definitions, make general terms more specific, specific terms more general, misunderstand intended meanings, and coin new terms. One goal of this paper, therefore, will be to examine the experience of some related ways to seek semantic interoperability through simplicity: planned languages, interlingua constructs, and pidgins. The problem of semantic interoperability is compounded when we consider Dublin Core in translation. All of the workshops, documents, mailing lists, user guides, and working group outputs of the Dublin Core Initiative have been in English. But in many countries and for many applications, people need a metadata standard in their own language. In principle, the broad elements of Dublin Core can be defined equally well in Bulgarian or Hindi. Since Dublin Core is a controlled standard, however, any parallel definitions need to be kept in sync as the standard evolves. Another goal of the paper, then, will be to define the conceptual and organizational problem of maintaining a metadata standard in multiple languages. In addition to a name and definition, which are meant for human consumption, each Dublin Core element has a label, or indexing token, meant for harvesting by search engines. For practical reasons, these machine-readable tokens are English-looking strings such as Creator and Subject (just as HTML tags are called HEAD, BODY, or TITLE). These tokens, which are shared by Dublin Cores in every language, ensure that metadata fields created in any particular language are indexed together across repositories. As symbols of underlying universal semantics, these tokens form the basis of semantic interoperability among the multiple Dublin Cores. As long as we limit ourselves to sharing these indexing tokens among exact translations of a simple set of fifteen broad elements, the definitions of which fit easily onto two pages, the problem of Dublin Core in multiple languages is straightforward. But nothing having to do with human language is ever so simple. Just as speakers of various languages must learn the language of Dublin Core in their own tongues, we must find the right words to talk about a metadata language that is expressable in many discipline-specific jargons and natural languages and that inevitably will evolve and change over time.