Search (96 results, page 2 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.02 
    0.016237568 = product of:
  0.0487127 = sum of:
    0.0487127 = product of:
      0.0974254 = sum of:
        0.0974254 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0974254 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
  2. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02 
    0.016237568 = product of:
  0.0487127 = sum of:
    0.0487127 = product of:
      0.0974254 = sum of:
        0.0974254 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0974254 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  3. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02 
    0.016237568 = product of:
  0.0487127 = sum of:
    0.0487127 = product of:
      0.0974254 = sum of:
        0.0974254 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0974254 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  4. Lagoze, C.: Keeping Dublin Core simple : Cross-domain discovery or resource description? (2001) 0.02 
    0.015436406 = product of:
  0.023154609 = sum of:
    0.016118024 = weight(_text_:management in 1216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016118024 = score(doc=1216,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051362853 = queryNorm
        0.09310089 = fieldWeight in 1216, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1216)
    0.007036585 = product of:
      0.01407317 = sum of:
        0.01407317 = weight(_text_:system in 1216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01407317 = score(doc=1216,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.08699492 = fieldWeight in 1216, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1216)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Reality is messy. Individuals perceive or define objects differently. Objects may change over time, morphing into new versions of their former selves or into things altogether different. A book can give rise to a translation, derivation, or edition, and these resulting objects are related in complex ways to each other and to the people and contexts in which they were created or transformed. Providing a normalized view of such a messy reality is a precondition for managing information. From the first library catalogs, through Melvil Dewey's Decimal Classification system in the nineteenth century, to today's MARC encoding of AACR2 cataloging rules, libraries have epitomized the process of what David Levy calls "order making", whereby catalogers impose a veneer of regularity on the natural disorder of the artifacts they encounter. The pre-digital library within which the Catalog and its standards evolved was relatively self-contained and controlled. Creating and maintaining catalog records was, and still is, the task of professionals. Today's Web, in contrast, has brought together a diversity of information management communities, with a variety of order-making standards, into what Stuart Weibel has called the Internet Commons. The sheer scale of this context has motivated a search for new ways to describe and index information. Second-generation search engines such as Google can yield astonishingly good search results, while tools such as ResearchIndex for automatic citation indexing and techniques for inferring "Web communities" from constellations of hyperlinks promise even better methods for focusing queries on information from authoritative sources. Such "automated digital libraries," according to Bill Arms, promise to radically reduce the cost of managing information. Alongside the development of such automated methods, there is increasing interest in metadata as a means of imposing pre-defined order on Web content. While the size and changeability of the Web makes professional cataloging impractical, a minimal amount of information ordering, such as that represented by the Dublin Core (DC), may vastly improve the quality of an automatic index at low cost; indeed, recent work suggests that some types of simple description may be generated with little or no human intervention.
  5. Grossmann, S.: Meta-Strukturen in Intranets : Konzepte, Vorgehensweise, Beispiele (2001) 0.02 
    0.015043489 = product of:
  0.045130465 = sum of:
    0.045130465 = weight(_text_:management in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045130465 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051362853 = queryNorm
        0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  6. Rusch-Feja, D.: Nationale und internationale Ansätze zur Vereinheitlichung von Metadaten im Bildungsbereich (2001) 0.02 
    0.015043489 = product of:
  0.045130465 = sum of:
    0.045130465 = weight(_text_:management in 5859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045130465 = score(doc=5859,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051362853 = queryNorm
        0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 5859, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5859)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  7. Cole, T.: Qualified Dublin Core metadata for online journal articles (2002) 0.02 
    0.015043489 = product of:
  0.045130465 = sum of:
    0.045130465 = weight(_text_:management in 962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045130465 = score(doc=962,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051362853 = queryNorm
        0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 962, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=962)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Timothy is the Mathematics Librarian and Associate Professor of Library Administration at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL. He describes his experience with encoding Qualified Dublin Core (DCQ) metadata in RDF/XML and concludes that although there are still some issues that need to be resolved, generally speaking expressing DCQ metadata in RDF/XML is still worthwhile. However, initial investment in some cases may not be warranted. The draft DCMI guidelines for expressing DCQ metadata in RDF/XML are adequate for generating DCQ/RDF metadata instances. The current need is to develop applications that will use these metadata instances to enhance resources management and discovery.
  8. Craven, T.C.: Variations in use of meta tag descriptions by Web pages in different languages (2004) 0.02 
    0.015043489 = product of:
  0.045130465 = sum of:
    0.045130465 = weight(_text_:management in 2569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045130465 = score(doc=2569,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051362853 = queryNorm
        0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2569, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2569)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 40(2004) no.3, S.479-493
  9. Zhang, J.; Jastram, I.: ¬A study of the metadata creation behavior of different user groups on the Internet (2006) 0.02 
    0.015043489 = product of:
  0.045130465 = sum of:
    0.045130465 = weight(_text_:management in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045130465 = score(doc=982,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051362853 = queryNorm
        0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.4, S.1099-1122
  10. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.01 
    0.013917915 = product of:
  0.041753743 = sum of:
    0.041753743 = product of:
      0.083507486 = sum of:
        0.083507486 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083507486 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  11. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.01 
    0.0131219365 = product of:
  0.03936581 = sum of:
    0.03936581 = product of:
      0.07873162 = sum of:
        0.07873162 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07873162 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  12. Masanès, J.; Lupovici, C.: Preservation metadata : the NEDLIB's proposal Bibliothèque Nationale de France (2001) 0.01 
    0.01289442 = product of:
  0.038683258 = sum of:
    0.038683258 = weight(_text_:management in 6013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038683258 = score(doc=6013,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051362853 = queryNorm
        0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 6013, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6013)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Preservation of digital documents for the long term requires above all to solve the problem of technological obsolescence. Accessing to digital documents in 20 or loo years will be impossible if we, or our successor, can't process the bit stream underlying digital documents. We can be sure that the modality of data processing will be different in 20 or loo years. It is then our task to collect key information about today's data processing to ensure future access to these documents. In this paper we present the NEDLIB's proposal for a preservation metadata set. This set gathers core metadata that are mandatory for preservation management purposes. We propose to define 8 metadata elements and 38 sub-elements following the OAIS taxonomy of information object. A layered information analysis of the digital document is proposed in order to list all information involved in the data processing of the bit stream. These metadata elements are intended to be populate, as much as possible, in an automatic way to make it possible to handle large amounts of documents
  13. Chen, Y.N.; Chen, S.J.: ¬A metadata practice of the OFLA FRBR model : a case study for the National Palace Museum in Taipai (2004) 0.01 
    0.01289442 = product of:
  0.038683258 = sum of:
    0.038683258 = weight(_text_:management in 3384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038683258 = score(doc=3384,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051362853 = queryNorm
        0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 3384, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3384)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    In 1998, the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model which is composed of four entities (work, expression, manifestation and item) and their associative relationships (primary, responsibility and subject), was proposed by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). The FRBR model can be deployed as a logical framework for proceeding metadata analysis and developing metadata format. This paper presents a case study of the National Palace Museum (NPM) in Taipei to examine the feasibility of the FRBR model. Based on the examination of case study at the NPM, the FRBR model is proven to be a useful and fundamental framework for metadata analysis and implementation. Findings show that the FRBR model is helpful in identifying proper metadata elements organization and their distribution over the FRBR entities. The model is more suitable for media-centric and association-rich contents. However, in order to refine the FRBR model as a common framework for metadata, it would also require supportive mechanisms for management responsibility relationships for the workflow consideration and refine the distinction between work and expression entity.
  14. Hert, C.A.; Denn, S.O.; Gillman, D.W.; Oh, J.S.; Pattuelli, M.C.; Hernandez, N.: Investigating and modeling metadata use to support information architecture development in the statistical knowledge network (2007) 0.01 
    0.01289442 = product of:
  0.038683258 = sum of:
    0.038683258 = weight(_text_:management in 422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038683258 = score(doc=422,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051362853 = queryNorm
        0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 422, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=422)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Metadata and an appropriate metadata model are nontrivial components of information architecture conceptualization and implementation, particularly when disparate and dispersed systems are integrated. Metadata availability can enhance retrieval processes, improve information organization and navigation, and support management of digital objects. To support these activities efficiently, metadata need to be modeled appropriately for the tasks. The authors' work focuses on how to understand and model metadata requirements to support the work of end users of an integrative statistical knowledge network (SKN). They report on a series of user studies. These studies provide an understanding of metadata elements necessary for a variety of user-oriented tasks, related business rules associated with the use of these elements, and their relationship to other perspectives on metadata model development. This work demonstrates the importance of the user perspective in this type of design activity and provides a set of strategies by which the results of user studies can be systematically utilized to support that design.
  15. Hickey, T.R.: CORC : a system for gateway creation (2000) 0.01 
    0.011375209 = product of:
  0.034125626 = sum of:
    0.034125626 = product of:
      0.06825125 = sum of:
        0.06825125 = weight(_text_:system in 4870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06825125 = score(doc=4870,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.42190298 = fieldWeight in 4870, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4870)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    CORC is an OCLC project that id developing tools and systems to enable libraries to provide enhanced access to Internet resources. By adapting and extending library techniques and procedures, we are developing a self-supporting system capable of describing a large and useful subset of the Web. CORC is more a system for hosting and supporting subject gateways than a gateway itself and relies on large-scale cooperation among libraries to maintain a centralized database. By supporting emerging metadata standards such as Dublin Core and other standards such as Unicode and RDF, CORC broadens the range of libraries and librarians able to participate. Current plans are for OCLC as a full service in July 2000
  16. Strötgen, R.; Kokkelink, S.: Metadatenextraktion aus Internetquellen : Heterogenitätsbehandlung im Projekt CARMEN (2001) 0.01 
    0.010745349 = product of:
  0.032236047 = sum of:
    0.032236047 = weight(_text_:management in 5808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032236047 = score(doc=5808,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051362853 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5808, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5808)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  17. Cordeiro, M.I.: From library authority control to network authoritative metadata sources (2003) 0.01 
    0.010745349 = product of:
  0.032236047 = sum of:
    0.032236047 = weight(_text_:management in 3083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032236047 = score(doc=3083,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051362853 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 3083, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3083)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Authority control is a quite recent term in the long history of cataloguing, although the underlying principle is among the very early principles of bibliographic control. Bibliographic control is a Field in transformation by the rapid expansion of the WWW, which has brought new problems to infonnation discovery and retrieval, creating new challenges and requirements in information management. In a comprehensive approach, authority control is presented as one of the most promising library activities in this respect. The evolution of work methods and standards for the sharing of authority files is reviewed, showing the imbalance in developments and practical achievements between name and subject authority, in an international perspective. The need to improve the network availability and usability of authority information assets in more effective and holistic ways is underlyned; and a new philosophy and scope is proposed for library authority work, based an the primacy of the linking function of authority data, and by expanding the finding, relating and informing functions of authority records. Some of these aspects are being addressed in several projects dealing with knowledge organization systems, notably to cope with multilingual needs and to enable semantic interoperability among different systems. Library practice itself should evolve in the same direction, thereby providing practical experience to inform new or improved principles and standards for authority work, while contributing to enhance local information services and to promote their involvement in the WWW environment.
  18. Chen, Y.-n.; Chen, S.-j.: ¬A metadata practice of the IFLA FRBR model : a case study for the National Palace Museum in Taipei (2004) 0.01 
    0.010745349 = product of:
  0.032236047 = sum of:
    0.032236047 = weight(_text_:management in 4436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032236047 = score(doc=4436,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051362853 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 4436, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4436)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    In 1998, the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model which is composed of four entities (work, expression, manifestation and item) and their associative relationships (primary, responsibility and subject), was proposed by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). The FRBR model can be deployed as a logical framework for proceeding metadata analysis and developing metadata format. This paper presents a case study of the National Palace Museum (NPM) in Taipei to examine the feasibility of the FRBR model. Based on the examination of case study at the NPM, the FRBR model is proven to be a useful and fundamental framework for metadata analysis and implementation. Findings show that the FRBR model is helpful in identifying proper metadata elements organization and their distribution over the FRBR entities. The model is more suitable for media-centric and association-rich contents. However, in order to refine the FRBR model as a common framework for metadata, it would also require supportive mechanisms for management responsibility relationships for the workflow consideration and refine the distinction between work and expression entity.
  19. Dawson, A.; Hamilton, V.: Optimising metadata to make high-value content more accessible to Google users (2006) 0.01 
    0.010745349 = product of:
  0.032236047 = sum of:
    0.032236047 = weight(_text_:management in 5598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032236047 = score(doc=5598,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051362853 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5598, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5598)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to show how information in digital collections that have been catalogued using high-quality metadata can be retrieved more easily by users of search engines such as Google. Design/methodology/approach - The research and proposals described arose from an investigation into the observed phenomenon that pages from the Glasgow Digital Library (gdl.cdlr.strath.ac.uk) were regularly appearing near the top of Google search results shortly after publication, without any deliberate effort to achieve this. The reasons for this phenomenon are now well understood and are described in the second part of the paper. The first part provides context with a review of the impact of Google and a summary of recent initiatives by commercial publishers to make their content more visible to search engines. Findings - The literature research provides firm evidence of a trend amongst publishers to ensure that their online content is indexed by Google, in recognition of its popularity with internet users. The practical research demonstrates how search engine accessibility can be compatible with use of established collection management principles and high-quality metadata. Originality/value - The concept of data shoogling is introduced, involving some simple techniques for metadata optimisation. Details of its practical application are given, to illustrate how those working in academic, cultural and public-sector organisations could make their digital collections more easily accessible via search engines, without compromising any existing standards and practices.
  20. Foulonneau, M.: Information redundancy across metadata collections (2007) 0.01 
    0.010745349 = product of:
  0.032236047 = sum of:
    0.032236047 = weight(_text_:management in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032236047 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051362853 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.3, S.740-751

Authors

Languages

  • e 85
  • d 9
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 83
  • el 10
  • s 6
  • m 5
  • b 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications