Search (67 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.02 
    0.024628652 = product of:
  0.049257305 = sum of:
    0.049257305 = product of:
      0.09851461 = sum of:
        0.09851461 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09851461 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
  2. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02 
    0.024628652 = product of:
  0.049257305 = sum of:
    0.049257305 = product of:
      0.09851461 = sum of:
        0.09851461 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09851461 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  3. Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany (2008) 0.02 
    0.023170639 = product of:
  0.046341278 = sum of:
    0.046341278 = sum of:
      0.024791209 = weight(_text_:g in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024791209 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04544495 = queryNorm
          0.14524212 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
      0.02155007 = weight(_text_:22 in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02155007 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04544495 = queryNorm
          0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Carol Jean Godby, Devon Smith, Eric Childress: Encoding Application Profiles in a Computational Model of the Crosswalk. - Maria Elisabete Catarino, Ana Alice Baptista: Relating Folksonomies with Dublin Core. - Ed Summers, Antoine Isaac, Clay Redding, Dan Krech: LCSH, SKOS and Linked Data. - Xia Lin, Jiexun Li, Xiaohua Zhou: Theme Creation for Digital Collections. - Boris Lauser, Gudrun Johannsen, Caterina Caracciolo, Willem Robert van Hage, Johannes Keizer, Philipp Mayr: Comparing Human and Automatic Thesaurus Mapping Approaches in the Agricultural Domain. - P. Bryan Heidorn, Qin Wei: Automatic Metadata Extraction From Museum Specimen Labels. - Stuart Allen Sutton, Diny Golder: Achievement Standards Network (ASN): An Application Profile for Mapping K-12 Educational Resources to Achievement Standards. - Allen H. Renear, Karen M. Wickett, Richard J. Urban, David Dubin, Sarah L. Shreeves: Collection/Item Metadata Relationships. - Seth van Hooland, Yves Bontemps, Seth Kaufman: Answering the Call for more Accountability: Applying Data Profiling to Museum Metadata. - Thomas Margaritopoulos, Merkourios Margaritopoulos, Ioannis Mavridis, Athanasios Manitsaris: A Conceptual Framework for Metadata Quality Assessment. - Miao Chen, Xiaozhong Liu, Jian Qin: Semantic Relation Extraction from Socially-Generated Tags: A Methodology for Metadata Generation. - Hak Lae Kim, Simon Scerri, John G. Breslin, Stefan Decker, Hong Gee Kim: The State of the Art in Tag Ontologies: A Semantic Model for Tagging and Folksonomies. - Martin Malmsten: Making a Library Catalogue Part of the Semantic Web. - Philipp Mayr, Vivien Petras: Building a Terminology Network for Search: The KoMoHe Project. - Michael Panzer: Cool URIs for the DDC: Towards Web-scale Accessibility of a Large Classification System. - Barbara Levergood, Stefan Farrenkopf, Elisabeth Frasnelli: The Specification of the Language of the Field and Interoperability: Cross-language Access to Catalogues and Online Libraries (CACAO)
  4. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.02 
    0.02155007 = product of:
  0.04310014 = sum of:
    0.04310014 = product of:
      0.08620028 = sum of:
        0.08620028 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08620028 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
  5. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02 
    0.02155007 = product of:
  0.04310014 = sum of:
    0.04310014 = product of:
      0.08620028 = sum of:
        0.08620028 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08620028 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  6. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02 
    0.02155007 = product of:
  0.04310014 = sum of:
    0.04310014 = product of:
      0.08620028 = sum of:
        0.08620028 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08620028 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  7. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.02 
    0.018471489 = product of:
  0.036942977 = sum of:
    0.036942977 = product of:
      0.073885955 = sum of:
        0.073885955 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073885955 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  8. Baker, T.; Dekkers, M.; Heery, R.; Patel, M.; Salokhe, G.: What Terms Does Your Metadata Use? : Application Profiles as Machine-Understandable Narratives (2002) 0.02 
    0.017708007 = product of:
  0.035416014 = sum of:
    0.035416014 = product of:
      0.07083203 = sum of:
        0.07083203 = weight(_text_:g in 1279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07083203 = score(doc=1279,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 1279, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1279)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  9. Apps, A.; MacIntyre, R.; Heery, R.; Patel, M.; Salokhe, G.: Zetoc : a Dublin Core Based Current Awareness Service (2002) 0.02 
    0.017708007 = product of:
  0.035416014 = sum of:
    0.035416014 = product of:
      0.07083203 = sum of:
        0.07083203 = weight(_text_:g in 1280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07083203 = score(doc=1280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 1280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1280)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  10. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.02 
    0.017415088 = product of:
  0.034830175 = sum of:
    0.034830175 = product of:
      0.06966035 = sum of:
        0.06966035 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06966035 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  11. Dechilly, T.; Bachimont, B.: Controlling the semantics of metadata on audio-visual documents using ontologies (2000) 0.01 
    0.0141664045 = product of:
  0.028332809 = sum of:
    0.028332809 = product of:
      0.056665618 = sum of:
        0.056665618 = weight(_text_:g in 5097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056665618 = score(doc=5097,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.331982 = fieldWeight in 5097, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5097)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Working with conceptual structures: contributions to ICCS 2000. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. Darmstadt, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: G. Stumme
  12. Agnew, G.: Developing a metadata strategy (2003) 0.01 
    0.0141664045 = product of:
  0.028332809 = sum of:
    0.028332809 = product of:
      0.056665618 = sum of:
        0.056665618 = weight(_text_:g in 5504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056665618 = score(doc=5504,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.331982 = fieldWeight in 5504, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5504)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  13. Gömpel, R.; Altenhöner, R.; Kunz, M.; Oehlschläger, S.; Werner, C.: Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 70. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in Buenos Aires : Aus den Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control, der Core Activities ICABS und UNIMARC sowie der Information Technology Section (2004) 0.01 
    0.013240365 = product of:
  0.02648073 = sum of:
    0.02648073 = sum of:
      0.0141664045 = weight(_text_:g in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0141664045 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04544495 = queryNorm
          0.0829955 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
      0.012314326 = weight(_text_:22 in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.012314326 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04544495 = queryNorm
          0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    "Libraries: Tools for Education and Development" war das Motto der 70. IFLA-Generalkonferenz, dem Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, der vom 22.-27. August 2004 in Buenos Aires, Argentinien, und damit erstmals in Lateinamerika stattfand. Rund 3.000 Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmer, davon ein Drittel aus spanischsprachigen Ländern, allein 600 aus Argentinien, besuchten die von der IFLA und dem nationalen Organisationskomitee gut organisierte Tagung mit mehr als 200 Sitzungen und Veranstaltungen. Aus Deutschland waren laut Teilnehmerverzeichnis leider nur 45 Kolleginnen und Kollegen angereist, womit ihre Zahl wieder auf das Niveau von Boston gesunken ist. Erfreulicherweise gab es nunmehr bereits im dritten Jahr eine deutschsprachige Ausgabe des IFLA-Express. Auch in diesem Jahr soll hier über die Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control berichtet werden. Die Arbeit der Division mit ihren Sektionen Bibliography, Cataloguing, Classification and Indexing sowie der neuen Sektion Knowledge Management bildet einen der Schwerpunkte der IFLA-Arbeit, die dabei erzielten konkreten Ergebnisse und Empfehlungen haben maßgeblichen Einfluss auf die tägliche Arbeit der Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. Erstmals wird auch ausführlich über die Arbeit der Core Activities ICABS und UNIMARC und der Information Technology Section berichtet.
    Content
    Aus den Arbeitsgruppen der Cataloguing Sektion: Schwerpunkt der Arbeiten der ISBD Review Group bleibt die Fortsetzung des generellen Revisionsprojekts. 2004 konnte die revidierte ISBD(G) veröffentlicht werden Für die Revision der ISBD(A) wurde eine Study Group aus Experten für das Alte Buch gebildet. Das weltweite Stellungnahmeverfahren ist für Frühjahr 2005 geplant. Bezüglich der Revision der ISBD(ER) konnten im weltweiten Stellungnahmeverfahren aufgekommene Fragen während der Sitzungen in Buenos Aires abschließend geklärt werden. Die Veröffentlichung der neuen ISBD(ER) ist für Ende 2004 / Anfang 2005 geplant. Die Revision der ISBD(CM) ist im Rahmen einer gemeinsamen Arbeitsgruppe der ISBD Review Group und der Sektion Geographie und Karten weiter vorangekommen. Für die Revision der ISBD(NBM) soll eine eigene Study Group gebildet werden. Die FRBR Review Group konnte erste Fortschritte bei der Erreichung der im vergangenen Jahr gesetzten Ziele Erarbeitung einer Richtlinie zur Anwendung der FRBR bei der Katalogisierung, Erweiterung der FRBR-Web-Seite im IFLAnet, um bei anderen communities (Archive, Museen etc.) für das Modell zu werben, sowie Überarbeitung des FRBR-Modells vermeIden. Von den in Berlin gebildeten fünf FRBR-Arbeitsgruppen (Expression entity Working Group, Working Group an continuing resources, Working Group an teaching and training, Working Group an subject relationships and classification, Working Group an FRBR/CRM dialogue) sind einige bereits aktiv gewesen, vor allem die letztgenannte Working Group an FRBR/CRM dialogue. Die "Working Group an subject relationships and classification" soll demnächst in Zusammenarbeit mit der Classification and Indexing Section etabliert werden. Ziel hierbei ist es, die FRBR auch auf den Bereich der Inhaltserschließung auszuweiten. Die "Working Group an continuing resources" hat in Buenos Aires beschlossen, ihre Arbeit nicht fortzuführen, da die FRBR in ihrer derzeitigen Fassung "seriality" nicht ausreichend berücksichtigen. Es ist geplant, eine neue Arbeitsgruppe unter Einbeziehung ausgewiesener Experten für fortlaufende Werke zu bilden, die sich mit diesem Problem beschäftigen soll. Für das IFLA Multilingual Dictionary of Cataloguing Terms and Concepts - MulDiCat' konnten die Richtlinien für die Eingabe in die Datenbank fertig gestellt und erforderliche Änderungen in der Datenbank implementiert werden. Die Datenbank dieses IFLA-Projekts enthält mittlerweile alle englischsprachigen Definitionen des AACR2-Glossars, die deutschen Übersetzungen der AACR2-Glossar-Definitionen sowie alle ISBD-Definitionen. Im nächsten Schritt sollen Einträge für die FRBR-Terminologie ergänzt werden. Ebenso sollen Ergänzungen zu den englischen Einträgen vorgenommen werden (aus AACR, ISBD, FRBR und weiteren IFLA-Publikationen). Die Guidelines for OPAC Displays (Richtlinien zur Präsentation von Suchergebnissen im OPAC) stehen nach der Durchführung des weltweiten Stellungnahmeverfahrens zur Veröffentlichung im IFLAnet bereit. Die Working Group an OPAC Displays hat damit ihre Arbeit beendet.
  14. Pitti, D.V.: Encoded Archival Description (EAD) (2009) 0.01 
    0.012521451 = product of:
  0.025042903 = sum of:
    0.025042903 = product of:
      0.050085805 = sum of:
        0.050085805 = weight(_text_:g in 3777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050085805 = score(doc=3777,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.2934334 = fieldWeight in 3777, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3777)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Encoded Archival Description (EAD) is an international digital standard based on Extensible Markup Language (XML) for encoding descriptions of archival records. People living their lives as individuals, as members of families, and as members of corporate bodies create and assemble records that serve as instruments for carrying out or documenting the performance of activities. Based on the archival principles of respect des fonds (or provenance) and original order, archivists traditionally have treated all of the records created and assembled by one individual, family, or corporate body as a collection or fonds. Archivists describe records as an essential part of their responsibility for preserving and facilitating access to and use of archives. Archival description provides information essential for establishing the authenticity and completeness of fonds, and serves effective administration, discovery, access, and understanding of records. Traditionally archivists have described each fonds hierarchically in a single apparatus commonly called a finding aid. Until the advent of computing, finding aids were typically in printed form. In the 1990s, archivists created EAD, an encoding standard for archival description. EAD is based technologically on XML and intellectually on General International Standard Archival Description (ISAD(G)), a descriptive framework developed by the International Council of Archives (ICA). As with all standards, EAD will continue to develop in the future. Future changes to EAD will be influenced by ICA descriptive standards that complement ISAD(G) and encoding standards based on them that will complement EAD. This entry is organized into six sections: introduction, archival records, archival description, EAD, history, and future.
  15. McClelland, M.; McArthur, D.; Giersch, S.; Geisler, G.: Challenges for service providers when importing metadata in digital libraries (2002) 0.01 
    0.0123956045 = product of:
  0.024791209 = sum of:
    0.024791209 = product of:
      0.049582418 = sum of:
        0.049582418 = weight(_text_:g in 565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049582418 = score(doc=565,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 565, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=565)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  16. Simons, G.; Bird, S.: Building an Open Language Archives Community on the OAI foundation (2003) 0.01 
    0.0123956045 = product of:
  0.024791209 = sum of:
    0.024791209 = product of:
      0.049582418 = sum of:
        0.049582418 = weight(_text_:g in 2336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049582418 = score(doc=2336,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 2336, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2336)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  17. Smiraglia, R.P.: Empiricism as the basis for metadata categorisation : expanding the case for instantiation with archival documents (2006) 0.01 
    0.0123956045 = product of:
  0.024791209 = sum of:
    0.024791209 = product of:
      0.049582418 = sum of:
        0.049582418 = weight(_text_:g in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049582418 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  18. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.01 
    0.012314326 = product of:
  0.024628652 = sum of:
    0.024628652 = product of:
      0.049257305 = sum of:
        0.049257305 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049257305 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  19. McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004) 0.01 
    0.012314326 = product of:
  0.024628652 = sum of:
    0.024628652 = product of:
      0.049257305 = sum of:
        0.049257305 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049257305 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
  20. Wusteman, J.: Whither HTML? (2004) 0.01 
    0.012314326 = product of:
  0.024628652 = sum of:
    0.024628652 = product of:
      0.049257305 = sum of:
        0.049257305 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049257305 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04544495 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.99-105

Authors

Languages

  • e 61
  • d 5
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 60
  • el 6
  • s 5
  • b 2
  • m 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications