Search (624 results, page 1 of 32)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.06
    0.06351568 = product of:
      0.12703136 = sum of:
        0.12703136 = sum of:
          0.009045236 = weight(_text_:a in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.009045236 = score(doc=5743,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.059167966 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.11798613 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11798613 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17969444 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
    Type
    a
  2. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.06
    0.06164935 = product of:
      0.1232987 = sum of:
        0.1232987 = sum of:
          0.012060314 = weight(_text_:a in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012060314 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.059167966 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
          0.11123838 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11123838 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17969444 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
    Type
    a
  3. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.05
    0.05394318 = product of:
      0.10788636 = sum of:
        0.10788636 = sum of:
          0.010552775 = weight(_text_:a in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.010552775 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.059167966 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
          0.09733358 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09733358 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17969444 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
    Type
    a
  4. Wu, C.-J.: Metadata and future developments in cataloguing (1997) 0.05
    0.050082892 = sum of:
      0.044806506 = product of:
        0.17922603 = sum of:
          0.17922603 = weight(_text_:author's in 2826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17922603 = score(doc=2826,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.34484094 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.51973534 = fieldWeight in 2826, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2826)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0052763876 = product of:
        0.010552775 = sum of:
          0.010552775 = weight(_text_:a in 2826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.010552775 = score(doc=2826,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.059167966 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2826, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2826)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata is a resource which can assist the information retrieval of digital documents on the Internet. In designing a metadata system, it is necessary to consider the characteristics of digital documents, such as the variety of file formats, frequent format transformation and the difficulty of distinguishing between the different versions. Provides a brief analysis of some existing metadata formats, and introduces several pronciples for the future development of cataloguing on the Internet. Briefly describes the Metadata Experimental System (MES) currently under development, and located at the author's homepage
    Type
    a
  5. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.05
    0.046714112 = product of:
      0.093428224 = sum of:
        0.093428224 = sum of:
          0.014770809 = weight(_text_:a in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.014770809 = score(doc=2845,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.059167966 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.07865742 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07865742 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17969444 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
    Type
    a
  6. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.04
    0.042343788 = product of:
      0.084687576 = sum of:
        0.084687576 = sum of:
          0.006030157 = weight(_text_:a in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.006030157 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.059167966 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.07865742 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07865742 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17969444 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
    Type
    a
  7. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.04
    0.041289832 = product of:
      0.082579665 = sum of:
        0.082579665 = sum of:
          0.013055675 = weight(_text_:a in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.013055675 = score(doc=3280,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.059167966 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
          0.06952399 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06952399 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17969444 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
    Type
    a
  8. Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016) 0.04
    0.04009195 = product of:
      0.0801839 = sum of:
        0.0801839 = sum of:
          0.0106599135 = weight(_text_:a in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0106599135 = score(doc=3281,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.059167966 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.06952399 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06952399 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17969444 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
    Type
    a
  9. Chilvers, A.: ¬The super-metadata framework for managing long-term access to digital data objects : a possible way forward with specific reference to the UK (2002) 0.04
    0.039055515 = sum of:
      0.032004647 = product of:
        0.12801859 = sum of:
          0.12801859 = weight(_text_:author's in 4468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12801859 = score(doc=4468,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.34484094 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 4468, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4468)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0070508695 = product of:
        0.014101739 = sum of:
          0.014101739 = weight(_text_:a in 4468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.014101739 = score(doc=4468,freq=28.0), product of:
              0.059167966 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.23833402 = fieldWeight in 4468, product of:
                5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                  28.0 = termFreq=28.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4468)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper examines the reasons why existing management practices designed to cope with paper-based data objects appear to be inadequate for managing digital data objects (DDOs). The research described suggests the need for a reassessment of the way we view long-term access to DDOs. There is a need for a shift in emphasis which embraces the fluid nature of such objects and addresses the multifaceted issues involved in achieving such access. It would appear from the findings of this research that a conceptual framework needs to be developed which addresses a range of elements. The research achieved this by examining the issues facing stakeholders involved in this field; examining the need for and structure of a new generic conceptual framework, the super-metadata framework; identifying and discussing the issues central to the development of such a framework; and justifying the feasibility through the creation of an interactive cost model and stakeholder evaluation. The wider conceptual justification for such a framework is discussed and this involves an examination of the "public good" argument for the long-term retention of DDOs and the importance of selection in the management process. The paper concludes by considering the benefits to practitioners and the role they might play in testing the feasibility of such a framework. The paper also suggests possible avenues researchers may wish to consider to develop further the management of this field. (Note: This paper is derived from the author's Loughborough University phD thesis, "Managing long-term access to digital data objects: a metadata approach", written while holding a research studentship funded by the Department of Information Science.)
    Type
    a
  10. Hoffmann, L.: Metadaten von Internetressourcen und ihre Integrierung in Bibliothekskataloge (1998) 0.04
    0.03853084 = product of:
      0.07706168 = sum of:
        0.07706168 = sum of:
          0.007537696 = weight(_text_:a in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.007537696 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.059167966 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
          0.06952399 = weight(_text_:22 in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06952399 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17969444 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 18:45:36
    Type
    a
  11. Essen, F. von: Metadaten - neue Perspektiven für die Erschließung von Netzpublikationen in Bibliotheken : Erster META-LIB-Workshop in Göttingen (1998) 0.04
    0.03853084 = product of:
      0.07706168 = sum of:
        0.07706168 = sum of:
          0.007537696 = weight(_text_:a in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.007537696 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.059167966 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
          0.06952399 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06952399 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17969444 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand
    Type
    a
  12. Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016) 0.04
    0.03853084 = product of:
      0.07706168 = sum of:
        0.07706168 = sum of:
          0.007537696 = weight(_text_:a in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.007537696 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.059167966 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
          0.06952399 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06952399 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17969444 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
    Type
    a
  13. Gursoy, A.; Wickett, K.; Feinberg, M.: Understanding tag functions in a moderated, user-generated metadata ecosystem (2018) 0.04
    0.03765792 = sum of:
      0.032004647 = product of:
        0.12801859 = sum of:
          0.12801859 = weight(_text_:author's in 3946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12801859 = score(doc=3946,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.34484094 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 3946, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3946)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.005653273 = product of:
        0.011306546 = sum of:
          0.011306546 = weight(_text_:a in 3946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.011306546 = score(doc=3946,freq=18.0), product of:
              0.059167966 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 3946, product of:
                4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                  18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3946)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate tag use in a metadata ecosystem that supports a fan work repository to identify functions of tags and explore the system as a co-constructed communicative context. Design/methodology/approach Using modified techniques from grounded theory (Charmaz, 2007), this paper integrates humanistic and social science methods to identify kinds of tag use in a rich setting. Findings Three primary roles of tags emerge out of detailed study of the metadata ecosystem: tags can identify elements in the fan work, tags can reflect on how those elements are used or adapted in the fan work, and finally, tags can express the fan author's sense of her role in the discursive context of the fan work repository. Attending to each of the tag roles shifts focus away from just what tags say to include how they say it. Practical implications Instead of building metadata systems designed solely for retrieval or description, this research suggests that it may be fruitful to build systems that recognize various metadata functions and allow for expressivity. This research also suggests that attending to metadata previously considered unusable in systems may reflect the participants' sense of the system and their role within it. Originality/value In addition to accommodating a wider range of tag functions, this research implies consideration of metadata ecosystems, where different kinds of tags do different things and work together to create a multifaceted artifact.
    Type
    a
  14. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.03
    0.034551516 = product of:
      0.06910303 = sum of:
        0.06910303 = sum of:
          0.013483843 = weight(_text_:a in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.013483843 = score(doc=4869,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.059167966 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.05561919 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05561919 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17969444 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
    Type
    a
  15. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.03
    0.033839755 = product of:
      0.06767951 = sum of:
        0.06767951 = sum of:
          0.012060314 = weight(_text_:a in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012060314 = score(doc=767,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.059167966 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
          0.05561919 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05561919 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17969444 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
    Type
    a
  16. Waugh, A.: Specifying metadata standards for metadata tool configuration (1998) 0.03
    0.033839755 = product of:
      0.06767951 = sum of:
        0.06767951 = sum of:
          0.012060314 = weight(_text_:a in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012060314 = score(doc=3596,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.059167966 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
          0.05561919 = weight(_text_:22 in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05561919 = score(doc=3596,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17969444 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a metadata specification designed to support dynamic configuration of metadata software by capturing features of metadata standards. The specification comprises 3 components: the classification of the metadata standard, the metadata schema, and the metadata expression
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
    Type
    a
  17. Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999) 0.03
    0.033839755 = product of:
      0.06767951 = sum of:
        0.06767951 = sum of:
          0.012060314 = weight(_text_:a in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012060314 = score(doc=6095,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.059167966 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
          0.05561919 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05561919 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17969444 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
    Type
    a
  18. Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004) 0.03
    0.033839755 = product of:
      0.06767951 = sum of:
        0.06767951 = sum of:
          0.012060314 = weight(_text_:a in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012060314 = score(doc=2834,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.059167966 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
          0.05561919 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05561919 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17969444 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article provides an introductory overview of the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard, better known as METS. It will be of most use to librarians and technical staff who are encountering METS for the first time. The article contains a brief history of the development of METS, a primer covering the basic structure and content of METS documents, and a discussion of several issues relevant to the implementation and continuing development of METS including object models, extension schemata, and application profiles.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
    Type
    a
  19. Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996) 0.03
    0.033031866 = product of:
      0.06606373 = sum of:
        0.06606373 = sum of:
          0.01044454 = weight(_text_:a in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01044454 = score(doc=3689,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.059167966 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
          0.05561919 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05561919 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17969444 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Using grant funding, some prominent creators of digital libraries have promised users of networked resources certain kinds of access. Some of this access finds a ready-made vehicle in USMARC, some of it in the TEI header, some of it has yet to find the most appropriate vehicle. In its quest to provide access to what users need, the cataloging community can show leadership by exploring the strength inherent in a metadata-providing system like the TEI header.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.59-73
    Type
    a
  20. El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001) 0.03
    0.033031866 = product of:
      0.06606373 = sum of:
        0.06606373 = sum of:
          0.01044454 = weight(_text_:a in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01044454 = score(doc=751,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.059167966 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
          0.05561919 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05561919 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17969444 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051314447 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article is a survey of representative metadata efforts comparing them to MARC 21 metadata in order to determine if new electronic formats require the development of a new set of standards. This study surveys the ongoing metadata projects in order to identify what types of metadata exist and how they are used and also compares and analyzes selected metadata elements in an attempt to illustrate how they are related to MARC 21 metadata format elements.
    Date
    23. 1.2007 11:22:30
    Type
    a

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 573
  • el 76
  • m 22
  • s 15
  • n 3
  • x 3
  • b 2
  • More… Less…

Subjects