Search (125 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Essen, F. von: Metadaten - neue Perspektiven für die Erschließung von Netzpublikationen in Bibliotheken : Erster META-LIB-Workshop in Göttingen (1998) 0.08
    0.08084841 = product of:
      0.16169682 = sum of:
        0.16169682 = sum of:
          0.09125608 = weight(_text_:f in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09125608 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
          0.07044074 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07044074 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand
  2. Alves dos Santos, E.; Mucheroni, M.L.: VIAF and OpenCitations : cooperative work as a strategy for information organization in the linked data era (2018) 0.06
    0.06467873 = product of:
      0.12935746 = sum of:
        0.12935746 = sum of:
          0.073004864 = weight(_text_:f in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.073004864 = score(doc=4826,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
          0.05635259 = weight(_text_:22 in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05635259 = score(doc=4826,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 1.2019 19:13:22
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  3. Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004) 0.04
    0.03903947 = sum of:
      0.01790725 = product of:
        0.071629 = sum of:
          0.071629 = weight(_text_:authors in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.071629 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021132221 = product of:
        0.042264443 = sum of:
          0.042264443 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042264443 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
  4. Baroncini, S.; Sartini, B.; Erp, M. Van; Tomasi, F.; Gangemi, A.: Is dc:subject enough? : A landscape on iconography and iconology statements of knowledge graphs in the semantic web (2023) 0.04
    0.03892873 = sum of:
      0.020677513 = product of:
        0.08271005 = sum of:
          0.08271005 = weight(_text_:authors in 1030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08271005 = score(doc=1030,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.34896153 = fieldWeight in 1030, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1030)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.018251216 = product of:
        0.036502432 = sum of:
          0.036502432 = weight(_text_:f in 1030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036502432 = score(doc=1030,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.17614852 = fieldWeight in 1030, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1030)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In the last few years, the size of Linked Open Data (LOD) describing artworks, in general or domain-specific Knowledge Graphs (KGs), is gradually increasing. This provides (art-)historians and Cultural Heritage professionals with a wealth of information to explore. Specifically, structured data about iconographical and iconological (icon) aspects, i.e. information about the subjects, concepts and meanings of artworks, are extremely valuable for the state-of-the-art of computational tools, e.g. content recognition through computer vision. Nevertheless, a data quality evaluation for art domains, fundamental for data reuse, is still missing. The purpose of this study is filling this gap with an overview of art-historical data quality in current KGs with a focus on the icon aspects. Design/methodology/approach This study's analyses are based on established KG evaluation methodologies, adapted to the domain by addressing requirements from art historians' theories. The authors first select several KGs according to Semantic Web principles. Then, the authors evaluate (1) their structures' suitability to describe icon information through quantitative and qualitative assessment and (2) their content, qualitatively assessed in terms of correctness and completeness. Findings This study's results reveal several issues on the current expression of icon information in KGs. The content evaluation shows that these domain-specific statements are generally correct but often not complete. The incompleteness is confirmed by the structure evaluation, which highlights the unsuitability of the KG schemas to describe icon information with the required granularity. Originality/value The main contribution of this work is an overview of the actual landscape of the icon information expressed in LOD. Therefore, it is valuable to cultural institutions by providing them a first domain-specific data quality evaluation. Since this study's results suggest that the selected domain information is underrepresented in Semantic Web datasets, the authors highlight the need for the creation and fostering of such information to provide a more thorough art-historical dimension to LOD.
  5. Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012) 0.03
    0.030971266 = sum of:
      0.016883118 = product of:
        0.06753247 = sum of:
          0.06753247 = weight(_text_:authors in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06753247 = score(doc=367,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.014088147 = product of:
        0.028176295 = sum of:
          0.028176295 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028176295 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.
  6. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.03
    0.029885476 = product of:
      0.059770953 = sum of:
        0.059770953 = product of:
          0.119541906 = sum of:
            0.119541906 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.119541906 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  7. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.03
    0.028176295 = product of:
      0.05635259 = sum of:
        0.05635259 = product of:
          0.11270518 = sum of:
            0.11270518 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11270518 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
  8. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.03
    0.028176295 = product of:
      0.05635259 = sum of:
        0.05635259 = product of:
          0.11270518 = sum of:
            0.11270518 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11270518 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  9. Koch, T.; Seiffert, F.; Wätjen, H.-J.: Informationen im Web anbieten und wiederfinden (1998) 0.03
    0.027660532 = product of:
      0.055321064 = sum of:
        0.055321064 = product of:
          0.11064213 = sum of:
            0.11064213 = weight(_text_:f in 1840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11064213 = score(doc=1840,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.53392184 = fieldWeight in 1840, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält die einzelnen Beiträge: KOCH, T.: Übersicht über die verschiedenen Typen von Suchdiensten; SEIFFERT, F.: Hilfsmittel zur Wahl passender Suchdienste für bestimmte Zwecke; KOCH, T.: Konzeptsuche / Erweiterung der Suchanfrage; KOCH, T.: Kontrolliertes Vokabular; SEIFFERT, F.: Ranking; WÄTJEN, H.-J.: Integration von Searching und Browsing; KOCH, T.: Metadaten und Suchdienste
  10. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.02
    0.024654258 = product of:
      0.049308516 = sum of:
        0.049308516 = product of:
          0.09861703 = sum of:
            0.09861703 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09861703 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
  11. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.024654258 = product of:
      0.049308516 = sum of:
        0.049308516 = product of:
          0.09861703 = sum of:
            0.09861703 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09861703 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  12. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02
    0.024654258 = product of:
      0.049308516 = sum of:
        0.049308516 = product of:
          0.09861703 = sum of:
            0.09861703 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09861703 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  13. Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany (2008) 0.02
    0.022773024 = sum of:
      0.010445896 = product of:
        0.041783582 = sum of:
          0.041783582 = weight(_text_:authors in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041783582 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.012327129 = product of:
        0.024654258 = sum of:
          0.024654258 = weight(_text_:22 in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024654258 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata is a key aspect of our evolving infrastructure for information management, social computing, and scientific collaboration. DC-2008 will focus on metadata challenges, solutions, and innovation in initiatives and activities underlying semantic and social applications. Metadata is part of the fabric of social computing, which includes the use of wikis, blogs, and tagging for collaboration and participation. Metadata also underlies the development of semantic applications, and the Semantic Web - the representation and integration of multimedia knowledge structures on the basis of semantic models. These two trends flow together in applications such as Wikipedia, where authors collectively create structured information that can be extracted and used to enhance access to and use of information sources. Recent discussion has focused on how existing bibliographic standards can be expressed as Semantic Web vocabularies to facilitate the ingration of library and cultural heritage data with other types of data. Harnessing the efforts of content providers and end-users to link, tag, edit, and describe their information in interoperable ways ("participatory metadata") is a key step towards providing knowledge environments that are scalable, self-correcting, and evolvable. DC-2008 will explore conceptual and practical issues in the development and deployment of semantic and social applications to meet the needs of specific communities of practice.
  14. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.02
    0.021132221 = product of:
      0.042264443 = sum of:
        0.042264443 = product of:
          0.084528886 = sum of:
            0.084528886 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084528886 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  15. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.02
    0.01992365 = product of:
      0.0398473 = sum of:
        0.0398473 = product of:
          0.0796946 = sum of:
            0.0796946 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0796946 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  16. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.02
    0.01992365 = product of:
      0.0398473 = sum of:
        0.0398473 = product of:
          0.0796946 = sum of:
            0.0796946 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0796946 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  17. Salaba, A.; Tennis, J.T.: Solid foundations and some secondary assumptions in the design of bibliographic metadata : toward a typology of complementary uses of metadata (2018) 0.02
    0.018251216 = product of:
      0.036502432 = sum of:
        0.036502432 = product of:
          0.073004864 = sum of:
            0.073004864 = weight(_text_:f in 4779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073004864 = score(doc=4779,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 4779, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4779)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  18. Simionato, A.C.; Arakaki, F.A.; Costa Santos, P.L.V.A. da: Integrating libraries, archives, museums and art galleries with Linked Data : initiatives study (2018) 0.02
    0.018251216 = product of:
      0.036502432 = sum of:
        0.036502432 = product of:
          0.073004864 = sum of:
            0.073004864 = weight(_text_:f in 4807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073004864 = score(doc=4807,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 4807, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4807)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  19. Pattuelli, M.C.: From uniform identifiers to graphs, from individuals to communities : what we talk about when we talk about linked person data (2018) 0.02
    0.018251216 = product of:
      0.036502432 = sum of:
        0.036502432 = product of:
          0.073004864 = sum of:
            0.073004864 = weight(_text_:f in 4816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073004864 = score(doc=4816,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 4816, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4816)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  20. Adland, M.K.; Lykke, M.: Tags on healthcare information websites (2018) 0.02
    0.018251216 = product of:
      0.036502432 = sum of:
        0.036502432 = product of:
          0.073004864 = sum of:
            0.073004864 = weight(_text_:f in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073004864 = score(doc=4823,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 108
  • d 14
  • f 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 113
  • el 13
  • s 7
  • m 5
  • b 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…