-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.12
0.12275928 = product of:
0.24551857 = sum of:
0.24551857 = sum of:
0.16187184 = weight(_text_:v in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16187184 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.64586604 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.08364672 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08364672 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014)
0.07
0.07160959 = product of:
0.14321917 = sum of:
0.14321917 = sum of:
0.094425246 = weight(_text_:v in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094425246 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.3767552 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.048793923 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048793923 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Brack, V.: ¬The eLib collection description scheme (2000)
0.05
0.05395728 = product of:
0.10791456 = sum of:
0.10791456 = product of:
0.21582912 = sum of:
0.21582912 = weight(_text_:v in 4905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21582912 = score(doc=4905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.86115474 = fieldWeight in 4905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4905)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kashyap, V.; Sheth, A.: Information brokering across heterogeneous digital data : a metadata-based approach (2000)
0.04
0.04046796 = product of:
0.08093592 = sum of:
0.08093592 = product of:
0.16187184 = sum of:
0.16187184 = weight(_text_:v in 6390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16187184 = score(doc=6390,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.64586604 = fieldWeight in 6390, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6390)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004)
0.04
0.038632046 = sum of:
0.017720366 = product of:
0.07088146 = sum of:
0.07088146 = weight(_text_:authors in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07088146 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02091168 = product of:
0.04182336 = sum of:
0.04182336 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04182336 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
-
Stiller, J.; Király, P.: Multitlinguality of metadata : measuring the miltilingual degree of Europeana's metadata (2017)
0.04
0.038153563 = product of:
0.076307125 = sum of:
0.076307125 = product of:
0.15261425 = sum of:
0.15261425 = weight(_text_:v in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15261425 = score(doc=3558,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.6089284 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Everything changes, everything stays the same? - Understanding information spaces : Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium of Information Science (ISI 2017), Berlin/Germany, 13th - 15th March 2017. Eds.: M. Gäde, V. Trkulja u. V. Petras
-
Henze, V.; Schefczik, M.: Metadaten : Beziehungen zwischen Dublin Core Set, Warwick Framework und Datenformaten (1997)
0.03
0.033723302 = product of:
0.067446604 = sum of:
0.067446604 = product of:
0.13489321 = sum of:
0.13489321 = weight(_text_:v in 7098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13489321 = score(doc=7098,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.5382217 = fieldWeight in 7098, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7098)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Holzhause, R.; Krömker, H.; Schnöll, M.: Vernetzung von audiovisuellen Inhalten und Metadaten : Metadatengestütztes System zur Generierung und Erschließung von Medienfragmenten (Teil 2) (2016)
0.03
0.033384368 = product of:
0.066768736 = sum of:
0.066768736 = product of:
0.13353747 = sum of:
0.13353747 = weight(_text_:v in 5861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13353747 = score(doc=5861,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.53281236 = fieldWeight in 5861, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5861)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Metadaten beschreiben audiovisuelle Medien (A/V-Medien) bisher meist nur als Ganzes und nicht im Detail. Die zeitliche Dimension, der Ablauf von Bildund Tonfolgen, bietet eine entscheidende Verknüpfungskette für Metadaten zur tiefen Erschließung von A/V-Medien. Zeitbezogene Zusatzinformationen eröffnen vielseitige Möglichkeiten zur Interaktion, Suche und Selektion zusammenhängender Inhalte, welche zudem auf unterschiedlichen Medienformen basieren können. Im Folgenden werden webbasierte Werkzeuge vorgestellt, welche sowohl für die Verarbeitung von zeitbezogenen Metadaten als auch für die Erstellung von Medienfragmenten konzipiert sind. Die daraus resultierenden hypermedialen Erzeugnisse können über bereitgestellte Widgets aktiv in bestehende Plattformen eingebunden werden. Somit können auch bereits vorhandene Datensätze und Dokumente engmaschig mit einem Medium vernetzt werden.
-
Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012)
0.03
0.030648042 = sum of:
0.016706921 = product of:
0.066827685 = sum of:
0.066827685 = weight(_text_:authors in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066827685 = score(doc=367,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.013941121 = product of:
0.027882243 = sum of:
0.027882243 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027882243 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.03
0.029573586 = product of:
0.05914717 = sum of:
0.05914717 = product of:
0.11829434 = sum of:
0.11829434 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11829434 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000)
0.03
0.027882243 = product of:
0.055764485 = sum of:
0.055764485 = product of:
0.11152897 = sum of:
0.11152897 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11152897 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16. 7.2000 20:58:22
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.03
0.027882243 = product of:
0.055764485 = sum of:
0.055764485 = product of:
0.11152897 = sum of:
0.11152897 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11152897 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Intner, S.S.; Lazinger, S.S.; Weihs, J.: Metadata and its impact on libraries (2005)
0.03
0.025302898 = sum of:
0.011813577 = product of:
0.04725431 = sum of:
0.04725431 = weight(_text_:authors in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04725431 = score(doc=339,freq=8.0), product of:
0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.01348932 = product of:
0.02697864 = sum of:
0.02697864 = weight(_text_:v in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02697864 = score(doc=339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.10764434 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIST. 58(2007) no.6., S.909-910 (A.D. Petrou): "A division in metadata definitions for physical objects vs. those for digital resources offered in Chapter 1 is punctuated by the use of broader, more inclusive metadata definitions, such as data about data as well as with the inclusion of more specific metadata definitions intended for networked resources. Intertwined with the book's subject matter, which is to "distinguish traditional cataloguing from metadata activity" (5), the authors' chosen metadata definition is also detailed on page 5 as follows: Thus while granting the validity of the inclusive definition, we concentrate primarily on metadata as it is most commonly thought of both inside and outside of the library community, as "structured information used to find, access, use and manage information resources primarily in a digital environment." (International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science, 2003) Metadata principles discussed by the authors include modularity, extensibility, refinement and multilingualism. The latter set is followed by seven misconceptions about metadata. Two types of metadata discussed are automatically generated indexes and manually created records. In terms of categories of metadata, the authors present three sets of them as follows: descriptive, structural, and administrative metadata. Chapter 2 focuses on metadata for communities of practice, and is a prelude to content in Chapter 3 where metadata applications, use, and development are presented from the perspective of libraries. Chapter 2 discusses the emergence and impact of metadata on organization and access of online resources from the perspective of communities for which such standards exist and for the need for mapping one standard to another. Discussion focuses on metalanguages, such as Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) and eXtensible Markup Language (XML), "capable of embedding descriptive elements within the document markup itself' (25). This discussion falls under syntactic interoperability. For semantic interoperability, HTML and other mark-up languages, such as Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) and Computer Interchange of Museum Information (CIMI), are covered. For structural interoperability, Dublin Core's 15 metadata elements are grouped into three areas: content (title, subject, description, type, source, relation, and coverage), intellectual property (creator, publisher, contributor and rights), and instantiation (date, format, identifier, and language) for discussion.
Chapter 8 discusses issues of archiving and preserving digital materials. The chapter reiterates, "What is the point of all of this if the resources identified and catalogued are not preserved?" (Gorman, 2003, p. 16). Discussion about preservation and related issues is organized in five sections that successively ask why, what, who, how, and how much of the plethora of digital materials should be archived and preserved. These are not easy questions because of media instability and technological obsolescence. Stakeholders in communities with diverse interests compete in terms of which community or representative of a community has an authoritative say in what and how much get archived and preserved. In discussing the above-mentioned questions, the authors once again provide valuable information and lessons from a number of initiatives in Europe, Australia, and from other global initiatives. The Draft Charter on the Preservation of the Digital Heritage and the Guidelines for the Preservation of Digital Heritage, both published by UNESCO, are discussed and some of the preservation principles from the Guidelines are listed. The existing diversity in administrative arrangements for these new projects and resources notwithstanding, the impact on content produced for online reserves through work done in digital projects and from the use of metadata and the impact on levels of reference services and the ensuing need for different models to train users and staff is undeniable. In terms of education and training, formal coursework, continuing education, and informal and on-the-job training are just some of the available options. The intensity in resources required for cataloguing digital materials, the questions over the quality of digital resources, and the threat of the new digital environment to the survival of the traditional library are all issues quoted by critics and others, however, who are concerned about a balance for planning and resources allocated for traditional or print-based resources and newer digital resources. A number of questions are asked as part of the book's conclusions in Chapter 10. Of these questions, one that touches on all of the rest and upon much of the book's content is the question: What does the future hold for metadata in libraries? Metadata standards are alive and well in many communities of practice, as Chapters 2-6 have demonstrated. The usefulness of metadata continues to be high and innovation in various elements should keep information professionals engaged for decades to come. There is no doubt that metadata have had a tremendous impact in how we organize information for access and in terms of who, how, when, and where contact is made with library services and collections online. Planning and commitment to a diversity of metadata to serve the plethora of needs in communities of practice are paramount for the continued success of many digital projects and for online preservation of our digital heritage."
- Pages
- V, 262 S
-
Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001)
0.02
0.024396962 = product of:
0.048793923 = sum of:
0.048793923 = product of:
0.097587846 = sum of:
0.097587846 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097587846 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 3.2002 9:22:34
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.02
0.024396962 = product of:
0.048793923 = sum of:
0.048793923 = product of:
0.097587846 = sum of:
0.097587846 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097587846 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.02
0.024396962 = product of:
0.048793923 = sum of:
0.048793923 = product of:
0.097587846 = sum of:
0.097587846 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097587846 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Lam, V.-T.: Cataloging Internet resources : Why, what, how (2000)
0.02
0.023606312 = product of:
0.047212623 = sum of:
0.047212623 = product of:
0.094425246 = sum of:
0.094425246 = weight(_text_:v in 967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094425246 = score(doc=967,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.3767552 = fieldWeight in 967, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=967)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Binz, V.; Rühle, S.: KIM - Das Kompetenzzentrum Interoperable Metadaten (2009)
0.02
0.023606312 = product of:
0.047212623 = sum of:
0.047212623 = product of:
0.094425246 = sum of:
0.094425246 = weight(_text_:v in 4559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094425246 = score(doc=4559,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.3767552 = fieldWeight in 4559, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4559)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Stiller, J.; Olensky, M.; Petras, V.: ¬A framework for the evaluation of automatic metadata enrichments (2014)
0.02
0.023606312 = product of:
0.047212623 = sum of:
0.047212623 = product of:
0.094425246 = sum of:
0.094425246 = weight(_text_:v in 1587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094425246 = score(doc=1587,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.3767552 = fieldWeight in 1587, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1587)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Dogtas, G.; Ibitz, M.-P.; Jonitz, F.; Kocher, V.; Poyer, A.,; Stapf, L.: Kritik an rassifizierenden und diskriminierenden Titeln und Metadaten : Praxisorientierte Lösungsansätze (2022)
0.02
0.023606312 = product of:
0.047212623 = sum of:
0.047212623 = product of:
0.094425246 = sum of:
0.094425246 = weight(_text_:v in 1828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094425246 = score(doc=1828,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.3767552 = fieldWeight in 1828, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1828)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
