-
Pope, J.T.; Holley, R.P.: Google Book Search and metadata (2011)
0.12
0.12304956 = sum of:
0.01989519 = product of:
0.07958076 = sum of:
0.07958076 = weight(_text_:authors in 1887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07958076 = score(doc=1887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22571123 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1887)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.10315437 = product of:
0.20630874 = sum of:
0.20630874 = weight(_text_:j.t in 1887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20630874 = score(doc=1887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.567688 = fieldWeight in 1887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1887)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article summarizes published documents on metadata provided by Google for books scanned as part of the Google Book Search (GBS) project and provides suggestions for improvement. The faulty, misleading, and confusing metadata in current Google records can pose potentially serious problems for users of GBS. Google admits that it took data, which proved to be inaccurate, from many sources and is attempting to correct errors. Some argue that metadata is not needed with keyword searching; but optical character recognition (OCR) errors, synonym control, and materials in foreign languages make reliable metadata a requirement for academic researchers. The authors recommend that users should be able to submit error reports to Google to correct faulty metadata.
-
Tennis, J.T.: 6th Annual Open Forum on Metadata Registries : Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, Jan 20-24, 2003 (2002)
0.09
0.08841802 = product of:
0.17683604 = sum of:
0.17683604 = product of:
0.3536721 = sum of:
0.3536721 = weight(_text_:j.t in 1856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3536721 = score(doc=1856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.97317934 = fieldWeight in 1856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1856)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Philips, J.T.: Metadata - information about electronic records (1995)
0.06
0.05894535 = product of:
0.1178907 = sum of:
0.1178907 = product of:
0.2357814 = sum of:
0.2357814 = weight(_text_:j.t in 4556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2357814 = score(doc=4556,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.64878625 = fieldWeight in 4556, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4556)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Mining the metadata quarries : Special section (2003)
0.06
0.05894535 = product of:
0.1178907 = sum of:
0.1178907 = product of:
0.2357814 = sum of:
0.2357814 = weight(_text_:j.t in 1248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2357814 = score(doc=1248,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.64878625 = fieldWeight in 1248, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1248)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Einleitung zu den Beiträgen: GUENTHER, R. et al.: New metadata standards for digital resources: MODS and METS; GREENBERG, J.: Metadata generation: processes, people and tools; TENNIS, J.T.: Data collection for controlled vocabulary interoperability: Dublin Core audience element; JUN, W.: A knowledge network constructed by integrating classification, thesaurs and metadata in a digital library
-
Salaba, A.; Tennis, J.T.: Solid foundations and some secondary assumptions in the design of bibliographic metadata : toward a typology of complementary uses of metadata (2018)
0.06
0.05894535 = product of:
0.1178907 = sum of:
0.1178907 = product of:
0.2357814 = sum of:
0.2357814 = weight(_text_:j.t in 4779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2357814 = score(doc=4779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.64878625 = fieldWeight in 4779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4779)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004)
0.04
0.03717717 = sum of:
0.017053021 = product of:
0.068212084 = sum of:
0.068212084 = weight(_text_:authors in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068212084 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22571123 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02012415 = product of:
0.0402483 = sum of:
0.0402483 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0402483 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
-
Tennis, J.T.: Data collection for controlled vocabulary interoperability : Dublin core audience element (2003)
0.04
0.036840845 = product of:
0.07368169 = sum of:
0.07368169 = product of:
0.14736338 = sum of:
0.14736338 = weight(_text_:j.t in 1253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14736338 = score(doc=1253,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.4054914 = fieldWeight in 1253, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1253)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012)
0.03
0.029493842 = sum of:
0.016077742 = product of:
0.06431097 = sum of:
0.06431097 = weight(_text_:authors in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06431097 = score(doc=367,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22571123 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0134161 = product of:
0.0268322 = sum of:
0.0268322 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0268322 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.03
0.028459849 = product of:
0.056919698 = sum of:
0.056919698 = product of:
0.113839395 = sum of:
0.113839395 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.113839395 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000)
0.03
0.0268322 = product of:
0.0536644 = sum of:
0.0536644 = product of:
0.1073288 = sum of:
0.1073288 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1073288 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16. 7.2000 20:58:22
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.03
0.0268322 = product of:
0.0536644 = sum of:
0.0536644 = product of:
0.1073288 = sum of:
0.1073288 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1073288 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001)
0.02
0.023478176 = product of:
0.046956353 = sum of:
0.046956353 = product of:
0.093912706 = sum of:
0.093912706 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093912706 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 3.2002 9:22:34
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.02
0.023478176 = product of:
0.046956353 = sum of:
0.046956353 = product of:
0.093912706 = sum of:
0.093912706 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093912706 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.02
0.023478176 = product of:
0.046956353 = sum of:
0.046956353 = product of:
0.093912706 = sum of:
0.093912706 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093912706 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany (2008)
0.02
0.021686684 = sum of:
0.009947595 = product of:
0.03979038 = sum of:
0.03979038 = weight(_text_:authors in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03979038 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22571123 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.011739088 = product of:
0.023478176 = sum of:
0.023478176 = weight(_text_:22 in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023478176 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Metadata is a key aspect of our evolving infrastructure for information management, social computing, and scientific collaboration. DC-2008 will focus on metadata challenges, solutions, and innovation in initiatives and activities underlying semantic and social applications. Metadata is part of the fabric of social computing, which includes the use of wikis, blogs, and tagging for collaboration and participation. Metadata also underlies the development of semantic applications, and the Semantic Web - the representation and integration of multimedia knowledge structures on the basis of semantic models. These two trends flow together in applications such as Wikipedia, where authors collectively create structured information that can be extracted and used to enhance access to and use of information sources. Recent discussion has focused on how existing bibliographic standards can be expressed as Semantic Web vocabularies to facilitate the ingration of library and cultural heritage data with other types of data. Harnessing the efforts of content providers and end-users to link, tag, edit, and describe their information in interoperable ways ("participatory metadata") is a key step towards providing knowledge environments that are scalable, self-correcting, and evolvable. DC-2008 will explore conceptual and practical issues in the development and deployment of semantic and social applications to meet the needs of specific communities of practice.
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.02
0.02012415 = product of:
0.0402483 = sum of:
0.0402483 = product of:
0.0804966 = sum of:
0.0804966 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0804966 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.02
0.018973231 = product of:
0.037946463 = sum of:
0.037946463 = product of:
0.075892925 = sum of:
0.075892925 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075892925 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.02
0.018973231 = product of:
0.037946463 = sum of:
0.037946463 = product of:
0.075892925 = sum of:
0.075892925 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075892925 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Hoffmann, L.: Metadaten von Internetressourcen und ihre Integrierung in Bibliothekskataloge (1998)
0.02
0.016770126 = product of:
0.033540253 = sum of:
0.033540253 = product of:
0.067080505 = sum of:
0.067080505 = weight(_text_:22 in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067080505 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1998 18:45:36
-
Essen, F. von: Metadaten - neue Perspektiven für die Erschließung von Netzpublikationen in Bibliotheken : Erster META-LIB-Workshop in Göttingen (1998)
0.02
0.016770126 = product of:
0.033540253 = sum of:
0.033540253 = product of:
0.067080505 = sum of:
0.067080505 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067080505 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049510952 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand
