Search (149 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany (2008) 0.06
    0.060980063 = sum of:
      0.010490555 = product of:
        0.04196222 = sum of:
          0.04196222 = weight(_text_:authors in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04196222 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.050489508 = sum of:
        0.025729846 = weight(_text_:k in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025729846 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052213363 = queryNorm
            0.13804297 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
        0.024759663 = weight(_text_:22 in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024759663 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052213363 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata is a key aspect of our evolving infrastructure for information management, social computing, and scientific collaboration. DC-2008 will focus on metadata challenges, solutions, and innovation in initiatives and activities underlying semantic and social applications. Metadata is part of the fabric of social computing, which includes the use of wikis, blogs, and tagging for collaboration and participation. Metadata also underlies the development of semantic applications, and the Semantic Web - the representation and integration of multimedia knowledge structures on the basis of semantic models. These two trends flow together in applications such as Wikipedia, where authors collectively create structured information that can be extracted and used to enhance access to and use of information sources. Recent discussion has focused on how existing bibliographic standards can be expressed as Semantic Web vocabularies to facilitate the ingration of library and cultural heritage data with other types of data. Harnessing the efforts of content providers and end-users to link, tag, edit, and describe their information in interoperable ways ("participatory metadata") is a key step towards providing knowledge environments that are scalable, self-correcting, and evolvable. DC-2008 will explore conceptual and practical issues in the development and deployment of semantic and social applications to meet the needs of specific communities of practice.
    Content
    Carol Jean Godby, Devon Smith, Eric Childress: Encoding Application Profiles in a Computational Model of the Crosswalk. - Maria Elisabete Catarino, Ana Alice Baptista: Relating Folksonomies with Dublin Core. - Ed Summers, Antoine Isaac, Clay Redding, Dan Krech: LCSH, SKOS and Linked Data. - Xia Lin, Jiexun Li, Xiaohua Zhou: Theme Creation for Digital Collections. - Boris Lauser, Gudrun Johannsen, Caterina Caracciolo, Willem Robert van Hage, Johannes Keizer, Philipp Mayr: Comparing Human and Automatic Thesaurus Mapping Approaches in the Agricultural Domain. - P. Bryan Heidorn, Qin Wei: Automatic Metadata Extraction From Museum Specimen Labels. - Stuart Allen Sutton, Diny Golder: Achievement Standards Network (ASN): An Application Profile for Mapping K-12 Educational Resources to Achievement Standards. - Allen H. Renear, Karen M. Wickett, Richard J. Urban, David Dubin, Sarah L. Shreeves: Collection/Item Metadata Relationships. - Seth van Hooland, Yves Bontemps, Seth Kaufman: Answering the Call for more Accountability: Applying Data Profiling to Museum Metadata. - Thomas Margaritopoulos, Merkourios Margaritopoulos, Ioannis Mavridis, Athanasios Manitsaris: A Conceptual Framework for Metadata Quality Assessment. - Miao Chen, Xiaozhong Liu, Jian Qin: Semantic Relation Extraction from Socially-Generated Tags: A Methodology for Metadata Generation. - Hak Lae Kim, Simon Scerri, John G. Breslin, Stefan Decker, Hong Gee Kim: The State of the Art in Tag Ontologies: A Semantic Model for Tagging and Folksonomies. - Martin Malmsten: Making a Library Catalogue Part of the Semantic Web. - Philipp Mayr, Vivien Petras: Building a Terminology Network for Search: The KoMoHe Project. - Michael Panzer: Cool URIs for the DDC: Towards Web-scale Accessibility of a Large Classification System. - Barbara Levergood, Stefan Farrenkopf, Elisabeth Frasnelli: The Specification of the Language of the Field and Interoperability: Cross-language Access to Catalogues and Online Libraries (CACAO)
  2. Golub, K.; Moon, J.; Nielsen, M.L.; Tudhope, D.: EnTag: Enhanced Tagging for Discovery (2008) 0.05
    0.046710957 = sum of:
      0.02098111 = product of:
        0.08392444 = sum of:
          0.08392444 = weight(_text_:authors in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08392444 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.025729846 = product of:
        0.051459692 = sum of:
          0.051459692 = weight(_text_:k in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.051459692 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose: Investigate the combination of controlled and folksonomy approaches to support resource discovery in repositories and digital collections. Aim: Investigate whether use of an established controlled vocabulary can help improve social tagging for better resource discovery. Objectives: (1) Investigate indexing aspects when using only social tagging versus when using social tagging with suggestions from a controlled vocabulary; (2) Investigate above in two different contexts: tagging by readers and tagging by authors; (3) Investigate influence of only social tagging versus social tagging with a controlled vocabulary on retrieval. - Vgl.: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/projects/enhanced-tagging/.
  3. Sutton, S.A.; Golder, D.: Achievement Standards Network (ASN) : an application profile for mapping K-12 educational resources to achievement (2008) 0.04
    0.04327672 = product of:
      0.08655344 = sum of:
        0.08655344 = sum of:
          0.044108305 = weight(_text_:k in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044108305 = score(doc=2636,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
          0.042445138 = weight(_text_:22 in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042445138 = score(doc=2636,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  4. Wartburg, K. von; Sibille, C.; Aliverti, C.: Metadata collaboration between the Swiss National Library and research institutions in the field of Swiss historiography (2019) 0.04
    0.04327672 = product of:
      0.08655344 = sum of:
        0.08655344 = sum of:
          0.044108305 = weight(_text_:k in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044108305 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
          0.042445138 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042445138 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 5.2019 19:22:49
  5. Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004) 0.04
    0.03920638 = sum of:
      0.017983811 = product of:
        0.071935244 = sum of:
          0.071935244 = weight(_text_:authors in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.071935244 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021222569 = product of:
        0.042445138 = sum of:
          0.042445138 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042445138 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
  6. Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012) 0.03
    0.031103678 = sum of:
      0.0169553 = product of:
        0.0678212 = sum of:
          0.0678212 = weight(_text_:authors in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0678212 = score(doc=367,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.01414838 = product of:
        0.02829676 = sum of:
          0.02829676 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02829676 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.
  7. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.03
    0.030013246 = product of:
      0.060026493 = sum of:
        0.060026493 = product of:
          0.120052986 = sum of:
            0.120052986 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.120052986 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  8. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.03
    0.02829676 = product of:
      0.05659352 = sum of:
        0.05659352 = product of:
          0.11318704 = sum of:
            0.11318704 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11318704 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
  9. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.03
    0.02829676 = product of:
      0.05659352 = sum of:
        0.05659352 = product of:
          0.11318704 = sum of:
            0.11318704 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11318704 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  10. Lee-Smeltzer, K.-H.J.: Finding the needle : controlled vocabularies, resource discovery, and Dublin Core (2000) 0.03
    0.025729846 = product of:
      0.051459692 = sum of:
        0.051459692 = product of:
          0.102919385 = sum of:
            0.102919385 = weight(_text_:k in 438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102919385 = score(doc=438,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.5521719 = fieldWeight in 438, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=438)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.02
    0.024759663 = product of:
      0.049519327 = sum of:
        0.049519327 = product of:
          0.09903865 = sum of:
            0.09903865 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09903865 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
  12. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.024759663 = product of:
      0.049519327 = sum of:
        0.049519327 = product of:
          0.09903865 = sum of:
            0.09903865 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09903865 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  13. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02
    0.024759663 = product of:
      0.049519327 = sum of:
        0.049519327 = product of:
          0.09903865 = sum of:
            0.09903865 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09903865 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  14. Gradmann, S.: Container - Content - Context : zur Evolution bibliothekarischer Metadaten von Katalogdaten zu Library Linked Data (2012) 0.02
    0.022054153 = product of:
      0.044108305 = sum of:
        0.044108305 = product of:
          0.08821661 = sum of:
            0.08821661 = weight(_text_:k in 1023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08821661 = score(doc=1023,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 1023, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1023)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Handbuch Bibliothek: Geschichte, Aufgaben, Perspektiven. Hrsg.: Umlauf, K. u. S. Gradmann
  15. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.02
    0.021222569 = product of:
      0.042445138 = sum of:
        0.042445138 = product of:
          0.084890276 = sum of:
            0.084890276 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084890276 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  16. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.02
    0.02000883 = product of:
      0.04001766 = sum of:
        0.04001766 = product of:
          0.08003532 = sum of:
            0.08003532 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08003532 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  17. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.02
    0.02000883 = product of:
      0.04001766 = sum of:
        0.04001766 = product of:
          0.08003532 = sum of:
            0.08003532 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08003532 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  18. Anutariya, C.; Wuwongse, K.; Akama, E.; Nantajeewarawat, E.: RDF Declarative Description (RDD) : A Language for Metadata (2002) 0.02
    0.01837846 = product of:
      0.03675692 = sum of:
        0.03675692 = product of:
          0.07351384 = sum of:
            0.07351384 = weight(_text_:k in 1278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07351384 = score(doc=1278,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 1278, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1278)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Wen, D.; Sakaguchi, T.; Sugimoto, S.; Tabata, K.: Multilingual Access to Dublin Core Metadata of ULIS Library (2002) 0.02
    0.01837846 = product of:
      0.03675692 = sum of:
        0.03675692 = product of:
          0.07351384 = sum of:
            0.07351384 = weight(_text_:k in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07351384 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Hoffmann, L.: Metadaten von Internetressourcen und ihre Integrierung in Bibliothekskataloge (1998) 0.02
    0.017685475 = product of:
      0.03537095 = sum of:
        0.03537095 = product of:
          0.0707419 = sum of:
            0.0707419 = weight(_text_:22 in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0707419 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 18:45:36

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 130
  • d 17
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 137
  • el 13
  • s 6
  • m 5
  • b 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…