-
Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004)
0.07
0.07184562 = sum of:
0.018270312 = product of:
0.07308125 = sum of:
0.07308125 = weight(_text_:authors in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07308125 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.053575307 = sum of:
0.01045397 = weight(_text_:a in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01045397 = score(doc=4748,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.043121338 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043121338 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
- Abstract
- Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
- Type
- a
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.07
0.06565794 = product of:
0.13131589 = sum of:
0.13131589 = sum of:
0.009350315 = weight(_text_:a in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009350315 = score(doc=5743,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.12196557 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12196557 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
- Type
- a
-
Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000)
0.06
0.06372866 = product of:
0.12745732 = sum of:
0.12745732 = sum of:
0.012467085 = weight(_text_:a in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012467085 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.11499024 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11499024 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16. 7.2000 20:58:22
- Type
- a
-
Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001)
0.06
0.05576258 = product of:
0.11152516 = sum of:
0.11152516 = sum of:
0.0109087005 = weight(_text_:a in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0109087005 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.10061646 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10061646 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 3.2002 9:22:34
- Type
- a
-
Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012)
0.05
0.05294229 = sum of:
0.017225416 = product of:
0.068901666 = sum of:
0.068901666 = weight(_text_:authors in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068901666 = score(doc=367,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.035716873 = sum of:
0.0069693136 = weight(_text_:a in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0069693136 = score(doc=367,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.11394546 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
0.02874756 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02874756 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
- Abstract
- The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.
- Type
- a
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.05
0.048289686 = product of:
0.09657937 = sum of:
0.09657937 = sum of:
0.015269 = weight(_text_:a in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015269 = score(doc=2845,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.08131038 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08131038 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
- Type
- a
-
Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany (2008)
0.04
0.043993324 = sum of:
0.010657682 = product of:
0.04263073 = sum of:
0.04263073 = weight(_text_:authors in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04263073 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.03333564 = sum of:
0.008181525 = weight(_text_:a in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008181525 = score(doc=2668,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.13376464 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
0.025154116 = weight(_text_:22 in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025154116 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
- Abstract
- Metadata is a key aspect of our evolving infrastructure for information management, social computing, and scientific collaboration. DC-2008 will focus on metadata challenges, solutions, and innovation in initiatives and activities underlying semantic and social applications. Metadata is part of the fabric of social computing, which includes the use of wikis, blogs, and tagging for collaboration and participation. Metadata also underlies the development of semantic applications, and the Semantic Web - the representation and integration of multimedia knowledge structures on the basis of semantic models. These two trends flow together in applications such as Wikipedia, where authors collectively create structured information that can be extracted and used to enhance access to and use of information sources. Recent discussion has focused on how existing bibliographic standards can be expressed as Semantic Web vocabularies to facilitate the ingration of library and cultural heritage data with other types of data. Harnessing the efforts of content providers and end-users to link, tag, edit, and describe their information in interoperable ways ("participatory metadata") is a key step towards providing knowledge environments that are scalable, self-correcting, and evolvable. DC-2008 will explore conceptual and practical issues in the development and deployment of semantic and social applications to meet the needs of specific communities of practice.
- Content
- Carol Jean Godby, Devon Smith, Eric Childress: Encoding Application Profiles in a Computational Model of the Crosswalk. - Maria Elisabete Catarino, Ana Alice Baptista: Relating Folksonomies with Dublin Core. - Ed Summers, Antoine Isaac, Clay Redding, Dan Krech: LCSH, SKOS and Linked Data. - Xia Lin, Jiexun Li, Xiaohua Zhou: Theme Creation for Digital Collections. - Boris Lauser, Gudrun Johannsen, Caterina Caracciolo, Willem Robert van Hage, Johannes Keizer, Philipp Mayr: Comparing Human and Automatic Thesaurus Mapping Approaches in the Agricultural Domain. - P. Bryan Heidorn, Qin Wei: Automatic Metadata Extraction From Museum Specimen Labels. - Stuart Allen Sutton, Diny Golder: Achievement Standards Network (ASN): An Application Profile for Mapping K-12 Educational Resources to Achievement Standards. - Allen H. Renear, Karen M. Wickett, Richard J. Urban, David Dubin, Sarah L. Shreeves: Collection/Item Metadata Relationships. - Seth van Hooland, Yves Bontemps, Seth Kaufman: Answering the Call for more Accountability: Applying Data Profiling to Museum Metadata. - Thomas Margaritopoulos, Merkourios Margaritopoulos, Ioannis Mavridis, Athanasios Manitsaris: A Conceptual Framework for Metadata Quality Assessment. - Miao Chen, Xiaozhong Liu, Jian Qin: Semantic Relation Extraction from Socially-Generated Tags: A Methodology for Metadata Generation. - Hak Lae Kim, Simon Scerri, John G. Breslin, Stefan Decker, Hong Gee Kim: The State of the Art in Tag Ontologies: A Semantic Model for Tagging and Folksonomies. - Martin Malmsten: Making a Library Catalogue Part of the Semantic Web. - Philipp Mayr, Vivien Petras: Building a Terminology Network for Search: The KoMoHe Project. - Michael Panzer: Cool URIs for the DDC: Towards Web-scale Accessibility of a Large Classification System. - Barbara Levergood, Stefan Farrenkopf, Elisabeth Frasnelli: The Specification of the Language of the Field and Interoperability: Cross-language Access to Catalogues and Online Libraries (CACAO)
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.04
0.04377196 = product of:
0.08754392 = sum of:
0.08754392 = sum of:
0.0062335427 = weight(_text_:a in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062335427 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.08131038 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08131038 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
- Type
- a
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.04
0.04268246 = product of:
0.08536492 = sum of:
0.08536492 = sum of:
0.013496018 = weight(_text_:a in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013496018 = score(doc=3280,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.071868904 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071868904 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
- Type
- a
-
Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016)
0.04
0.04144418 = product of:
0.08288836 = sum of:
0.08288836 = sum of:
0.011019452 = weight(_text_:a in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011019452 = score(doc=3281,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.071868904 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071868904 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
- Type
- a
-
Hoffmann, L.: Metadaten von Internetressourcen und ihre Integrierung in Bibliothekskataloge (1998)
0.04
0.039830416 = product of:
0.07966083 = sum of:
0.07966083 = sum of:
0.0077919285 = weight(_text_:a in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0077919285 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
0.071868904 = weight(_text_:22 in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071868904 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1998 18:45:36
- Type
- a
-
Essen, F. von: Metadaten - neue Perspektiven für die Erschließung von Netzpublikationen in Bibliotheken : Erster META-LIB-Workshop in Göttingen (1998)
0.04
0.039830416 = product of:
0.07966083 = sum of:
0.07966083 = sum of:
0.0077919285 = weight(_text_:a in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0077919285 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
0.071868904 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071868904 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand
- Type
- a
-
Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016)
0.04
0.039830416 = product of:
0.07966083 = sum of:
0.07966083 = sum of:
0.0077919285 = weight(_text_:a in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0077919285 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.071868904 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071868904 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
- Type
- a
-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.04
0.035716873 = product of:
0.071433745 = sum of:
0.071433745 = sum of:
0.013938627 = weight(_text_:a in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013938627 = score(doc=4869,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.05749512 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05749512 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
- Type
- a
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.03
0.0349811 = product of:
0.0699622 = sum of:
0.0699622 = sum of:
0.012467085 = weight(_text_:a in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012467085 = score(doc=767,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.05749512 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05749512 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
- Type
- a
-
Waugh, A.: Specifying metadata standards for metadata tool configuration (1998)
0.03
0.0349811 = product of:
0.0699622 = sum of:
0.0699622 = sum of:
0.012467085 = weight(_text_:a in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012467085 = score(doc=3596,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
0.05749512 = weight(_text_:22 in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05749512 = score(doc=3596,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes a metadata specification designed to support dynamic configuration of metadata software by capturing features of metadata standards. The specification comprises 3 components: the classification of the metadata standard, the metadata schema, and the metadata expression
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
- Type
- a
-
Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999)
0.03
0.0349811 = product of:
0.0699622 = sum of:
0.0699622 = sum of:
0.012467085 = weight(_text_:a in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012467085 = score(doc=6095,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.05749512 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05749512 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations
- Source
- Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
- Type
- a
-
Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004)
0.03
0.0349811 = product of:
0.0699622 = sum of:
0.0699622 = sum of:
0.012467085 = weight(_text_:a in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012467085 = score(doc=2834,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.05749512 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05749512 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article provides an introductory overview of the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard, better known as METS. It will be of most use to librarians and technical staff who are encountering METS for the first time. The article contains a brief history of the development of METS, a primer covering the basic structure and content of METS documents, and a discussion of several issues relevant to the implementation and continuing development of METS including object models, extension schemata, and application profiles.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
- Type
- a
-
Maurer, M.B.; McCutcheon, S.; Schwing, T.: Who's doing what? : findability and author-supplied ETD metadata in the library catalog (2011)
0.03
0.034868084 = sum of:
0.030144477 = product of:
0.12057791 = sum of:
0.12057791 = weight(_text_:authors in 1891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12057791 = score(doc=1891,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24182312 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 1891, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1891)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.004723606 = product of:
0.009447212 = sum of:
0.009447212 = weight(_text_:a in 1891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009447212 = score(doc=1891,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 1891, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1891)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Kent State University Libraries' ETD cataloging process features contributions by authors, by the ETDcat application, and by catalogers. Who is doing what, and how much of it is findable in the library catalog? An empirical analysis is performed featuring simple frequencies within the KentLINK catalog, articulated by the use of a newly devised rubric. The researchers sought the degree to which the ETD authors, the applications, and the catalogers can supply accurate, findable metadata. Further development of combinatory cataloging processes is suggested. The method of examining the data and the rubric are provided as a framework for other metadata analysis.
- Type
- a
-
Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996)
0.03
0.034145966 = product of:
0.06829193 = sum of:
0.06829193 = sum of:
0.010796814 = weight(_text_:a in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010796814 = score(doc=3689,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.05749512 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05749512 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053045183 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Using grant funding, some prominent creators of digital libraries have promised users of networked resources certain kinds of access. Some of this access finds a ready-made vehicle in USMARC, some of it in the TEI header, some of it has yet to find the most appropriate vehicle. In its quest to provide access to what users need, the cataloging community can show leadership by exploring the strength inherent in a metadata-providing system like the TEI header.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.59-73
- Type
- a
