Search (546 results, page 1 of 28)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004) 0.07
    0.06858569 = sum of:
      0.01825141 = product of:
        0.07300564 = sum of:
          0.07300564 = weight(_text_:authors in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07300564 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24157293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.050334275 = sum of:
        0.0072575454 = weight(_text_:e in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0072575454 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052990302 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
        0.043076728 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043076728 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052990302 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
    Language
    e
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
  2. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.07
    0.067112364 = product of:
      0.13422473 = sum of:
        0.13422473 = sum of:
          0.019353455 = weight(_text_:e in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019353455 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
          0.11487127 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11487127 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
    Language
    e
  3. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.07
    0.067112364 = product of:
      0.13422473 = sum of:
        0.13422473 = sum of:
          0.019353455 = weight(_text_:e in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019353455 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.11487127 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11487127 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  4. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.06
    0.058723316 = product of:
      0.11744663 = sum of:
        0.11744663 = sum of:
          0.016934272 = weight(_text_:e in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.016934272 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
          0.10051236 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10051236 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
    Language
    e
  5. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.06
    0.058723316 = product of:
      0.11744663 = sum of:
        0.11744663 = sum of:
          0.016934272 = weight(_text_:e in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.016934272 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
          0.10051236 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10051236 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  6. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.06
    0.058723316 = product of:
      0.11744663 = sum of:
        0.11744663 = sum of:
          0.016934272 = weight(_text_:e in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.016934272 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
          0.10051236 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10051236 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  7. Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012) 0.05
    0.05076378 = sum of:
      0.017207595 = product of:
        0.06883038 = sum of:
          0.06883038 = weight(_text_:authors in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06883038 = score(doc=367,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24157293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.033556182 = sum of:
        0.0048383637 = weight(_text_:e in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048383637 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052990302 = queryNorm
            0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
        0.028717818 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028717818 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052990302 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
    
    Abstract
    The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.
    Language
    e
  8. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.05
    0.050334275 = product of:
      0.10066855 = sum of:
        0.10066855 = sum of:
          0.014515091 = weight(_text_:e in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.014515091 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.086153455 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.086153455 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
    Language
    e
  9. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.05
    0.045451492 = product of:
      0.090902984 = sum of:
        0.090902984 = sum of:
          0.0096767275 = weight(_text_:e in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0096767275 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.08122626 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08122626 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Language
    e
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  10. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.05
    0.045451492 = product of:
      0.090902984 = sum of:
        0.090902984 = sum of:
          0.0096767275 = weight(_text_:e in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0096767275 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.08122626 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08122626 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Language
    e
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  11. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.04
    0.044450372 = product of:
      0.088900745 = sum of:
        0.088900745 = sum of:
          0.0171062 = weight(_text_:e in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0171062 = score(doc=3280,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.22458905 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
          0.07179455 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07179455 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  12. Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016) 0.04
    0.044450372 = product of:
      0.088900745 = sum of:
        0.088900745 = sum of:
          0.0171062 = weight(_text_:e in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0171062 = score(doc=3281,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.22458905 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.07179455 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07179455 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  13. Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016) 0.04
    0.044450372 = product of:
      0.088900745 = sum of:
        0.088900745 = sum of:
          0.0171062 = weight(_text_:e in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0171062 = score(doc=3282,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.22458905 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
          0.07179455 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07179455 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  14. Warner, S.: E-prints and the Open Archives Initiative (2003) 0.04
    0.03632906 = product of:
      0.07265812 = sum of:
        0.07265812 = sum of:
          0.022401938 = weight(_text_:e in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022401938 = score(doc=4772,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.29411736 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
          0.05025618 = weight(_text_:22 in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05025618 = score(doc=4772,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Open Archives Initiative (OAI) was created as a practical way to promote interoperability between e-print repositories. Although the scope of the OAI has been broadened, e-print repositories still represent a significant fraction of OAI data providers. This article presents a brief survey of OAI e-print repositories, and of services using metadata harvested from e-print repositories using the OAI protocol for metadata harvesting (OAI-PMH). It then discusses several situations where metadata harvesting may be used to further improve the utility of e-print archives as a component of the scholarly communication infrastructure.
    Date
    18.12.2005 13:18:22
    Language
    e
  15. Alves dos Santos, E.; Mucheroni, M.L.: VIAF and OpenCitations : cooperative work as a strategy for information organization in the linked data era (2018) 0.04
    0.0355603 = product of:
      0.0711206 = sum of:
        0.0711206 = sum of:
          0.01368496 = weight(_text_:e in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01368496 = score(doc=4826,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.17967124 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
          0.057435635 = weight(_text_:22 in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057435635 = score(doc=4826,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 1.2019 19:13:22
    Language
    e
  16. Maurer, M.B.; McCutcheon, S.; Schwing, T.: Who's doing what? : findability and author-supplied ETD metadata in the library catalog (2011) 0.03
    0.03434686 = sum of:
      0.030113291 = product of:
        0.120453164 = sum of:
          0.120453164 = weight(_text_:authors in 1891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.120453164 = score(doc=1891,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24157293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 1891, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1891)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.004233568 = product of:
        0.008467136 = sum of:
          0.008467136 = weight(_text_:e in 1891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.008467136 = score(doc=1891,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 1891, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1891)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Kent State University Libraries' ETD cataloging process features contributions by authors, by the ETDcat application, and by catalogers. Who is doing what, and how much of it is findable in the library catalog? An empirical analysis is performed featuring simple frequencies within the KentLINK catalog, articulated by the use of a newly devised rubric. The researchers sought the degree to which the ETD authors, the applications, and the catalogers can supply accurate, findable metadata. Further development of combinatory cataloging processes is suggested. The method of examining the data and the rubric are provided as a framework for other metadata analysis.
    Language
    e
  17. Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996) 0.03
    0.033556182 = product of:
      0.067112364 = sum of:
        0.067112364 = sum of:
          0.0096767275 = weight(_text_:e in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0096767275 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
          0.057435635 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057435635 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.59-73
  18. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.03
    0.033556182 = product of:
      0.067112364 = sum of:
        0.067112364 = sum of:
          0.0096767275 = weight(_text_:e in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0096767275 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
          0.057435635 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057435635 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  19. McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004) 0.03
    0.033556182 = product of:
      0.067112364 = sum of:
        0.067112364 = sum of:
          0.0096767275 = weight(_text_:e in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0096767275 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
          0.057435635 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057435635 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
  20. Rogers, D.: Cataloguing Internet resources : the evolution of the Dublin Core metadata set (1997) 0.03
    0.033556182 = product of:
      0.067112364 = sum of:
        0.067112364 = sum of:
          0.0096767275 = weight(_text_:e in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0096767275 = score(doc=903,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
          0.057435635 = weight(_text_:22 in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057435635 = score(doc=903,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 23(1997) nos.1/2, S.17-22

Years

Languages

  • e 531
  • d 12
  • pt 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 482
  • el 78
  • m 23
  • s 19
  • n 5
  • b 2
  • x 2
  • p 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects