-
a cataloger's primer : Metadata (2005)
0.04
0.041082107 = sum of:
0.010163498 = product of:
0.040653992 = sum of:
0.040653992 = weight(_text_:authors in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040653992 = score(doc=133,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2282923 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.17807868 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.030918607 = product of:
0.061837215 = sum of:
0.061837215 = weight(_text_:s.j in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061837215 = score(doc=133,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3348283 = queryWeight, product of:
6.686252 = idf(docFreq=149, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.18468337 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.686252 = idf(docFreq=149, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 33(2006) no.1, S.58-60 (S.J. Miller): "Metadata: A Cataloger's Primer is a welcome addition to the field of introductory books about metadata intended for librarians and students. The book consists of a collection of papers co-published simultaneously as Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, Volume 40, Numbers 3/4 2005. In the Introduction, the book's editor, Richard P Smiraglia, states that "The purpose of this volume is to provide a learning resource about metadata for catalog librarians and students ... The point of the volume, overall, is that in library and information science there is an ongoing convergence of cataloging and metadata, such that the community will benefit from instructional material that demonstrates this convergence" (p. 1). The collection is divided into two major sections. Part I, "Intellectual Foundations," includes papers with an introductory and theoretical focus, while Part II, "How to Create, Apply, and Use Metadata," contains material with a relatively more practical, instructive focus. In "Understanding Metadata and Metadata Schemes," Jane Greenberg defines metadata and its functions and provides a useful framework for analyzing and comparing diverse metadata schemes based on their objectives and principles, domains, and architectural layout. In her paper "Metadata and Bibliographic Control: Soul-mates or Two Solitudes?" Lynne Howarth directly addresses the central theme of this collection by examining the historical development of, and growing convergence between, the two fields, and concludes that they are more soulmates than solitudes. In "Metadata, Metaphor, and Metonymy," D. Grant Campbell outlines the development of metadata among different stakeholder communities and employs structuralist literary theory to illuminate a perspective on metadata and information representation as special uses of human language in the form of metaphor and metonymy. Part I continues with three papers that present the results of original applied research. Leatrice Ferraioli explores the ways in which individual workers use their own personal metadata for organizing documents in the workplace in "An Exploratory Study of Metadata Creation in a Health Care Agency." In her paper "The Defining Element-A Discussion of the Creator Element within Metadata Schemas," Jennifer Cwiok analyses divergent uses of the "Creator" or equivalent elements in seven different metadata schemes and compares those with the AACR2 approach to representing authorship and intellectual responsibility. The relevance of the bibliographic concept of "the work" to metadata creation for museum artifacts is the focus of "Content Metadata-An Analysis of Etruscan Artifacts in a Museum of Archeology" by Richard P Smiraglia.
Part II consists of five papers on specific metadata standards and applications. Anita Coleman presents an element-by-element description of how to create Dublin Core metadata for Web resources to be included in a library catalog, using principles inspired by cataloging practice, in her paper "From Cataloging to Metadata: Dublin Core Records for the Library Catalog." The next three papers provide especially excellent introductory overviews of three diverse types of metadata-related standards: "Metadata Standards for Archival Control: An Introduction to EAD and EAC" by Alexander C. Thurman, "Introduction to XML" by Patrick Yott, and "METS: the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard" by Linda Cantara. Finally, Michael Chopey offers a superb and most useful overview of "Planning and Implementing a Metadata-Driven Digital Repository." Although all of the articles in this book contain interesting, often illuminating, and potentially useful information, not all serve equally well as introductory material for working catalogers not already familiar with metadata. It would be difficult to consider this volume, taken as a whole, as truly a "primer" for catalog librarians, as the subtitle implies. The content of the articles is too much a mix of introductory essays and original research, some of it at a relatively more advanced level. The collection does not approach the topic in the kind of coherent, systematic, or comprehensive way that would be necessary for a true "primer" or introductory textbook. While several of the papers would be quite appropriate for a primer, such a text would need to include, among other things, coverage of other metadata schemes and protocols such as TEI, VRA, and OAI, which are missing here. That having been said, however, Dr. Smiraglia's excellent introduction to the volume itself serves as a kind of concise, well-written "mini-primer" for catalogers new to metadata. It succinctly covers definitions of metadata, basic concepts, content designation and markup languages, metadata for resource description, including short overviews of TEI, DC, EAD, and AACR2/MARC21, and introduces the papers included in the book. In the conclusion to this essay, Dr. Smiraglia says about the book: "In the end the contents go beyond the definition of primer as `introductory textbook.' But the authors have collectively compiled a thought-provoking volume about the uses of metadata" (p. 15). This is a fair assessment of the work taken as a whole. In this reviewer's opinion, there is to date no single introductory textbook on metadata that is fully satisfactory for both working catalogers and for library and information science (LIS) students who may or may not have had exposure to cataloging. But there are a handful of excellent books that serve different aspects of that function. These include the following recent publications:
- Caplan, Priscilla. 2003. Metadata fundamentals for all librarians. Chicago: ALA Editions. - Gorman, G.E. and Daniel G. Dorner, eds. 2004. Metadata applications and management. International yearbook of library and information management 2003/2004. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press. - Intner, Sheila S., Susan S. Lazinger and Jean Weihs. 2006. Metadata and its impact on libraries. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited. - Haynes, David. 2004. Metadata for information management and retrieval. London: Facet. - Hillmann, Diane I. and Elaine L. Westbrooks, eds. 2004. Metadata in practice. Chicago: American Library Association. Metadata: A Cataloger's Primer compares favorably with these texts, and like them has its own special focus and contribution to make to the introductorylevel literature on metadata. Although the focus, purpose, and nature of the contents are different, this volume bears a similarity to the Hillmann and Westbrooks text insofar as it consists of a collection of papers written by various authors tied together by a general, common theme. In conclusion, this volume makes a significant contribution to the handful of books that attempt to present introductory level information about metadata to catalog librarians and students. Although it does not serve fully satisfactorily as a stand-alone textbook for an LIS course nor as a single unified and comprehensive introduction for catalogers, it, like the others mentioned above, could serve as an excellent supplementary LIS course text, and it is highly worthwhile reading for working catalogers who want to learn more about metadata, as well as librarians and instructors already well-versed in metadata topics."
-
Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004)
0.04
0.037602305 = sum of:
0.017248027 = product of:
0.06899211 = sum of:
0.06899211 = weight(_text_:authors in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06899211 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2282923 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.020354277 = product of:
0.040708553 = sum of:
0.040708553 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040708553 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17536156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
-
Chen, Y.N.; Chen, S.J.: ¬A metadata practice of the OFLA FRBR model : a case study for the National Palace Museum in Taipai (2004)
0.04
0.03710233 = product of:
0.07420466 = sum of:
0.07420466 = product of:
0.14840932 = sum of:
0.14840932 = weight(_text_:s.j in 3384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14840932 = score(doc=3384,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3348283 = queryWeight, product of:
6.686252 = idf(docFreq=149, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.4432401 = fieldWeight in 3384, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.686252 = idf(docFreq=149, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3384)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012)
0.03
0.029831115 = sum of:
0.016261596 = product of:
0.065046385 = sum of:
0.065046385 = weight(_text_:authors in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065046385 = score(doc=367,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2282923 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.013569518 = product of:
0.027139036 = sum of:
0.027139036 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027139036 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17536156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.03
0.028785296 = product of:
0.05757059 = sum of:
0.05757059 = product of:
0.11514118 = sum of:
0.11514118 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11514118 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17536156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000)
0.03
0.027139036 = product of:
0.054278072 = sum of:
0.054278072 = product of:
0.108556144 = sum of:
0.108556144 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108556144 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17536156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16. 7.2000 20:58:22
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.03
0.027139036 = product of:
0.054278072 = sum of:
0.054278072 = product of:
0.108556144 = sum of:
0.108556144 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108556144 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17536156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Miller, S.J.: Metadata for digital collections : a how-to-do-it manual (2011)
0.02
0.024734886 = product of:
0.049469773 = sum of:
0.049469773 = product of:
0.098939545 = sum of:
0.098939545 = weight(_text_:s.j in 4911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098939545 = score(doc=4911,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3348283 = queryWeight, product of:
6.686252 = idf(docFreq=149, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.2954934 = fieldWeight in 4911, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.686252 = idf(docFreq=149, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4911)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001)
0.02
0.023746656 = product of:
0.047493313 = sum of:
0.047493313 = product of:
0.094986625 = sum of:
0.094986625 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094986625 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17536156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 3.2002 9:22:34
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.02
0.023746656 = product of:
0.047493313 = sum of:
0.047493313 = product of:
0.094986625 = sum of:
0.094986625 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094986625 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17536156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.02
0.023746656 = product of:
0.047493313 = sum of:
0.047493313 = product of:
0.094986625 = sum of:
0.094986625 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094986625 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17536156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany (2008)
0.02
0.021934677 = sum of:
0.010061349 = product of:
0.040245395 = sum of:
0.040245395 = weight(_text_:authors in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040245395 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2282923 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.011873328 = product of:
0.023746656 = sum of:
0.023746656 = weight(_text_:22 in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023746656 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17536156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Metadata is a key aspect of our evolving infrastructure for information management, social computing, and scientific collaboration. DC-2008 will focus on metadata challenges, solutions, and innovation in initiatives and activities underlying semantic and social applications. Metadata is part of the fabric of social computing, which includes the use of wikis, blogs, and tagging for collaboration and participation. Metadata also underlies the development of semantic applications, and the Semantic Web - the representation and integration of multimedia knowledge structures on the basis of semantic models. These two trends flow together in applications such as Wikipedia, where authors collectively create structured information that can be extracted and used to enhance access to and use of information sources. Recent discussion has focused on how existing bibliographic standards can be expressed as Semantic Web vocabularies to facilitate the ingration of library and cultural heritage data with other types of data. Harnessing the efforts of content providers and end-users to link, tag, edit, and describe their information in interoperable ways ("participatory metadata") is a key step towards providing knowledge environments that are scalable, self-correcting, and evolvable. DC-2008 will explore conceptual and practical issues in the development and deployment of semantic and social applications to meet the needs of specific communities of practice.
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.02
0.020354277 = product of:
0.040708553 = sum of:
0.040708553 = product of:
0.081417106 = sum of:
0.081417106 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.081417106 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17536156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.02
0.019190198 = product of:
0.038380396 = sum of:
0.038380396 = product of:
0.07676079 = sum of:
0.07676079 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07676079 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17536156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.02
0.019190198 = product of:
0.038380396 = sum of:
0.038380396 = product of:
0.07676079 = sum of:
0.07676079 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07676079 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17536156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Hoffmann, L.: Metadaten von Internetressourcen und ihre Integrierung in Bibliothekskataloge (1998)
0.02
0.016961899 = product of:
0.033923797 = sum of:
0.033923797 = product of:
0.067847595 = sum of:
0.067847595 = weight(_text_:22 in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067847595 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17536156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1998 18:45:36
-
Essen, F. von: Metadaten - neue Perspektiven für die Erschließung von Netzpublikationen in Bibliotheken : Erster META-LIB-Workshop in Göttingen (1998)
0.02
0.016961899 = product of:
0.033923797 = sum of:
0.033923797 = product of:
0.067847595 = sum of:
0.067847595 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067847595 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17536156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.02
0.016961899 = product of:
0.033923797 = sum of:
0.033923797 = product of:
0.067847595 = sum of:
0.067847595 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067847595 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17536156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016)
0.02
0.016961899 = product of:
0.033923797 = sum of:
0.033923797 = product of:
0.067847595 = sum of:
0.067847595 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067847595 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17536156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016)
0.02
0.016961899 = product of:
0.033923797 = sum of:
0.033923797 = product of:
0.067847595 = sum of:
0.067847595 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067847595 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17536156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050077125 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
