Search (151 results, page 1 of 8)

0.063865945 = product of:
  0.12773189 = sum of:
    0.12773189 = sum of:
      0.07135128 = weight(_text_:t in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07135128 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.34819782 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
      0.056380603 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056380603 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2002 19:38:24

0.060776327 = sum of:
  0.029560141 = product of:
    0.118240565 = sum of:
      0.118240565 = weight(_text_:authors in 1891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.118240565 = score(doc=1891,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 1891, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1891)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.031216186 = product of:
    0.06243237 = sum of:
      0.06243237 = weight(_text_:t in 1891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06243237 = score(doc=1891,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 1891, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1891)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Kent State University Libraries' ETD cataloging process features contributions by authors, by the ETDcat application, and by catalogers. Who is doing what, and how much of it is findable in the library catalog? An empirical analysis is performed featuring simple frequencies within the KentLINK catalog, articulated by the use of a newly devised rubric. The researchers sought the degree to which the ETD authors, the applications, and the catalogers can supply accurate, findable metadata. Further development of combinatory cataloging processes is suggested. The method of examining the data and the rubric are provided as a framework for other metadata analysis.

0.0558827 = product of:
  0.1117654 = sum of:
    0.1117654 = sum of:
      0.06243237 = weight(_text_:t in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06243237 = score(doc=3597,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
      0.04933303 = weight(_text_:22 in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04933303 = score(doc=3597,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

1. 8.1996 22:08:06

0.0558827 = product of:
  0.1117654 = sum of:
    0.1117654 = sum of:
      0.06243237 = weight(_text_:t in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06243237 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
      0.04933303 = weight(_text_:22 in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04933303 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

9. 9.2000 17:22:23

0.0558827 = product of:
  0.1117654 = sum of:
    0.1117654 = sum of:
      0.06243237 = weight(_text_:t in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06243237 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
      0.04933303 = weight(_text_:22 in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04933303 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: https://www.b-i-t-online.de/heft/2017-01-index.php.

Source

B.I.T.online. 20(2017) H.1, S.22-25

0.05211836 = sum of:
  0.020902177 = product of:
    0.08360871 = sum of:
      0.08360871 = weight(_text_:authors in 5133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08360871 = score(doc=5133,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5133, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5133)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.031216186 = product of:
    0.06243237 = sum of:
      0.06243237 = weight(_text_:t in 5133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06243237 = score(doc=5133,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 5133, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5133)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article presents a case study of quality management for print and electronic resource metadata, summarizing problems and solutions encountered by the Cataloging and Discovery Services Department in the George A. Smathers Libraries at the University of Florida. The authors discuss national, state, and local standards for cataloging, automated and manual record enhancements for data, user feedback, and statewide consortial factors. Findings show that adherence to standards, proactive cleanup of data via manual processes and automated tools, collaboration with vendors and stakeholders, and continual assessment of workflows are key to the management of biblio-graphic data quality in consortial academic libraries.

0.05211836 = sum of:
  0.020902177 = product of:
    0.08360871 = sum of:
      0.08360871 = weight(_text_:authors in 5160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08360871 = score(doc=5160,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5160, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5160)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.031216186 = product of:
    0.06243237 = sum of:
      0.06243237 = weight(_text_:t in 5160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06243237 = score(doc=5160,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 5160, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5160)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article presents a case study of quality management issues for electronic resource metadata to assess the support of user tasks (find, select, and obtain library resources) and potential for increased efficiencies in acquisitions and cataloging workflows. The authors evaluated the quality of existing bibliographic records (mostly vendor supplied) for e-resource collections as compared with records for the same collections in OCLC's WorldShare Collection Manager (WCM). Findings are that WCM records better support user tasks by containing more summaries and tables of contents; other checkpoints are largely comparable between the two source record groups. The transition to WCM records is discussed.

0.04789946 = product of:
  0.09579892 = sum of:
    0.09579892 = sum of:
      0.053513464 = weight(_text_:t in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053513464 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
      0.042285454 = weight(_text_:22 in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042285454 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

0.04789946 = product of:
  0.09579892 = sum of:
    0.09579892 = sum of:
      0.053513464 = weight(_text_:t in 3737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053513464 = score(doc=3737,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 3737, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3737)
      0.042285454 = weight(_text_:22 in 3737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042285454 = score(doc=3737,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3737, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3737)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly

0.03905888 = sum of:
  0.017916152 = product of:
    0.07166461 = sum of:
      0.07166461 = weight(_text_:authors in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07166461 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.021142727 = product of:
    0.042285454 = sum of:
      0.042285454 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042285454 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.

Source

Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152

0.037227403 = sum of:
  0.014930127 = product of:
    0.05972051 = sum of:
      0.05972051 = weight(_text_:authors in 5281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05972051 = score(doc=5281,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5281, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5281)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.022297276 = product of:
    0.044594552 = sum of:
      0.044594552 = weight(_text_:t in 5281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.044594552 = score(doc=5281,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 5281, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5281)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose For digital libraries, it is useful to understand how users search in a collection. Investigating search patterns can help them to improve the user interface, collection management and search algorithms. However, search patterns may vary widely in different parts of a collection. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how to identify these search patterns within a well-curated historical newspaper collection using the existing metadata. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyzed search logs combined with metadata records describing the content of the collection, using this metadata to create subsets in the logs corresponding to different parts of the collection. Findings The study shows that faceted search is more prevalent than non-faceted search in terms of number of unique queries, time spent, clicks and downloads. Distinct search patterns are observed in different parts of the collection, corresponding to historical periods, geographical regions or subject matter. Originality/value First, this study provides deeper insights into search behavior at a fine granularity in a historical newspaper collection, by the inclusion of the metadata in the analysis. Second, it demonstrates how to use metadata categorization as a way to analyze distinct search patterns in a collection.

0.034900755 = product of:
  0.06980151 = sum of:
    0.06980151 = product of:
      0.13960302 = sum of:
        0.13960302 = weight(_text_:t in 1840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13960302 = score(doc=1840,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.6812697 = fieldWeight in 1840, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Enthält die einzelnen Beiträge: KOCH, T.: Übersicht über die verschiedenen Typen von Suchdiensten; SEIFFERT, F.: Hilfsmittel zur Wahl passender Suchdienste für bestimmte Zwecke; KOCH, T.: Konzeptsuche / Erweiterung der Suchanfrage; KOCH, T.: Kontrolliertes Vokabular; SEIFFERT, F.: Ranking; WÄTJEN, H.-J.: Integration von Searching und Browsing; KOCH, T.: Metadaten und Suchdienste

0.031932972 = product of:
  0.063865945 = sum of:
    0.063865945 = sum of:
      0.03567564 = weight(_text_:t in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03567564 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.17409891 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
      0.028190302 = weight(_text_:22 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028190302 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

26.12.2011 14:01:22

0.03153311 = product of:
  0.06306622 = sum of:
    0.06306622 = product of:
      0.12613244 = sum of:
        0.12613244 = weight(_text_:t in 1279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12613244 = score(doc=1279,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.6155326 = fieldWeight in 1279, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1279)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Teil eines Sonderheftes: Selected papers from the Dublin Core 2001 Conference. Ed. T. Koch

0.03153311 = product of:
  0.06306622 = sum of:
    0.06306622 = product of:
      0.12613244 = sum of:
        0.12613244 = weight(_text_:t in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12613244 = score(doc=2342,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.6155326 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Teil eines Sonderheftes: Selected papers from the Dublin Core 2001 Conference. Ed. T. Koch

0.03098666 = sum of:
  0.01689151 = product of:
    0.06756604 = sum of:
      0.06756604 = weight(_text_:authors in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06756604 = score(doc=367,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.014095151 = product of:
    0.028190302 = sum of:
      0.028190302 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028190302 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.

0.029900333 = product of:
  0.059800666 = sum of:
    0.059800666 = product of:
      0.11960133 = sum of:
        0.11960133 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11960133 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

30. 3.2002 19:45:22

Source

Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219

0.028190302 = product of:
  0.056380603 = sum of:
    0.056380603 = product of:
      0.11276121 = sum of:
        0.11276121 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11276121 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

16. 7.2000 20:58:22

0.028190302 = product of:
  0.056380603 = sum of:
    0.056380603 = product of:
      0.11276121 = sum of:
        0.11276121 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11276121 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1

0.026756732 = product of:
  0.053513464 = sum of:
    0.053513464 = product of:
      0.10702693 = sum of:
        0.10702693 = weight(_text_:t in 1107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10702693 = score(doc=1107,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 1107, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1107)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Teil eines Sonderheftes: Selected papers from the Dublin Core 2001 Conference. Ed. T. Koch