Search (101 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Margaritopoulos, T.; Margaritopoulos, M.; Mavridis, I.; Manitsaris, A.: ¬A conceptual framework for metadata quality assessment (2008) 0.08
    0.07781324 = product of:
      0.15562648 = sum of:
        0.10374144 = weight(_text_:fields in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10374144 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.32825118 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
        0.051885046 = weight(_text_:22 in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051885046 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata quality of digital resources in a repository is an issue directly associated with the repository's efficiency and value. In this paper, the subject of metadata quality is approached by introducing a new conceptual framework that defines it in terms of its fundamental components. Additionally, a method for assessing these components by exploiting structural and semantic relations among the resources is presented. These relations can be used to generate implied logic rules, which include, impose or prohibit certain values in the fields of a metadata record. The use of such rules can serve as a tool for conducting quality control in the records, in order to diagnose deficiencies and errors.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  2. Zavalina, O.; Palmer, C.L.; Jackson, A.S.; Han, M.-J.: Assessing descriptive substance in free-text collection-level metadata (2008) 0.08
    0.07781324 = product of:
      0.15562648 = sum of:
        0.10374144 = weight(_text_:fields in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10374144 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.32825118 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
        0.051885046 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051885046 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Collection-level metadata has the potential to provide important information about the features and purpose of individual collections. This paper reports on a content analysis of collection records in an aggregation of cultural heritage collections. The findings show that the free-text Description field often provides more accurate and complete representation of subjects and object types than the specified fields. Properties such as importance, uniqueness, comprehensiveness, provenance, and creator are articulated, as well as other vital contextual information about the intentions of a collector and the value of a collection, as a whole, for scholarly users. The results demonstrate that the semantically rich free-text Description field is essential to understanding the context of collections in large aggregations and can serve as a source of data for enhancing and customizing controlled vocabularies.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  3. Banush, D.; Kurth, M:; Pajerek, J.: Rehabilitating killer serials : an automated strategy for maintaining E-journal metadata (2005) 0.06
    0.06484437 = product of:
      0.12968874 = sum of:
        0.0864512 = weight(_text_:fields in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0864512 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.27354267 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
        0.04323754 = weight(_text_:22 in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04323754 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Cornell University Library (CUL) has developed a largely automated method for providing title-level catalog access to electronic journals made available through aggregator packages. CUL's technique for automated e-journal record creation and maintenance relies largely on the conversion of externally supplied metadata into streamlined, abbreviated-level MARC records. Unlike the Cooperative Online Serials Cataloging Program's recently implemented aggregator-neutral approach to e-journal cataloging, CUL's method involves the creation of a separate bibliographic record for each version of an e-journal title in order to facilitate automated record maintenance. An indexed local field indicates the aggregation to which each title belongs and enables machine manipulation of all the records associated with a specific aggregation. Information encoded in another locally defined field facilitates the identification of all of the library's e-journal titles and allows for the automatic generation of a Web-based title list of e-journals. CUL's approach to providing title-level catalog access to its e-journal aggregations involves a number of tradeoffs in which some elements of traditional bibliographic description (such as subject headings and linking fields) are sacrificed in the interest of timeliness and affordability. URLs (Uniform Resource Locators) and holdings information are updated on a regular basis by use of automated methods that save on staff costs.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Raja, N.A.: Digitized content and index pages as alternative subject access fields (2012) 0.04
    0.04492136 = product of:
      0.17968544 = sum of:
        0.17968544 = weight(_text_:fields in 870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17968544 = score(doc=870,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.5685477 = fieldWeight in 870, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=870)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes a pilot study undertaken to test the benefits of the digitized Content and Index pages of books and content pages of journal Issues in providing subject access to documents in a collection. A partial digitization strategy is used to fossick specific information using the alternative subject access fields in bibliographic records. A pilot study was carried out to search for books and journal articles containing information on "Leadership., "Women Entrepreneurs., "Disinvestment. and "Digital preservation. through normal procedu re and based on information stored in MARC 21 fields 653, 505 and 520 of the bibliographic records in the University of Mumbai Library. The results are compared to draw the conclusions.
  5. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.04
    0.036688272 = product of:
      0.14675309 = sum of:
        0.14675309 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14675309 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  6. Qin, J.; Wesley, K.: Web indexing with meta fields : a survey of Web objects in polymer chemistry (1998) 0.04
    0.03667814 = product of:
      0.14671256 = sum of:
        0.14671256 = weight(_text_:fields in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14671256 = score(doc=3589,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.4642173 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study of 4 WWW search engines: AltaVista; Lycos; Excite and WebCrawler to collect data on Web objects on polymer chemistry. 1.037 Web objects were examined for data in 4 categories: document information; use of meta fields; use of images and use of chemical names. Issues raised included: whether to provide metadata elements for parts of entities or whole entities only, the use of metasyntax, problems in representation of special types of objects, and whether links should be considered when encoding metadata. Use of metafields was not widespread in the sample and knowledge of metafields in HTML varied greatly among Web object creators. The study formed part of a metadata project funded by the OCLC Library and Information Science Research Grant Program
  7. Margaritopoulos, M.; Margaritopoulos, T.; Mavridis, I.; Manitsaris, A.: Quantifying and measuring metadata completeness (2012) 0.04
    0.03667814 = product of:
      0.14671256 = sum of:
        0.14671256 = weight(_text_:fields in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14671256 = score(doc=43,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.4642173 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Completeness of metadata is one of the most essential characteristics of their quality. An incomplete metadata record is a record of degraded quality. Existing approaches to measure metadata completeness limit their scope in counting the existence of values in fields, regardless of the metadata hierarchy as defined in international standards. Such a traditional approach overlooks several issues that need to be taken into account. This paper presents a fine-grained metrics system for measuring metadata completeness, based on field completeness. A metadata field is considered to be a container of multiple pieces of information. In this regard, the proposed system is capable of following the hierarchy of metadata as it is set by the metadata schema and admeasuring the effect of multiple values of multivalued fields. An application of the proposed metrics system, after being configured according to specific user requirements, to measure completeness of a real-world set of metadata is demonstrated. The results prove its ability to assess the sufficiency of metadata to describe a resource and provide targeted measures of completeness throughout the metadata hierarchy.
  8. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.03
    0.034590032 = product of:
      0.13836013 = sum of:
        0.13836013 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13836013 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
  9. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.03
    0.034590032 = product of:
      0.13836013 = sum of:
        0.13836013 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13836013 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  10. McDonough, J.P.: SGML and USMARC standard : applying markup to bibliographic data (1998) 0.03
    0.03458048 = product of:
      0.13832192 = sum of:
        0.13832192 = weight(_text_:fields in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13832192 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.43766826 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The recent increase in electronic publishing has led many in the library community to consider altering standards for bibliographic data to promote greater compatibility between digital works and their bibliographic representation. SGML has been prominently mentioned as a mechanism for encoding bibliographic data. Examines the problems and potential of applying SGML to to USMARC record standard, with a particular emphasis on issues of field order and repeatability, character set encoding, and obsolete fields
  11. Popham, M.: Resource discovery metadata for electronic texts and linguistic corpora (1997) 0.03
    0.03458048 = product of:
      0.13832192 = sum of:
        0.13832192 = weight(_text_:fields in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13832192 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.43766826 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a workshop convened by the Oxford Text Archiuve, UK, which focussed on identifying the metadata essential to finding electronic texts of interest to those working in the fields of literary and linguistic studies, encompassing texts of every type and period. Makes recommendations for changes to the Dublin Core metadata format to enable better resource discovery
  12. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.03
    0.030266277 = product of:
      0.12106511 = sum of:
        0.12106511 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12106511 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
  13. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.03
    0.030266277 = product of:
      0.12106511 = sum of:
        0.12106511 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12106511 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  14. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.03
    0.030266277 = product of:
      0.12106511 = sum of:
        0.12106511 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12106511 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  15. Clark, C.: Audio-visual resource discovery on the Web (1998) 0.03
    0.03025792 = product of:
      0.12103168 = sum of:
        0.12103168 = weight(_text_:fields in 3201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12103168 = score(doc=3201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.38295972 = fieldWeight in 3201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3201)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines the meatadata standard known as the Dublin Core, as well as the Instructional Management Systems Projects, an American Educom NLII initiative which is developing a specification and software for managing online learning resources. Gives the list of fields with brief descriptions from the IMS Metadata Dictionary, and describes the UK Performing Arts Data Service (PADS) workshops on moving image and sound resources with particular reference to the use of the Dublin Core for cataloguing sound recordings. The slow rate of audiovisual progress is touched on: 5 other relevant initiatives connected wit metadata are listed
  16. Smits, J.: Metadata : an introduction (1999) 0.03
    0.03025792 = product of:
      0.12103168 = sum of:
        0.12103168 = weight(_text_:fields in 5333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12103168 = score(doc=5333,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.38295972 = fieldWeight in 5333, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5333)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    With the transition from cartographic materials to spatial information the nature and amount of access data for the library field is changing. Besides bibliographic data there exists now a range of metadata, each kind for specific purposes within specific user fields. To define their relation to each other they have been put into a diagram. Through the Resource Description Framework these should all be available through a common interface for Internet-searching. To prevent confusion spatial metadata is defined. Spatial metadata introduces new elements to descriptions with new application possibilities.
  17. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.03
    0.025942523 = product of:
      0.10377009 = sum of:
        0.10377009 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10377009 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  18. Benz, J.; Voigt, K.: Indexing file system for the set-up of metadatabases in environmental sciences on the Internet (1995) 0.03
    0.02593536 = product of:
      0.10374144 = sum of:
        0.10374144 = weight(_text_:fields in 3865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10374144 = score(doc=3865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.32825118 = fieldWeight in 3865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3865)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes an approach to retrieving environmental sciences information on the Internet using metadatabases. an inf-sheet is created in a flat file system for each resource. The contents of theses sheets are structured by different fields which hold different types of information. 2 classes of information can be distinguished: information describing the content of a resource, which is searchable, and information which links to the resources (URL). A rough automated selection is performed, humans analyze the pre selected resources, and a final selection and indexing is carried out. An algorithm which controle the validity of the meta information is implemented. Describes 2 implemented examples, the Register of Ecological Models and the Metadatabase of Internet Resources
  19. Howarth, L.: Metadata and bibliographic control : soul-mates or two solitudes? (2005) 0.03
    0.02593536 = product of:
      0.10374144 = sum of:
        0.10374144 = weight(_text_:fields in 5728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10374144 = score(doc=5728,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.32825118 = fieldWeight in 5728, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5728)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The historical interweaving of evolving trends and applications in metadata and bibliographic control seems largely absent from the literature. To address this apparent gap in perspective, we trace some historic and more recent developments related to each, and speculate on future directions. Cataloguing rules are ancestors to the current lineage of bibliographic standards. Metadata schemas have been developed to meet the needs of particular fields or domains and to support a variety of functions related to resource discovery. While differences between the tools of bibliographic control and of metadata application still remain, the similarities have become sufficient to warrant a confluence in terminology and definition. While internationally determined codes and standards have fostered the goal of universal bibliographic control, syntactic structures, semantic element sets, transmission protocols, cross-schema mappings, and metadata harvesting tools have been instrumental to realizing the concept of interoperability.
  20. Zavalin, V.: Exploration of subject and genre representation in bibliographic metadata representing works of fiction for children and young adults (2024) 0.03
    0.02593536 = product of:
      0.10374144 = sum of:
        0.10374144 = weight(_text_:fields in 1152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10374144 = score(doc=1152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.32825118 = fieldWeight in 1152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1152)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This study examines subject and genre representation in metadata that describes information resources created for children and young adult audiences. Both quantitative and limited qualitative analyses were applied to the analysis of WorldCat records collected in 2021 and contributed by the Children's and Young Adults' Cataloging Program at the US Library of Congress. This dataset contains records created several years prior to the data collection point and edited by various OCLC member institutions. Findings provide information on the level and patterns of application of these kinds of metadata important for information access, with a focus on the fields, subfields, and controlled vocabularies used. The discussion of results includes a detailed evaluation of genre and subject metadata quality (accuracy, completeness, and consistency).

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 90
  • d 9
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 92
  • el 6
  • s 6
  • m 4
  • b 2
  • More… Less…