Search (88 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016) 0.12
    0.11797046 = product of:
      0.23594092 = sum of:
        0.23594092 = sum of:
          0.16316196 = weight(_text_:word in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16316196 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05371688 = queryNorm
              0.5793041 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.072778955 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.072778955 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05371688 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  2. Wolfekuhler, M.R.; Punch, W.F.: Finding salient features for personal Web pages categories (1997) 0.11
    0.106233686 = product of:
      0.21246737 = sum of:
        0.21246737 = sum of:
          0.1615221 = weight(_text_:word in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1615221 = score(doc=2673,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05371688 = queryNorm
              0.5734818 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
          0.050945267 = weight(_text_:22 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050945267 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05371688 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Examines techniques that discover features in sets of pre-categorized documents, such that similar documents can be found on the WWW. Examines techniques which will classifiy training examples with high accuracy, then explains why this is not necessarily useful. Describes a method for extracting word clusters from the raw document features. Results show that the clustering technique is successful in discovering word groups in personal Web pages which can be used to find similar information on the WWW
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  3. Baker, T.: ¬A grammar of Dublin Core (2000) 0.05
    0.047188185 = product of:
      0.09437637 = sum of:
        0.09437637 = sum of:
          0.06526479 = weight(_text_:word in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06526479 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05371688 = queryNorm
              0.23172164 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
          0.029111583 = weight(_text_:22 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029111583 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05371688 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Dublin Core is often presented as a modern form of catalog card -- a set of elements (and now qualifiers) that describe resources in a complete package. Sometimes it is proposed as an exchange format for sharing records among multiple collections. The founding principle that "every element is optional and repeatable" reinforces the notion that a Dublin Core description is to be taken as a whole. This paper, in contrast, is based on a much different premise: Dublin Core is a language. More precisely, it is a small language for making a particular class of statements about resources. Like natural languages, it has a vocabulary of word-like terms, the two classes of which -- elements and qualifiers -- function within statements like nouns and adjectives; and it has a syntax for arranging elements and qualifiers into statements according to a simple pattern. Whenever tourists order a meal or ask directions in an unfamiliar language, considerate native speakers will spontaneously limit themselves to basic words and simple sentence patterns along the lines of "I am so-and-so" or "This is such-and-such". Linguists call this pidginization. In such situations, a small phrase book or translated menu can be most helpful. By analogy, today's Web has been called an Internet Commons where users and information providers from a wide range of scientific, commercial, and social domains present their information in a variety of incompatible data models and description languages. In this context, Dublin Core presents itself as a metadata pidgin for digital tourists who must find their way in this linguistically diverse landscape. Its vocabulary is small enough to learn quickly, and its basic pattern is easily grasped. It is well-suited to serve as an auxiliary language for digital libraries. This grammar starts by defining terms. It then follows a 200-year-old tradition of English grammar teaching by focusing on the structure of single statements. It concludes by looking at the growing dictionary of Dublin Core vocabulary terms -- its registry, and at how statements can be used to build the metadata equivalent of paragraphs and compositions -- the application profile.
    Date
    26.12.2011 14:01:22
  4. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.03
    0.030877497 = product of:
      0.061754994 = sum of:
        0.061754994 = product of:
          0.12350999 = sum of:
            0.12350999 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12350999 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  5. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.03
    0.029111583 = product of:
      0.058223166 = sum of:
        0.058223166 = product of:
          0.11644633 = sum of:
            0.11644633 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11644633 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
  6. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.03
    0.029111583 = product of:
      0.058223166 = sum of:
        0.058223166 = product of:
          0.11644633 = sum of:
            0.11644633 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11644633 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  7. Wolfe, EW.: a case study in automated metadata enhancement : Natural Language Processing in the humanities (2019) 0.03
    0.028553344 = product of:
      0.05710669 = sum of:
        0.05710669 = product of:
          0.11421338 = sum of:
            0.11421338 = weight(_text_:word in 5236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11421338 = score(doc=5236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.40551287 = fieldWeight in 5236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5236)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Black Book Interactive Project at the University of Kansas (KU) is developing an expanded corpus of novels by African American authors, with an emphasis on lesser known writers and a goal of expanding research in this field. Using a custom metadata schema with an emphasis on race-related elements, each novel is analyzed for a variety of elements such as literary style, targeted content analysis, historical context, and other areas. Librarians at KU have worked to develop a variety of computational text analysis processes designed to assist with specific aspects of this metadata collection, including text mining and natural language processing, automated subject extraction based on word sense disambiguation, harvesting data from Wikidata, and other actions.
  8. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.03
    0.025472634 = product of:
      0.050945267 = sum of:
        0.050945267 = product of:
          0.101890534 = sum of:
            0.101890534 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.101890534 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
  9. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.03
    0.025472634 = product of:
      0.050945267 = sum of:
        0.050945267 = product of:
          0.101890534 = sum of:
            0.101890534 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.101890534 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  10. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.03
    0.025472634 = product of:
      0.050945267 = sum of:
        0.050945267 = product of:
          0.101890534 = sum of:
            0.101890534 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.101890534 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  11. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.02
    0.021833686 = product of:
      0.043667372 = sum of:
        0.043667372 = product of:
          0.087334745 = sum of:
            0.087334745 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.087334745 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  12. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.02
    0.020584997 = product of:
      0.041169994 = sum of:
        0.041169994 = product of:
          0.08233999 = sum of:
            0.08233999 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08233999 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  13. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.02
    0.020584997 = product of:
      0.041169994 = sum of:
        0.041169994 = product of:
          0.08233999 = sum of:
            0.08233999 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08233999 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  14. Hoffmann, L.: Metadaten von Internetressourcen und ihre Integrierung in Bibliothekskataloge (1998) 0.02
    0.018194739 = product of:
      0.036389478 = sum of:
        0.036389478 = product of:
          0.072778955 = sum of:
            0.072778955 = weight(_text_:22 in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072778955 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 18:45:36
  15. Essen, F. von: Metadaten - neue Perspektiven für die Erschließung von Netzpublikationen in Bibliotheken : Erster META-LIB-Workshop in Göttingen (1998) 0.02
    0.018194739 = product of:
      0.036389478 = sum of:
        0.036389478 = product of:
          0.072778955 = sum of:
            0.072778955 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072778955 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand
  16. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.02
    0.018194739 = product of:
      0.036389478 = sum of:
        0.036389478 = product of:
          0.072778955 = sum of:
            0.072778955 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072778955 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  17. Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016) 0.02
    0.018194739 = product of:
      0.036389478 = sum of:
        0.036389478 = product of:
          0.072778955 = sum of:
            0.072778955 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072778955 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  18. Aldana, J.F.; Gómez, A.C.; Moreno, N.; Nebro, A.J.; Roldán, M.M.: Metadata functionality for semantic Web integration (2003) 0.02
    0.016316198 = product of:
      0.032632396 = sum of:
        0.032632396 = product of:
          0.06526479 = sum of:
            0.06526479 = weight(_text_:word in 2731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06526479 = score(doc=2731,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.23172164 = fieldWeight in 2731, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2731)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We propose an extension of a mediator architecture. This extension is oriented to ontology-driven data integration. In our architecture ontologies are not managed by an extemal component or service, but are integrated in the mediation layer. This approach implies rethinking the mediator design, but at the same time provides advantages from a database perspective. Some of these advantages include the application of optimization and evaluation techniques that use and combine information from all abstraction levels (physical schema, logical schema and semantic information defined by ontology). 1. Introduction Although the Web is probably the richest information repository in human history, users cannot specify what they want from it. Two major problems that arise in current search engines (Heflin, 2001) are: a) polysemy, when the same word is used with different meanings; b) synonymy, when two different words have the same meaning. Polysemy causes irrelevant information retrieval. On the other hand, synonymy produces lost of useful documents. The lack of a capability to understand the context of the words and the relationships among required terms, explains many of the lost and false results produced by search engines. The Semantic Web will bring structure to the meaningful content of Web pages, giving semantic relationships among terms and possibly avoiding the previous problems. Various proposals have appeared for meta-data representation and communication standards, and other services and tools that may eventually merge into the global Semantic Web (Berners-lee, 2001). Hopefully, in the next few years we will see the universal adoption of open standards for representation and sharing of meta-information. In this environment, software agents roaming from page to page can readily carry out sophisticated tasks for users (Berners-Lee, 2001). In this context, ontologies can be seen as metadata that represent semantic of data; providing a knowledge domain standard vocabulary, like DTDs and XML Schema do. If its pages were so structured, the Web could be seen as a heterogeneous collection of autonomous databases. This suggests that techniques developed in the Database area could be useful. Database research mainly deals with efficient storage and retrieval and with powerful query languages.
  19. Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996) 0.01
    0.014555791 = product of:
      0.029111583 = sum of:
        0.029111583 = product of:
          0.058223166 = sum of:
            0.058223166 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058223166 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.59-73
  20. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.01
    0.014555791 = product of:
      0.029111583 = sum of:
        0.029111583 = product of:
          0.058223166 = sum of:
            0.058223166 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058223166 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 77
  • d 9
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 80
  • el 6
  • s 5
  • b 2
  • m 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…