-
Alves dos Santos, E.; Mucheroni, M.L.: VIAF and OpenCitations : cooperative work as a strategy for information organization in the linked data era (2018)
0.06
0.062367752 = product of:
0.124735504 = sum of:
0.124735504 = sum of:
0.065297656 = weight(_text_:work in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065297656 = score(doc=4826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.32441974 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
0.059437852 = weight(_text_:22 in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059437852 = score(doc=4826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 1.2019 19:13:22
-
Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008)
0.06
0.055125825 = product of:
0.11025165 = sum of:
0.11025165 = sum of:
0.05771552 = weight(_text_:work in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05771552 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.28674924 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.052536134 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052536134 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Folksonomy is the result of describing Web resources with tags created by Web users. Although it has become a popular application for the description of resources, in general terms Folksonomies are not being conveniently integrated in metadata. However, if the appropriate metadata elements are identified, then further work may be conducted to automatically assign tags to these elements (RDF properties) and use them in Semantic Web applications. This article presents research carried out to continue the project Kinds of Tags, which intends to identify elements required for metadata originating from folksonomies and to propose an application profile for DC Social Tagging. The work provides information that may be used by software applications to assign tags to metadata elements and, therefore, means for tags to be conveniently gathered by metadata interoperability tools. Despite the unquestionably high value of DC and the significance of the already existing properties in DC Terms, the pilot study show revealed a significant number of tags for which no corresponding properties yet existed. A need for new properties, such as Action, Depth, Rate, and Utility was determined. Those potential new properties will have to be validated in a later stage by the DC Social Tagging Community.
- Pages
- S.14-22
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Brasethvik, T.: ¬A semantic modeling approach to metadata (1998)
0.05
0.054571785 = product of:
0.10914357 = sum of:
0.10914357 = sum of:
0.05713545 = weight(_text_:work in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05713545 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.28386727 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
0.05200812 = weight(_text_:22 in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05200812 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- States that heterogeneous project groups today may be expected to use the mechanisms of the Web for sharing information. Metadata has been proposed as a mechanism for expressing the semantics of information and, hence, facilitate information retrieval, understanding and use. Presents an approach to sharing information which aims to use a semantic modeling language as the basis for expressing the semantics of information and designing metadata schemes. Functioning on the borderline between human and computer understandability, the modeling language would be able to express the semantics of published Web documents. Reporting on work in progress, presents the overall framework and ideas
- Date
- 9. 9.2000 17:22:23
-
Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014)
0.05
0.054571785 = product of:
0.10914357 = sum of:
0.10914357 = sum of:
0.05713545 = weight(_text_:work in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05713545 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.28386727 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.05200812 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05200812 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Catalogers have become fluent in information technology such as web design skills, HyperText Markup Language (HTML), Cascading Stylesheets (CSS), eXensible Markup Language (XML), and programming languages. The knowledge gained from learning information technology can be used to experiment with methods of transforming one metadata schema into another using various software solutions. This paper will discuss the use of eXtensible Stylesheet Language Transformations (XSLT) for repurposing, editing, and reformatting metadata. Catalogers have the requisite skills for working with any metadata schema, and if they are excluded from metadata work, libraries are wasting a valuable human resource.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Renear, A.H.; Wickett, K.M.; Urban, R.J.; Dubin, D.; Shreeves, S.L.: Collection/item metadata relationships (2008)
0.05
0.046775818 = product of:
0.093551636 = sum of:
0.093551636 = sum of:
0.048973244 = weight(_text_:work in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048973244 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.2433148 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.04457839 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04457839 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Contemporary retrieval systems, which search across collections, usually ignore collection-level metadata. Alternative approaches, exploiting collection-level information, will require an understanding of the various kinds of relationships that can obtain between collection-level and item-level metadata. This paper outlines the problem and describes a project that is developing a logic-based framework for classifying collection/item metadata relationships. This framework will support (i) metadata specification developers defining metadata elements, (ii) metadata creators describing objects, and (iii) system designers implementing systems that take advantage of collection-level metadata. We present three examples of collection/item metadata relationship categories, attribute/value-propagation, value-propagation, and value-constraint and show that even in these simple cases a precise formulation requires modal notions in addition to first-order logic. These formulations are related to recent work in information retrieval and ontology evaluation.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Belém, F.M.; Almeida, J.M.; Gonçalves, M.A.: ¬A survey on tag recommendation methods : a review (2017)
0.04
0.038979847 = product of:
0.077959694 = sum of:
0.077959694 = sum of:
0.040811036 = weight(_text_:work in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040811036 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.20276234 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
0.03714866 = weight(_text_:22 in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03714866 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Tags (keywords freely assigned by users to describe web content) have become highly popular on Web 2.0 applications, because of the strong stimuli and easiness for users to create and describe their own content. This increase in tag popularity has led to a vast literature on tag recommendation methods. These methods aim at assisting users in the tagging process, possibly increasing the quality of the generated tags and, consequently, improving the quality of the information retrieval (IR) services that rely on tags as data sources. Regardless of the numerous and diversified previous studies on tag recommendation, to our knowledge, no previous work has summarized and organized them into a single survey article. In this article, we propose a taxonomy for tag recommendation methods, classifying them according to the target of the recommendations, their objectives, exploited data sources, and underlying techniques. Moreover, we provide a critical overview of these methods, pointing out their advantages and disadvantages. Finally, we describe the main open challenges related to the field, such as tag ambiguity, cold start, and evaluation issues.
- Date
- 16.11.2017 13:30:22
-
Lange, H.R.; Winkler, B.J.: Taming the Internet : metadata, a work in progress (1997)
0.03
0.032648828 = product of:
0.065297656 = sum of:
0.065297656 = product of:
0.13059531 = sum of:
0.13059531 = weight(_text_:work in 4705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13059531 = score(doc=4705,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.6488395 = fieldWeight in 4705, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4705)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.03
0.03152168 = product of:
0.06304336 = sum of:
0.06304336 = product of:
0.12608673 = sum of:
0.12608673 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12608673 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
Rice, R.: Applying DC to institutional data repositories (2008)
0.03
0.031183876 = product of:
0.062367752 = sum of:
0.062367752 = sum of:
0.032648828 = weight(_text_:work in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032648828 = score(doc=2664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.16220987 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
0.029718926 = weight(_text_:22 in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029718926 = score(doc=2664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- DISC-UK DataShare (2007-2009), a project led by the University of Edinburgh and funded by JISC (Joint Information Systems Committee, UK), arises from an existing consortium of academic data support professionals working in the domain of social science datasets (Data Information Specialists Committee-UK). We are working together across four universities with colleagues engaged in managing open access repositories for e-prints. Our project supports 'early adopter' academics who wish to openly share datasets and presents a model for depositing 'orphaned datasets' that are not being deposited in subject-domain data archives/centres. Outputs from the project are intended to help to demystify data as complex objects in repositories, and assist other institutional repository managers in overcoming barriers to incorporating research data. By building on lessons learned from recent JISC-funded data repository projects such as SToRe and GRADE the project will help realize the vision of the Digital Repositories Roadmap, e.g. the milestone under Data, "Institutions need to invest in research data repositories" (Heery and Powell, 2006). Application of appropriate metadata is an important area of development for the project. Datasets are not different from other digital materials in that they need to be described, not just for discovery but also for preservation and re-use. The GRADE project found that for geo-spatial datasets, Dublin Core metadata (with geo-spatial enhancements such as a bounding box for the 'coverage' property) was sufficient for discovery within a DSpace repository, though more indepth metadata or documentation was required for re-use after downloading. The project partners are examining other metadata schemas such as the Data Documentation Initiative (DDI) versions 2 and 3, used primarily by social science data archives (Martinez, 2008). Crosswalks from the DDI to qualified Dublin Core are important for describing research datasets at the study level (as opposed to the variable level which is largely out of scope for this project). DataShare is benefiting from work of of the DRIADE project (application profile development for evolutionary biology) (Carrier, et al, 2007), eBank UK (developed an application profile for crystallography data) and GAP (Geospatial Application Profile, in progress) in defining interoperable Dublin Core qualified metadata elements and their application to datasets for each partner repository. The solution devised at Edinburgh for DSpace will be covered in the poster.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000)
0.03
0.029718926 = product of:
0.059437852 = sum of:
0.059437852 = product of:
0.118875705 = sum of:
0.118875705 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.118875705 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16. 7.2000 20:58:22
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.03
0.029718926 = product of:
0.059437852 = sum of:
0.059437852 = product of:
0.118875705 = sum of:
0.118875705 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.118875705 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001)
0.03
0.02600406 = product of:
0.05200812 = sum of:
0.05200812 = product of:
0.10401624 = sum of:
0.10401624 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10401624 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 3.2002 9:22:34
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.03
0.02600406 = product of:
0.05200812 = sum of:
0.05200812 = product of:
0.10401624 = sum of:
0.10401624 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10401624 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.03
0.02600406 = product of:
0.05200812 = sum of:
0.05200812 = product of:
0.10401624 = sum of:
0.10401624 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10401624 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Vorndran, A.; Grund, S.: Metadata sharing : how to transfer metadata information among work cluster members (2021)
0.02
0.024486622 = product of:
0.048973244 = sum of:
0.048973244 = product of:
0.09794649 = sum of:
0.09794649 = weight(_text_:work in 721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09794649 = score(doc=721,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.4866296 = fieldWeight in 721, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=721)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The German National Library (DNB) is using a clustering technique to aggregate works from the database Culturegraph. Culturegraph collects bibliographic metadata records from all German Regional Library Networks, the Austrian Library Network, and DNB. This stock of about 180 million records serves as the basis for work clustering-the attempt to assemble all manifestations of a work in one cluster. The results of this work clustering are not employed in the display of search results, as other similar approaches successfully do, but for transferring metadata elements among the cluster members. In this paper the transfer of content-descriptive metadata elements such as controlled and uncontrolled index terms and classifications and links to name records in the German Integrated Authority File (GND) are described. In this way, standardization and cross linking can be improved and the richness of metadata description can be enhanced.
-
Gursoy, A.; Wickett, K.; Feinberg, M.: Understanding tag functions in a moderated, user-generated metadata ecosystem (2018)
0.02
0.022814061 = product of:
0.045628123 = sum of:
0.045628123 = product of:
0.091256246 = sum of:
0.091256246 = weight(_text_:work in 3946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.091256246 = score(doc=3946,freq=10.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.45339036 = fieldWeight in 3946, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3946)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate tag use in a metadata ecosystem that supports a fan work repository to identify functions of tags and explore the system as a co-constructed communicative context. Design/methodology/approach Using modified techniques from grounded theory (Charmaz, 2007), this paper integrates humanistic and social science methods to identify kinds of tag use in a rich setting. Findings Three primary roles of tags emerge out of detailed study of the metadata ecosystem: tags can identify elements in the fan work, tags can reflect on how those elements are used or adapted in the fan work, and finally, tags can express the fan author's sense of her role in the discursive context of the fan work repository. Attending to each of the tag roles shifts focus away from just what tags say to include how they say it. Practical implications Instead of building metadata systems designed solely for retrieval or description, this research suggests that it may be fruitful to build systems that recognize various metadata functions and allow for expressivity. This research also suggests that attending to metadata previously considered unusable in systems may reflect the participants' sense of the system and their role within it. Originality/value In addition to accommodating a wider range of tag functions, this research implies consideration of metadata ecosystems, where different kinds of tags do different things and work together to create a multifaceted artifact.
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.02
0.022289194 = product of:
0.04457839 = sum of:
0.04457839 = product of:
0.08915678 = sum of:
0.08915678 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08915678 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Hert, C.A.; Denn, S.O.; Gillman, D.W.; Oh, J.S.; Pattuelli, M.C.; Hernandez, N.: Investigating and modeling metadata use to support information architecture development in the statistical knowledge network (2007)
0.02
0.021206036 = product of:
0.042412072 = sum of:
0.042412072 = product of:
0.084824145 = sum of:
0.084824145 = weight(_text_:work in 422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084824145 = score(doc=422,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.4214336 = fieldWeight in 422, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=422)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Metadata and an appropriate metadata model are nontrivial components of information architecture conceptualization and implementation, particularly when disparate and dispersed systems are integrated. Metadata availability can enhance retrieval processes, improve information organization and navigation, and support management of digital objects. To support these activities efficiently, metadata need to be modeled appropriately for the tasks. The authors' work focuses on how to understand and model metadata requirements to support the work of end users of an integrative statistical knowledge network (SKN). They report on a series of user studies. These studies provide an understanding of metadata elements necessary for a variety of user-oriented tasks, related business rules associated with the use of these elements, and their relationship to other perspectives on metadata model development. This work demonstrates the importance of the user perspective in this type of design activity and provides a set of strategies by which the results of user studies can be systematically utilized to support that design.
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.02
0.021014454 = product of:
0.042028908 = sum of:
0.042028908 = product of:
0.084057815 = sum of:
0.084057815 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084057815 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.02
0.021014454 = product of:
0.042028908 = sum of:
0.042028908 = product of:
0.084057815 = sum of:
0.084057815 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084057815 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
