-
Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000)
0.21
0.20732313 = product of:
0.41464627 = sum of:
0.41464627 = sum of:
0.2816384 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2816384 = score(doc=4899,freq=5.0), product of:
0.24864492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
1.1326932 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.13300787 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13300787 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21486087 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16. 7.2000 20:58:22
- Source
- Vine. 2000, no.117, S.18-23
- Year
- 2000
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.11
0.10547392 = sum of:
0.07222196 = product of:
0.21666586 = sum of:
0.21666586 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21666586 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
0.32611546 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.033251967 = product of:
0.066503935 = sum of:
0.066503935 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066503935 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21486087 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000)
0.10
0.10366157 = product of:
0.20732313 = sum of:
0.20732313 = sum of:
0.1408192 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1408192 = score(doc=4867,freq=5.0), product of:
0.24864492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.5663466 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
0.066503935 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066503935 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21486087 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:38:24
- Source
- Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.35-39
- Year
- 2000
-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.10
0.10366157 = product of:
0.20732313 = sum of:
0.20732313 = sum of:
0.1408192 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1408192 = score(doc=4869,freq=5.0), product of:
0.24864492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.5663466 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.066503935 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066503935 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21486087 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
- Source
- Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.46-48
- Year
- 2000
-
Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000)
0.09
0.090703875 = product of:
0.18140775 = sum of:
0.18140775 = sum of:
0.1232168 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1232168 = score(doc=4866,freq=5.0), product of:
0.24864492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.49555326 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
0.058190946 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058190946 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21486087 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:38:54
- Source
- Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.40-45
- Year
- 2000
-
Vellucci, S.L.: Metadata and authority control (2000)
0.09
0.090703875 = product of:
0.18140775 = sum of:
0.18140775 = sum of:
0.1232168 = weight(_text_:2000 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1232168 = score(doc=180,freq=5.0), product of:
0.24864492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.49555326 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
0.058190946 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058190946 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21486087 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 44(2000) no.1, S.33-43
- Year
- 2000
-
Understanding metadata (2004)
0.08
0.0843206 = sum of:
0.05106863 = product of:
0.15320589 = sum of:
0.15320589 = weight(_text_:objects in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15320589 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32611546 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.033251967 = product of:
0.066503935 = sum of:
0.066503935 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066503935 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21486087 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful
- Date
- 10. 9.2004 10:22:40
-
Sturmane, A.; Eglite, E.; Jankevica-Balode, M.: Subject metadata development for digital resources in Latvia (2014)
0.08
0.08364962 = sum of:
0.04468505 = product of:
0.13405515 = sum of:
0.13405515 = weight(_text_:objects in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13405515 = score(doc=1963,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32611546 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.038964573 = product of:
0.07792915 = sum of:
0.07792915 = weight(_text_:2000 in 1963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07792915 = score(doc=1963,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24864492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.3134154 = fieldWeight in 1963, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1963)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The National Library of Latvia (NLL) made a decision to use the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) in 2000. At present the NLL Subject Headings Database in Latvian holds approximately 34,000 subject headings and is used for subject cataloging of textual resources, including articles from serials. For digital objects NLL uses a system like Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST). We succesfully use it in the project "In Search of Lost Latvia," one of the milestones in the development of the subject cataloging of digital resources in Latvia.
-
Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004)
0.08
0.079105444 = sum of:
0.054166466 = product of:
0.1624994 = sum of:
0.1624994 = weight(_text_:objects in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1624994 = score(doc=4752,freq=4.0), product of:
0.32611546 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.024938976 = product of:
0.049877953 = sum of:
0.049877953 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049877953 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21486087 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- As educational technology becomes pervasive, demand will grow for library content to be incorporated into courseware. Among the barriers impeding interoperability between libraries and educational tools is the difference in specifications commonly used for the exchange of digital objects and metadata. Among libraries, Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a new but increasingly popular standard; the IMS content-package (IMS-CP) plays a parallel role in educational technology. This article describes how METS-encoded library content can be converted into digital objects for IMS-compliant systems through an XSLT-based crosswalk. The conceptual models behind METS and IMS-CP are compared, the design and limitations of an XSLT-based translation are described, and the crosswalks are related to other techniques to enhance interoperability.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
-
El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001)
0.08
0.077782914 = product of:
0.15556583 = sum of:
0.15556583 = sum of:
0.089061886 = weight(_text_:2000 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089061886 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24864492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.35818905 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.066503935 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066503935 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21486087 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 23. 1.2007 11:22:30
- Footnote
- Auch in: Library computing 19(2000) nos.3/4, S.180-191
-
Weber, J.: Nachlässe und Autographen im WWW : Dublin Core in Museen, Archiven und Bibliotheken (2000)
0.08
0.077746175 = product of:
0.15549235 = sum of:
0.15549235 = sum of:
0.105614394 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.105614394 = score(doc=4458,freq=5.0), product of:
0.24864492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.42475992 = fieldWeight in 4458, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4458)
0.049877953 = weight(_text_:22 in 4458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049877953 = score(doc=4458,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21486087 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4458, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4458)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 3.2000 19:25:22
- Source
- Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 47(2000) H.1, S.63-69
- Year
- 2000
-
Marchiori, M.: ¬The limits of Web metadata, and beyond (1998)
0.07
0.07378052 = sum of:
0.04468505 = product of:
0.13405515 = sum of:
0.13405515 = weight(_text_:objects in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13405515 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32611546 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.029095473 = product of:
0.058190946 = sum of:
0.058190946 = weight(_text_:22 in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058190946 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21486087 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Highlights 2 major problems of the WWW metadata: it will take some time before a reasonable number of people start using metadata to provide a better Web classification, and that no one can guarantee that a majority of the Web objects will be ever properly classified via metadata. Addresses the problem of how to cope with intrinsic limits of Web metadata, proposes a method to solve these problems and show evidence of its effectiveness. Examines the important problem of what is the required critical mass in the WWW for metadata in order for it to be really useful
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Lubas, R.L.; Wolfe, R.H.W.; Fleischman, M.: Creating metadata practices for MIT's OpenCourseWare Project (2004)
0.07
0.07378052 = sum of:
0.04468505 = product of:
0.13405515 = sum of:
0.13405515 = weight(_text_:objects in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13405515 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32611546 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.029095473 = product of:
0.058190946 = sum of:
0.058190946 = weight(_text_:22 in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058190946 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21486087 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The MIT libraries were called upon to recommend a metadata scheme for the resources contained in MIT's OpenCourseWare (OCW) project. The resources in OCW needed descriptive, structural, and technical metadata. The SCORM standard, which uses IEEE Learning Object Metadata for its descriptive standard, was selected for its focus on educational objects. However, it was clear that the Libraries would need to recommend how the standard would be applied and adapted to accommodate needs that were not addressed in the standard's specifications. The newly formed MIT Libraries Metadata Unit adapted established practices from AACR2 and MARC traditions when facing situations in which there were no precedents to follow.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.138-143
-
Morris, S.: Metadata and rights (2000)
0.07
0.0704096 = product of:
0.1408192 = sum of:
0.1408192 = product of:
0.2816384 = sum of:
0.2816384 = weight(_text_:2000 in 2628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2816384 = score(doc=2628,freq=5.0), product of:
0.24864492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
1.1326932 = fieldWeight in 2628, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2628)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Vine. 2000, no.117, S.30-34
- Year
- 2000
-
Metadata : pt.1 (2000)
0.07
0.0704096 = product of:
0.1408192 = sum of:
0.1408192 = product of:
0.2816384 = sum of:
0.2816384 = weight(_text_:2000 in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2816384 = score(doc=3816,freq=5.0), product of:
0.24864492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
1.1326932 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Vine. 2000, no.116
- Year
- 2000
-
Metadata : pt.2 (2000)
0.07
0.0704096 = product of:
0.1408192 = sum of:
0.1408192 = product of:
0.2816384 = sum of:
0.2816384 = weight(_text_:2000 in 7681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2816384 = score(doc=7681,freq=5.0), product of:
0.24864492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
1.1326932 = fieldWeight in 7681, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7681)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Vine. 2000, no.117
- Year
- 2000
-
Yeates, R.: Metadata : an introduction (2000)
0.07
0.0704096 = product of:
0.1408192 = sum of:
0.1408192 = product of:
0.2816384 = sum of:
0.2816384 = weight(_text_:2000 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2816384 = score(doc=488,freq=5.0), product of:
0.24864492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
1.1326932 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Vine. 2000, no.116, S.3-5
- Year
- 2000
-
Brack, V.: ¬The eLib collection description scheme (2000)
0.07
0.0704096 = product of:
0.1408192 = sum of:
0.1408192 = product of:
0.2816384 = sum of:
0.2816384 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2816384 = score(doc=4905,freq=5.0), product of:
0.24864492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
1.1326932 = fieldWeight in 4905, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4905)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Vine. 2000, no.116, S.38-48
- Year
- 2000
-
Medeiros, N.: Metadata : semantics plus structure plus syntax (2000)
0.07
0.0704096 = product of:
0.1408192 = sum of:
0.1408192 = product of:
0.2816384 = sum of:
0.2816384 = weight(_text_:2000 in 3899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2816384 = score(doc=3899,freq=5.0), product of:
0.24864492 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
1.1326932 = fieldWeight in 3899, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3899)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- OCLC systems and services. 16(2000) no.2, S.54-56
- Year
- 2000
-
Renear, A.H.; Wickett, K.M.; Urban, R.J.; Dubin, D.; Shreeves, S.L.: Collection/item metadata relationships (2008)
0.06
0.06324045 = sum of:
0.038301475 = product of:
0.11490442 = sum of:
0.11490442 = weight(_text_:objects in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11490442 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32611546 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.024938976 = product of:
0.049877953 = sum of:
0.049877953 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049877953 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21486087 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.061356746 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Contemporary retrieval systems, which search across collections, usually ignore collection-level metadata. Alternative approaches, exploiting collection-level information, will require an understanding of the various kinds of relationships that can obtain between collection-level and item-level metadata. This paper outlines the problem and describes a project that is developing a logic-based framework for classifying collection/item metadata relationships. This framework will support (i) metadata specification developers defining metadata elements, (ii) metadata creators describing objects, and (iii) system designers implementing systems that take advantage of collection-level metadata. We present three examples of collection/item metadata relationship categories, attribute/value-propagation, value-propagation, and value-constraint and show that even in these simple cases a precise formulation requires modal notions in addition to first-order logic. These formulations are related to recent work in information retrieval and ontology evaluation.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
