-
Murphy, A.; Enser, P.: Accessing the visual heritage : metadata construction at the Science & Society Picture Library (1998)
0.07
0.07239305 = product of:
0.108589575 = sum of:
0.04389794 = product of:
0.13169383 = sum of:
0.13169383 = weight(_text_:objects in 5180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13169383 = score(doc=5180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32037106 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 5180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5180)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06469163 = weight(_text_:science in 5180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06469163 = score(doc=5180,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1587741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 5180, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5180)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The Science & Society Picture Library (SSPL) has been established to market the images of 3 of Britain's museums: the Science Museum in London, the National Railway Museum in York, and the National Museum of Photography, Film and Television in Bradford - collectively called the National Museum of Science and Industry). The images are drawn from many different collections within these museums and, as a result, SSPL represents one of the widest varieties of photographs, paintings, prints, posters and objects in the world. Discusses issues surrounding the SSPL's current task of developing an integrated cataloguing and indexing strategy by which metadata construction can proceed, and which will provide potential users with effective and standardized subject access to the many components of its holding
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.07
0.069077365 = product of:
0.103616044 = sum of:
0.07094979 = product of:
0.21284938 = sum of:
0.21284938 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21284938 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
0.32037106 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.032666247 = product of:
0.065332495 = sum of:
0.065332495 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065332495 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21107617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
Qin, J.; Wesley, K.: Web indexing with meta fields : a survey of Web objects in polymer chemistry (1998)
0.07
0.06865241 = product of:
0.1029786 = sum of:
0.07525362 = product of:
0.22576085 = sum of:
0.22576085 = weight(_text_:objects in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22576085 = score(doc=3589,freq=8.0), product of:
0.32037106 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.7046855 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.027724985 = weight(_text_:science in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027724985 = score(doc=3589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1587741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study of 4 WWW search engines: AltaVista; Lycos; Excite and WebCrawler to collect data on Web objects on polymer chemistry. 1.037 Web objects were examined for data in 4 categories: document information; use of meta fields; use of images and use of chemical names. Issues raised included: whether to provide metadata elements for parts of entities or whole entities only, the use of metasyntax, problems in representation of special types of objects, and whether links should be considered when encoding metadata. Use of metafields was not widespread in the sample and knowledge of metafields in HTML varied greatly among Web object creators. The study formed part of a metadata project funded by the OCLC Library and Information Science Research Grant Program
-
Rice, R.: Applying DC to institutional data repositories (2008)
0.07
0.06755703 = sum of:
0.025084538 = product of:
0.07525361 = sum of:
0.07525361 = weight(_text_:objects in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07525361 = score(doc=2664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32037106 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.23489517 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.02613937 = weight(_text_:science in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02613937 = score(doc=2664,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1587741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.16463245 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
0.016333124 = product of:
0.032666247 = sum of:
0.032666247 = weight(_text_:22 in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032666247 = score(doc=2664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21107617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- DISC-UK DataShare (2007-2009), a project led by the University of Edinburgh and funded by JISC (Joint Information Systems Committee, UK), arises from an existing consortium of academic data support professionals working in the domain of social science datasets (Data Information Specialists Committee-UK). We are working together across four universities with colleagues engaged in managing open access repositories for e-prints. Our project supports 'early adopter' academics who wish to openly share datasets and presents a model for depositing 'orphaned datasets' that are not being deposited in subject-domain data archives/centres. Outputs from the project are intended to help to demystify data as complex objects in repositories, and assist other institutional repository managers in overcoming barriers to incorporating research data. By building on lessons learned from recent JISC-funded data repository projects such as SToRe and GRADE the project will help realize the vision of the Digital Repositories Roadmap, e.g. the milestone under Data, "Institutions need to invest in research data repositories" (Heery and Powell, 2006). Application of appropriate metadata is an important area of development for the project. Datasets are not different from other digital materials in that they need to be described, not just for discovery but also for preservation and re-use. The GRADE project found that for geo-spatial datasets, Dublin Core metadata (with geo-spatial enhancements such as a bounding box for the 'coverage' property) was sufficient for discovery within a DSpace repository, though more indepth metadata or documentation was required for re-use after downloading. The project partners are examining other metadata schemas such as the Data Documentation Initiative (DDI) versions 2 and 3, used primarily by social science data archives (Martinez, 2008). Crosswalks from the DDI to qualified Dublin Core are important for describing research datasets at the study level (as opposed to the variable level which is largely out of scope for this project). DataShare is benefiting from work of of the DRIADE project (application profile development for evolutionary biology) (Carrier, et al, 2007), eBank UK (developed an application profile for crystallography data) and GAP (Geospatial Application Profile, in progress) in defining interoperable Dublin Core qualified metadata elements and their application to datasets for each partner repository. The solution devised at Edinburgh for DSpace will be covered in the poster.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Chilvers, A.: ¬The super-metadata framework for managing long-term access to digital data objects : a possible way forward with specific reference to the UK (2002)
0.06
0.06214505 = product of:
0.093217574 = sum of:
0.07011342 = product of:
0.21034026 = sum of:
0.21034026 = weight(_text_:objects in 4468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21034026 = score(doc=4468,freq=10.0), product of:
0.32037106 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.656552 = fieldWeight in 4468, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4468)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.023104155 = weight(_text_:science in 4468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023104155 = score(doc=4468,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1587741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4468, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4468)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper examines the reasons why existing management practices designed to cope with paper-based data objects appear to be inadequate for managing digital data objects (DDOs). The research described suggests the need for a reassessment of the way we view long-term access to DDOs. There is a need for a shift in emphasis which embraces the fluid nature of such objects and addresses the multifaceted issues involved in achieving such access. It would appear from the findings of this research that a conceptual framework needs to be developed which addresses a range of elements. The research achieved this by examining the issues facing stakeholders involved in this field; examining the need for and structure of a new generic conceptual framework, the super-metadata framework; identifying and discussing the issues central to the development of such a framework; and justifying the feasibility through the creation of an interactive cost model and stakeholder evaluation. The wider conceptual justification for such a framework is discussed and this involves an examination of the "public good" argument for the long-term retention of DDOs and the importance of selection in the management process. The paper concludes by considering the benefits to practitioners and the role they might play in testing the feasibility of such a framework. The paper also suggests possible avenues researchers may wish to consider to develop further the management of this field. (Note: This paper is derived from the author's Loughborough University phD thesis, "Managing long-term access to digital data objects: a metadata approach", written while holding a research studentship funded by the Department of Information Science.)
-
Hill, L.L.; Janée, G.; Dolin, R.; Frew, J.; Larsgaard, M.: Collection metadata solutions for digital library applications (1999)
0.06
0.061931025 = product of:
0.092896536 = sum of:
0.065171555 = product of:
0.19551465 = sum of:
0.19551465 = weight(_text_:objects in 4053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19551465 = score(doc=4053,freq=6.0), product of:
0.32037106 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 4053, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4053)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.027724985 = weight(_text_:science in 4053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027724985 = score(doc=4053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1587741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4053)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Within a digital library, collections may range from an ad hoc set of objects that serve a temporary purpose to established library collections intended to persist through time. The objects in these collections vary widely, from library and data center holdings to pointers to real-world objects, such as geographic places, and the various metadata schemes that describe them. The key to integrated use of such a variety of collections in a digital library is collection metadata that represents the inherent and contextual characteristics of a collection. The Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Project has designed and implemented collection metadata for several purposes: in XML form, the collection metadatada 'registers' the collection with the user interface client; in HTML form, it is used for user documentation; eventually, it will be used to describe the collection to network search agents; and it is used for internal collection management, including mapping the object metadata attributes to the common search parameters of the system
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.13, S.1169-1181
-
Desai, B.C.: Supporting discovery in virtual libraries (1997)
0.06
0.05855491 = product of:
0.08783236 = sum of:
0.036966648 = weight(_text_:science in 543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036966648 = score(doc=543,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1587741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 543, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=543)
0.05086571 = product of:
0.10173142 = sum of:
0.10173142 = weight(_text_:index in 543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10173142 = score(doc=543,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26339173 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.3862362 = fieldWeight in 543, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=543)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses the development and implementation of models for indexing and searching information resources on the Internet. Examines briefly the results of a simple query on a number of existing search systems and discusses 2 proposed index metadata structures for indexing and supporting search and discovery: The Dublin Core Elements List and the Semantic Header. Presents an indexing and discovery system based on the Semantic Header
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.3, S.190-204
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.06
0.058027416 = product of:
0.087041125 = sum of:
0.04620831 = weight(_text_:science in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04620831 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1587741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.04083281 = product of:
0.08166562 = sum of:
0.08166562 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08166562 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21107617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 672
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016)
0.06
0.058027416 = product of:
0.087041125 = sum of:
0.04620831 = weight(_text_:science in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04620831 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1587741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.04083281 = product of:
0.08166562 = sum of:
0.08166562 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08166562 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21107617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 672
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016)
0.06
0.058027416 = product of:
0.087041125 = sum of:
0.04620831 = weight(_text_:science in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04620831 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1587741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.04083281 = product of:
0.08166562 = sum of:
0.08166562 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08166562 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21107617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 672
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Understanding metadata (2004)
0.06
0.05522355 = product of:
0.082835324 = sum of:
0.050169077 = product of:
0.15050723 = sum of:
0.15050723 = weight(_text_:objects in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15050723 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32037106 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.032666247 = product of:
0.065332495 = sum of:
0.065332495 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065332495 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21107617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful
- Date
- 10. 9.2004 10:22:40
-
Zeng, M.L.: Metadata elements for object description and representaion : a case report from a digitized historical fashion collection project (1999)
0.05
0.05395822 = product of:
0.080937326 = sum of:
0.053212345 = product of:
0.15963703 = sum of:
0.15963703 = weight(_text_:objects in 4055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15963703 = score(doc=4055,freq=4.0), product of:
0.32037106 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 4055, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4055)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.027724985 = weight(_text_:science in 4055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027724985 = score(doc=4055,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1587741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4055, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4055)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This project's goal is to develop a catalog for a digitized collection of historical fashion objects held at the Kent State University Museum and to analyze and evaluate how well existing metadata formats can be applied to a fashion collection. The project considered the known and anticipated uses of the collection and the identification of the metadata elements that would be needed to support these uses. From a set of 90 museum accession records, 42 fashion objects were selected for cataloging. 2 metadata treatments were created for these 42 items using (a) AACR in use with USMARC formats, (b) the Dublic Core set of elements designed for minimal level cataloging, and (c) the Visual Resources Association (VRA) Core Categories for Visual Resources created for developing local databases and cataloging records for visual resource collections. Comparison and analysis of the formats resulted in the adoption of a modified VRA metadata format to catalog the entire digitized historical fashion collection
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.13, S.1193-1208
-
Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004)
0.05
0.051808022 = product of:
0.07771203 = sum of:
0.053212345 = product of:
0.15963703 = sum of:
0.15963703 = weight(_text_:objects in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15963703 = score(doc=4752,freq=4.0), product of:
0.32037106 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.024499685 = product of:
0.04899937 = sum of:
0.04899937 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04899937 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21107617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- As educational technology becomes pervasive, demand will grow for library content to be incorporated into courseware. Among the barriers impeding interoperability between libraries and educational tools is the difference in specifications commonly used for the exchange of digital objects and metadata. Among libraries, Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a new but increasingly popular standard; the IMS content-package (IMS-CP) plays a parallel role in educational technology. This article describes how METS-encoded library content can be converted into digital objects for IMS-compliant systems through an XSLT-based crosswalk. The conceptual models behind METS and IMS-CP are compared, the design and limitations of an XSLT-based translation are described, and the crosswalks are related to other techniques to enhance interoperability.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
-
Carroll, D.J.; Lele, P.: Human intervention in the networked environment : metadata alternatives (1998)
0.05
0.05123554 = product of:
0.07685331 = sum of:
0.032345816 = weight(_text_:science in 2221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032345816 = score(doc=2221,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1587741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 2221, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2221)
0.044507496 = product of:
0.08901499 = sum of:
0.08901499 = weight(_text_:index in 2221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08901499 = score(doc=2221,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26339173 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.33795667 = fieldWeight in 2221, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2221)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Emphasizes the increased importance of the role of the librarian as a 'human' interface in the organization and retrieval of resources in the networked environment. Comments on the recent increase in metadata and compares the long established MARC format and adaptations of MARC with several other alternative metadata systems. Outlines the use of embedded META tag information in HTML documents and describes how existing search engines find and index resources on the WWW, with their pros and cons. Discusses the implications for effective research of the inherent limitations of these automated indexing schemes
- Source
- Data or information: the fading boundaries. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of Aquatic and Marine Science Libraries and Information Centers (IAMSLIC), Charleston, South Carolina, 5-9 Oct. 1997. Ed.: J.W. Markham et al
-
Cortez, E.M.: Use of metadata vocabularies in data retrieval (1999)
0.05
0.05123554 = product of:
0.07685331 = sum of:
0.032345816 = weight(_text_:science in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032345816 = score(doc=4057,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1587741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
0.044507496 = product of:
0.08901499 = sum of:
0.08901499 = weight(_text_:index in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08901499 = score(doc=4057,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26339173 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.33795667 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Researchers have developed a prototype of a system that uses metadata to guide their user in selecting document databases of interest. A standardized vocabulary is used to index the document sets and is also used to locate databases. Once a database is located, then freeform searches are aided by the metadata vocabulary to locate specific documents. This system, the Research, Education, Economic Information System (REEIS), is being developed fot the USDA to provide a way to locate programs, projects, and research that focus on food, agriculture, natural resources and rural development
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.13, S.1218-1223
-
Jizba, L.; Hillmann, D.I.: Insights from Ithaca : an interview with Diane Hillmann on metadata, Dublin Core, the National Science Digital Library, and more (2004/05)
0.05
0.04955124 = product of:
0.07432686 = sum of:
0.045743894 = weight(_text_:science in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045743894 = score(doc=637,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1587741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
0.028582966 = product of:
0.057165932 = sum of:
0.057165932 = weight(_text_:22 in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057165932 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21107617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In an interview, Diane I. Hillmann, an expert in metadata for digital libraries and currently co-principal investigator for the National Science Digital Library Registry based at Cornell University, discusses her education and career, and provides overviews and insights on metadata initiatives, including standards and models such as the widely adopted Dublin Core schema. She shares her professional interests from the early part of her career with communications, cataloging, and database production services; highlights key issues; and provides ideas and resources for managing changes in metadata standards and digital projects.
- Date
- 2.12.2007 19:35:22
-
Marchiori, M.: ¬The limits of Web metadata, and beyond (1998)
0.05
0.048320606 = product of:
0.07248091 = sum of:
0.04389794 = product of:
0.13169383 = sum of:
0.13169383 = weight(_text_:objects in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13169383 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32037106 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.028582966 = product of:
0.057165932 = sum of:
0.057165932 = weight(_text_:22 in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057165932 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21107617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Highlights 2 major problems of the WWW metadata: it will take some time before a reasonable number of people start using metadata to provide a better Web classification, and that no one can guarantee that a majority of the Web objects will be ever properly classified via metadata. Addresses the problem of how to cope with intrinsic limits of Web metadata, proposes a method to solve these problems and show evidence of its effectiveness. Examines the important problem of what is the required critical mass in the WWW for metadata in order for it to be really useful
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Lubas, R.L.; Wolfe, R.H.W.; Fleischman, M.: Creating metadata practices for MIT's OpenCourseWare Project (2004)
0.05
0.048320606 = product of:
0.07248091 = sum of:
0.04389794 = product of:
0.13169383 = sum of:
0.13169383 = weight(_text_:objects in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13169383 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32037106 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.028582966 = product of:
0.057165932 = sum of:
0.057165932 = weight(_text_:22 in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057165932 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21107617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The MIT libraries were called upon to recommend a metadata scheme for the resources contained in MIT's OpenCourseWare (OCW) project. The resources in OCW needed descriptive, structural, and technical metadata. The SCORM standard, which uses IEEE Learning Object Metadata for its descriptive standard, was selected for its focus on educational objects. However, it was clear that the Libraries would need to recommend how the standard would be applied and adapted to accommodate needs that were not addressed in the standard's specifications. The newly formed MIT Libraries Metadata Unit adapted established practices from AACR2 and MARC traditions when facing situations in which there were no precedents to follow.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.138-143
-
Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005)
0.05
0.04642193 = product of:
0.069632895 = sum of:
0.036966648 = weight(_text_:science in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036966648 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1587741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.032666247 = product of:
0.065332495 = sum of:
0.065332495 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065332495 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21107617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
White, H.: Examining scientific vocabulary : mapping controlled vocabularies with free text keywords (2013)
0.05
0.04642193 = product of:
0.069632895 = sum of:
0.036966648 = weight(_text_:science in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036966648 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1587741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
0.032666247 = product of:
0.065332495 = sum of:
0.065332495 = weight(_text_:22 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065332495 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21107617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06027597 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Scientific repositories create a new environment for studying traditional information science issues. The interaction between indexing terms provided by users and controlled vocabularies continues to be an area of debate and study. This article reports and analyzes findings from a study that mapped the relationships between free text keywords and controlled vocabulary terms used in the sciences. Based on this study's findings recommendations are made about which vocabularies may be better to use in scientific data repositories.
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 19:09:22
