-
Kent, R.E.: Organizing conceptual knowledge online : metadata interoperability and faceted classification (1998)
0.06
0.055340804 = product of:
0.12451681 = sum of:
0.009233146 = weight(_text_:information in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009233146 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.0387704 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0387704 = score(doc=57,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.05814285 = weight(_text_:techniques in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05814285 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.3406997 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.018370414 = product of:
0.03674083 = sum of:
0.03674083 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03674083 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- Conceptual Knowledge Markup Language (CKML), an application of XML, is a new standard being promoted for the specification of online conceptual knowledge (Kent and Shrivastava, 1998). CKML follows the philosophy of Conceptual Knowledge Processing (Wille, 1982), a principled approach to knowledge representation and data analysis, which advocates the development of methodologies and techniques to support people in their rational thinking, judgement and actions. CKML was developed and is being used in the WAVE networked information discovery and retrieval system (Kent and Neuss, 1994) as a standard for the specification of conceptual knowledge
- Date
- 30.12.2001 16:22:41
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Belém, F.M.; Almeida, J.M.; Gonçalves, M.A.: ¬A survey on tag recommendation methods : a review (2017)
0.04
0.037138324 = product of:
0.08356123 = sum of:
0.009326885 = weight(_text_:information in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009326885 = score(doc=3524,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
0.01958201 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01958201 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
0.04153061 = weight(_text_:techniques in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04153061 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.24335694 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
0.013121725 = product of:
0.02624345 = sum of:
0.02624345 = weight(_text_:22 in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02624345 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- Tags (keywords freely assigned by users to describe web content) have become highly popular on Web 2.0 applications, because of the strong stimuli and easiness for users to create and describe their own content. This increase in tag popularity has led to a vast literature on tag recommendation methods. These methods aim at assisting users in the tagging process, possibly increasing the quality of the generated tags and, consequently, improving the quality of the information retrieval (IR) services that rely on tags as data sources. Regardless of the numerous and diversified previous studies on tag recommendation, to our knowledge, no previous work has summarized and organized them into a single survey article. In this article, we propose a taxonomy for tag recommendation methods, classifying them according to the target of the recommendations, their objectives, exploited data sources, and underlying techniques. Moreover, we provide a critical overview of these methods, pointing out their advantages and disadvantages. Finally, we describe the main open challenges related to the field, such as tag ambiguity, cold start, and evaluation issues.
- Date
- 16.11.2017 13:30:22
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.4, S.830-844
-
Wolfekuhler, M.R.; Punch, W.F.: Finding salient features for personal Web pages categories (1997)
0.04
0.03660999 = product of:
0.10982996 = sum of:
0.009233146 = weight(_text_:information in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009233146 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
0.0822264 = weight(_text_:techniques in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0822264 = score(doc=2673,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.48182213 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
0.018370414 = product of:
0.03674083 = sum of:
0.03674083 = weight(_text_:22 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03674083 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Examines techniques that discover features in sets of pre-categorized documents, such that similar documents can be found on the WWW. Examines techniques which will classifiy training examples with high accuracy, then explains why this is not necessarily useful. Describes a method for extracting word clusters from the raw document features. Results show that the clustering technique is successful in discovering word groups in personal Web pages which can be used to find similar information on the WWW
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Heidorn, P.B.; Wei, Q.: Automatic metadata extraction from museum specimen labels (2008)
0.04
0.0359242 = product of:
0.08082945 = sum of:
0.0065951035 = weight(_text_:information in 2624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0065951035 = score(doc=2624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2624)
0.01958201 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01958201 = score(doc=2624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2624)
0.04153061 = weight(_text_:techniques in 2624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04153061 = score(doc=2624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.24335694 = fieldWeight in 2624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2624)
0.013121725 = product of:
0.02624345 = sum of:
0.02624345 = weight(_text_:22 in 2624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02624345 = score(doc=2624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2624)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- This paper describes the information properties of museum specimen labels and machine learning tools to automatically extract Darwin Core (DwC) and other metadata from these labels processed through Optical Character Recognition (OCR). The DwC is a metadata profile describing the core set of access points for search and retrieval of natural history collections and observation databases. Using the HERBIS Learning System (HLS) we extract 74 independent elements from these labels. The automated text extraction tools are provided as a web service so that users can reference digital images of specimens and receive back an extended Darwin Core XML representation of the content of the label. This automated extraction task is made more difficult by the high variability of museum label formats, OCR errors and the open class nature of some elements. In this paper we introduce our overall system architecture, and variability robust solutions including, the application of Hidden Markov and Naïve Bayes machine learning models, data cleaning, use of field element identifiers, and specialist learning models. The techniques developed here could be adapted to any metadata extraction situation with noisy text and weakly ordered elements.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Garshol, L.M.: Metadata? Thesauri? Taxonomies? Topic Maps! : making sense of it all (2005)
0.03
0.029071974 = product of:
0.13082388 = sum of:
0.019385567 = weight(_text_:information in 4729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019385567 = score(doc=4729,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 4729, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4729)
0.11143831 = weight(_text_:techniques in 4729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11143831 = score(doc=4729,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.65299517 = fieldWeight in 4729, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4729)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- The task of an information architect is to create web sites where users can actually find the information they are looking for. As the ocean of information rises and leaves what we seek ever more deeply buried in what we don't seek, this discipline becomes ever more relevant. Information architecture involves many different aspects of web site creation and organization, but its principal tools are information organization techniques developed in other disciplines. Most of these techniques come from library science, such as thesauri, taxonomies, and faceted classification. Topic maps are a relative newcomer to this area and bring with them the promise of better-organized web sites, compared to what is possible with existing techniques. However, it is not generally understood how topic maps relate to the traditional techniques, and what advantages and disadvantages they have, compared to these techniques. The aim of this paper is to help build a better understanding of these issues.
- Source
- Journal of information science. 30(2005) no.4, S.378-391
-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.03
0.027860228 = product of:
0.08358068 = sum of:
0.018276889 = weight(_text_:information in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018276889 = score(doc=4869,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.04430903 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04430903 = score(doc=4869,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.02099476 = product of:
0.04198952 = sum of:
0.04198952 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04198952 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
- Source
- Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.46-48
- Theme
- Information Gateway
Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Aldana, J.F.; Gómez, A.C.; Moreno, N.; Nebro, A.J.; Roldán, M.M.: Metadata functionality for semantic Web integration (2003)
0.03
0.026979571 = product of:
0.08093871 = sum of:
0.0117976805 = weight(_text_:information in 2731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0117976805 = score(doc=2731,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.1734784 = fieldWeight in 2731, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2731)
0.022154516 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022154516 = score(doc=2731,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.18905719 = fieldWeight in 2731, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2731)
0.046986517 = weight(_text_:techniques in 2731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046986517 = score(doc=2731,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.27532694 = fieldWeight in 2731, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2731)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- We propose an extension of a mediator architecture. This extension is oriented to ontology-driven data integration. In our architecture ontologies are not managed by an extemal component or service, but are integrated in the mediation layer. This approach implies rethinking the mediator design, but at the same time provides advantages from a database perspective. Some of these advantages include the application of optimization and evaluation techniques that use and combine information from all abstraction levels (physical schema, logical schema and semantic information defined by ontology). 1. Introduction Although the Web is probably the richest information repository in human history, users cannot specify what they want from it. Two major problems that arise in current search engines (Heflin, 2001) are: a) polysemy, when the same word is used with different meanings; b) synonymy, when two different words have the same meaning. Polysemy causes irrelevant information retrieval. On the other hand, synonymy produces lost of useful documents. The lack of a capability to understand the context of the words and the relationships among required terms, explains many of the lost and false results produced by search engines. The Semantic Web will bring structure to the meaningful content of Web pages, giving semantic relationships among terms and possibly avoiding the previous problems. Various proposals have appeared for meta-data representation and communication standards, and other services and tools that may eventually merge into the global Semantic Web (Berners-lee, 2001). Hopefully, in the next few years we will see the universal adoption of open standards for representation and sharing of meta-information. In this environment, software agents roaming from page to page can readily carry out sophisticated tasks for users (Berners-Lee, 2001). In this context, ontologies can be seen as metadata that represent semantic of data; providing a knowledge domain standard vocabulary, like DTDs and XML Schema do. If its pages were so structured, the Web could be seen as a heterogeneous collection of autonomous databases. This suggests that techniques developed in the Database area could be useful. Database research mainly deals with efficient storage and retrieval and with powerful query languages.
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.03
0.026199227 = product of:
0.07859768 = sum of:
0.013190207 = weight(_text_:information in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013190207 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.03916402 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03916402 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.02624345 = product of:
0.0524869 = sum of:
0.0524869 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0524869 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 672
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Seaman, D.: Selection, access, and control in library of electronic texts (1996)
0.03
0.02502045 = product of:
0.11259203 = sum of:
0.094221614 = weight(_text_:line in 599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094221614 = score(doc=599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21724595 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.4337094 = fieldWeight in 599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=599)
0.018370414 = product of:
0.03674083 = sum of:
0.03674083 = weight(_text_:22 in 599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03674083 = score(doc=599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=599)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- The Electronic Text Center at the University of Virginia has been mounting SGML full-text databases on-line since 1992, and actively building a user community around this Internet resource. Conceiving of what we do as firmly a library operation, we have sought to integrate the electronic text databases into the training, cataloging, preservation, and collection development areas of our library. Central to our selection criteria is the desire for softwareand platform-independent textsif it's not SGML, it's ephermeraland central to our cataloging endeavors is on SGML bibliographic record such as the Text Encoding Initiative header.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.75-84
-
Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000)
0.02
0.023534289 = product of:
0.070602864 = sum of:
0.018276889 = weight(_text_:information in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018276889 = score(doc=4867,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
0.031331215 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031331215 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
0.02099476 = product of:
0.04198952 = sum of:
0.04198952 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04198952 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- The current subject gateways have evolved over time when the discipline of Internet resource discovery was in its infancy. This is reflected by the lack of well-established, light-weight, deployable, easy-to-use, standards for metadata and information retrieval. We provide an introduction to the architecture, standards and software solutions in use by subject gateways, and to the issues that must be addressed to support future subject gateways
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:38:24
- Source
- Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.35-39
- Theme
- Information Gateway
-
Liu, X.; Qin, J.: ¬An interactive metadata model for structural, descriptive, and referential representation of scholarly output (2014)
0.02
0.023479834 = product of:
0.0704395 = sum of:
0.009326885 = weight(_text_:information in 1253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009326885 = score(doc=1253,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1253, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1253)
0.01958201 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01958201 = score(doc=1253,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 1253, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1253)
0.04153061 = weight(_text_:techniques in 1253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04153061 = score(doc=1253,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.24335694 = fieldWeight in 1253, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1253)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- The scientific metadata model proposed in this article encompasses both classical descriptive metadata such as those defined in the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set (DC) and the innovative structural and referential metadata properties that go beyond the classical model. Structural metadata capture the structural vocabulary in research publications; referential metadata include not only citations but also data about other types of scholarly output that is based on or related to the same publication. The article describes the structural, descriptive, and referential (SDR) elements of the metadata model and explains the underlying assumptions and justifications for each major component in the model. ScholarWiki, an experimental system developed as a proof of concept, was built over the wiki platform to allow user interaction with the metadata and the editing, deleting, and adding of metadata. By allowing and encouraging scholars (both as authors and as users) to participate in the knowledge and metadata editing and enhancing process, the larger community will benefit from more accurate and effective information retrieval. The ScholarWiki system utilizes machine-learning techniques that can automatically produce self-enhanced metadata by learning from the structural metadata that scholars contribute, which will add intelligence to enhance and update automatically the publication of metadata Wiki pages.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.5, S.964-983
-
Brasethvik, T.: ¬A semantic modeling approach to metadata (1998)
0.02
0.022143722 = product of:
0.066431165 = sum of:
0.02064594 = weight(_text_:information in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02064594 = score(doc=5165,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
0.027414814 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027414814 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
0.018370414 = product of:
0.03674083 = sum of:
0.03674083 = weight(_text_:22 in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03674083 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- States that heterogeneous project groups today may be expected to use the mechanisms of the Web for sharing information. Metadata has been proposed as a mechanism for expressing the semantics of information and, hence, facilitate information retrieval, understanding and use. Presents an approach to sharing information which aims to use a semantic modeling language as the basis for expressing the semantics of information and designing metadata schemes. Functioning on the borderline between human and computer understandability, the modeling language would be able to express the semantics of published Web documents. Reporting on work in progress, presents the overall framework and ideas
- Date
- 9. 9.2000 17:22:23
-
Jizba, L.: Reflections on summarizing and abstracting : implications for Internet Web documents, and standardized library cataloging databases (1997)
0.02
0.021826373 = product of:
0.09821868 = sum of:
0.015992278 = weight(_text_:information in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015992278 = score(doc=701,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.0822264 = weight(_text_:techniques in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0822264 = score(doc=701,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.48182213 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Comments on the value of abstracts or summary notes to information available online via the Internet and WWW and concludes that automated abstracting techniques would be highly useful if routinely applied to cataloguing or metadata for Internet documents and documents in other databases. Information seekers need external summary information to assess content and value of retrieved documents. Examines traditional models for writers, in library audiovisual cataloguing, periodical databases and archival work, along with innovative new model databases featuring robust cataloguing summaries. Notes recent developments in automated techniques, computational research, and machine summarization of digital images. Recommendations are made for future designers of cataloguing and metadata standards
-
Metadata and semantics research : 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings (2016)
0.02
0.020592501 = product of:
0.061777502 = sum of:
0.015992278 = weight(_text_:information in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015992278 = score(doc=3283,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
0.027414814 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027414814 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
0.018370414 = product of:
0.03674083 = sum of:
0.03674083 = weight(_text_:22 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03674083 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 10th Metadata and Semantics Research Conference, MTSR 2016, held in Göttingen, Germany, in November 2016. The 26 full papers and 6 short papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 67 submissions. The papers are organized in several sessions and tracks: Digital Libraries, Information Retrieval, Linked and Social Data, Metadata and Semantics for Open Repositories, Research Information Systems and Data Infrastructures, Metadata and Semantics for Agriculture, Food and Environment, Metadata and Semantics for Cultural Collections and Applications, European and National Projects.
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 672
-
Renear, A.H.; Wickett, K.M.; Urban, R.J.; Dubin, D.; Shreeves, S.L.: Collection/item metadata relationships (2008)
0.02
0.020056702 = product of:
0.060170107 = sum of:
0.011192262 = weight(_text_:information in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011192262 = score(doc=2623,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.033231772 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033231772 = score(doc=2623,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.01574607 = product of:
0.03149214 = sum of:
0.03149214 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03149214 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Contemporary retrieval systems, which search across collections, usually ignore collection-level metadata. Alternative approaches, exploiting collection-level information, will require an understanding of the various kinds of relationships that can obtain between collection-level and item-level metadata. This paper outlines the problem and describes a project that is developing a logic-based framework for classifying collection/item metadata relationships. This framework will support (i) metadata specification developers defining metadata elements, (ii) metadata creators describing objects, and (iii) system designers implementing systems that take advantage of collection-level metadata. We present three examples of collection/item metadata relationship categories, attribute/value-propagation, value-propagation, and value-constraint and show that even in these simple cases a precise formulation requires modal notions in addition to first-order logic. These formulations are related to recent work in information retrieval and ontology evaluation.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
NISO seeking comments : metadata for still images (2001)
0.02
0.018614836 = product of:
0.08376676 = sum of:
0.021104332 = weight(_text_:information in 3526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021104332 = score(doc=3526,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3526, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3526)
0.06266243 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06266243 = score(doc=3526,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 3526, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3526)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Source
- Information retrieval and library automation. 36(2001) no.10, S.11
-
Hakala, J.: Dublin core in 1997 : a report from Dublin Core metadata workshops 4 & 5 (1998)
0.02
0.018339459 = product of:
0.055018373 = sum of:
0.009233146 = weight(_text_:information in 2220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009233146 = score(doc=2220,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2220, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2220)
0.027414814 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027414814 = score(doc=2220,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2220, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2220)
0.018370414 = product of:
0.03674083 = sum of:
0.03674083 = weight(_text_:22 in 2220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03674083 = score(doc=2220,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13565971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2220, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2220)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Creation of more and better metadata, or resource descriptions, is the best means to solve the problems of massive recall and lack of precision associated with Internet information retrieval. Dublin Core Metadata workshops aim to develop the resource descriptions. Describes the 4th workshop held in Canberra March 1997 and the 5th held in Oct. 1997 in Helsinki. DC-4 dealt with element structure with qualifiers language, scheme and type; extensibility issues; and element refinement. DC-5 dealt with element refinement and stability; definition of sub-elements and resource types; and sharing of Dublin Core implementation experiences, one of which is the Nordic Metadata project. The Nordic countries are now well prepared to implement useful new tools built by the Internet metadata community
- Source
- Nordinfo Nytt. 1997, nos.3/4, S.10-22
-
Haynes, D.: Metadata for information management and retrieval : understanding metadata and its use (2018)
0.02
0.017765254 = product of:
0.07994364 = sum of:
0.022384524 = weight(_text_:information in 4096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022384524 = score(doc=4096,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 4096, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4096)
0.057559118 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057559118 = score(doc=4096,freq=12.0), product of:
0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 4096, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4096)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- This new and updated second edition of a classic text provides a thought-provoking introduction to metadata for all library and information students and professionals. Metadata for Information Management and Retrieval has been fully revised by David Haynes to bring it up to date with new technology and standards. The new edition, containing new chapters on Metadata Standards and Encoding Schemes, assesses the current theory and practice of metadata and examines key developments in terms of both policy and technology. Coverage includes: an introduction to the concept of metadata a description of the main components of metadata systems and standards an overview of the scope of metadata and its applications a description of typical information retrieval issues in corporate and research environments a demonstration of ways in which metadata is used to improve retrieval a look at ways in which metadata is used to manage information consideration of the role of metadata in information governance.
- RSWK
- Informationsmanagement / Information Retrieval / Metadatenmodell
- Subject
- Informationsmanagement / Information Retrieval / Metadatenmodell
-
Electronic cataloging : AACR2 and metadata for serials and monographs (2003)
0.02
0.017337326 = product of:
0.052011978 = sum of:
0.009233146 = weight(_text_:information in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009233146 = score(doc=3082,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
0.013707407 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013707407 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1171842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.11697317 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
0.029071424 = weight(_text_:techniques in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029071424 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.17034985 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Electronic Cataloging is the undertaking of three pioneers in library science: Sheila S. Intner, Sally C. Tseng, and Mary L. Larsgaard, who co-edited Maps and Related Cartographic Materials: Cataloging Classification, and Bibliographic Control (Haworth, 2000). With illustrations, references, additional reading lists, and case studies, this research tool offers you tips and strategies to make metadata work for you and your library. No one currently involved in information cataloging should be without this book! For a complete list of contents, visit our Web site at www.HaworthPress.com. Electronic Cataloging: AACR2 and Metadata for Serials and Monographs is a collection of papers about recent developments in metadata and its practical applications in cataloging. Acknowledged experts examine a wide variety of techniques for managing serials and monographs using standards and schemas like MARC, AACR2, ISSN, ISBD, and Dublin Core. From the broadest introduction of metadata usage to the revisions of AACR2 through 2000, this book offers vital analysis and strategy for achieving Universal Bibliographic Control. Electronic Cataloging is divided into three parts. The first is an introduction to metadata, what it is, and its relationship to the library in general. The second portion focuses in more an how metadata can be utilized by a library system and the possibilities in the near future. The third portion is very specific, dealing with individual standards of metadata and elements, such as AACR2 and MARC, as well as current policies and prospects for the future. Information covered in Electronic Cataloging includes: an overview of metadata and seriality and why it is important to the cataloging community Universal Bibliographic Control: what has succeeded so far in cataloging and how metadata will evolve the step-by-step process for creating an effective metadata repository for the community the inherent problems that accompany cataloging nonprint research materials, such as electronic serials and the Web metadata schemas and the use of controlled vocabularies and classification systems standards of metadata, including MARC, Dublin Core, RDF, and AACR2, with emphasis an the revisions and efforts made with AACR2 through 2000 an overview of the ISSN (International Serials Standard Number) and its relationships to current codes and metadata standards, including AACR2 and much more!
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: Editors' Introduction (Sheila S. Intner, Sally C. Tseng, and Mary Lynette Larsgaard) PART 1. Cataloging in an Electronic Age (Michael Gorman) Why Metadata? Why Me? Why Now? (Brian E. C. Schottlaender) PART 2. Developing a Metadata Strategy (Grace Agnew) Practical Issues in Applying Metadata Schemas and Controlled Vocabularies to Cultural Heritage Information (Murtha Baca) Digital Resources and Metadata Application in the Shanghai Library (Yuanliang Ma and Wei Liu) Struggling Toward Retrieval: Alternatives to Standard Operating Procedures Can Help Librarians and the Public (Sheila S. Intner) PART 3. AACR2 and Other Metadata Standards: The Way Forward (Ann Huthwaite) AACR2 and Metadata: Library Opportunities in the Global Semantic Web (Barbara B. Tillett) Seriality: What Have We Accomplished? What's Next? (Jean Hirons) MARC and Mark-Up (Erik Jul) ISSN: Dumb Number, Smart Solution (Regina Romano Reynolds) Index Reference Notes Included
- Imprint
- Binghampton, NY : Haworth Information Press
-
Clemson, P.A.: ¬An inside approach to a networked document cataloging (1997)
0.02
0.017024254 = product of:
0.07660914 = sum of:
0.018466292 = weight(_text_:information in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018466292 = score(doc=702,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06800663 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
0.05814285 = weight(_text_:techniques in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05814285 = score(doc=702,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17065717 = queryWeight, product of:
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.038739666 = queryNorm
0.3406997 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Information professions identified the need for a set of standard metadata almost as soon as the WWW became a reality. Several initiatives have already identified the types of bibliographic information that would be necessary to describe and locate an electronic publication. The descriptors identified in the OCLC/NCSA Dublin Core are combined with those assembled by the Coalition of Networked Information and the Internet Engineering Task force to produce a list of electronic citation elements. Advocates embedding these citation elements within electrinic documents through the use of HTML<META>tags and other markup techniques. There is also a call to cataloguing librarians to contribute their expertise in information resources management to document being prepared for the WWW in order to influence the quality of electronic publication from the insides
