Search (158 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Dawson, A.; Hamilton, V.: Optimising metadata to make high-value content more accessible to Google users (2006) 0.02 
    0.021338467 = product of:
  0.085353866 = sum of:
    0.085353866 = weight(_text_:trend in 5598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.085353866 = score(doc=5598,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24938065 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.3422634 = fieldWeight in 5598, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5598)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to show how information in digital collections that have been catalogued using high-quality metadata can be retrieved more easily by users of search engines such as Google. Design/methodology/approach - The research and proposals described arose from an investigation into the observed phenomenon that pages from the Glasgow Digital Library (gdl.cdlr.strath.ac.uk) were regularly appearing near the top of Google search results shortly after publication, without any deliberate effort to achieve this. The reasons for this phenomenon are now well understood and are described in the second part of the paper. The first part provides context with a review of the impact of Google and a summary of recent initiatives by commercial publishers to make their content more visible to search engines. Findings - The literature research provides firm evidence of a trend amongst publishers to ensure that their online content is indexed by Google, in recognition of its popularity with internet users. The practical research demonstrates how search engine accessibility can be compatible with use of established collection management principles and high-quality metadata. Originality/value - The concept of data shoogling is introduced, involving some simple techniques for metadata optimisation. Details of its practical application are given, to illustrate how those working in academic, cultural and public-sector organisations could make their digital collections more easily accessible via search engines, without compromising any existing standards and practices.
  2. White, H.: Examining scientific vocabulary : mapping controlled vocabularies with free text keywords (2013) 0.01 
    0.014608572 = product of:
  0.05843429 = sum of:
    0.05843429 = product of:
      0.08765143 = sum of:
        0.04402373 = weight(_text_:29 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04402373 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
        0.043627705 = weight(_text_:22 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043627705 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 5.2015 19:09:22
  3. Baker, T.; Fischer, T.: Bericht von der Dublin-Core-Konferenz (DC-2005) in Madrid (2005) 0.01 
    0.01280308 = product of:
  0.05121232 = sum of:
    0.05121232 = weight(_text_:trend in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05121232 = score(doc=4872,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24938065 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04025106 = queryNorm
        0.20535803 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.195629 = idf(docFreq=244, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Im März 2005 hat die DCMI mit der Verabschiedung des so genannten "Abstrakten Modells" einen wichtigen Meilenstein erreicht. Dieses DC-Modell ist die formale Grammatik der Metadatensprache, die sich im Laufe der Jahre entwickelt hat. Es hat eine gemeinsame Wurzel mit dem Modell des Semantic Web beim W3C und teilt dessen Grundstruktur, bleibt jedoch absichtlich einfacher als die voll entwickelten Ontologiesprachen des letzteren. Das abstrakte Modell dient als Maßstab für den systematischen Vergleich verschiedenartiger Implementierungstechniken in Bezug auf deren Ausdrucksfähigkeit. Ein hierarchisch aufgebautes XML-Schema kann beispielsweise Metainformationen differenzierter übertragen als ein HTML-Webdokument mit einem flachen Satz eingebetteter META-Tags. Dagegen kann RDF expliziter als ein XML-Schema die Semantik einer Beschreibung in einen größeren semantischen Zusammenhang verankern und somit die Rekombinierbarkeit der Daten erleichtern. In der Praxis müssen Systementwickler sich für die eine oder andere Implementierungstechnik entscheiden, dabei liefern die Metadaten nur eines von mehreren Kriterien. Das DC-Modell bietet eine Basis für den Vergleich der möglichen Lösungen in Hinblick auf die Unterstützung von Metadaten und dient somit als Vorbereitung für deren spätere Integration. Die Interoperabilität der Metadaten ist aber nicht nur eine Frage einer gemeinsamen Semantik mit einem gemeinsamen Modell. Wie auch bei menschlichen Sprachen wird die Interoperabilität umso vollkommener, je besser die Sprachgebräuche verstanden werden - d.h. die Katalogisierungsregeln, die den Metadaten zugrunde liegen. Die Metadatenregeln, die innerhalb einer Anwendungsgemeinschaft benutzt werden, sind Gegenstand eines so genannten Anwendungsprofils. Viele DCMI-Arbeitsgruppen sehen ihre Hauptaufgabe darin, ein Anwendungsprofil für ein bestimmtes Arbeitsgebiet zu erstellen (siehe Abschnitt 6, unten). Diesem Trend zufolge orientiert sich das DCMI Usage Board zunehmend auf die Überprüfung ganzer Anwendungsprofile auf Übereinstimmung mit dem DCMI-Modell."
  4. Wolfekuhler, M.R.; Punch, W.F.: Finding salient features for personal Web pages categories (1997) 0.01 
    0.012782501 = product of:
  0.051130004 = sum of:
    0.051130004 = product of:
      0.076695 = sum of:
        0.03852076 = weight(_text_:29 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03852076 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
        0.03817424 = weight(_text_:22 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03817424 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Source
    Computer networks and ISDN systems. 29(1997) no.8, S.1147-1156
  5. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.01 
    0.0077123623 = product of:
  0.03084945 = sum of:
    0.03084945 = product of:
      0.09254835 = sum of:
        0.09254835 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09254835 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  6. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.01 
    0.0072712842 = product of:
  0.029085137 = sum of:
    0.029085137 = product of:
      0.08725541 = sum of:
        0.08725541 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08725541 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
  7. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.0072712842 = product of:
  0.029085137 = sum of:
    0.029085137 = product of:
      0.08725541 = sum of:
        0.08725541 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08725541 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  8. Granger, S.: Metadata and digital preservation : a plea for cross-interest collaboration (2000) 0.01 
    0.006420127 = product of:
  0.025680508 = sum of:
    0.025680508 = product of:
      0.07704152 = sum of:
        0.07704152 = weight(_text_:29 in 4900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07704152 = score(doc=4900,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4900, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4900)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Vine. 2000, no.117, S.24-29
  9. Siripan, P.: Metadata and trends of cataloguing in Thai libraries (2000) 0.01 
    0.006420127 = product of:
  0.025680508 = sum of:
    0.025680508 = product of:
      0.07704152 = sum of:
        0.07704152 = weight(_text_:29 in 6338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07704152 = score(doc=6338,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6338, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6338)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.2, S.33-35
  10. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.01 
    0.006362374 = product of:
  0.025449496 = sum of:
    0.025449496 = product of:
      0.07634848 = sum of:
        0.07634848 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07634848 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
  11. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.006362374 = product of:
  0.025449496 = sum of:
    0.025449496 = product of:
      0.07634848 = sum of:
        0.07634848 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07634848 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  12. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.01 
    0.006362374 = product of:
  0.025449496 = sum of:
    0.025449496 = product of:
      0.07634848 = sum of:
        0.07634848 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07634848 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  13. Turner, J.M.: ¬The organization of moving-image metadata : a research agenda (1997) 0.01 
    0.005502966 = product of:
  0.022011865 = sum of:
    0.022011865 = product of:
      0.06603559 = sum of:
        0.06603559 = weight(_text_:29 in 47) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06603559 = score(doc=47,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 47, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=47)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    3. 1.1999 12:29:24
  14. Organizing Internet resources : metadata and the Web (1997) 0.01 
    0.005502966 = product of:
  0.022011865 = sum of:
    0.022011865 = product of:
      0.06603559 = sum of:
        0.06603559 = weight(_text_:29 in 2562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06603559 = score(doc=2562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 2562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2562)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 24(1997) no.1, Oct./Nov., S.4-29
  15. Hengel-Dittrich, C.: Im Kern einig: Dublin Core auf dem Wege zum weltweiten Standard : 7. Dublin Core Workshop in Frankfurt am Main (1999) 0.01 
    0.005502966 = product of:
  0.022011865 = sum of:
    0.022011865 = product of:
      0.06603559 = sum of:
        0.06603559 = weight(_text_:29 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06603559 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    26.12.1999 20:08:29
  16. Tennis, J.T.: 6th Annual Open Forum on Metadata Registries : Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, Jan 20-24, 2003 (2002) 0.01 
    0.005502966 = product of:
  0.022011865 = sum of:
    0.022011865 = product of:
      0.06603559 = sum of:
        0.06603559 = weight(_text_:29 in 1856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06603559 = score(doc=1856,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1856, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1856)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.234-235
  17. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.01 
    0.005453463 = product of:
  0.021813853 = sum of:
    0.021813853 = product of:
      0.06544156 = sum of:
        0.06544156 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06544156 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  18. Schottlaender, B.E.C.: Why metadata? Why now? Why me? (2003) 0.01 
    0.0051882463 = product of:
  0.020752985 = sum of:
    0.020752985 = product of:
      0.062258955 = sum of:
        0.062258955 = weight(_text_:29 in 5513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062258955 = score(doc=5513,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14159065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.43971092 = fieldWeight in 5513, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5513)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    30. 7.2006 14:34:29
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 36(2003) nos.3/4, S.19-29
  19. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.01 
    0.005141575 = product of:
  0.0205663 = sum of:
    0.0205663 = product of:
      0.061698895 = sum of:
        0.061698895 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061698895 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  20. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.01 
    0.005141575 = product of:
  0.0205663 = sum of:
    0.0205663 = product of:
      0.061698895 = sum of:
        0.061698895 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061698895 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14095236 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04025106 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 137
  • d 17
  • f 1
  • i 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 146
  • s 8
  • el 6
  • m 5
  • b 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications