-
Schweibenz, W.: Proactive Web design : Maßnahmen zur Verbesserung der Auffindbarkeit von Webseiten durch Suchmaschinen (1999)
0.04
0.03987723 = product of:
0.15950891 = sum of:
0.15950891 = sum of:
0.06044602 = weight(_text_:web in 4065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06044602 = score(doc=4065,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.49962097 = fieldWeight in 4065, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4065)
0.0990629 = weight(_text_:seiten in 4065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0990629 = score(doc=4065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20383513 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.4859952 = fieldWeight in 4065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4065)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Unter proactive Web design versteht man alle Maßnahmen, welche die Auffindbarkeit von Webseiten durch Suchmaschinen verbessern und bereits im Vorfeld oder im Moment der Publikation im WWW ergriffen werden können. Diese Maßnahmen reichen von der Registrierung einer Webseite bei Suchmaschinen über die Verknüpfung mit verwandten Web-Seiten und der aussagekräftigen Gestaltung von Titeln von Webseiten bis zur Verwendung von Metadaten
-
Weibel, S.; Miller, E.: Cataloging syntax and public policy meet in PICS (1997)
0.03
0.028857488 = product of:
0.057714976 = sum of:
0.024676984 = product of:
0.04935397 = sum of:
0.04935397 = weight(_text_:web in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04935397 = score(doc=1561,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.03303799 = product of:
0.082594976 = sum of:
0.042048648 = weight(_text_:28 in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042048648 = score(doc=1561,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
0.040546328 = weight(_text_:29 in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040546328 = score(doc=1561,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- The PICS, an initiative of W3C, is a technology that supports the association of descriptive labels with Web resources. By providing a single common transport syntax for metadata, PICS will support the growth of metadata systems (including library cataloguing) that are interoperable and widely supported in Web information systems. Within the PICS framework, a great diversity of resource description models can be implemented, from simple rating schemes to complex data content standards
- Source
- OCLC newsletter. 1997, May/June, S.28-29
-
Wolfekuhler, M.R.; Punch, W.F.: Finding salient features for personal Web pages categories (1997)
0.03
0.02734995 = product of:
0.0546999 = sum of:
0.026445134 = product of:
0.052890267 = sum of:
0.052890267 = weight(_text_:web in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052890267 = score(doc=2673,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.028254768 = product of:
0.07063692 = sum of:
0.035478037 = weight(_text_:29 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035478037 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
0.035158884 = weight(_text_:22 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035158884 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Examines techniques that discover features in sets of pre-categorized documents, such that similar documents can be found on the WWW. Examines techniques which will classifiy training examples with high accuracy, then explains why this is not necessarily useful. Describes a method for extracting word clusters from the raw document features. Results show that the clustering technique is successful in discovering word groups in personal Web pages which can be used to find similar information on the WWW
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue of papers from the 6th International World Wide Web conference, held 7-11 Apr 1997, Santa Clara, California
- Source
- Computer networks and ISDN systems. 29(1997) no.8, S.1147-1156
-
Liechti, O.; Sifer, M.J.; Ichikawa, T.: Structured graph format : XML metadata for describing Web site structure (1998)
0.02
0.02221542 = product of:
0.04443084 = sum of:
0.037399065 = product of:
0.07479813 = sum of:
0.07479813 = weight(_text_:web in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07479813 = score(doc=3597,freq=12.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.6182494 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.007031777 = product of:
0.035158884 = sum of:
0.035158884 = weight(_text_:22 in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035158884 = score(doc=3597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- To improve searching, filtering and processing of information on the Web, a common effort is made in the direction of metadata, defined as machine understandable information about Web resources or other things. In particular, the eXtensible Markup Language (XML) aims at providing a common syntax to emerging metadata formats. Proposes the Structured Graph Format (SGF) an XML compliant markup language based on structured graphs, for capturing Web sites' structure. Presents SGMapper, a client-site tool, which aims to facilitate navigation in large Web sites by generating highly interactive site maps using SGF metadata
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
-
Clark, C.: Audio-visual resource discovery on the Web (1998)
0.02
0.022088174 = product of:
0.044176348 = sum of:
0.015268105 = product of:
0.03053621 = sum of:
0.03053621 = weight(_text_:web in 3201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03053621 = score(doc=3201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 3201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.028908242 = product of:
0.0722706 = sum of:
0.03679257 = weight(_text_:28 in 3201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03679257 = score(doc=3201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 3201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3201)
0.035478037 = weight(_text_:29 in 3201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035478037 = score(doc=3201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3201)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 28. 1.1996 19:47:56
- Source
- IASA journal. 1998, no.11, S.18-29
-
Marchiori, M.: ¬The limits of Web metadata, and beyond (1998)
0.02
0.020586148 = product of:
0.041172296 = sum of:
0.03414052 = product of:
0.06828104 = sum of:
0.06828104 = weight(_text_:web in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06828104 = score(doc=3383,freq=10.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.5643819 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.007031777 = product of:
0.035158884 = sum of:
0.035158884 = weight(_text_:22 in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035158884 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Highlights 2 major problems of the WWW metadata: it will take some time before a reasonable number of people start using metadata to provide a better Web classification, and that no one can guarantee that a majority of the Web objects will be ever properly classified via metadata. Addresses the problem of how to cope with intrinsic limits of Web metadata, proposes a method to solve these problems and show evidence of its effectiveness. Examines the important problem of what is the required critical mass in the WWW for metadata in order for it to be really useful
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
-
Franklin, R.A.: Re-inventing subject access for the semantic web (2003)
0.02
0.020326022 = product of:
0.040652044 = sum of:
0.034624808 = product of:
0.069249615 = sum of:
0.069249615 = weight(_text_:web in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069249615 = score(doc=2556,freq=14.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.57238775 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0060272375 = product of:
0.030136187 = sum of:
0.030136187 = weight(_text_:22 in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030136187 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- First generation scholarly research on the Web lacked a firm system of authority control. Second generation Web research is beginning to model subject access with library science principles of bibliographic control and cataloguing. Harnessing the Web and organising the intellectual content with standards and controlled vocabulary provides precise search and retrieval capability, increasing relevance and efficient use of technology. Dublin Core metadata standards permit a full evaluation and cataloguing of Web resources appropriate to highly specific research needs and discovery. Current research points to a type of structure based on a system of faceted classification. This system allows the semantic and syntactic relationships to be defined. Controlled vocabulary, such as the Library of Congress Subject Headings, can be assigned, not in a hierarchical structure, but rather as descriptive facets of relating concepts. Web design features such as this are adding value to discovery and filtering out data that lack authority. The system design allows for scalability and extensibility, two technical features that are integral to future development of the digital library and resource discovery.
- Date
- 30.12.2008 18:22:46
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
Organizing Internet resources : metadata and the Web (1997)
0.02
0.019168895 = product of:
0.03833779 = sum of:
0.026173891 = product of:
0.052347783 = sum of:
0.052347783 = weight(_text_:web in 2562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052347783 = score(doc=2562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 2562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.012163899 = product of:
0.06081949 = sum of:
0.06081949 = weight(_text_:29 in 2562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06081949 = score(doc=2562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 2562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2562)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 24(1997) no.1, Oct./Nov., S.4-29
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.02
0.019114183 = product of:
0.038228367 = sum of:
0.026173891 = product of:
0.052347783 = sum of:
0.052347783 = weight(_text_:web in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052347783 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.012054475 = product of:
0.060272373 = sum of:
0.060272373 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060272373 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
Sutton, S.A.: Metadata quality, utility and the Semantic Web : the case of learning resources and achievement standards (2008)
0.02
0.018947363 = product of:
0.037894726 = sum of:
0.03053621 = product of:
0.06107242 = sum of:
0.06107242 = weight(_text_:web in 801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06107242 = score(doc=801,freq=8.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 801, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=801)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.007358514 = product of:
0.03679257 = sum of:
0.03679257 = weight(_text_:28 in 801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03679257 = score(doc=801,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 801, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=801)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article explores metadata quality issues in the creation and encoding of mappings or correlations of educational resources to K-12 achievement standards and the deployment of the metadata generated on the Semantic Web. The discussion is framed in terms of quality indicia derived from empirical studies of metadata in the Web environment. A number of forces at work in determining the quality of correlations metadata are examined including the nature of the emerging Semantic Web metadata ecosystem itself, the reliance on string values in metadata to identify achievement standards, the growing complexity of the standards environment, and the misalignment in terms of granularity between resource and declared objectives.
- Date
- 28. 9.2008 18:59:33
-
Howarth, L.C.: Modelling a natural language gateway to metadata-enabled resources (2004)
0.02
0.018932719 = product of:
0.037865438 = sum of:
0.013086946 = product of:
0.026173891 = sum of:
0.026173891 = weight(_text_:web in 2626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026173891 = score(doc=2626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2626)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.024778493 = product of:
0.061946232 = sum of:
0.031536486 = weight(_text_:28 in 2626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031536486 = score(doc=2626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2626)
0.030409746 = weight(_text_:29 in 2626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030409746 = score(doc=2626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2626)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Even as the number of Web-enabled resources and knowledge repositories continues its unabated climb, both general purpose and domain-specific metadata schemas are in vigorous development. While this might be viewed as a promising direction for more precise access to disparate metadata-enabled resources, semantically-oriented tools to facilitate cross-domain searching by end-users unfamiliar with structured approaches to language or particular metadata schema conventions have received little attention. This paper describes findings from a focus group assessment of a natural language "gateway" previously derived from mapping, then categorizing terminology from nine metadata schemas. Semantic ambiguities identified in relation to three core metadata elements, namely, "Names", "Title", and "Subject", are discussed relative to data collection techniques employed in the research. Implications for further research, and particularly that pertaining to the design of an Interlingua gateway to multilingual, metadata-enabled resources, are addressed.
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
29. 8.2004 9:04:54
-
Greenberg, J.: Metadata generation : processes, people and tools (2003)
0.02
0.016393125 = product of:
0.03278625 = sum of:
0.024676984 = product of:
0.04935397 = sum of:
0.04935397 = weight(_text_:web in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04935397 = score(doc=1251,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.008109266 = product of:
0.040546328 = sum of:
0.040546328 = weight(_text_:29 in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040546328 = score(doc=1251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Metadata generation is the act of creating or producing metadata. Generating good quality metadata in an efficient manner is essential for organizing and making accessible the growing number of rich resources available an the Web. The success of digital libraries, the sustenance of interoperability - as promoted by the Open Archives Initiative - and the evolution of Semantic Web all rely an efficient metadata generation. This article sketches a metadata generation framework that involves processes, people and tools. It also presents selected research initiatives and highlights the goals of the Metadata Generation Research Project.
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 29(2003) no.2, S.16-19
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.01
0.014407165 = product of:
0.02881433 = sum of:
0.017449262 = product of:
0.034898523 = sum of:
0.034898523 = weight(_text_:web in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034898523 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.011365069 = product of:
0.056825344 = sum of:
0.056825344 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056825344 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001)
0.01
0.01439029 = product of:
0.05756116 = sum of:
0.05756116 = product of:
0.1439029 = sum of:
0.07358514 = weight(_text_:28 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07358514 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.5541031 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.07031777 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07031777 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 28. 3.2002 9:22:34
-
Jun, W.: ¬A knowledge network constructed by integrating classification, thesaurus and metadata in a digital library (2003)
0.01
0.014363525 = product of:
0.02872705 = sum of:
0.008724631 = product of:
0.017449262 = sum of:
0.017449262 = weight(_text_:web in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017449262 = score(doc=1254,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.02000242 = product of:
0.050006047 = sum of:
0.029732885 = weight(_text_:28 in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029732885 = score(doc=1254,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.22389145 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
0.020273164 = weight(_text_:29 in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020273164 = score(doc=1254,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Knowledge management in digital libraries is a universal problem. Keyword-based searching is applied everywhere no matter whether the resources are indexed databases or full-text Web pages. In keyword matching, the valuable content description and indexing of the metadata, such as the subject descriptors and the classification notations, are merely treated as common keywords to be matched with the user query. Without the support of vocabulary control tools, such as classification systems and thesauri, the intelligent labor of content analysis, description and indexing in metadata production are seriously wasted. New retrieval paradigms are needed to exploit the potential of the metadata resources. Could classification and thesauri, which contain the condensed intelligence of generations of librarians, be used in a digital library to organize the networked information, especially metadata, to facilitate their usability and change the digital library into a knowledge management environment? To examine that question, we designed and implemented a new paradigm that incorporates a classification system, a thesaurus and metadata. The classification and the thesaurus are merged into a concept network, and the metadata are distributed into the nodes of the concept network according to their subjects. The abstract concept node instantiated with the related metadata records becomes a knowledge node. A coherent and consistent knowledge network is thus formed. It is not only a framework for resource organization but also a structure for knowledge navigation, retrieval and learning. We have built an experimental system based on the Chinese Classification and Thesaurus, which is the most comprehensive and authoritative in China, and we have incorporated more than 5000 bibliographic records in the computing domain from the Peking University Library. The result is encouraging. In this article, we review the tools, the architecture and the implementation of our experimental system, which is called Vision.
- Date
- 19. 1.2003 19:53:28
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 29(2003) no.2, S.24-28
-
Brasethvik, T.: ¬A semantic modeling approach to metadata (1998)
0.01
0.01431207 = product of:
0.02862414 = sum of:
0.021592362 = product of:
0.043184724 = sum of:
0.043184724 = weight(_text_:web in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043184724 = score(doc=5165,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.007031777 = product of:
0.035158884 = sum of:
0.035158884 = weight(_text_:22 in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035158884 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- States that heterogeneous project groups today may be expected to use the mechanisms of the Web for sharing information. Metadata has been proposed as a mechanism for expressing the semantics of information and, hence, facilitate information retrieval, understanding and use. Presents an approach to sharing information which aims to use a semantic modeling language as the basis for expressing the semantics of information and designing metadata schemes. Functioning on the borderline between human and computer understandability, the modeling language would be able to express the semantics of published Web documents. Reporting on work in progress, presents the overall framework and ideas
- Date
- 9. 9.2000 17:22:23
-
Gartner, R.: Metadata : shaping knowledge from antiquity to the semantic web (2016)
0.01
0.013439935 = product of:
0.02687987 = sum of:
0.021811578 = product of:
0.043623157 = sum of:
0.043623157 = weight(_text_:web in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043623157 = score(doc=731,freq=8.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.005068291 = product of:
0.025341455 = sum of:
0.025341455 = weight(_text_:29 in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025341455 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This book offers a comprehensive guide to the world of metadata, from its origins in the ancient cities of the Middle East, to the Semantic Web of today. The author takes us on a journey through the centuries-old history of metadata up to the modern world of crowdsourcing and Google, showing how metadata works and what it is made of. The author explores how it has been used ideologically and how it can never be objective. He argues how central it is to human cultures and the way they develop. Metadata: Shaping Knowledge from Antiquity to the Semantic Web is for all readers with an interest in how we humans organize our knowledge and why this is important. It is suitable for those new to the subject as well as those know its basics. It also makes an excellent introduction for students of information science and librarianship.
- Date
- 29. 9.2022 17:43:42
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008)
0.01
0.012996274 = product of:
0.025992548 = sum of:
0.01888938 = product of:
0.03777876 = sum of:
0.03777876 = weight(_text_:web in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03777876 = score(doc=2652,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0071031675 = product of:
0.035515837 = sum of:
0.035515837 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035515837 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Folksonomy is the result of describing Web resources with tags created by Web users. Although it has become a popular application for the description of resources, in general terms Folksonomies are not being conveniently integrated in metadata. However, if the appropriate metadata elements are identified, then further work may be conducted to automatically assign tags to these elements (RDF properties) and use them in Semantic Web applications. This article presents research carried out to continue the project Kinds of Tags, which intends to identify elements required for metadata originating from folksonomies and to propose an application profile for DC Social Tagging. The work provides information that may be used by software applications to assign tags to metadata elements and, therefore, means for tags to be conveniently gathered by metadata interoperability tools. Despite the unquestionably high value of DC and the significance of the already existing properties in DC Terms, the pilot study show revealed a significant number of tags for which no corresponding properties yet existed. A need for new properties, such as Action, Depth, Rate, and Utility was determined. Those potential new properties will have to be validated in a later stage by the DC Social Tagging Community.
- Pages
- S.14-22
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Aldana, J.F.; Gómez, A.C.; Moreno, N.; Nebro, A.J.; Roldán, M.M.: Metadata functionality for semantic Web integration (2003)
0.01
0.01278788 = product of:
0.02557576 = sum of:
0.021370895 = product of:
0.04274179 = sum of:
0.04274179 = weight(_text_:web in 2731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04274179 = score(doc=2731,freq=12.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.35328537 = fieldWeight in 2731, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2731)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.004204865 = product of:
0.021024324 = sum of:
0.021024324 = weight(_text_:28 in 2731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021024324 = score(doc=2731,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.15831517 = fieldWeight in 2731, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2731)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- We propose an extension of a mediator architecture. This extension is oriented to ontology-driven data integration. In our architecture ontologies are not managed by an extemal component or service, but are integrated in the mediation layer. This approach implies rethinking the mediator design, but at the same time provides advantages from a database perspective. Some of these advantages include the application of optimization and evaluation techniques that use and combine information from all abstraction levels (physical schema, logical schema and semantic information defined by ontology). 1. Introduction Although the Web is probably the richest information repository in human history, users cannot specify what they want from it. Two major problems that arise in current search engines (Heflin, 2001) are: a) polysemy, when the same word is used with different meanings; b) synonymy, when two different words have the same meaning. Polysemy causes irrelevant information retrieval. On the other hand, synonymy produces lost of useful documents. The lack of a capability to understand the context of the words and the relationships among required terms, explains many of the lost and false results produced by search engines. The Semantic Web will bring structure to the meaningful content of Web pages, giving semantic relationships among terms and possibly avoiding the previous problems. Various proposals have appeared for meta-data representation and communication standards, and other services and tools that may eventually merge into the global Semantic Web (Berners-lee, 2001). Hopefully, in the next few years we will see the universal adoption of open standards for representation and sharing of meta-information. In this environment, software agents roaming from page to page can readily carry out sophisticated tasks for users (Berners-Lee, 2001). In this context, ontologies can be seen as metadata that represent semantic of data; providing a knowledge domain standard vocabulary, like DTDs and XML Schema do. If its pages were so structured, the Web could be seen as a heterogeneous collection of autonomous databases. This suggests that techniques developed in the Database area could be useful. Database research mainly deals with efficient storage and retrieval and with powerful query languages.
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
-
Chopey, M.: Planning and implementing a metadata-driven digital repository (2005)
0.01
0.012779264 = product of:
0.025558528 = sum of:
0.017449262 = product of:
0.034898523 = sum of:
0.034898523 = weight(_text_:web in 5729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034898523 = score(doc=5729,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 5729, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5729)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.008109266 = product of:
0.040546328 = sum of:
0.040546328 = weight(_text_:29 in 5729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040546328 = score(doc=5729,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5729, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5729)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Metadata is used to organize and control a wide range of different types of information object collections, most of which are accessed via the World Wide Web. This chapter presents a brief introduction to the purpose of metadata and how it has developed, and an overview of the steps to be taken and the functional expertise required in planning for and implementing the creation, storage, and use of metadata for resource discovery in a local repository of information objects.
- Date
- 29. 9.2008 19:12:46
