-
Davis, M.; Dunning, T.: ¬A TREC evaluation of query translation methods for multi-lingual text retrieval (1996)
0.03
0.025915677 = product of:
0.051831353 = sum of:
0.051831353 = product of:
0.10366271 = sum of:
0.10366271 = weight(_text_:t in 1917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10366271 = score(doc=1917,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19847474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05038186 = queryNorm
0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 1917, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1917)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Airio, E.: Who benefits from CLIR in web retrieval? (2008)
0.02
0.018853799 = product of:
0.037707597 = sum of:
0.037707597 = product of:
0.15083039 = sum of:
0.15083039 = weight(_text_:author's in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15083039 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33857384 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05038186 = queryNorm
0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The aim of the current paper is to test whether query translation is beneficial in web retrieval. Design/methodology/approach - The language pairs were Finnish-Swedish, English-German and Finnish-French. A total of 12-18 participants were recruited for each language pair. Each participant performed four retrieval tasks. The author's aim was to compare the performance of the translated queries with that of the target language queries. Thus, the author asked participants to formulate a source language query and a target language query for each task. The source language queries were translated into the target language utilizing a dictionary-based system. In English-German, also machine translation was utilized. The author used Google as the search engine. Findings - The results differed depending on the language pair. The author concluded that the dictionary coverage had an effect on the results. On average, the results of query-translation were better than in the traditional laboratory tests. Originality/value - This research shows that query translation in web is beneficial especially for users with moderate and non-active language skills. This is valuable information for developers of cross-language information retrieval systems.
-
Kluck, M.; Mandl, T.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Cross-Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF) : Europäische Initiative zur Bewertung sprachübergreifender Retrievalverfahren (2002)
0.02
0.015117477 = product of:
0.030234953 = sum of:
0.030234953 = product of:
0.060469907 = sum of:
0.060469907 = weight(_text_:t in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060469907 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19847474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05038186 = queryNorm
0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Talvensaari, T.; Laurikkala, J.; Järvelin, K.; Juhola, M.: ¬A study on automatic creation of a comparable document collection in cross-language information retrieval (2006)
0.01
0.010798198 = product of:
0.021596396 = sum of:
0.021596396 = product of:
0.043192793 = sum of:
0.043192793 = weight(_text_:t in 5601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043192793 = score(doc=5601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19847474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05038186 = queryNorm
0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 5601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis : ausgewählte und erweiterte Beiträge des Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop (HIER 2005), Hildesheim, 20.7.2005 (2006)
0.00
0.0043192795 = product of:
0.008638559 = sum of:
0.008638559 = product of:
0.017277118 = sum of:
0.017277118 = weight(_text_:t in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017277118 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19847474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05038186 = queryNorm
0.087049454 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Editor
- Mandl, T. u. C. Womser-Hacker
