Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Notationen / Signaturen"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Drezek, G.: Call number relabelling project in an amalgamated university library : how and why we relabelled 170.000 items in three weeks and what good did it to us? (1993) 0.02
    0.016246125 = product of:
      0.03249225 = sum of:
        0.03249225 = product of:
          0.0649845 = sum of:
            0.0649845 = weight(_text_:g in 3075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0649845 = score(doc=3075,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.331982 = fieldWeight in 3075, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3075)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Savic, D.: CUTT-x: an expert system for automatic assignment of Cutter numbers (1996) 0.01
    0.01412215 = product of:
      0.0282443 = sum of:
        0.0282443 = product of:
          0.0564886 = sum of:
            0.0564886 = weight(_text_:22 in 6582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0564886 = score(doc=6582,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6582, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6582)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.71-87
  3. Broughton, V.: Notational expressivity : the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding (1999) 0.01
    0.010591612 = product of:
      0.021183224 = sum of:
        0.021183224 = product of:
          0.04236645 = sum of:
            0.04236645 = weight(_text_:22 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04236645 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052116565 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 8.2001 13:22:14