Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Hora, M.: Methoden für das Ranking in Discovery-Systemen (2018) 0.01 
    0.012349852 = product of:
  0.09879882 = sum of:
    0.09879882 = weight(_text_:informationskompetenz in 4968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09879882 = score(doc=4968,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2063236 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033323385 = queryNorm
        0.4788537 = fieldWeight in 4968, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4968)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Discovery-Systeme bieten meist als Standardeinstellung eine Sortierung nach Relevanz an. Wie die Relevanz ermittelt wird, ist häufig intransparent. Dabei wären Kenntnisse darüber aus Nutzersicht ein wichtiger Faktor in der Informationskompetenz, während Bibliotheken sicherstellen sollten, dass das Ranking zum eigenen Bestand und Publikum passt. In diesem Aufsatz wird dargestellt, wie Discovery-Systeme Treffer auswählen und bewerten. Dazu gehören Indexierung, Prozessierung, Text-Matching und weitere Relevanzkriterien, z. B. Popularität oder Verfügbarkeit. Schließlich müssen alle betrachteten Kriterien zu einem zentralen Score zusammengefasst werden. Ein besonderer Fokus wird auf das Ranking von EBSCO Discovery Service, Primo und Summon gelegt.
  2. Archuby, C.G.: Interfaces se recuperacion para catalogos en linea con salidas ordenadas por probable relevancia (2000) 0.00 
    0.0026845555 = product of:
  0.021476444 = sum of:
    0.021476444 = product of:
      0.06442933 = sum of:
        0.06442933 = weight(_text_:29 in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06442933 = score(doc=5727,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 18:23:13
    Source
    Ciencia da informacao. 29(2000) no.3, S.5-13
  3. Maylein, L.; Langenstein, A.: Neues vom Relevanz-Ranking im HEIDI-Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg : Perspektiven für bibliothekarische Dienstleistungen (2013) 0.00 
    0.0015186139 = product of:
  0.012148911 = sum of:
    0.012148911 = product of:
      0.03644673 = sum of:
        0.03644673 = weight(_text_:29 in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03644673 = score(doc=775,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11722125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    29. 6.2013 18:06:23
  4. Khoo, C.S.G.; Wan, K.-W.: ¬A simple relevancy-ranking strategy for an interface to Boolean OPACs (2004) 0.00 
    6.584169E-4 = product of:
  0.005267335 = sum of:
    0.005267335 = product of:
      0.015802005 = sum of:
        0.015802005 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015802005 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11669282 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033323385 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Electronic library. 22(2004) no.2, S.112-120

Authors

Years

Languages