Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Oberhauser, O.; Labner, J.: Relevance Ranking in Online-Katalogen : Informationsstand und Perspektiven (2003) 0.00 
    0.0044489806 = product of:
  0.035591844 = sum of:
    0.011801938 = weight(_text_:und in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011801938 = score(doc=2188,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.011987969 = weight(_text_:der in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011987969 = score(doc=2188,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.24431825 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.011801938 = weight(_text_:und in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011801938 = score(doc=2188,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.125 = coord(3/24)
    Abstract
    Bekanntlich führen Suchmaschinen wie Google &Co. beider Auflistung der Suchergebnisse ein "Ranking" nach "Relevanz" durch, d.h. die Dokumente werden in absteigender Reihenfolge entsprechend ihrer Erfüllung von Relevanzkriterien ausgeben. In Online-Katalogen (OPACs) ist derlei noch nicht allgemein übliche Praxis, doch bietet etwa das im Österreichischen Bibliothekenverbund eingesetzte System Aleph 500 tatsächlich eine solche Ranking-Option an (die im Verbundkatalog auch implementiert ist). Bislang liegen allerdings kaum Informationen zur Funktionsweise dieses Features, insbesondere auch im Hinblick auf eine Hilfestellung für Benutzer, vor. Daher möchten wir mit diesem Beitrag versuchen, den in unserem Verbund bestehenden Informationsstand zum Thema "Relevance Ranking" zu erweitern. Sowohl die Verwendung einer Ranking-Option in OPACs generell als auch die sich unter Aleph 500 konkret bietenden Möglichkeiten sollen im folgenden näher betrachtet werden.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 56(2003) H.3/4, S.49-63
  2. Archuby, C.G.: Interfaces se recuperacion para catalogos en linea con salidas ordenadas por probable relevancia (2000) 0.00 
    8.848001E-4 = product of:
  0.021235202 = sum of:
    0.021235202 = product of:
      0.042470403 = sum of:
        0.042470403 = weight(_text_:29 in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042470403 = score(doc=5727,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 18:23:13
    Source
    Ciencia da informacao. 29(2000) no.3, S.5-13
  3. Lewandowski, D.: How can library materials be ranked in the OPAC? (2009) 0.00 
    2.5228495E-4 = product of:
  0.0060548387 = sum of:
    0.0060548387 = weight(_text_:der in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060548387 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.12339935 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    Content
    Vortrag, anlässlich der 9. Internationalen Bielefeld-Konferenz 2009, 3. - 5. Februar 2009.
  4. Khoo, C.S.G.; Wan, K.-W.: ¬A simple relevancy-ranking strategy for an interface to Boolean OPACs (2004) 0.00 
    2.1700701E-4 = product of:
  0.005208168 = sum of:
    0.005208168 = product of:
      0.010416336 = sum of:
        0.010416336 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010416336 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    Source
    Electronic library. 22(2004) no.2, S.112-120

Authors

Languages

Types