Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- locks%3a%22086.s3737 2003%22 2
- lockss%3a%22046.s3737 2003%22 2
- lockss%3a%22086.s.b37 2003%22 2
- locks%3a%22046.s3737 2003%22 2
- lockss%3a%22086.s37h36 2003%22 2
-
Oberhauser, O.; Labner, J.: Relevance Ranking in Online-Katalogen : Informationsstand und Perspektiven (2003)
0.03
0.02692207 = product of: 0.05384414 = sum of: 0.05384414 = product of: 0.10768828 = sum of: 0.10768828 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.10768828 = score(doc=2188,freq=5.0), product of: 0.20291246 = queryWeight, product of: 4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218) 0.046754356 = queryNorm 0.53071296 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of: 2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of: 5.0 = termFreq=5.0 4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2188) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 56(2003) H.3/4, S.49-63
- Year
- 2003
-
Khoo, C.S.G.; Wan, K.-W.: ¬A simple relevancy-ranking strategy for an interface to Boolean OPACs (2004)
0.01
0.0055427486 = product of: 0.011085497 = sum of: 0.011085497 = product of: 0.022170994 = sum of: 0.022170994 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.022170994 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of: 0.1637258 = queryWeight, product of: 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.046754356 = queryNorm 0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Electronic library. 22(2004) no.2, S.112-120