Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  • × theme_ss:"Suchoberflächen"
  1. Hildreth, C.R.: ¬The GUI OPAC : approach with caution (1995) 0.02
    0.019988423 = product of:
      0.09994212 = sum of:
        0.09994212 = weight(_text_:40 in 3230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09994212 = score(doc=3230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19765252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051825367 = queryNorm
            0.5056456 = fieldWeight in 3230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3230)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 2.1996 13:57:40
  2. Ramdeen, S.; Hemminger, B.M.: ¬A tale of two interfaces : how facets affect the library catalog search (2012) 0.01
    0.011778293 = product of:
      0.058891464 = sum of:
        0.058891464 = weight(_text_:40 in 87) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058891464 = score(doc=87,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19765252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051825367 = queryNorm
            0.29795453 = fieldWeight in 87, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=87)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    In the summer of 2008 all University of North Carolina libraries switched from a traditional library catalog interface supporting text-based searching (TextOnly) to a text and facet-based interface (TextFacet) to improve users' search experiences. This study seeks to understand the differences between these two interfaces and how they affect the search experience of the novice user. In this study, 40 participants were asked to search for resources using both interfaces. Their search times and accuracy were measured across three types of search tasks (known, partially known, and exploratory). After completing the searches, they were asked a series of questions about their experiences. The data were analyzed in order to identify strengths and weaknesses in both search interfaces. Thirty-six out of 40 participants preferred the TextFacet interface to the TextOnly interface. Using three dependent variables-time, accuracy, and rating-the two interfaces were compared and interactions were tested with the three task types. Search times for the TextFacet were shorter and participants preferred the TextFacet search interface over the TextOnly search interface. Performances across the three task types were different in terms of search time. The partially known and exploratory task types showed similar distributions for rating and accuracy. These distributions were distinctly different from the known task type. The results of this study may assist libraries in developing improved library catalog search interfaces that utilize facets as well as text searching.
  3. Stewart, M.R.: Users, standards, and access : in search of the standard user (1992) 0.01
    0.011659914 = product of:
      0.058299568 = sum of:
        0.058299568 = weight(_text_:40 in 2725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058299568 = score(doc=2725,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19765252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051825367 = queryNorm
            0.2949599 = fieldWeight in 2725, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2725)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Standards for user interfaces for access to bibliographic data bases cannot be developed without more complete understanding of the current user, user attitude and capabilities. Gives 3 means of achieving this based on observing the user. 45% of access points in subject searches results in no retrievals. Errors in searching on-line catalogues occur with a 40% no hit title search rate and a 51% no hit author search rate when those records were on the data base. Stresses the importance of fundamental user interface components contained in the IBM staff publication systems guide. Concludes that although there is no such thing as a standard user it is still vital to develop user standards
  4. ¬A graphical user interface : the case of the British Library network OPAC (1996) 0.01
    0.011659914 = product of:
      0.058299568 = sum of:
        0.058299568 = weight(_text_:40 in 2768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058299568 = score(doc=2768,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19765252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051825367 = queryNorm
            0.2949599 = fieldWeight in 2768, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2768)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    14. 7.1996 12:40:07
  5. Cherry, J.M.: Bibliographic displays in OPACs and Web catalogs : how well do they comply with display guidelines (1998) 0.01
    0.011659914 = product of:
      0.058299568 = sum of:
        0.058299568 = weight(_text_:40 in 3378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058299568 = score(doc=3378,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19765252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051825367 = queryNorm
            0.2949599 = fieldWeight in 3378, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3378)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    16. 3.1999 9:40:06
  6. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: Searching behaviour and the evaluation of online catalogues (1991) 0.01
    0.011234595 = product of:
      0.056172974 = sum of:
        0.056172974 = weight(_text_:22 in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056172974 = score(doc=2765,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18148361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051825367 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Pages
    S.20-22
  7. Kinney, T.; Pasak, P.: ¬The 'naive subject searcher' model : a tool for evaluating library catalog user interfaces (1990) 0.01
    0.009994212 = product of:
      0.04997106 = sum of:
        0.04997106 = weight(_text_:40 in 2776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04997106 = score(doc=2776,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19765252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051825367 = queryNorm
            0.2528228 = fieldWeight in 2776, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2776)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    23. 1.1999 20:40:31
  8. Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996) 0.01
    0.009830271 = product of:
      0.049151354 = sum of:
        0.049151354 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049151354 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18148361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051825367 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  9. Thomas, D.H.: ¬The effect of interface design on item selection in an online catalog (2001) 0.01
    0.0056172977 = product of:
      0.028086487 = sum of:
        0.028086487 = weight(_text_:22 in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028086487 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18148361 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051825367 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22