Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Khoo, C.S.G.; Wan, K.-W.: ¬A simple relevancy-ranking strategy for an interface to Boolean OPACs (2004) 0.03
    0.03422837 = product of:
      0.06845674 = sum of:
        0.06845674 = sum of:
          0.04719258 = weight(_text_:e.g in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04719258 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044842023 = queryNorm
              0.20173478 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.021264162 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021264162 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044842023 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Most Web search engines accept natural language queries, perform some kind of fuzzy matching and produce ranked output, displaying first the documents that are most likely to be relevant. On the other hand, most library online public access catalogs (OPACs) an the Web are still Boolean retrieval systems that perform exact matching, and require users to express their search requests precisely in a Boolean search language and to refine their search statements to improve the search results. It is well-documented that users have difficulty searching Boolean OPACs effectively (e.g. Borgman, 1996; Ensor, 1992; Wallace, 1993). One approach to making OPACs easier to use is to develop a natural language search interface that acts as a middleware between the user's Web browser and the OPAC system. The search interface can accept a natural language query from the user and reformulate it as a series of Boolean search statements that are then submitted to the OPAC. The records retrieved by the OPAC are ranked by the search interface before forwarding them to the user's Web browser. The user, then, does not need to interact directly with the Boolean OPAC but with the natural language search interface or search intermediary. The search interface interacts with the OPAC system an the user's behalf. The advantage of this approach is that no modification to the OPAC or library system is required. Furthermore, the search interface can access multiple OPACs, acting as a meta search engine, and integrate search results from various OPACs before sending them to the user. The search interface needs to incorporate a method for converting the user's natural language query into a series of Boolean search statements, and for ranking the OPAC records retrieved. The purpose of this study was to develop a relevancyranking algorithm for a search interface to Boolean OPAC systems. This is part of an on-going effort to develop a knowledge-based search interface to OPACs called the E-Referencer (Khoo et al., 1998, 1999; Poo et al., 2000). E-Referencer v. 2 that has been implemented applies a repertoire of initial search strategies and reformulation strategies to retrieve records from OPACs using the Z39.50 protocol, and also assists users in mapping query keywords to the Library of Congress subject headings."
    Source
    Electronic library. 22(2004) no.2, S.112-120
  2. Markey, K.: ¬The online library catalog : paradise lost and paradise regained? (2007) 0.02
    0.016685098 = product of:
      0.033370197 = sum of:
        0.033370197 = product of:
          0.06674039 = sum of:
            0.06674039 = weight(_text_:e.g in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06674039 = score(doc=1172,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.28529608 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The impetus for this essay is the library community's uncertainty regarding the present and future direction of the library catalog in the era of Google and mass digitization projects. The uncertainty is evident at the highest levels. Deanna Marcum, Associate Librarian for Library Services at the Library of Congress (LC), is struck by undergraduate students who favor digital resources over the online library catalog because such resources are available at anytime and from anywhere (Marcum, 2006). She suggests that "the detailed attention that we have been paying to descriptive cataloging may no longer be justified ... retooled catalogers could give more time to authority control, subject analysis, [and] resource identification and evaluation" (Marcum, 2006, 8). In an abrupt about-face, LC terminated series added entries in cataloging records, one of the few subject-rich fields in such records (Cataloging Policy and Support Office, 2006). Mann (2006b) and Schniderman (2006) cite evidence of LC's prevailing viewpoint in favor of simplifying cataloging at the expense of subject cataloging. LC commissioned Karen Calhoun (2006) to prepare a report on "revitalizing" the online library catalog. Calhoun's directive is clear: divert resources from cataloging mass-produced formats (e.g., books) to cataloging the unique primary sources (e.g., archives, special collections, teaching objects, research by-products). She sums up her rationale for such a directive, "The existing local catalog's market position has eroded to the point where there is real concern for its ability to weather the competition for information seekers' attention" (p. 10). At the University of California Libraries (2005), a task force's recommendations parallel those in Calhoun report especially regarding the elimination of subject headings in favor of automatically generated metadata. Contemplating these events prompted me to revisit the glorious past of the online library catalog. For a decade and a half beginning in the early 1980s, the online library catalog was the jewel in the crown when people eagerly queued at its terminals to find information written by the world's experts. I despair how eagerly people now embrace Google because of the suspect provenance of the information Google retrieves. Long ago, we could have added more value to the online library catalog but the only thing we changed was the catalog's medium. Our failure to act back then cost the online catalog the crown. Now that the era of mass digitization has begun, we have a second chance at redesigning the online library catalog, getting it right, coaxing back old users, and attracting new ones. Let's revisit the past, reconsidering missed opportunities, reassessing their merits, combining them with new directions, making bold decisions and acting decisively on them.
  3. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.01
    0.01215095 = product of:
      0.0243019 = sum of:
        0.0243019 = product of:
          0.0486038 = sum of:
            0.0486038 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0486038 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  4. Horn, M.E.: "Garbage" in, "refuse and refuse disposal" out : making the most of the subject authority file in the OPAC (2002) 0.01
    0.010632081 = product of:
      0.021264162 = sum of:
        0.021264162 = product of:
          0.042528324 = sum of:
            0.042528324 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042528324 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Beccaria, M.; Scott, D.: Fac-Back-OPAC : an open source interface to your library system (2007) 0.01
    0.010632081 = product of:
      0.021264162 = sum of:
        0.021264162 = product of:
          0.042528324 = sum of:
            0.042528324 = weight(_text_:22 in 2207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042528324 = score(doc=2207,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2207, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2207)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 8.2008 11:22:47
  6. Moulaison, H.L.: OPAC queries at a medium-sized academic library : a transaction log analysis (2008) 0.01
    0.010632081 = product of:
      0.021264162 = sum of:
        0.021264162 = product of:
          0.042528324 = sum of:
            0.042528324 = weight(_text_:22 in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042528324 = score(doc=3599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Lam, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs : table of contents added to bibliographic records (2000) 0.01
    0.009113212 = product of:
      0.018226424 = sum of:
        0.018226424 = product of:
          0.03645285 = sum of:
            0.03645285 = weight(_text_:22 in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03645285 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  8. Li, Y.-O.; Leung, S.W.: Computer cataloging of electronic Journals in unstable Aggregator Databases the Hong Kong Baptist University Library experience (2001) 0.01
    0.009113212 = product of:
      0.018226424 = sum of:
        0.018226424 = product of:
          0.03645285 = sum of:
            0.03645285 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03645285 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Golderman, G.M.; Connolly, B.: Between the book covers : going beyond OPAC keyword searching with the deep linking capabilities of Google Scholar and Google Book Search (2004/05) 0.01
    0.0075943437 = product of:
      0.0151886875 = sum of:
        0.0151886875 = product of:
          0.030377375 = sum of:
            0.030377375 = weight(_text_:22 in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030377375 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2.12.2007 19:39:22
  10. Rädler, K.: Kataloganreicherung mit digitalen Inhaltsverzeichnissen eröffnet neue Geschäftsfelder : Erfahrungen aus der Vorarlberger Landesbibliothek (2008) 0.01
    0.0075943437 = product of:
      0.0151886875 = sum of:
        0.0151886875 = product of:
          0.030377375 = sum of:
            0.030377375 = weight(_text_:22 in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030377375 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2008 17:14:24
  11. Thomas, D.H.: ¬The effect of interface design on item selection in an online catalog (2001) 0.01
    0.006075475 = product of:
      0.01215095 = sum of:
        0.01215095 = product of:
          0.0243019 = sum of:
            0.0243019 = weight(_text_:22 in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0243019 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Ikas, W.-V.; Litten, F.: World Wide Web und Catalogue Enrichment : Möglichkeiten des verbesserten Nachweises von mikroverfilmten Handschriften und Inkunabeln (2007) 0.01
    0.006075475 = product of:
      0.01215095 = sum of:
        0.01215095 = product of:
          0.0243019 = sum of:
            0.0243019 = weight(_text_:22 in 323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0243019 = score(doc=323,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 323, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=323)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2007 11:19:21
  13. Greifeneder, E.: Hilfe auf allen Ebenen : ein Beitrag zur Forschung über Online-Hilfen in OPACs (2008) 0.01
    0.006075475 = product of:
      0.01215095 = sum of:
        0.01215095 = product of:
          0.0243019 = sum of:
            0.0243019 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0243019 = score(doc=1936,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2008 13:29:15
  14. Hahn, U.; Schulze, M.: Katalogerweiterungen, Mashups und Elemente der Bibliothek 2.0" in der Praxis : der Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek der Helmut-Schmidt-Universität (IHSU) Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg (2009) 0.01
    0.006075475 = product of:
      0.01215095 = sum of:
        0.01215095 = product of:
          0.0243019 = sum of:
            0.0243019 = weight(_text_:22 in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0243019 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2009 19:40:38
  15. Oberhauser, O.: Implementierung und Parametrisierung klassifikatorischer Recherchekomponenten im OPAC (2005) 0.01
    0.0053160405 = product of:
      0.010632081 = sum of:
        0.010632081 = product of:
          0.021264162 = sum of:
            0.021264162 = weight(_text_:22 in 3353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021264162 = score(doc=3353,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3353, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3353)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 58(2005) H.1, S.22-37