Search (43 results, page 1 of 3)

0.028738767 = product of:
  0.0862163 = sum of:
    0.04498204 = weight(_text_:t in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04498204 = score(doc=3862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
    0.041234262 = weight(_text_:i in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041234262 = score(doc=3862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Language

i

0.02410407 = product of:
  0.072312206 = sum of:
    0.031077946 = weight(_text_:u in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031077946 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
    0.041234262 = weight(_text_:i in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041234262 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

This paper examines some traditional information searching methods and their role in Hungarian OPACs. What challenges are there in the digital and online environment? How do users work with them and do they give users satisfactory results? What kinds of techniques are users employing? In this paper I examine the user interfaces of UDC, thesauri, subject headings etc. in the Hungarian library. The key question of the paper is whether a universal system or local solutions is the best approach for searching in the digital environment.

Source

Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch

0.017929737 = product of:
  0.053789206 = sum of:
    0.038556036 = weight(_text_:t in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038556036 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
    0.015233172 = product of:
      0.030466344 = sum of:
        0.030466344 = weight(_text_:22 in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030466344 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13124086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05

0.017217193 = product of:
  0.051651575 = sum of:
    0.022198534 = weight(_text_:u in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022198534 = score(doc=5100,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
    0.029453041 = weight(_text_:i in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029453041 = score(doc=5100,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

0.016225737 = product of:
  0.048677206 = sum of:
    0.025114773 = weight(_text_:u in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025114773 = score(doc=536,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.20465277 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
    0.023562433 = weight(_text_:i in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023562433 = score(doc=536,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.16668847 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

In schätzungsweise jedem vierten deutschen Zeitungsartikel und InternetDokument, in dem der italienische Vorname Giuseppe enthalten ist, taucht der Fehler auf, sei nun die Rede von Verdi, Arcimboldo oder Garibaldi: Giuseppe wird falsch geschrieben, nämlich als *Guiseppe, als handele sich um eine Variante von Guido, was dem deutschen Auge offensichtlich vertrauter ist. Bemerkenswert ist, dass die Buchstaben "i" und "u° auf der Tastatur direkt nebeneinander liegen, was der Tippfehleranfälligkeit Vorschub leistet. Lässt man die Internet-Suchmaschine Google "Seiten auf deutsch" absuchen, findet sie 61.500 Giuseppes und 15.200 *Guiseppes (über 25%). Google ist übrigens seit neuestem so "intelligent', bei der falschen Eingabe zu fragen: "Meinten Sie Giuseppe?'. Schränkt man die Suchmaschine auf italienisch-sprachige Seiten ein, sinkt der Anteil der falschen Schreibweise auf 0,54 % (426.000 richtige gegen 2.330 falsche). Bei genauerem Hinsehen tauchen die meisten der Falschschreibungen bei offenbar amerikanischen dot-com-Seiten auf, die italienische Genealogien aufschlüsseln. Die genuin aus Italien stammenden Seiten weisen nur in den allerwenigsten Fällen den Fehler auf. Dieses Phänomen fiel mir als Romanistin zunächst auf, dann störte es mich, später belustigte es mich beinahe und schließlich wurde die Suche danach fast zum Spiel. Unter bibliothekarischen Gesichtspunkten ist der Fehler ein Ärgernis, hat sich doch diese falsche Schreibweise massenhaft in bibliothekarische Datenbanken eingeschlichen. Als ich schon vor Jahren eine Düsseldorfer Diplombibliothekarin darauf ansprach, widersprach diese und behauptete, es gebe sehr wohl den Namen in der Schreibweise *Guiseppe neben der - vielleicht üblicheren - Form Giuseppe. Und tatsächlich findet sich die falsche Form in manchen Vornamenbüchern - so oft schon wurde der Fehler tradiert, dass er jetzt schon legitimiert erscheint. Schlägt man hingegen in italienischen Vornamenbüchern nach, zeigt sich, dass man hier vergeblich nach *Guiseppe suchen muss.

0.014994013 = product of:
  0.08996408 = sum of:
    0.08996408 = weight(_text_:t in 2777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08996408 = score(doc=2777,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.60934615 = fieldWeight in 2777, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2777)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.013744755 = product of:
  0.082468525 = sum of:
    0.082468525 = weight(_text_:i in 852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.082468525 = score(doc=852,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 852, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=852)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.012676664 = product of:
  0.03802999 = sum of:
    0.02249102 = weight(_text_:t in 2875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02249102 = score(doc=2875,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14764035 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.15233654 = fieldWeight in 2875, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2875)
    0.015538973 = weight(_text_:u in 2875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015538973 = score(doc=2875,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.12662244 = fieldWeight in 2875, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2875)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

0.009304758 = product of:
  0.027914274 = sum of:
    0.017758826 = weight(_text_:u in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017758826 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
    0.010155449 = product of:
      0.020310897 = sum of:
        0.020310897 = weight(_text_:22 in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020310897 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13124086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037477795 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Date

22. 2.2009 19:40:38

0.00833058 = product of:
  0.049983475 = sum of:
    0.049983475 = weight(_text_:i in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049983475 = score(doc=3103,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.35359967 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.0059196088 = product of:
  0.03551765 = sum of:
    0.03551765 = weight(_text_:u in 2195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03551765 = score(doc=2195,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 2195, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2195)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Theme

Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

0.0059196088 = product of:
  0.03551765 = sum of:
    0.03551765 = weight(_text_:u in 2491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03551765 = score(doc=2491,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 2491, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2491)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Theme

Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

0.0059196088 = product of:
  0.03551765 = sum of:
    0.03551765 = weight(_text_:u in 1115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03551765 = score(doc=1115,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1115, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1115)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Source

¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez

0.005890609 = product of:
  0.035343654 = sum of:
    0.035343654 = weight(_text_:i in 1558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035343654 = score(doc=1558,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 1558, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1558)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Content

"MOST INTEGRATED library systems, as they are currently configured and used, should be removed from public view. Before I say why, let me be clean that I think the integrated library system serves a very important, albeit limited, role. An integrated library system should serve as a key piece of the infrastructure of a library, handling such tasks as ma terials acquisition, cataloging (including holdings, of course), and circulation. The integrated library system should be a complete and accurate recording of a local library's holdings. It should not be presented to users as the primary system for locating information. It fails badly at that important job. - Lack of content- The central problem of almost any library catalog system is that it typically includes only information about the books and journals held by a parficular library. Most do not provide access to joumal article indexes, web search engines, or even selective web directories like the Librarians' Index to the Internet. If they do offen such access, it is only via links to these services. The library catalog is far from onestop shopping for information. Although we acknowledge that fact to each other, we still treat it as if it were the best place in the universe to begin a search. Most of us give the catalog a place of great prominente an our web pages. But Information for each book is limited to the author, title, and a few subject headings. Seldom can book reviews, jacket summaries, recommendations, or tables of contents be found-or anything at all to help users determine if they want the material. - Lack of coverage - Most catalogs do not allow patrons to discover even all the books that are available to them. If you're lucky, your catalog may cover the collections of those libraries with which you have close ties-such as a regional network. But that leaves out all those items that could be requested via interlibrary loan. As Steve Coffman pointed out in his "Building Earth's Largest Library" article, we must show our users the universe that is open to them, highlight the items most accessible, and provide an estimate of how long it would take to obtain other items. - Inability to increase coverage - Despite some well-meaning attempts to smash everything of interest into the library catalog, the fact remains that most integrated library systems expect MARC records and MARC records only. This means that whatever we want to put into the catalog must be described using MARC and AACR2 (see "Marc Must Die," LJ 10/15/02, p. 26ff.). This is a barrier to dramatically increasing the scope of a catalog system, even if we decided to do it. How would you, for example, use the Open Archives Initiative Harvesting Protocol to crawl the bibliographic records of remote repositories and make them searchable within your library catalog? It can't be dope, and it shouldn't. The library catalog should be a record of a given library's holdings. Period.
- User Interface hostility - Recently I used the Library catalogs of two public libraries, new products from two major library vendors. A link an one catalog said "Knowledge Portal," whatever that was supposed to mean. Clicking an it brought you to two choices: Z39.50 Bibliographic Sites and the World Wide Web. No public library user will have the faintest clue what Z39.50 is. The other catalog launched a Java applet that before long froze my web browser so badly I was forced to shut the program down. Pick a popular book and pretend you are a library patron. Choose three to five libraries at random from the lib web-cats site (pick catalogs that are not using your system) and attempt to find your book. Try as much as possible to see the system through the eyes of your patrons-a teenager, a retiree, or an older faculty member. You may not always like what you see. Now go back to your own system and try the same thing. - What should the public see? - Our users deserve an information system that helps them find all different kinds of resources-books, articles, web pages, working papers in institutional repositories-and gives them the tools to focus in an what they want. This is not, and should not be, the library catalog. It must communicate with the catalog, but it will also need to interface with other information systems, such as vendor databases and web search engines. What will such a tool look like? We are seeing the beginnings of such a tool in the current offerings of cross-database search tools from a few vendors (see "Cross-Database Search," LJ 10/15/01, p. 29ff). We are in the early stages of developing the kind of robust, userfriendly tool that will be required before we can pull our catalogs from public view. Meanwhile, we can begin by making what we have easier to understand and use."

0.0052322443 = product of:
  0.031393465 = sum of:
    0.031393465 = weight(_text_:u in 6646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031393465 = score(doc=6646,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.25581595 = fieldWeight in 6646, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6646)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Source

Globalisierung und Wissensorganisation: Neue Aspekte für Wissen, Wissenschaft und Informationssysteme: Proceedings der 6. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Hamburg, 23.-25.9.1999. Hrsg.: H.P. Ohly, G. Rahmstorf u. A. Sigel

0.0051796576 = product of:
  0.031077946 = sum of:
    0.031077946 = weight(_text_:u in 5812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031077946 = score(doc=5812,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 5812, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5812)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Elektronische Bibliothekskataloge und Bibliografien haben ihr Monopol bei der Suche nach Büchern, Aufsätzen, musikalischen Werken u. a. verloren. Globale Suchmaschinen sind starke Konkurrenten, und Bibliotheken müssen heute so planen, dass ihre Dienstleistungen auch morgen noch interessant sind. Die Deutsche Bibliothek (DDB) wird ihre traditionelle Katalogrecherche zu einem globalen, netzbasierten Informationssystem erweitern, das die Vorteile der neutralen, qualitätsbasierten Katalogsuche mit den Vorteilen moderner Suchmaschinen zu verbinden sucht. Dieser Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit der Verbesserung der inhaltlichen Suchmöglichkeiten im Informationssystem Der Deutschen Bibliothek. Weitere Entwicklungsstränge sollen nur kurz im Ausblick angerissen werden.

0.0051796576 = product of:
  0.031077946 = sum of:
    0.031077946 = weight(_text_:u in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031077946 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Source

Bibliotheken und die Vernetzung des Wissens. Hrsg.: Achim Puhl u. Richard Stang

0.0051796576 = product of:
  0.031077946 = sum of:
    0.031077946 = weight(_text_:u in 5186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031077946 = score(doc=5186,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 5186, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5186)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.00490884 = product of:
  0.029453041 = sum of:
    0.029453041 = weight(_text_:i in 2549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029453041 = score(doc=2549,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14135611 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 2549, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2549)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.004439707 = product of:
  0.02663824 = sum of:
    0.02663824 = weight(_text_:u in 5526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02663824 = score(doc=5526,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12271895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037477795 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 5526, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5526)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Source

Information und Öffentlichkeit: 1. Gemeinsamer Kongress der Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Bibliotheksverbände e.V. (BDB) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. (DGI), Leipzig, 20.-23.3.2000. Zugleich 90. Deutscher Bibliothekartag, 52. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. (DGI). Hrsg.: G. Ruppelt u. H. Neißer