Search (157 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Spinas, P.: Benutzerfreundlichkeit von ETHICS : Ergebnisse einer Untersuchung des Online-Kataloges der ETH-Bibliothek (1992) 0.04
    0.035003114 = product of:
      0.315028 = sum of:
        0.315028 = weight(_text_:benutzerfreundlichkeit in 491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.315028 = score(doc=491,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2289144 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.7848644 = idf(docFreq=49, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            1.3761826 = fieldWeight in 491, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.7848644 = idf(docFreq=49, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=491)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
  2. Niggemann, E.: Tanz um den Katalog : Online-Kataloge zwischen Benutzerfreundlichkeit und Regeltreue (1994) 0.03
    0.026252333 = product of:
      0.236271 = sum of:
        0.236271 = weight(_text_:benutzerfreundlichkeit in 7854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.236271 = score(doc=7854,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2289144 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.7848644 = idf(docFreq=49, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            1.0321369 = fieldWeight in 7854, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.7848644 = idf(docFreq=49, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7854)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
  3. Wissen, D.: Web2.0-Opac bietet mehr Service : Dritter Medientag in Frankfurt an der Oder / Neue Produkte und Dienstleistungen vorgestellt (2011) 0.01
    0.0109496135 = product of:
      0.04927326 = sum of:
        0.010380501 = product of:
          0.020761002 = sum of:
            0.020761002 = weight(_text_:web in 4175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020761002 = score(doc=4175,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 4175, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.038892757 = product of:
          0.077785514 = sum of:
            0.077785514 = weight(_text_:bewertung in 4175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077785514 = score(doc=4175,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18575147 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.41876122 = fieldWeight in 4175, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Im vergangenen Herbst hat die Stadt- und Regionalbibliothek Frankfurt an der Oder ihren dritten Medientag veranstaltet - erstmals in Kooperation mit dem Verein deutscher Bibliothekare Berlin-Brandenburg, um so vor allem Fachkollegen zu erreichen. Im Mittelpunkt standen neue Techniken und web-Angebote für Bibliotheken.
    Content
    Folgende Neuerungen im Web2.0-Opac stehen den Lesern zur Verfügung: - Durch Mashups können weitere Informationen zu Suchworten oder markierten Begriffen aufgespürt werden in Wikipedia, Google-Buchsuche, You-Tube, Amazon. - Ein Rating erlaubt den Lesern die Bewertung einzelner Medien mit Sternen und die Empfehlung an Freunde per E-Mail. - Mit Social Bookmarks (Links zu Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, Mr. Wrong, et cetera) gelangen Leser per Mausklick zum Medium in ihrer Bibliothek. Merklisten können weitergegeben oder veröffentlicht werden. - Bibliotheks-News und Informationen zum Leserkonto sind per RSS-Feed zu abonnieren.
  4. Oberhauser, O.: ¬The International CIPAC List im neuen Gewand (2007) 0.01
    0.009930064 = product of:
      0.08937058 = sum of:
        0.08937058 = sum of:
          0.017300837 = weight(_text_:web in 407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017300837 = score(doc=407,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02940506 = queryNorm
              0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 407, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=407)
          0.07206974 = weight(_text_:seite in 407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07206974 = score(doc=407,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16469958 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02940506 = queryNorm
              0.43758303 = fieldWeight in 407, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=407)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Die Webseite The International CIPAC List besteht seit 2001. Sie verzeichnet "card-image public access catalogues" (CIPACs), d.h. Online-Kataloge auf der Basis digitalisierter (gescannter) Zettel- bzw. Bandkataloge. Das erste bekannte Beispiel eines solchen Katalogs war der 1994 realisierte Electronic Card Catalog der Universitätsbibliothek Princeton, NJ (USA). Seit der Mitte der 1990er Jahre begannen sich CIPACs auch in Europa zu etablieren. Das zunächst als Nebenprodukt meiner Master-Arbeit (MSc in Information& Library Management, University of Central England, Birmingham, 2002) erstellte Webverzeichnis aller bekannten Kataloge dieser Art begann mit etwa 20 Links. Anfang 2002 waren es bereits 50 Kataloge aus 11 Ländern, Anfang 2007 gar schon 110 Kataloge aus 19 Ländern. Auf den ersten Blick verzeichnet Deutschland mit 37 Links das stärkste Kontingent, doch bei genauerer Betrachtung hält Italien die Spitze, da eine der acht aus diesem Land angeführten Web-Adressen zu der Seite Cataloghi Storici führt, die ihrerseits 215 Kataloge von 35 italienischen Bibliotheken nachweist. Da die Auflistung von über hundert Links den Rahmen einer simplen Webseite, die nur Scroll- und Ankerfunktionen aufwies, sprengte, wurde das Verzeichnis kürzlich in eine neue Form gebracht, in der pro angezeigter Seite immer nur die Kataloge jeweils eines zuvor selektierten Landes angezeigt werden. Dadurch wird das Scrollen weitgehend vermieden; lediglich die Auflistung für Deutschland ist nun länger als eine Bildschirmseite. Wie man mittels einer Google-Recherche unschwer feststellen kann, ist das Verzeichnis inzwischen auf zahllosen Webseiten verlinkt und somit zu einem Service geworden, das weiterhin gepflegt und gewartet werden will. Hinweise auf neue bzw. noch nicht in dieser internationalen Liste verzeichnete CIPACs sind daher stets willkommen (bitte E-Mail an <oberh@web.de>).
  5. Wimmer, W.: Mit dem 'Surfbrett' in die Bibliothek : der World-Wide-Web Katalog der Bibliothek der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (1996) 0.01
    0.009925528 = product of:
      0.04466488 = sum of:
        0.020761002 = product of:
          0.041522004 = sum of:
            0.041522004 = weight(_text_:web in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041522004 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.023903877 = product of:
          0.047807753 = sum of:
            0.047807753 = weight(_text_:22 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047807753 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1996 20:07:57
  6. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.01
    0.009692724 = product of:
      0.043617256 = sum of:
        0.027681338 = product of:
          0.055362675 = sum of:
            0.055362675 = weight(_text_:web in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055362675 = score(doc=2905,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.015935918 = product of:
          0.031871837 = sum of:
            0.031871837 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031871837 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Der Artikel betrachtet anhand einer Studie zum Benutzerverhalten bei der Online-Katalogrecherche den gegenwärtigen Stellenwert und das zukünftige Potential der Web-OPACs. Dabei werden zunächst die Ergebnisse einer quantitativen Logfile-Analyse sowie qualitativer Benutzertests erörtert, bevor aktuelle Entwicklungen der Webtechnologie, die unter den Schlagworten Web 2.0 und Web 3.0 propagiert werden, im Zusammenhang mit der Online-Recherche und der Entwicklung neuartiger Suchverfahren kurz diskutiert werden.
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  7. Oberhauser, O.: Card-Image Public Access Catalogues (CIPACS) : Verbreitung und Charakteristika einer kostengünstigen OPAC-Alternative (2004) 0.01
    0.009101578 = product of:
      0.0819142 = sum of:
        0.0819142 = sum of:
          0.020761002 = weight(_text_:web in 2201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020761002 = score(doc=2201,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02940506 = queryNorm
              0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2201, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2201)
          0.061153203 = weight(_text_:seite in 2201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.061153203 = score(doc=2201,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16469958 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02940506 = queryNorm
              0.3713015 = fieldWeight in 2201, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2201)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Obwohl CIPACs bislang keine weitverbreitete "Spezies" von Katalogen darstellen, hat ihre Zahl in den letzten Jahren deutlich zugenommen. Nach einem etwas zögerlichen Start in der ersten Hälfte der 1990er jahre begann das eigentliche "take-off` erst mit 1999; über 80 Prozent aller CIPACS wurden seit damals installiert. Zur Zeit (Februar 2004) weist meine Web-Seite The International CipAC List Links zu 82 Card-Image Katalogen in 15 Staaten auf; ein weiteres Wachstum kann sicherlich erwartet werden. Obwohl mehr als die Hälfte aller CIPACS in deutschsprachigen Ländern realisiert wurde, nimmt die Verbreitung dieses Katalogtyps in anderen Staaten zu. Besonders häufig sind CIPACs auch in der Tschechischen Republik zu finden.
  8. Oberhauser, O.: Teil 1: Anlage und Durchführung der Befragung : Web-Umfrage zur Benutzung von Card-Image Online-Katalogen (2001) 0.01
    0.008380897 = product of:
      0.075428076 = sum of:
        0.075428076 = sum of:
          0.024467077 = weight(_text_:web in 986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024467077 = score(doc=986,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02940506 = queryNorm
              0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 986, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=986)
          0.050961 = weight(_text_:seite in 986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050961 = score(doc=986,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16469958 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02940506 = queryNorm
              0.3094179 = fieldWeight in 986, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=986)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Unter der Bezeichnung "CardImage OnlineKataloge" werden im folgenden jene auf den ersten Blick oft seltsam oder gar anachronistisch anmutenden, aber seit einigen Jahren immer häufiger anzutreffenden OPAC Varianten zusammengefasst, die auf einer meist größeren Menge eingescannter (digitalisierter) Katalogzettel und einem mehr oder weniger komfortablen und leistungsfähigen Blätter oder SuchMechanismus basieren. OPACs dieser Art werden auch als "elektronische Zettelkataloge", "digitalisierte Kartenkataloge" oder oft, wenn auch unpräzise, schlicht als "ImageKataloge" bezeichnet. Im Englischen hat sich bislang kein Standardterminus durchgesetzt; in Analogie zu "OPAC" wurde kürzlich das Akronym "CIPAC" (CardImage Public Access Catalogue) vorgeschlagen CIPACS werden in aller Regel als Alternativen zur Retrokonversion im herkömmlichen Sinn (Retrokatalogisierung) eingesetzt, sowohl als Interims als auch als Dauerlösungen. Wie erst jüngst wieder eindrucksvoll vorgerechnet wurde, können dadurch Zeit und vor allem finanzielle Mittel in beträchtlichem Ausmaß eingespart werden; oft handelt es sich für die betreffenden Bibliotheken um die einzige realisierbare Konversionsmöglichkeit. Obwohl der erste große CardImage OnlineKatalog 1994 in den USA in Betrieb genommen wurde, haben seitdem fast ausschließlich Bibliotheken in Kontinentaleuropa (Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz, Tschechische Republik) derartige CIPACs realisiert. Bekannte Beispiele, die auch das Leistungsspektrum und die Variationsbreite dieses Katalogtyps widerspiegeln, sind etwa die Anwendungen der Österreichischen Nationalbibliothek (ÖNB), verschiedener großer deutscher Bibliotheken sowie der Zentralbibliothek Zürich. Eine vom Autor erstellte Web-Seite verzeichnet alle bisher bekannt gewordenen Kataloge dieser Art
  9. Davis, E.; Stone, J.: ¬A painless route on to the Web : Web services 1: The Royal Postgraduate Medical School (1997) 0.01
    0.007891018 = product of:
      0.03550958 = sum of:
        0.019573662 = product of:
          0.039147325 = sum of:
            0.039147325 = weight(_text_:web in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039147325 = score(doc=1632,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.015935918 = product of:
          0.031871837 = sum of:
            0.031871837 = weight(_text_:22 in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031871837 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Date
    29. 7.1998 21:22:27
  10. Green, E.; Head, A.J.: Web-based catalogs : is their design language anything to talk about? (1998) 0.01
    0.007891018 = product of:
      0.03550958 = sum of:
        0.019573662 = product of:
          0.039147325 = sum of:
            0.039147325 = weight(_text_:web in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039147325 = score(doc=5185,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.015935918 = product of:
          0.031871837 = sum of:
            0.031871837 = weight(_text_:22 in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031871837 = score(doc=5185,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Stanford University's Socrates II and University of California at Berkeley's Pathfinder are 2 USA World Wide Web based online publication access catalogues under development. They differ in their design language (how an interface functionally and visually communicates to the users). Evaluates each system's interface design and their ability to communicate functionality to users: analyzes design in terms of: colour, buttons, metaphors, layout, and basic and advanced search modes. Concludes that the design languages of both systems have the right directive and have the potential to evolve
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.98-105
  11. Dierolf, U.; Mönnich, M.: Karlsruher Virtueller Katalog (KVK) : neue Dienstleistung im World Wide Web (1996) 0.01
    0.0066170194 = product of:
      0.029776588 = sum of:
        0.013840669 = product of:
          0.027681338 = sum of:
            0.027681338 = weight(_text_:web in 5217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027681338 = score(doc=5217,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 5217, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5217)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.015935918 = product of:
          0.031871837 = sum of:
            0.031871837 = weight(_text_:22 in 5217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031871837 = score(doc=5217,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5217, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5217)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Date
    21. 9.1996 16:03:22
  12. Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996) 0.01
    0.0066170194 = product of:
      0.029776588 = sum of:
        0.013840669 = product of:
          0.027681338 = sum of:
            0.027681338 = weight(_text_:web in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027681338 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.015935918 = product of:
          0.031871837 = sum of:
            0.031871837 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031871837 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Over the past year, innumerable discussions on the relationship between traditional library OPACs and the newly burgeoning World WideWeb have occured in many libraries and in virtually every library related discussion list. Rumors and speculation abound, some insisting that SGML will replace USMARC "soon," others maintaining that OPACs that haven't migrated to the Web will go the way of the dinosaurs.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
  13. Piccotti, P.: ¬Les nouvelles technologies et la recherche documentaire (1998) 0.01
    0.005789892 = product of:
      0.026054513 = sum of:
        0.012110585 = product of:
          0.02422117 = sum of:
            0.02422117 = weight(_text_:web in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02422117 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013943928 = product of:
          0.027887857 = sum of:
            0.027887857 = weight(_text_:22 in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027887857 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    The Venice University Institute of Architecture has developed Easyweb, a software package to integrate its heterogeneous non-compatible bibliographic and multimedia databases, standardise access and create internal links, by transferring all existing OPAC applications to the Web. Features include importation of UNIMARC data, multiple window searching, multibase searching and special applications, e.g. circulation management. Easyweb is notable user friendly and has become the point of reference for OPACs in Italy
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1998, no.178, S.20-22
  14. Hahn, U.; Schulze, M.: Katalogerweiterungen, Mashups und Elemente der Bibliothek 2.0" in der Praxis : der Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek der Helmut-Schmidt-Universität (IHSU) Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg (2009) 0.00
    0.004846362 = product of:
      0.021808628 = sum of:
        0.013840669 = product of:
          0.027681338 = sum of:
            0.027681338 = weight(_text_:web in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027681338 = score(doc=2672,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007967959 = product of:
          0.015935918 = sum of:
            0.015935918 = weight(_text_:22 in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015935918 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Die verschiedenen unter dem Schlagwort "Bibliothek 2.0" zusammengefassten neuen Dienste und Komponenten wie etwa Wikis, Tagging-Systeme und Blogs sind seit einiger Zeit in aller Munde und dringen über Fortbildungsveranstaltungen, Konferenzen und Publikationsorgane immer mehr in das deutschsprachige Bibliothekswesen ein. Darüber hinaus gibt es öffentlich geförderte Projekte zu bibliothekarischen 2.0-Themen und sogar ein Projekt, welches sich explizit einen 2.0-Katalog zum Ziel gesetzt hat. In diesem Beitrag soll es nun nicht um die Vorstellung eines weiteren Projekts im Dienste des Themas "Bibliothek 2.0" gehen, ebenso hat dieser Beitrag nicht den Anspruch, die Diskussion über die möglichen Vor- oder Nachteile dieser Thematik auf theoretischer Ebene voranzubringen. Vielmehr wird hier ganz praktisch aus Sicht einer kleinen Universitätsbibliothek, der Bibliothek der Helmut-SchmidtUniversität (HSU) - Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, aufgezeigt, wie das Thema "Web/Bibliothek 2.0" durchaus neben und in Unterstützung von weiteren nutzerorientierten Servicedienstleistungen auch in kleinen Schritten positive Auswirkungen für die Nutzerinnen und Nutzer haben kann. Der Focus wird dabei auf dem zentralen Arbeits- und Rechercheinstrument der Bibliotheksnutzer liegen, dem Bibliothekskatalog. Speziell wird es darum gehen, wie auf relativ einfache Art und Weise durch Anwendung verschiedener Elemente anderer Dienste und Anbieter sowie das Aufgreifen von Schnittstellen und wenig aufwendigen Verbesserungen, Mehrwert für die Nutzerinnen und Nutzer zu erzielen ist. Ein zentraler Begriff bei fast allen Überlegungen, die im Zusammenhang mit der Verbesserung und Anreicherung des Kataloges stehen, war und ist das Thema "Mash-up". Unter Mashups - ein Begriff, der gerade im Zusammenhang mit dem Thema "Web 2.0" im deutschsprachigen Raum eingeführt und adaptiert wurde - wird das Verfahren bezeichnet, Web-Inhalte neu zu kombinieren. Dabei nutzt man bei und für Mashups offene "APIs" (Application Programming Interfaces, also offene Programmierschnittstellen), die von anderen Web-Anwendungen zur Verfügung gestellt werden.
    Date
    22. 2.2009 19:40:38
  15. Khoo, C.S.G.; Wan, K.-W.: ¬A simple relevancy-ranking strategy for an interface to Boolean OPACs (2004) 0.00
    0.004240567 = product of:
      0.01908255 = sum of:
        0.012110585 = product of:
          0.02422117 = sum of:
            0.02422117 = weight(_text_:web in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02422117 = score(doc=2509,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.006971964 = product of:
          0.013943928 = sum of:
            0.013943928 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013943928 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Content
    "Most Web search engines accept natural language queries, perform some kind of fuzzy matching and produce ranked output, displaying first the documents that are most likely to be relevant. On the other hand, most library online public access catalogs (OPACs) an the Web are still Boolean retrieval systems that perform exact matching, and require users to express their search requests precisely in a Boolean search language and to refine their search statements to improve the search results. It is well-documented that users have difficulty searching Boolean OPACs effectively (e.g. Borgman, 1996; Ensor, 1992; Wallace, 1993). One approach to making OPACs easier to use is to develop a natural language search interface that acts as a middleware between the user's Web browser and the OPAC system. The search interface can accept a natural language query from the user and reformulate it as a series of Boolean search statements that are then submitted to the OPAC. The records retrieved by the OPAC are ranked by the search interface before forwarding them to the user's Web browser. The user, then, does not need to interact directly with the Boolean OPAC but with the natural language search interface or search intermediary. The search interface interacts with the OPAC system an the user's behalf. The advantage of this approach is that no modification to the OPAC or library system is required. Furthermore, the search interface can access multiple OPACs, acting as a meta search engine, and integrate search results from various OPACs before sending them to the user. The search interface needs to incorporate a method for converting the user's natural language query into a series of Boolean search statements, and for ranking the OPAC records retrieved. The purpose of this study was to develop a relevancyranking algorithm for a search interface to Boolean OPAC systems. This is part of an on-going effort to develop a knowledge-based search interface to OPACs called the E-Referencer (Khoo et al., 1998, 1999; Poo et al., 2000). E-Referencer v. 2 that has been implemented applies a repertoire of initial search strategies and reformulation strategies to retrieve records from OPACs using the Z39.50 protocol, and also assists users in mapping query keywords to the Library of Congress subject headings."
    Source
    Electronic library. 22(2004) no.2, S.112-120
  16. Golderman, G.M.; Connolly, B.: Between the book covers : going beyond OPAC keyword searching with the deep linking capabilities of Google Scholar and Google Book Search (2004/05) 0.00
    0.004135637 = product of:
      0.018610368 = sum of:
        0.008650418 = product of:
          0.017300837 = sum of:
            0.017300837 = weight(_text_:web in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017300837 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009959949 = product of:
          0.019919898 = sum of:
            0.019919898 = weight(_text_:22 in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019919898 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    One finding of the 2006 OCLC study of College Students' Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources was that students expressed equal levels of trust in libraries and search engines when it came to meeting their information needs in a way that they felt was authoritative. Seeking to incorporate this insight into our own instructional methodology, Schaffer Library at Union College has attempted to engineer a shift from Google to Google Scholar among our student users by representing Scholar as a viable adjunct to the catalog and to snore traditional electronic resources. By attempting to engage student researchers on their own terms, we have discovered that most of them react enthusiastically to the revelation that the Google they think they know so well is, it turns out, a multifaceted resource that is capable of delivering the sort of scholarly information that will meet with their professors' approval. Specifically, this article focuses on the fact that many Google Scholar searches link hack to our own Web catalog where they identify useful book titles that direct OPAC keyword searches have missed.
    Date
    2.12.2007 19:39:22
  17. Walker, S.: Improving subject access painlessly : recent work on the Okapi online catalogue projects (1988) 0.00
    0.0035413152 = product of:
      0.031871837 = sum of:
        0.031871837 = product of:
          0.06374367 = sum of:
            0.06374367 = weight(_text_:22 in 7403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06374367 = score(doc=7403,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7403, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7403)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Program. 22(1988), S.21-31
  18. Hug, H.; Nöthiger, R.: ETHICS: an online public access catalogue at ETH-Bibliothek, Zürich (1988) 0.00
    0.0035413152 = product of:
      0.031871837 = sum of:
        0.031871837 = product of:
          0.06374367 = sum of:
            0.06374367 = weight(_text_:22 in 7483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06374367 = score(doc=7483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Program. 22(1988), S.133-142
  19. Ikas, W.-V.; Litten, F.: World Wide Web und Catalogue Enrichment : Möglichkeiten des verbesserten Nachweises von mikroverfilmten Handschriften und Inkunabeln (2007) 0.00
    0.0033085097 = product of:
      0.014888294 = sum of:
        0.0069203344 = product of:
          0.013840669 = sum of:
            0.013840669 = weight(_text_:web in 323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013840669 = score(doc=323,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 323, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=323)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007967959 = product of:
          0.015935918 = sum of:
            0.015935918 = weight(_text_:22 in 323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015935918 = score(doc=323,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 323, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=323)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2007 11:19:21
  20. Long, C.E.: Improving subject searching in Web-based OPACs : evaluation of the problem and guidelines for design (2000) 0.00
    0.003296084 = product of:
      0.029664757 = sum of:
        0.029664757 = product of:
          0.059329513 = sum of:
            0.059329513 = weight(_text_:web in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059329513 = score(doc=6110,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.6182494 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Online catalog users search predominately by subject, yet it is the most difficult search to perform and retrieves records only about one-half of the time. A new generation of OPACs (online public access catalogs) is on the horizon, the Web-based OPAC. Web-based OPACs allow users to access online catalogs through a WWW (World Wide Web) interface and have the potential to improve patrons' ability to search by subject. But will this potential be realized? This article proposes some basic guidelines that can be incorporated into Web-based OPAC interface design to help users perform subject searches more effectively, and evaluates how well Web-based OPACs currently in operation address the subject searching problem

Years

Languages

Types