Search (31 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  • × type_ss:"r"
  1. Larson, R.R.: Users look at online catalogs : results of a national survey of users and non-users of online public access catalogs (1982) 0.01
    0.007874288 = product of:
      0.04330858 = sum of:
        0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 2972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046860883 = score(doc=2972,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2972, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2972)
        0.03862249 = weight(_text_:r in 2972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03862249 = score(doc=2972,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 2972, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2972)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Type
    r
  2. Goodstein, L.P.; Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬The Book House : System functionality and evaluation (1989) 0.01
    0.0077798064 = product of:
      0.042788934 = sum of:
        0.03862249 = weight(_text_:r in 7626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03862249 = score(doc=7626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 7626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7626)
        0.0041664424 = weight(_text_:s in 7626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041664424 = score(doc=7626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 7626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7626)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: International Classification 18(1991) S. 233-235 (C. Beghtol)
    Type
    r
  3. Murphy, F.J.; Pollitt, A.S.; White, P.R.: Matching OPAC user interfaces to user needs (1991) 0.01
    0.0073482147 = product of:
      0.026943453 = sum of:
        0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 2772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046860883 = score(doc=2772,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2772, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2772)
        0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 2772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019311246 = score(doc=2772,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2772, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2772)
        0.00294612 = weight(_text_:s in 2772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00294612 = score(doc=2772,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 2772, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2772)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the results of a research project, conducted by the School of Computing and Mathematics and the Library of Huddersfield Polytechnic, into the problem of matching the user interface of OPACs to the needs of users. The project brought together issues involving: Human Computer Instruction (HCI); system methods in the determinination of user requirements; and user centred design, and prototyping in a sequence of design and evaluation cycles. These cycles applied appropriate HCI styles, techniques and equipment (such as Graphical User Interface (GUI) and a mouse pointing device) and incorporated the lessons of each evaluation, to produce an OPAC user interface, ICARUS, which differs considerably in style, behaviour and characteristcs from those commonly encountered in academic and public libraries. The project concluded by evaluating ICARUS, against the BLCMP OPAC with 38 subjects in the Library of Huddersfield Polytechnic, and demonstrating a significant improvement in performance for different tasks for the ICARUS interface
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Program 26(1992) no.4, S.425-426 (M. Hancock-Beaulieu)
    Pages
    700 S
    Type
    r
  4. De Rosa, C.; Cantrell, J.; Cellentani, D.; Hawk, J.; Jenkins, L.; Wilson, A.: Perceptions of libraries and information resources : A Report to the OCLC Membership (2005) 0.01
    0.007112879 = product of:
      0.026080554 = sum of:
        0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 5018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046860883 = score(doc=5018,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5018, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5018)
        0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 5018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019311246 = score(doc=5018,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 5018, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5018)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 5018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=5018,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5018, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5018)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Summarizes findings of an international study on information-seeking habits and preferences: With extensive input from hundreds of librarians and OCLC staff, the OCLC Market Research team developed a project and commissioned Harris Interactive Inc. to survey a representative sample of information consumers. In June of 2005, we collected over 3,300 responses from information consumers in Australia, Canada, India, Singapore, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Perceptions report provides the findings and responses from the online survey in an effort to learn more about: * Library use * Awareness and use of library electronic resources * Free vs. for-fee information * The "Library" brand The findings indicate that information consumers view libraries as places to borrow print books, but they are unaware of the rich electronic content they can access through libraries. Even though information consumers make limited use of these resources, they continue to trust libraries as reliable sources of information.
    Pages
    290 S
    Type
    r
  5. Akeroyd, J.; Brimage, D.; Royce, C.: Using CD-ROM as a public access catalogue (1988) 0.01
    0.0054848026 = product of:
      0.030166414 = sum of:
        0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0044180867 = score(doc=2132,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
        0.025748327 = weight(_text_:r in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025748327 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    This short guide describes the process for creating a CD-ROM based üublic access catalog. The authors admit that the material will be outdated by the time of publication, because product specifics change so rapidly. The report is useful, but not completely thorough. Disadvantages to using CD-ROM for public access catalog are listed, but existing methods to overcome these hindrances are not mentioned. The paper also touches on the possibility that CD-ROM-based catalogs may be more than simply an extra service, that they may become full-service catalogs in themselves
    Type
    r
  6. Crawford, J.C.; Thorn, L.C.; Powles, J.A.: ¬A survey of subject access to academic library catalogues in Great Britain : a report to the British Library Research and Development Department (1992) 0.01
    0.0052076713 = product of:
      0.028642192 = sum of:
        0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006112407 = score(doc=367,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
        0.022529786 = weight(_text_:r in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022529786 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    The study of subject access to UK academic library catalogues was based on a questionnaires end out during Summer 1991. 86 out of a possible 110 questionnaires were returned. All universities and polytechniques now have OPACs which are progressing well towards comprehensive bibliographical coverage of their libraries' stocks. The MARC format is now widely used. Subject access strategies are usually based on either Library of Congress Subject Headings or inhouse indexing systems but almost half the OPACs studies have no separate subject searching option based on subject indexing is expensive and future subject indexing strategies are best based on pre-existing controlled vocabularies. Strategies authority control is essential. A limited range of software strategies is recommended including the need to limit search results
    Type
    r
  7. Ferguson, D.: Public online catalog and research libraries (1982) 0.00
    0.004681514 = product of:
      0.051496655 = sum of:
        0.051496655 = weight(_text_:r in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051496655 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.5851765 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
    Type
    r
  8. Tolle, J.: Current utilisation of online catalogs : transaction log analysis: final report to the Council on Library Resources (1983) 0.00
    0.004681514 = product of:
      0.051496655 = sum of:
        0.051496655 = weight(_text_:r in 3907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051496655 = score(doc=3907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.5851765 = fieldWeight in 3907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3907)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
    Type
    r
  9. Lawrence, G.S.; Matthews, J.R.: Detailed data analysis of the CLR online catalog project : final report for the Council on Library Resources (1984) 0.00
    0.004096325 = product of:
      0.045059573 = sum of:
        0.045059573 = weight(_text_:r in 2420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045059573 = score(doc=2420,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 2420, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2420)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
    Type
    r
  10. Larson, R.R.: Users look at online catalogs : Pt.2: interacting with online catalogs. Final report for the Council on Library Resources (1983) 0.00
    0.004096325 = product of:
      0.045059573 = sum of:
        0.045059573 = weight(_text_:r in 2424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045059573 = score(doc=2424,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 2424, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2424)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
    Type
    r
  11. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.; Robertson, S.E.; Neilson, C.: Evaluation of online catalogues : an assessment of methods (1990) 0.00
    0.004096325 = product of:
      0.045059573 = sum of:
        0.045059573 = weight(_text_:r in 5262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045059573 = score(doc=5262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 5262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5262)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
    Type
    r