Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  • × type_ss:"s"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Subject control in online catalogs (1989) 0.05 
    0.04557904 = product of:
  0.15952663 = sum of:
    0.06709666 = weight(_text_:subject in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06709666 = score(doc=235,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.6248056 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
    0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03364573 = score(doc=235,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
    0.02513852 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02513852 = score(doc=235,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
    0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03364573 = score(doc=235,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
  0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    Abstract
    Auch als 'Cataloging & classification quarterly 10(198) No.1/2' erschienen
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: HOLLEY, R.P.: Subject access in the online catalog; KLUGMAN, S.: Failures in subject retreival; CARLYLE, A.: Matching LCSH and user vocabulary in the library catalog; MURDOCK, P.R.: Cataloging catalysis: toward a new chemistry of conscience, communication and conduct in the online catalog; DYKSTRA, M.: PRECIS in the online catalog; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: The role of classification in online systems; BROADBENT, E.: The online catalog: dictionary, classified, or both?; OLSEN, R.J., CHRISTENSEN, J.O., LARSEN, K.A. u. K. WILLEY: Implementing NOTIS keyword/Boolean searching: a case study; ROLLAND-THOMA, P. u. G. MERCURE: Subject access in a bilingual online catalogue; FROST, C.O.: Title words as entry vocabulary to LCSH: correlation between assigned LSCH terms and derived terms from titles in bibliographic records with implications for subject access in online catalogs; STONE, A.T.: Subject searching in law library OPACs; CHAN, L.M.: A subject cataloging code?; McCARTHY, C.: A reference librarian's view of the online subject catalog; JOUGUELET, S.: Subject access in online catalogs: developments in France; DALE, D.C.: Subject access in online catalogs: an overview bibliography
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library resources and technical services 35(1990) S.119-120 (P. Lisbon); International classification 18(1991) S.238-239 (W. Gödert)
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.10, nos.1/2
  2. Subject access and bibliographic instruction : two sides of the OPAC problem (1988) 0.02 
    0.021191474 = product of:
  0.14834031 = sum of:
    0.067897044 = weight(_text_:subject in 2781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.067897044 = score(doc=2781,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 2781, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2781)
    0.08044326 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08044326 = score(doc=2781,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 2781, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2781)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
  3. Document retrieval systems (1988) 0.01 
    0.00927127 = product of:
  0.064898886 = sum of:
    0.029704956 = weight(_text_:subject in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029704956 = score(doc=1053,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
    0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035193928 = score(doc=1053,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Content
    Entählt u.a. die Beiträge: CLEVERDON, C.: Optimizing convenient online access to bibliographic databases; SALTON, G.: Automatic indexing and abstracting; HARTER, S.P.: Statistical approaches to automatic indexing; WALKER, S.: Improving subject access painlessly: recent work on the OKAPI online catalogue projects; SPARCK JONES, K.: A statistical interpretation of term specifity and its application in retrieval; CROFT, W.B. u. D.J. HARPER: Using probabilistic model of document retrieval without relevance information; BERSTEIN, L. u. R.E. WILLIAMSON: Testing of a natural language retrieval system for a full text knowledge base; FRAKES, W.B.: Term conflation for information retrieval; PORTER, M. u. V. GALPIN: Relevance feedback in a public access catalogue for a research library: MUSCAT at the Scott Polar Institute; SALTON, G. u. M.J. McGILL: The SMART and SIRE experimental retrieval systems; BRZOZOWSKI, J.P. MASQUERADE: searching full text of abstracts using automatic indexing; DOSZKOCS, T.E.: CITE NLM: Natural-language searching in an online catalog
  4. Future of online catalogues : Essen symposium, 30.9.-3.10.1985 (1986) 0.00 
    0.002539374 = product of:
  0.035551235 = sum of:
    0.035551235 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035551235 = score(doc=2077,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.30414405 = fieldWeight in 2077, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2077)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    In the late 1970s libraries suddenly recognized the importance of online catalogues. Advanced computer technology can handle massive bibliographic records and direct user inquiries (cataloguing and circulation) and online access is much more adequate than a cara and COM catalogue. There are several problems associated woth online public access catalogues as they are designed primarily for direct use by library patrons without knowledge of library cataloguing rules, yet the introduction of online catalogues extends the services that a library offers in the sense of efficiency, productivity and cooperation with other libraries, i. e. users and staff.
    Content
    Enthält u.a die Beiträge: HILDRETH, Ch.: Online public access catalogues; VOGT, H.: The future of online catalogues in the northern areas of Germany; SEAL, A.: Data structures, MARC and online access; HOLM, L.: Design of databases as good catalogues; RISHOEJ, J.: From database-production to an online catalogue; BUCKLE, D.: OCLC Europe: bibliographic database services for catalogue conversion; FERGUSON, J.: Future of online catalogues. UTLAS in Europe - a personal view; SÜLE, G.: Problems of duplicate records, standards and quality control; HUNSTAD, S.: Problems of duplicate records; SCHOOTS, P.: Browsers in Rotterdam: popular access to the database; KINSELLA, J.: "Prospects for browsing": experimental approaches to the presentation of brief entries and the design of 'browse screens'; MERRIN, G.: Access points and search methods in the SIBIL system with special reference to Boolean and tree search; KOHL, E.: The online union catalogue of parliamentary and government institutions in the Federal Republic of Germany; COSTERS, L. u. J. BUYS: The results of an experiment with an online public access catalogue; NOERR, K.B. u. P. NOERR: A microcomputer system for online catalogues; RAITT, D.: Online catalogues: the facts, the features, the future